Charlie Kirk assassinated at Utah campus event

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wake me up when they do the same for the kids who die in school shootings. Healthy change would occur if, instead of sowing seeds of division, there were seeds of uniting and dealing with an obvious problem in the US.

But that won't occur, considering the "me first" attitudes ingrained in American society, especially the guy in the White House.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!!!
 
Last edited:
Echo chamber in here.

Wake me up when they do the same for the kids who die in school shootings. Healthy change would occur if, instead of sowing seeds of division, there were seeds of uniting and dealing with an obvious problem in the US.

But that won't occur, considering the "me first" attitudes ingrained in American society, especially the guy in the White House.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!!!

It's hardly an echo chamber in this thread. There's plenty of people who disagree and calling out hypocrisy and/or lies. Plenty taking a wait and see approach to the killers motives as well.

It's a healthy exchange of ideas
 
Last edited:
If an unarmed protester wrapped in a BLM flag had been gunned down by police at a mostly peaceful protest, most of America would have been burned down and the person responsible would be in prison or dead right now.
Jack shit would have happened. It was going to be either a black person (who cares?) or a left-leaning color hair one (who cares?). Meanwhile you guys had a Nazi-like rally
Leni Riefenstahl would have loved to capture for a white supremacist with the acting US President in attendance and those beautiful photos of Kirk's PERFECTLY AMERICAN SWEETHEART WIFE BECAUSE OF COURSE.

Really, take it from the countries that have a bit more historical education and high-level discourse than your 5th grade NBC/CNN/FOX NEWS slop - you are on a highway to autocracy. Hitler had jack shit education, yet he was once in a generation individual capable of sensing the crowd like nobody else. Trump is the same. He will use that, he will steamroll over all the floppy lite Republicans and Democrats and absolutely set you for another 30 years.
 
Last edited:
I expected ab
Jack shit would have happened. It was going to be either a black person (who cares?) or a left-leaning color hair one (who cares?). Meanwhile you guys had a Nazi-like rally
Leni Riefenstahl would have loved to capture for a white supremacist with the acting US President in attendance and those beautiful photos of Kirk's PERFECTLY AMERICAN SWEETHEART WIFE BECAUSE OF COURSE.

Really, take it from the countries that have a bit more historical education and high-level discourse than your 5th grade NBC/CNN/FOX NEWS slop - you are on a highway to autocracy. Hitler had jack shit education, yet he was once in a generation individual capable of sensing the crowd like nobody else. Trump is the same. He will use that, he will steamroll over all the floppy lite Republicans and Democrats and absolutely set you for another 30 years.
I will pray for you. ✝️
 
The gospel... give me a break. The president saying "I don't wish the best for my opponents, I hate them". That gospel?

Well you would not expect Trump to share the Gospel. So that wasn't the Gospel part. But other people did share the gospel of Jesus Christ. Trump just shared the typical world view of politicians in general, "I hate em". He demonstrated what Christ was counter culture to. Jesus says Love your enemies, Trump, not a follower of Jesus says "I hate my enemies." He also said Charlie wouldn't like me for saying this.
 
Why? I don't live in the US. Our President is married to a woman 30 older that groomed him, the ex president was caught on a scooter (not even a motorcycle) going to visit his mistress, the one 30 years before had a child out of wedlock. Compared to what you guys have we are living a dream.
I wish our scandals where things like this again….
 
Well done. This level of gaslighting yourself is a feat few people achieve.

It is some Jedi mind trick of the highest order. And I can't exactly blame forum posters for it when people in political positions, like Rubio, who were openly critcical of it then are now mum about it or revisit it in completely different light.






 
And how could he stop what he can't stop now? What's the difference?
What's the difference between avoiding a war -as he has done with several recently- and trying to bring one to a halt once both sides are already tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of dead soldiers into it and territory has changed hands? I would think that's pretty self-explanatory.

How would he have stopped it? By projecting strength and a degree of unpredictability, rather than projecting catastrophic weakness like Obama and Biden, which is why Putin chose to take Crimea on the former's watch and launch the invasion proper on the latter's watch.

Jack shit would have happened. It was going to be either a black person (who cares?)
Did you miss the entire Summer of Love?
 
G1alTTMWwAASbjZ



This is what really makes them seethe. This image right here, youth showed up, our future.
 
Last edited:
Well you would not expect Trump to share the Gospel. So that wasn't the Gospel part. But other people did share the gospel of Jesus Christ. Trump just shared the typical world view of politicians in general, "I hate em". He demonstrated what Christ was counter culture to. Jesus says Love your enemies, Trump, not a follower of Jesus says "I hate my enemies." He also said Charlie wouldn't like me for saying this.
To be fair that was a great way to distance himself from Charlie, in a good way for Charlie.
 
His death was met with vigils and memorials. People went and paid their respects, some prayed. They didn't steal lcds, they didn't steal sneakers, they didn't damage property, they didn't riot, they didn't burn cars or houses, they didn't kill people. This is the middle ground, to respectfully mourn without going berserk over a (political) murder.
 
Jack shit would have happened. It was going to be either a black person (who cares?) or a left-leaning color hair one (who cares?). Meanwhile you guys had a Nazi-like rally
Leni Riefenstahl would have loved to capture for a white supremacist with the acting US President in attendance and those beautiful photos of Kirk's PERFECTLY AMERICAN SWEETHEART WIFE BECAUSE OF COURSE.

Really, take it from the countries that have a bit more historical education and high-level discourse than your 5th grade NBC/CNN/FOX NEWS slop - you are on a highway to autocracy. Hitler had jack shit education, yet he was once in a generation individual capable of sensing the crowd like nobody else. Trump is the same. He will use that, he will steamroll over all the floppy lite Republicans and Democrats and absolutely set you for another 30 years.
Donald Trump is simply too old to become an autocrat. Not enough time left on the clock.
 
What's the difference between avoiding a war -as he has done with several recently- and trying to bring one to a halt once both sides are already tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of dead soldiers into it and territory has changed hands? I would think that's pretty self-explanatory.
It's not, and those "several" are not the same.

By projecting strength and a degree of unpredictability
He did it, but it didn't stop the war. Just as it didn't stop Kim Jong-un. It only works on those who bow down, and, unfortunately, putin is not one of them.
 
His death was met with vigils and memorials. People went and paid their respects, some prayed. They didn't steal lcds, they didn't steal sneakers, they didn't damage property, they didn't riot, they didn't burn cars or houses, they didn't kill people. This is the middle ground, to respectfully mourn without going berserk over a (political) murder.
Stop trying to put these in the same category. one was a miscarriage of justice and power imbalance that affects millions of people in the same way--state oppression against the powerless, while the other is a political assassination. Both are serious, but not interchangeable
 
Last edited:
Donald Trump is simply too old to become an autocrat. Not enough time left on the clock.
I agree it won't be him, at the same time Hitler was a logical conclusion of incredibly militaristic Prussia, which was created in 1870 by Bismarck, and you can argue the origins go even further in. It's a long term play, maybe not 60-100 years as it was the case, but 15-20 easily.
 
I agree it won't be him, at the same time Hitler was a logical conclusion of incredibly militaristic Prussia, which was created in 1870 by Bismarck, and you can argue the origins go even further in. It's a long term play, maybe not 60-100 years as it was the case, but 15-20 easily.
I can honestly respect that opinion. But anyone saying that Trump himself is going to be a dictator... he just doesn't have time.
 
It's not, and those "several" are not the same.
Because a competent President was in office to defuse them.

Just as it didn't stop Kim Jong-un
Stop him doing what?

It only works on those who bow down, and, unfortunately, putin is not one of them.
It worked well enough for Putin to wait for a much weaker President to be in office before launching stage 2 the invasion proper (with stage 1 being under Obama, another weak President). The West also should have listened to and taken seriously President Trump's prophetic warning during his first term that Europe being so dependent on Russian energy was not only funding their military but seriously undermining their leverage against Russia. He was laughed at at the time by the usual clowns, and then events proved him entirely correct.
 
What's the difference between avoiding a war -as he has done with several recently- and trying to bring one to a halt once both sides are already tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of dead soldiers into it and territory has changed hands? I would think that's pretty self-explanatory.

How would he have stopped it? By projecting strength and a degree of unpredictability, rather than projecting catastrophic weakness like Obama and Biden, which is why Putin chose to take Crimea on the former's watch and launch the invasion proper on the latter's watch.


Did you miss the entire Summer of Love?
Trump was supposed to keep the Democrat/Neo-Con military industrial complex fat cats happy and well fed. He is evil for not doing so.
 
Stop trying to put these in the same category. one was a miscarriage of justice and power imbalance that affects millions of people in the same way--state oppression against the powerless, while the other is a political assassination. Both are serious, but not interchangeable
This was worse than miscarriage of justice. You need to define what you mean as power imbalance.
 
I'm sorry I don't distill my viewpoints to a brief tweet meant as a gotcha moment. I look at actions, policies, and what people across a wide spectrum actually say. Both the far left and far right would have you believe half of the USA are evil.

Because look, evil America:

ap-january-6-protesters-2024-09-06.jpg


15XP-DOXXING-articleLarge.jpg


It's far more nuanced than that. America isn't made up is solely two political sides with one being obviously evil and the other one being obviously good.
honestly these prove the opposite point... the Floyd hysteria mobs caused widespread damage to thousands of stores and streets, intentional arson of vehicles and more, mass smash-and-grab looting, etc.

The Jan 6th images of smoke are not even any kind of incendiaries, it's just crowd control gas and a few smoke devices from protestors, but zero burning. The Charlottesville tiki-torch rally was inconsequential that night, and only had violence at all when the usual Antifa druggies showed up to try and make it a fight.

This was BLM thuggery in the streets (NYT photo):
ViJWxw.jpg

other official photos
ba169e610e094a01ba6e11e1526fd7a5_8.jpeg
a04df6f8961f4808a49d68782da6a261_8.jpeg
 
Last edited:
honestly these prove the opposite point... the Floyd hysteria mobs caused widespread damage to thousands of stores and streets, intentional arson of vehicles and more, mass smash-and-grab looting, etc.

The Jan 6th images of smoke are not even any kind of incendiaries, it's just crowd control gas and a few smoke devices from protestors, but zero burning. The Charlottesville tiki-torch rally was inconsequential that night, and only had violence at all when the usual Antifa druggies showed up to try and make it a fight.
Sure, you put your head in the sand and pretend the far right is utterly incapable of proper violent attacks. I suppose I can start listing other acts of far right violence but you'd probably just brush that under the rug as well.
 
Sure, you put your head in the sand and pretend the far right is utterly incapable of proper violent attacks. I suppose I can start listing other acts of far right violence but you'd probably just brush that under the rug as well.
No, we're talking about widespread, violent mobs from BLM that destroyed entire downtowns, countless businesses, intentionally burned and destroyed property, etc -- and it was given a pass by the left. Actually, it was excused and even applauded in the mainstream.

When you dig up some old case of a right wing bomber, you won't find that. You'll find essentially zero support for it. These things are not the same, sorry.

Anyone involved in Antifa should absolutely have their door kicked in and be facing decades in prison at this point.
 
Last edited:
No, we're talking about widespread, violent mobs from BLM that destroyed entire downtowns, countless businesses, intentionally burned and destroyed property, etc -- and it was given a pass by the left. Actually, it was excused and even applauded in the mainstream.
In reality the far majority of "the left" denounced the violence and destruction of property, while supporting the right of peaceful protests. This goes for both various politicians and media outlets. Naturally I assume you don't believe this and no evidence I can provide you will sway you on the matter, so let's move on.
 
honestly these prove the opposite point... the Floyd hysteria mobs caused widespread damage to thousands of stores and streets, intentional arson of vehicles and more, mass smash-and-grab looting, etc.

The Jan 6th images of smoke are not even any kind of incendiaries, it's just crowd control gas and a few smoke devices from protestors, but zero burning. The Charlottesville tiki-torch rally was inconsequential that night, and only had violence at all when the usual Antifa druggies showed up to try and make it a fight.

This was BLM thuggery in the streets (NYT photo):
ViJWxw.jpg

other official photos
ba169e610e094a01ba6e11e1526fd7a5_8.jpeg
a04df6f8961f4808a49d68782da6a261_8.jpeg
And remember, riots don't spread covid as per experts. What a moronic moment of humanity that was. All of that for a violent drug junkie.
 
In reality the far majority of "the left" denounced the violence and destruction of property, while supporting the right of peaceful protests. This goes for both various politicians and media outlets. Naturally I assume you don't believe this and no evidence I can provide you will sway you on the matter, so let's move on.
I think you're confusing "left" with "liberal." Many liberals not terminally online denounced it, but political commentators, mainstream media, social media, etc were far more tolerant and supportive of the destruction. Making excuses and downplaying the destruction is in fact supporting it, regardless of any asterisks in the statement.
 
I think you're confusing "left" with "liberal." Many liberals not terminally online denounced it, but political commentators, mainstream media, social media, etc were far more tolerant and supportive of the destruction. Making excuses and downplaying the destruction is in fact supporting it, regardless of any asterisks in the statement.
I don't really consider social media to be in the real world. If I did then I'd think almost everyone is a political nut job. As for mainstream media, quite a lot of them denounced the looting and violence, just a quick ask on ChatGPT gave me a link to over a dozen articles condemning it. And supporting the peaceful protests that did happen while contextualising why it all happened does not mean supporting the looting and such. It is permissible to have a more nuanced opinion than a simple if statement.
 
Jack shit would have happened. It was going to be either a black person (who cares?) or a left-leaning color hair one (who cares?). Meanwhile you guys had a Nazi-like rally
Leni Riefenstahl would have loved to capture for a white supremacist with the acting US President in attendance and those beautiful photos of Kirk's PERFECTLY AMERICAN SWEETHEART WIFE BECAUSE OF COURSE.

Really, take it from the countries that have a bit more historical education and high-level discourse than your 5th grade NBC/CNN/FOX NEWS slop - you are on a highway to autocracy. Hitler had jack shit education, yet he was once in a generation individual capable of sensing the crowd like nobody else. Trump is the same. He will use that, he will steamroll over all the floppy lite Republicans and Democrats and absolutely set you for another 30 years.
Tu voterais pas LFI toi par hasard avec les conneries que tu débites?
 
Last edited:
What happened to not wanting to politically indoctrinate children into believing things like MLK was an awful person and that the civil rights has evolved to become an anti-white weapon, etc? That is acceptable indoctrination?
None of that is true and Turning Point chapters are grass roots school based chapters in high schools and colleges started by students.
 
What happened to not wanting to politically indoctrinate children into believing things like MLK was an awful person and that the civil rights has evolved to become an anti-white weapon, etc? That is acceptable indoctrination?

Both are true from Kirk's moral viewpoint. MLK was an adulterer, by most morally, especially christian morals, awful. I guarantee that is the context with which Kirk said what he said about MLK. The rules around Civil Rights have become an anti-white weapon. If someone says something like kill all white people, no one really bats an eye. Saying the same but swapping white for black will cause a ton of backlash.
 
Last edited:
Jack shit would have happened. It was going to be either a black person (who cares?) or a left-leaning color hair one (who cares?). Meanwhile you guys had a Nazi-like rally
Leni Riefenstahl would have loved to capture for a white supremacist with the acting US President in attendance and those beautiful photos of Kirk's PERFECTLY AMERICAN SWEETHEART WIFE BECAUSE OF COURSE.

Really, take it from the countries that have a bit more historical education and high-level discourse than your 5th grade NBC/CNN/FOX NEWS slop - you are on a highway to autocracy. Hitler had jack shit education, yet he was once in a generation individual capable of sensing the crowd like nobody else. Trump is the same. He will use that, he will steamroll over all the floppy lite Republicans and Democrats and absolutely set you for another 30 years.
The problem is not a nazi rally, the problem is that you guys think its a nazi rally. You even have issues with Kirk's wife showing up to the fucking Kirk memorial.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom