Yea definitely the least impressive implementations. Alan wake 2 looked better with motion blur turned off though in the vid at leastAgree that resolution is too low but wouldnt call Veilguard and Alans Wake2 prorformance modes massive improvements ;d
/s?Fucking hell. 65% more tflops. only 30% more performance. Even worse than the 45% figure Cerny gave us.
My guess is that they needed infinity cache. Expected more from Cerny.
Unless they have the same cpu, not sure they can be compared, ps5/ps5 pro has a zen 1 equivalent cpu.Power:
IQ in DA
It's much worse than 6800, but maybe games have not full access to GPU without patch.
Not performance, no.I thought the One X consistently offered better performance as well as fidelity over the PS4 Pro?
Yeah even AW2 looks a lot better than base perf mode imo. Sharper, better graphics settings etc. I saw some DA footage and it looked pretty great and also much sharper than base PS5It was a strange video review because their main points of criticism weren't so much as to whether the games look better, or play better, but rather that they weren't locked to 60 fps (graph showed it dipping to 57fps), or that there was some shimmering on the grass (I didn't notice it till they mentioned it). In some cases, they didn't really highlight whether there were any improvements at all despite the video comparison showing that improvement. Dragon Age Veilguard, for instance, looked significantly better in Performance Mode.
I suppose in hindsight, the context of the discussion was more about the varied success PSSR was having, in contrast to Sony 1st party. But overall, after being quite sceptical myself about this machine when it was revealed, it only reinforced my anticipation rather than dwindling it.
That's not what he said.I think the biggest question the reviews should be answering...is Mark Cernys statement.
Does this console provide quality mode settings at performance mode framerates?
That's not what he said.
I'm more curious if the Pro answers the question that Mark Cerny is famous for...How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
OMG. Found this Alan wake video.
Disable len distortion and film grain will make the game crisper and Disable motion blur will mostly clear the shimmering when moving. This is the most annoying thing in consoles.
Go to 10:20. What a fucked up Remedy.
The performance mode look pretty crisp here and all the shimmering almost gone. It is a game changer. Really.
wtf. does this work on on the base consoles? Nobody reporting this?
Like Demon’s Souls and FF7:R?He says fidelity mode graphics at performance mode framerates....?
He said "With graphics showing something like fidelity levels of detail but at double the framerate".He says fidelity mode graphics at performance mode framerates....?
Like Demon’s Souls and FF7:R?
Yea, this guy video alway fucked up. If the shimmering showing the same improvement in this scence here, the performance is back on the table as the prefer mode to play.Even tho the footage has wrong black levels it does look pretty nice and crisp.
So they are running quality mode at 60fps?
2 games?
He said "With graphics showing something like fidelity levels of detail but at double the framerate".
Yep. Thats why i kept harping on the supposed 45% gpu performance upgrade. And now we know its 45% peak and as low as 30%. Thats simply not enough to boost some of these 720p ps5 performance modes to 1080p. you need 100% more GPU power. not 30-45%.Like DLSS it's not magic, if the internal Res is super low (below 1080p) then it only has so much to work with. It's still a huge improvement over FSR2 at those resolutions. But yea don't expect miracles
so far, most of the times, it does, doesn't it? Sometimes it even exceeds that.Does this console provide quality mode settings at performance mode framerates?
Not something like fidelity mode, something like fidelity levels of detail. And we've seen it do just that in most cases.700 pounds for "something" like fidelity mode at performance mode.
Don't fall for this shit peeps. Please.
I suppose in hindsight, the context of the discussion was more about the varied success PSSR was having, in contrast to Sony 1st party. It's a fair point to make; if Horizon can look this good, and run this flawlessly, what excuse is there for other developers to have 57fps rather than 60fps (if the base can do 60). However, that is arguably a weak argument overall. Ater being quite sceptical myself about this machine when it was revealed, it only reinforced my anticipation rather than dwindling it.
Yea, this guy video alway fucked up. If the shimmering showing the same improvement in this scence here, the performance is back on the table as the prefer mode to play.
We need someone to test this more lol. Maybe tomorrow.
What do you recommend to do with $700 for gaming?700 pounds for "something" like fidelity mode at performance mode.
Don't fall for this shit peeps. Please.
You make it sound like it's a scam.700 pounds for "something" like fidelity mode at performance mode.
Don't fall for this shit peeps. Please.
What do you recommend to do with $700 for gaming?
When did the PS4 Pro ever exhibit such performance increases? It would have been a 4K machine 99% of the time when it clearly wasn’t. It rarely ever hit 4K.Yep. Thats why i kept harping on the supposed 45% gpu performance upgrade. And now we know its 45% peak and as low as 30%. Thats simply not enough to boost some of these 720p ps5 performance modes to 1080p. you need 100% more GPU power. not 30-45%.
I was a big believer in the PS4 pro. The 2.3x increase in tflops combined with a 1.25x increase in IPC gains meant that we could get up to 2.5-2.8x more performance out of the GPU. The fact that there is no IPC gains this time around and a mere 45% increase despite the 65% increase in tflops was simply never going to enough.
Hopefully, the RT IPC gains will help in future games but even then the vram and cpu bottlenecks will hold back 60 fps rt performance.
Good. I think the shimmering mostly will clear though with all post process disable. I think the console low post processing setting is causing all these specular shimmering. When moving with motion blur over an object with specular highlights willl cause it to shimmer.My first game will be AW2 tomorrow when i get the Pro, so i will test it
It took base PS4 1080p (2.1 million pixels) games and ran them at 4kcb (4.1 million pixels + reconstruction cost on the GPU). Several games ran at 1620p. Some games like GOW and SOTC ran at 1080p 60 fps so doubling the performance.When did the PS4 Pro ever exhibit such performance increases? It would have been a 4K machine 99% of the time when it clearly wasn’t. It rarely ever hit 4K.
Prostitution.Does anybody have any tips for migrating the 100 PS5 games I bought to a PC?
Yeah hit up CDKEYSIt’s nice that DenchDeckard is looking out for all us foolish gamers. What a guy.
I’ll immediately send my PS5 Pro back and use the money to get a PC.
Does anybody have any tips for migrating the 100 PS5 games I bought to a PC?
It’s nice that DenchDeckard is looking out for all us foolish gamers. What a guy.
I’ll immediately send my PS5 Pro back and use the money to get a PC.
Does anybody have any tips for migrating the 100 PS5 games I bought to a PC?
In other words, never. Going from 2.1 to 4.1M pixel doesn’t require twice the GPU horsepower. Try going from 1080p>4K.It took base PS4 1080p (2.1 million pixels) games and ran them at 4kcb (4.1 million pixels + reconstruction cost on the GPU). Several games ran at 1620p. Some games like GOW and SOTC ran at 1080p 60 fps so doubling the performance.
Some other games were held back because of the poor vram bandwidth increase but most games managed to hit 4kcb at a minimum.
No... I don't have a PC and will only spend $700 to play game. So what do you recommend me for $700? I can sell my PS5 fat for whatever I can get and have $700.Hopefully you have already bought a pc. Spend that money on a gpu and literally turn the settings up on every single one of your games. Get better settings and framerate.
If you haven't invested in a pc I would say use that 700 dollars to pay a large chunk towards your first pc and enjoy every game you want to play running at the settings you want. No waiting for patches etc.
Everyone knows my stance on how I felt this box was a rip off. It's even worse than I thought imo. I would advise people don't spend money on this until Sony truly shows its worth.
Same 32gps hdmi chip etc is just an insult.
No... I don't have a PC and will only spend $700 to play game. So what do you recommend me for $700?
there are 0 games that are worse on PS5 because of thisSame 32gps hdmi chip etc is just an insult.
I have a ps5 fat disk and would like to play the games with better resolution, graphics or fps...Buy a ps5 disk model and lots of nice games for it.
Buying a third one now.700 pounds for "something" like fidelity mode at performance mode.
Don't fall for this shit peeps. Please.
I have a ps5 fat disk and want to enjoy 60fps with better graphics.
Tbf Forbidden West at 40fps was already a visual masterpiece, easily one of the best looking games I've seen, it would take something else to make that game look even better tbh and from the clips I've seen so far I ain't really seeing itAs expected GPU bound games will see a noticeable increase in fidelity and those that are CPU bound will see a very small bump if not locked but nowhere near enough to push 30fps games to 60fps.
Seems like a reasonably good upgrade and I'm eager to see how first party games come out looking. I'm kind of excited to give Horizon Forbidden West a go too. The DF team really made that sound impressive.
RTGI would go a long way.Tbf Forbidden West at 40fps was already a visual masterpiece, easily one of the best looking games I've seen, it would take something else to make that game look even better tbh and from the clips I've seen so far I ain't really seeing it