• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Crimson Desert | Review Thread

What scores do you think Crimson Desert is getting?

  • Total voters
    400
  • Poll closed .
oooooooof, day one, not barely 20 pages into the thread and were getting the '70's are a good score' cope :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Not looking good my homies. Pre-order cancelation time?
 
Hugare said:
You telling me those problems arent present in BOTW?

Just showing media bias, thats all
Click to expand...
This has the same energy as a Lakeof9 post.

"Nintendo games only score high because of bias"

*run of Nintendo games getting 74-80 on MC*

"Wow Nintendo sucks will they have a 80+ game this year?"
 
And there goes the hype.

I just lost 57 € for Deluxe Edition on PC.

Oh well... I knew it was a mistake but did pre-order anyway.
Let this be a reminder to not pre-order when you feel the hype is too high which was clearly the case here.

Pearl Abyss will be super happy with their 500K CCU for their 70 meta crap though, they are the clear winner here.

Also thanks to people still giving credits to sponsored youtubers & twitchers which again, did their job perfectly and confused everyone.
 
Last edited:
Sausy1987 said:
Still on the fence will just have to try myself friday morning maybe . I've the day off for it anyways . Still tempted to refund it . Will see . Some of the negatives in the reviews are deal breakers for me .
Click to expand...
Just hang in there, you may resonate with the ones that gave it a 9 or what not, don't let scores sway ya especially when being interested
 
MagiusNecros said:
I eagerly await your impressions. Specifically combat.
Click to expand...
Deep, challenging but with a bit of power fantasy, and a good feel (sense of weight, proper feedback through htistop and screenshake and proper ragdolls/animations) is what I'm after. I'll let you know if the combat meets those expectations.
 
Topher said:
I'll just say what I've always said. 70 is a good score. 80 is a great score. Looking forward to playing

Awkward John Krasinski GIF by Saturday Night Live
Click to expand...

A balanced take from a fellow old man. Agreed.
 
MMaRsu said:
Boss battles restart with unskippable cutscenes 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀Acg says thats very annoying
Click to expand...
Based on what I'm hearing in these review videos regarding their patches, this team is going to patch this game with lightning speeds based on any and every minor issue.

They have said before they literally don't want this game to drop below an 8/10… they'll patch it up so fast that the reviews from today might be outdated by the weekend.

Jeff Gerstmann even talked about this on his recent podcast, because he said old school 'static reviews' that are based on an outdated or 1.0 version are worthless, and games media never fully adapted properly to the digital shift in gaming.
 
Watched the ACG review. I wish he'd have gone more in depth on discovery which he praises, but at the same time, his cuts to the in game map are littered with fog of war question marks (undiscovered areas) and points of interest question marks. He touches on it, but the pop in is super noticeable and that's on a beefy system. He also mentioned the combat is only best served on bosses and the open world are just fodder, which doesn't sound great.
 
Last edited:
Kurotri said:
Yeah I see your point, again sorry if I came across like a jerk in my post, but man...I just think people should be a little bit more analytical when it comes to hyping themselves up watching all that marketing footage. The comparisons people did with other games (especially the ones I mentioned) were just flat out stupid in my eyes, which is why I reacted that way.
Click to expand...
Naw bro, don't back down now…you came across as a jerk because you sound like a jerk. Let people enjoy what they enjoy and stop getting your rocks off on a 5 point differential…we can all see your post history.

You legitimately said you felt some sort of validation because the game isn't a 9+ 🤦‍♂️
 
Last edited:
March Climber said:
Based on what I'm hearing in these review videos regarding their patches, this team is going to patch this game with lightning speeds based on any and every minor issue.

They have said before they literally don't want this game to drop below an 8/10… they'll patch it up so fast that the reviews from today might be outdated by the weekend.

Jeff Gerstmann even talked about this on his recent podcast, because he said old school 'static reviews' that are based on an outdated or 1.0 version are worthless, and games media never fully adapted properly to the digital shift in gaming.
Click to expand...

I hope so man I hate unskippable cutscenes and especially if it's right before a boss battle, you quickly want to get back into the action
 
Hero_Select said:
This has the same energy as a Lakeof9 post.

"Nintendo games only score high because of bias"

*run of Nintendo games getting 74-80 on MC*

"Wow Nintendo sucks will they have a 80+ game this year?"
Click to expand...
Again: did I lie about BOTW problems?

Not Nintendo bias, but "big names" bias is a thing. GOW Ragnarok shouldnt score higher than GOW 2018. Spiderman 2 sure as hell isnt a 92 MC game.

BOTW is easier to compare cause they have a lot in common, imo. Lots of the same problems, it seems. And yet BOTW sits at 97 MC score.

Go figures
 
Last edited:
cash_longfellow said:
I have no interest in picking this up right now…but this is some 🤡 shit post right here…and the whole fucking problem with gaming right now.

And to add, you aren't coming across as an ass, you are coming across as an idiot who thrives on the failure of others. And again, the problem with why gaming companies don't even know what to come out with now. Y'all are a special bunch.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure you understood my point correctly. I'm not calling the game itself garbage, nor do I shit on Pearl Abyss for their work. No one has failed here and I'm not belittling someone failing. I'm talking about the people, potential customers like you and myself, all across social media just absolutely pushing this game to insane hype levels and making comparisons to other phenomenal games when the game never showed any semblance of having the kind of gameplay or content that those games have. As I said in another post in an older thread, the game seemed to me like it would be a huge hit for the Dragon's Dogma crowd, but that game is nowhere close to having the clout of say, Elden Ring or Red Dead 2. It rubbed me the wrong way to see those comparisons everywhere. That's all there is to it. I saw people comparing this to Witcher 3 simply because of the music and the medieval style. Like come on, man. The game itself is probably good at what it wants to be and it'll land and sell well to the correct crowd. but it didn't need to be pushed so hard. That's all my point really is.
 
Almost an 80 in Metacritic is a good rating. Could be better obviously but I think its a solid score. Still excited for this
 
Last edited:
After watching ACG review, which i value a lot, i love the game's pros and hate its flaws, gonna wait few more weeks hoping bugs are fixed and maybe some additional setting/patch/mod is introduced that eliminates/vastly reduces that freaking mid and close range pop-in :(
 
Rivdoric said:
And there goes the hype.
Click to expand...
This mostly on you guys, the way you guys hype this game up as if it was going to be greatest game ever created....the game could end up being good but the some you guys build hype for this game so much that it will disappoint you no matter what.

I think GAF expectation got twisted at some point.....either the game is a "masterpiece" or "trash" and nothing in between.....maybe this is why GAF gets disappointed so often.
 
Last edited:
MMaRsu said:
I hope so man I hate unskippable cutscenes and especially if it's right before a boss battle, you quickly want to get back into the action
Click to expand...
It's a large MMO Developer. There's no way this game stays exactly the same in 6 months let alone 6 weeks.

Again, like mentioned above, they patched review copies of this game the instant any reviewer brought up a bug or issue on their discord.
 
Hugare said:
Again: did I lie about BOTW problems?

Not Nintendo bias, but "big names" bias is a thing. GOW Ragnarok shouldnt score higher than GOW 2018. Spiderman 2 sure as hell isnt a 92 MC game.

BOTW is easier to compare cause they have a lot in common, imo. Lots of the same problems, it seems. And yet BOTW sits at 97 MC score.

Go figures
Click to expand...
I dont like GTA or RDR2. I feel like the gameplay, especially in RDR2 is abysmal.

The game is not for me. But clearly a lot of other people enjoyed it. That's how reviews by individuals work.
 
HRK69 said:
That's going to be a no for me. I'll probably wait for a sale

Death Stranding 2 it is
Click to expand...

DS2 on PC should be fucking GOD tier.

The only real knock on the original release was its fairly relaxed difficulty even at the highest setting, which the new extra hard mode should "solve" if you are looking for a more survival style experience. And if not, and you just want to enjoy the world-building (literally and figuratively) and the gonzo set-pieces the original modes have you covered.

Honestly, I think its the best game Kojima's ever made.
 
Nocty said:
oooooooof, day one, not barely 20 pages into the thread and were getting the '70's are a good score' cope :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Not looking good my homies. Pre-order cancelation time?
Click to expand...

It's even funnier how some ppl here just hand pick reviews that praise the game and are like "yeah I trust this guy now!". The coping is insane. I'll never understand this shit. Just accept the game is decent/average and buy it, but "trusting" one random guy over another random guy just so you dont have buyers remorse is childish af.
 
Hero_Select said:
I dont like GTA or RDR2. I feel like the gameplay, especially in RDR2 is abysmal.

The game is not for me. But clearly a lot of other people enjoyed it. That's how reviews by individuals work.
Click to expand...
That's not how professional reviews should work tho

You complain about shitty story in one open world game. You review another open world game with the same flaw, and yet you rate it a 10/10?

What the fuck is the point of your review then if you contradict yourself in every piece?
 
Gonzito said:
Almost an 80 in Metacritic is a good rating. Could be better obviously but I think its a solid score. Still excited for this
Click to expand...

I called 80 and I did so while being very hyped for this game so not sure why 2 points is supposed to make a difference. Time for me to move over to the OT for good. These review threads get played out really quick.

amzzrq.jpg
 
Dynasty8 said:


First 5 mins into the review sold me.
Click to expand...


Also watched this one. I'm sold.

Dude saying he reported a bug before recording, and the dev team fixed it while he was recording, lmao.

Game is super massive, it's perfectly normal to have bugs here and there if you ask me.

Having 50 hours of gameplay and still be engaged in new mechanics is wild.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Poll
Crimson Desert Steam CCU Prediction Thread
Poll  2
57
112
pepeno replied
No review codes sent out for Crimson Desert console versions
46
47
Clear replied
  • Poll
Will crimson desert deliver?
2 3 4 5
209
1K
Roman Empire replied
Crimson Desert Combat Overview
2 3
113
1K
Svalr93 replied
Crimson Desert base PS5 footage released
2
68
166
Dr. Suchong replied
Top Bottom