I'd probably never see the east coast ever.
Are there any snowy mountains near the coast? I might be inclined to travel to snowboard but that'd be it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...2225da-1c37-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html
Trump is an, uhh, fascinating individual....
But aren't there hours and hours of footage that you have not watched? There are reports and accounts of violence which you have disregarded as untrue based on your incomplete viewing of the proceedings.
Is there something going on in Discord tonight?
No. No mountains near the coast. Canadians come to our beaches in the winter to swim.
Is there something going on in Discord tonight?
No. No mountains near the coast. Canadians come to our beaches in the winter to swim.
Okay, 'indefensible' is probably a bit hyperbole. However, I find the arguments in defense of the NSDP's conduct to be tenuous at best.
Actually, I'd be fine with Hillary winning the state flat out according to the popular vote. The actual results aren't the problem. It's the conduct of the state party that I take issue with.
Is there something going on in Discord tonight?
on an unrelated note:
has anyone been paying attention to Al Giordano's Twitter lately?
apparently he's mulling over challenging Sanders in 2018
But, like, if you had to choose between delegates being awarded correctly, and making sure Roberts Rules of Order were adhered to, which is more important.
100% agree on "gimme a primary" though. Caucus are a messy fat big thing.
We oughta just have primaries in every state.
But, like, if you had to choose between delegates being awarded correctly, and making sure Roberts Rules of Order were adhered to, which is more important.
100% agree on "gimme a primary" though. Caucus are a messy fat big thing.
People chat there every nightIs there something going on in Discord tonight?
In Jesus name I pray Hillary wins Kentucky tonight and a deluge of supers wash away this campaign.
on an unrelated note:
has anyone been paying attention to Al Giordano's Twitter lately?
apparently he's mulling over challenging Sanders in 2018
I'm more talking about the motion to change the rules of the convention from the temporary ones to the rules the Sanders' supporters wanted.
Yes, the rules of order were not followed correctly, but the rules the Sanders' supporters were in favor of would have not passed given the split in representation and the chair's final say in deciding the outcome of a voice vote.
I'm just struggling to see how you can take a "both sides were bad" stance when the conduct of the state party, though improper, had no bearing on the results. No rules would have been different nor delegate counts changed had the state party followed the rules of order correctly.
In Jesus name I pray Hillary wins Kentucky tonight and a deluge of supers wash away this campaign.
In Jesus name I pray Hillary wins Kentucky tonight and a deluge of supers wash away this campaign.
Intriguingly, after I began this series on election fraud allegations, a reader who would like to remain anonymous, emailed to point out similar irregularities in New York’s Democratic primary this year:
Results for Kings County and Bronx county [show] deviation from perfect 60-40 and 70-30 results was the same 0.035% The increase in votes in Kings (Brooklyn) from 2008 is incredible, almost a perfect 10%. Not only that but that’s where over a 100,000 voters lost their right to vote. Another 20,000 votes in Kings would mean almost a 20% increase which would be amazing compared to other counties that experienced decreases or mild increases.
In Jesus name I pray Hillary wins Kentucky tonight and a deluge of supers wash away this campaign.
It's a matter of principle. That the outcome was correct is merely coincidental. With the way the rules were manipulated, it could have just as easily favored Bernie and that would have been just as wrong.
Daniel B·;203940261 said:Screw it!
Doug Johnson Hatlem's, from CounterPunch, just concluded six part investigation on possible election fraud in this year's Democratic primaries, is too juicy to sit on (an interesting read), which even includes an interview with lead Edison exit pollster, Joe Lenski, Executive Vice-President and lead researcher for Edison Research, and will you look at that, the article even highlights the NY election oddity I wrote about the [post=202315457]other day[/post]:
Unless someone else beats me to the punch, I'll probably follow up with a post that highlights the most interesting points, but the fact that the Republican primaries are not exhibiting the same wide difference between the exit poll results and the recorded vote is possibly quite telling.
Daniel B·;203940261 said:Screw it!
Doug Johnson Hatlem's, from CounterPunch, just concluded six part investigation on possible election fraud in this year's Democratic primaries, is too juicy to sit on (an interesting read), which even includes an interview with lead Edison exit pollster, Joe Lenski, Executive Vice-President and lead researcher for Edison Research, and will you look at that, the article even highlights the NY election oddity I wrote about the [post=202315457]other day[/post]:
Unless someone else beats me to the punch, I'll probably follow up with a post that highlights the most interesting points, but the fact that the Republican primaries are not exhibiting the same wide difference between the exit poll results and the recorded vote is possibly quite telling.
I tend to think that if Sanders pitches a huge fight at the convention the DNC will probably run somebody against him in 2018. This is probably a trial balloon.
The DNC is probably going to find a way to make sure that doesn't happen at the convention. They may try to get both the Hilary and Bernie campaign teams together right after the primaries and try to figure out what happens at the convention and to possibly reconcile their differences. I'm probably being optimistic about this but I expect something like that to happen before the convention unless Bernie decides to support her after the June 7th primaries.
Obsession over exit polls really highlights that you guys haven't paid a lick of attention to politics or polls until this election.
Really? This is PollGAF you are talking about. They knew Romney was losing before Rmoney.
The man can't even do a denouncing statement paragraph without writing a fucking conspiracy over bullet holes and break-ins from months ago on the same paragraph.
How do you "reconcile differences" with that kind of thinking?
Obsession over exit polls really highlights that you guys haven't paid a lick of attention to politics or polls until this election.
Didn't everyone though?
No I'm talking about Bernie folks, specifically that post about "fraud."Really? This is PollGAF you are talking about. They knew Romney was losing before Rmoney.
Sanders has at every turn refused to work with the DNC. He has continually criticized them whenever things haven't gone his way. He has shown zero ability to either force them into doing what he wants, or meeting them in the middle to come up with something equitable.
And he thinks he'd be able to get shit done with the Republican party?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
This just seems like a situation where a person running down the street knocks someone over and in response a gun in drawn. Yes, everyone involved did something wrong but one person is clearly much more in the wrong.
We're talking death threats, obscenities, violence and threats of violence versus following rules in a way that, though improper, in no way changed the outcome.
If the representation wasn't so split I think you might have a point. If it were 80/20 Sanders and everything that could favor Clinton did favor Clinton then yeah, there'd be room for some anger (though still not death threats). But that isn't what happened.
So Brainchild, about this:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/312952650/nsdp
In particular:
Can't post text, as the OCR was terrible.
Kentucky results in 40 min, right?