phisheep
NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
So I've had to review quite a lot of junior work now and I have decided that two things irritate me (in addition to everything else that is remotely youthful or energetic and/or is not communicated by hand-written letter)
1. The incorrect use of myself. 'Myself' is not a formal alternative to 'me'. It is a reflexive pronoun. Google it.
2. Review your own work before you send it to me. One or two typos is natural. Four or more typos and careless errors are unacceptable and depressing, especially when I've taken two hours to talk you through the finer points of the project.
Phew.
I'm with you in the main sploat.
But also, in all the (seemingly thousands) of years I spent as a junior something-or-other, there's nothing more irritating than a boss who puts all their attention into spelling and grammar and none at all into the content of what you are saying.
Especially if it is a boss who has specifically requested an early version of your stuff to check (like before you've done the niceties).
Sometimes this leads into absurdity. I had a boss once (in my very early days, early 1980s) who spellchecked the entire 10 pages or so and never noticed I had missed a zero off the quotation at the bottom. My fault, sure. Bad boss? Sure too.
So in litigation for example, I am all about the evidence and the result, because the spelling can be sorted out afterwards unless you are actually in front of a judge.
Not saying you are like that at all, but it's a to-be-aware-of thing. Get the thing right before you criticise how you spell the thing.