Trying everythingAnyone else going to read Green Lanterns? I know Humphries is typically pretty bad, but I liked his Secret Wars tie-in a lot. GL could be very similar with the character dynamic set-up.
Trying everythingAnyone else going to read Green Lanterns? I know Humphries is typically pretty bad, but I liked his Secret Wars tie-in a lot. GL could be very similar with the character dynamic set-up.
Is Roy Harper supposed to be a hot head and angsty. Watching young justice for the first time and he acts just like the live action arsenal
Thank you so Much for thisHe's grown past that anger Him and green arrow fell out because he was a Heroin addict (now alcoholic) but they've slowly gotten on better terms the hate and parinoia are YJ only.
Crises on infinite earthsWhat's the reference to the skies turning red mean?
Have Marvel said anything about Abnett's books with them?
That must be there the show is working up to then.Crises on infinite earths
What's the reference to the skies turning red mean?
What's the reference to the skies turning red mean?
My two hopes for the JSA and legion books are they take place in the past and future respectively.
Judging by the setup , I'm pretty sure they'll at least start in the present.
I'd expect the Legion to end up back in the future since otherwise they are just another superteam since they are from the future they have very little tie in to other characters beside Superman / Supergirl.
The JSA could go either way, the Elder Statesmen of the hero community and the successors of the legacy of the fallen members thing they had going on post-Crisis was actually a pretty solid hook.
Anyone else going to read Green Lanterns? I know Humphries is typically pretty bad, but I liked his Secret Wars tie-in a lot. GL could be very similar with the character dynamic set-up.
I wonder why they bother labeling it a #1? Seems odd when they could of just called it Rebirth and it be a stand alone thing. Makes me think there could still be a direct follow up down the line? But that seems like it'd be dumb to then say rebirth 2 after so long.
I wonder why they bother labeling it a #1? Seems odd when they could of just called it Rebirth and it be a stand alone thing. Makes me think there could still be a direct follow up down the line? But that seems like it'd be dumb to then say rebirth 2 after so long.
yup they're called one shots and they happen every so often.
What up with thread title change? Not really a reboot at all. Quite the opposite really, they just added elements onto things that already existed. Hell, if anything it's more of a retcon, loosely.
I get the feeling that there's going to be more events soon, iirc they said they wanted to harken back to Infinite Crisis with a heavy focus on continuity.
You know what, I like how the Black/White Wally thing shook out.
DC swerved pretty well with that.
If they are going to focus more on continuity then they are going to need to cut loose large parts of their editorial staff first. Seriously , Bat Editorial at the moment can't even do consistent characterization and events across a Batfamily Crossover that was obviously written for the Trade (had a very short miniseries as a centre even). They've been saying story over continuity because they can't do continuity. And Bat Editorial is probably one of the better ones consider they handle more closely connected titles than any of the others.
I think there's just a general terror at both DC and Marvel that editorial taking too heavy a hand leads to talent walking, and its a lot easier for talent to walk nowadays as their contributions are so much better understood.
Realistically I don't think we're ever going to see Jim Shooter style editorial control again
Judging by the setup , I'm pretty sure they'll at least start in the present.
I'd expect the Legion to end up back in the future since otherwise they are just another superteam since they are from the future they have very little tie in to other characters beside Superman / Supergirl.
The JSA could go either way, the Elder Statesmen of the hero community and the successors of the legacy of the fallen members thing they had going on post-Crisis was actually a pretty solid hook.
Other than the Big Names, talent back in ye olden days of editorial control was much less valued, generally. Nowadays, nobody's going to insist on having a single person running an entire suite of books, overriding the writers and artists actually making them; the quality pitfalls are just too great to justify the added "consistency." Just hold your nose and recite the MST3K mantra.
But you need to find that balance where editorial makes sure characters are consistent (or at least only vary within a plausible range, even supers have good/bad days) and where event crossovers don't have books that contradict each other
Just got Rebirth #1.
Damn, that's a good comic book.
Pretty sure they always do that. It's just how the distributor system works.
One-shots happen all the time, and are almost always labeled #1. Just how it is.
If they are going to focus more on continuity then they are going to need to cut loose large parts of their editorial staff first. Seriously , Bat Editorial at the moment can't even do consistent characterization and events across a Batfamily Crossover that was obviously written for the Trade (had a very short miniseries as a centre even). They've been saying story over continuity because they can't do continuity. And Bat Editorial is probably one of the better ones consider they handle more closely connected titles than any of the others.
I don't actually mind people playing "loose" with things as long as they aren't pretending to do tight continuity. If they just want to do this is a Batman story, these are the characters, you work out where in continuity this fits (and don't do something that's blatantly wrong given even a high level overview), I'm happy with that. I really enjoyed the Batman books like Shadow of the Bat and Legends of the Dark Knight, and the Classified books that did stuff like that.
They don't pretend that, generally. Continuity is largely preserved from book to book, and across sequential arcs, but in terms of simultaneous events? You just gotta roll with it. Batman has several giant catastrophic problems on his plate constantly, the exact order they transpire in is generally not important. Stuff like Alfred's hand or Red Hood's helmet is annoying, but not much more than that.
I'm more talking about stuff like Robin War. I read it in trade and the characterization flips between books and the event order of what was obviously intended as a key scene near the end doesn't work either. And then the next issue of We Are Robin acts like the outcome was different (Robin War ends with them being promised more training in the future, the next issue of We Are Robin picks up as if they got told to cut it out and stop doing it). That kind of thing needs to be done right.
It's not unrepresentative either , the early Gothtopia crossover (one of the earlier new 52 ones) had different writers treat the premise entirely differently too.
We Are Robin was a pretty great book too, but Robin War completely screwed it over.
A lot of it is worth checking out.Aside from batman which is a definite. Especially with Tom King on it what are two other books I should look at when the rebirth launches?
Rucka on wonder woman is a good thing right?
We Are Robin was a pretty great book too, but Robin War completely screwed it over.
A lot of it is worth checking out.
Aqua man and green arrow to name a few.
Aside from batman which is a definite. Especially with Tom King on it what are two other books I should look at when the rebirth launches?
Rucka on wonder woman is a good thing right?
Damn 3-4 means you are definitely going to miss out on some good series and maybe hidden gems.I don't read that many at once. Kinda just wanna stick to 3 or 4 tops
When the runs finish is when mass collection is more viable imo
Didn't Robin War only take up a single issue? I mean not that bad all things considering.
Not to mention that the issue itself was pretty good as far as event tie-ins go.
I liked court of owls but that was like the only thing I readYeah but the characters just looked kind of shitty and annoying in the event as a whole and I couldn't really see that doing good on getting people to want to check it out. And like above it was just weird with the continuity and seemed like an odd shift. It was fine on its own I just saw it as where the book started losing it.
They're all supposed to need training then in Robin War Duke can escape handcuffs, go head to head with Dick, jump off bridges and shit.
I think I'm more just irritated at DC's crossovers recently. They've all been terrible in my eyes.