• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Democrat Debate 8 [Univision] Agent Smith goes to Washington

Status
Not open for further replies.

noshten

Member
Do I need to show you a map? It's North Africa. It was part of the ottoman empire. Not the middle east.

Being located somewhere doesn't mean it's not part of the Middle East, the Middle East is far more than an area of the World. Historically it has had fluid borders:

Before the First World War, "Near East" was used in English to refer to the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire, while "Middle East" referred to Iran, the Caucasus, Afghanistan, Central Asia, and Turkestan. In contrast, "Far East" referred to the countries of East Asia (e.g. China, Japan, Formosa, Korea, Hong Kong, etc.)

With the disappearance of the Ottoman Empire in 1918, "Near East" largely fell out of common use in English, while "Middle East" came to be applied to the re-emerging countries of the Islamic world. However, the usage "Near East" was retained by a variety of academic disciplines, including archaeology and ancient history, where it describes an area identical to the term Middle East, which is not used by these disciplines (see Ancient Near East).

The first official use of the term "Middle East" by the United States government was in the 1957 Eisenhower Doctrine, which pertained to the Suez Crisis. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles defined the Middle East as "the area lying between and including Libya on the west and Pakistan on the east, Syria and Iraq on the North and the Arabian peninsula to the south, plus the Sudan and Ethiopia."[15] In 1958, the State Department explained that the terms "Near East" and "Middle East" were interchangeable, and defined the region as including only Egypt, Syria, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar.[19]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East
 

Makai

Member
agent-smith-pose.gif
 

foxuzamaki

Doesn't read OPs, especially not his own
I went back to rewatch the children part. This is the high-level transcript.

*opens with clip of Hillary saying she won't deport children*
Jorge: Will you deport children?
Hillary: We want the laws to give children all of the council they need, keep families together, only violent crimincals, Obama's current policy, etc...
Jorge: Will you deport children?
Hillary: "I will not deport children. I will not deport children." - HRC
Jorge: So you won't deport children?
Hillary: "I will not." - HRC
Jorge: So you will stop deportations for children.
Hillary "Yes. I want to see them on a path to citizenship." - HRC
Jorge: "Bernie, will you deport children?"
Bernie: "I don't think the Secretary answered your question..."

Forgive me if you were being sarcastic.
Is that real?
 

Ekai

Member
Sorry Bernie I like you but some of your socialist views would bankrupt this country.

It's about implementation. Widening the income inequality has already ruined this country. And Republican economic policies have only continued to ruin things for the lower classes. The burden under Bernie's economic views shifts the issue to the upper class who have consistently avoided taxes for their own gain and addresses the income inequality gap at hand here.

We need people like Bernie making these arguments because America's economy and general "prosperity of the American Dream" is fucked until then. We've let Repubs fuck this country over for decades now and the only recovery is a massive reversal of who is paying the debts. Hell, more income for the individual means we won't have a working poor class anymore. Jobs should not be a prison. The worker having more income means more money will go back into the system itself as they will actually have more to spend. The rich hording everything isn't helping our countries finances at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom