Now that I think about it again, it sounds kinda obvious, so forgive me if I'm preaching to the Choir here (
), but the same way that Micolash and the School of Mensis can be used to make connections to Gehrman and the Hunter's Dream, and how the internal logic of the nightmare works, as well as giving me reason to believe Rom isn't mindless, I feel like they can also be used to show the in-lore difference between Rom and ourselves in the cord ending.
The cord we get after we defeat the Wet Nurse says:
"A great relic, also known as the Cord of the Eye. Every infant Great One has this precursor to the umbilical cord (
*).
Every Great One loses its child, and then yearns for a surrogate. This Cord granted Mensis audience with Mergo, but resulted in the stillbirth of their brains.
Use to gain Insight and, so they say, eyes on the inside, although no one remembers what that truly entails."
One single cord granted the School of Mensis audience with Mergo through the nightmare. And we see Micolash praying to Kos (or some say Kosm), asking him/her (sounds like her to me, but Rom sounded like him, so who knows) to grant him eyes, "as you once did for the vacuous Rom". One cord can allow you to be in communion with Kosm, and can grant you eyes on the insine ("plant eyes on our brains to cleanse our beastly idiocy"), allowing one to evolve. Rom could be a result of one cord being used to partake in communion with Kos, while the infant Great One we become is a result of the Paleblood ritual, using three cords.
Again, now that I think about it, this sounds fairly obvious, but I felt like, even though I knew this before, I didn't really have any in-game evidence to back it other than "well, it has to be, doesn't make sense that the secret ending is just reproducing what happened to Rom".
* I'd also like to call attention to the "this precursor to the umbilical cord" part, for the "well, what is the second cord, then?"
The Third Eye is what people call the inner eye (or your eye on the inside, if you will). If you, for whatever reason, only have one eye, you won't call it "The Second Eye", it's still The Third Eye, it's the name this concept was given, and I feel like what's happening here is similar, maybe even direct reference to that.
The fact that it's a precursor to the umbilical cord (which is also fairly obvious, everyone must've assumed the existence of the great eldritch beings far precedes our own) is also evidence that it's not a "voice of god name". If it came before our regular umbilical cord, then it can't be the third cord in a "ranking system", if anything, it should be the first cord (or second, if they're leaving even more advanced beings for a possible sequel), and our cord would be the third.
So, in other words, you shouldn't question the game logic about "so what is the second cord", but Byrgenwerth. The Great Ones don't call it The Third Umbilical Cord, we humans do. Their existance far precedes our own, and our classification systems.
It's The Third Cord because it's called The Third Cord, not because it comes after the second.
Yharnam was a trivial fight but I think the lore behind her begs to be explored, especially with her first appearing during the start of the blood moon and the story of Mergo.
Unless it has been explored and I'm an asshole.
Agreed, there's just not a lot of info on her in-game :C
Or at least I wasn't able to perceive a lot, I'll admit I wasn't able to gather too much on my chalice playthroughs. The fact that I was bored as hell probably didn't help.
Is Ludwig the Claric Beast?
No way in hell. Unless From confirms it later through an interview or something, then I'll look like a moron.