They did this to Elon Musk too, literally called him a Nazi. People were instantly radicalized into burning Teslas and shooting up the dealerships. If it weren't for the fact that Elon was already a well known billionaire and had very good private security, they probably would have tried to assassinate him too
And subsequently announced they have released that fellow - perhaps they had not captured the fellow on the roof after all.
But someone definitely didn't run up to the front of the crowd, fire a shot, and run away? I assume someone would have seen and tackled someone, but like I said before, I didn't watch any video so I'm unsure of the layout of the crowd and whether or not someone could do that and then escape away during the confusion and chaos.
From my understanding, the University itself has claimed to have some footage (yet to be released..?) that verifies the shot originated from the top of a particular building - this is the graphic that was released related to that information (Edit: I should instead say, this is the graphic that is circulating on some news sites in relation to that information, not sure of the actual origin).
Wasn't the old guy telling people to shoot him? Such a weird person.
He was likely shot because someone was probably mentally ill, had access to a gun and couldn't handle what he was saying. Or maybe just a butthurt simp. I hope we do find out more about the coward killer him.
That's why I was saying politicians have no decency. I know you said it's not definitely yet, but it's safe to assume he was assassinated because of politics. The congress members could at least show condolences, even if you have opposite opinions of his.
the thing with guns is that when they are part of the equation, they rise the probably of something happening where a gun is involved... i mean, it's logical.
Yep, such weird behavior no matter what his motives were. Severely mentally ill.
Sure, just get a constitutional convention or have the Senate pass it to be ratified by 3/4s of the states. There IS a process and we have done it at times in the past for really important issues concerning the majority of citizens (and sometimes not aka the eighteenth amendment).
One of the good ones? Are you fucking kidding me? You guys live in some kind of reality distortion field. Guy got shot while trying to convince someone that trans people were the cause of mass shootings.
Quick question, where are you from?
Maybe. But I don't want to watch those videos anymore to analyze impact and trajectory, TBH. I did like that kinda work before, but I don't like it now.
He climbed a rooftop and shot him with a sniper rifle from 400 feet; I think it's safe to say it was premeditated.
He was?
Just what this thread needs, more sweeping generalisations
if by "hate speech" you mean the hate that UK have for its citizens, i agree, its really bad.
Stop with this garbage. If you want to spread your toxic narrative once there is confirmation that the shooter is some leftist extremist, sure, but if it turns out it's not, we all know you'll never reverse course which is why nobody can take you seriously. You'll just stay silent until the next opportunity comes up for you to spread hateful shit
You sure? Because as far as I know, guy couldn't finish his argument because something in his throat distracted him a little.
That's fucked up. Guy wanted to bring back public executions so children could watch them. Believed in the great replacement theory. Thought gun deaths were necessary to protect the second amendment.
Has it been posted anywhere else? Not sure if it's AI or just a cut in it. You can see what might be a teleprompter in the reflection on the window.
Going with "the Jews did it!", eh?
But what he said about Elon was true. And there's what? A ~99.99% chance this will be a radicalised left wing shooter? Who are you thinking it could be?
It is overwhelmingly one-sided.
It's not. It seems that way because of confirmation bias.
Oh boy, that logic is the most slippery slope in the history of mankind... We straight men are fucked.
Amen.
