I'm not even going to paste this in spoiler tags as it's that potentially volatile. One of the guys who provided correct spoilers for NOTD and clearly knows about Christmas (he mentioned the Cyberman head last month, and... lo, there it is in the promo pic) has posted a straight-up synopsis of Christmas. For those without Outpost Gallifrey accounts, here it is on Pastebin. Spoilers, SPOILERS, click at your own risk.
I really do not like the sound of those spoilers and I hope they're a cunning ruse tbh :-/
Fixed. But yes, exactly.
That depends on how you count regenerations though. At one point, in the episode where Amy and Rory leave, the Doctor uses regeneration energy to heal River, which costs him a couple of hundred years or so. Of course, it's Doctor Who, so it's all rather wibbly-wobbly and up to the mood of the writer. I guess I'd just prefer only counting the actual regenerations from one Doctor to the next (including Hurt), and not the incidental stuff like fake Tennant. It's a bit cleaner that way.
Just read it.
To be honest, it sounds amazing, but its all the spoilers cobbled together over the past few weeks / days.
IE: Still no explanation as to why the crack is there, which I'm hoping my be partially explained in the episode.
Apparently, this is from the Official App:
(Shamelessly stolen from GB)
Image possibly showing the Title of the Christmas Episode
I'm not even going to paste this in spoiler tags as it's that potentially volatile. One of the guys who provided correct spoilers for NOTD and clearly knows about Christmas (he mentioned the Cyberman head last month, and... lo, there it is in the promo pic) has posted a straight-up synopsis of Christmas. For those without Outpost Gallifrey accounts, here it is on Pastebin. Spoilers, SPOILERS, click at your own risk.
Those spoilers seem uneventful enough to be true. :lol
and unless I'm missing something, there areno answers to any plot questions! No resolution on the exploding TARDIS, silence will fall, or "doctor who?".
Do we know the running time of this episode?
Seems like an awful lot of content that is going to be rushed.
I'm not even going to paste this in spoiler tags as it's that potentially volatile. One of the guys who provided correct spoilers for NOTD and clearly knows about Christmas (he mentioned the Cyberman head last month, and... lo, there it is in the promo pic) has posted a straight-up synopsis of Christmas. For those without Outpost Gallifrey accounts, here it is on Pastebin. Spoilers, SPOILERS, click at your own risk.
Apparently, this is from the Official App:
(Shamelessly stolen from GB)
Image possibly showing the Title of the Christmas Episode
Its fake, thats a fanmade poster that was posted back in august by a user who does a lot of these:Apparently, this is from the Official App:
(Shamelessly stolen from GB)
Image possibly showing the Title of the Christmas Episode
Bet Moffat's properly naffed off RTD used the "Death of the Doctor" title.
I'm not even going to paste this in spoiler tags as it's that potentially volatile. One of the guys who provided correct spoilers for NOTD and clearly knows about Christmas (he mentioned the Cyberman head last month, and... lo, there it is in the promo pic) has posted a straight-up synopsis of Christmas. For those without Outpost Gallifrey accounts, here it is on Pastebin. Spoilers, SPOILERS, click at your own risk.
If there's one thing Moffat is definitely not guilty of, it's immediately explaining his own plot points. :lol
Really?
He explained the cracks in time (more-or-less; I'm aware there's still some stuff unexplained) by the end of the 5th season, having set them up at the beginning of the same season.
He explained who River Pond was (Amy and Rory's daughter/why she can regenerate/how and why she married the Doctor), who the Silent are, where the mystery time machine from 'The Lodger' and what the question is by the end of the 6th season, having set them up at the end of the 5th season.
He explained what Trenzalore is by the end of the 7th season, having set it up as significant at the end of the 6th, and what makes Clara special by the end of the season too having set it up the first time we meet her.
Every time something mysterious appears, by the end of the next season we've discovered what it is. Nothing is allowed to remain mysterious, like the end of the Time War (although that's now explained), or what the Cruciform is, or what the Nightmare Child was. Something becomes mysterious and significant, then a year later it's explained and gone. It just feels like forced plotting to me. The Doctor just lurches from significant event to significant event.
Nope he was right. Moffat recently said Ten's first one counts.
Really?
He explained the cracks in time (more-or-less; I'm aware there's still some stuff unexplained) by the end of the 5th season, having set them up at the beginning of the same season.
He explained who River Pond was (Amy and Rory's daughter/why she can regenerate/how and why she married the Doctor), who the Silent are, where the mystery time machine from 'The Lodger' and what the question is by the end of the 6th season, having set them up at the end of the 5th season.
He explained what Trenzalore is by the end of the 7th season, having set it up as significant at the end of the 6th, and what makes Clara special by the end of the season too having set it up the first time we meet her.
Every time something mysterious appears, by the end of the next season we've discovered what it is. Nothing is allowed to remain mysterious, like the end of the Time War (although that's now explained), or what the Cruciform is, or what the Nightmare Child was. Something becomes mysterious and significant, then a year later it's explained and gone. It just feels like forced plotting to me. The Doctor just lurches from significant event to significant event.
Some people in here just cannot appreciate a long setup or a multi-season arc/storyline, something which I absolutely adore.
WTF @the Doctor spending 900 more years in a single town :/
.Well it does sound like the kind of thing The Doctor would do
Haha thought you wouldn't notice.. damn.
Including the War Doctor, Smith is the 12. To get to 12, starting from 1 you need 11 regenerations. 1 extra one for Tennant. 11+1=12.
ninja edited![]()
I'm sorry but those are completely different things. Lines of dialogue used to build up the time war and nothing more. What you're complaining about is what has been happening since the series was revived. Series long arcs like Bad Wolf, Torchwood and the disappearing planets/bees are always explained in the same series they were introduced in.Really?
He explained the cracks in time (more-or-less; I'm aware there's still some stuff unexplained) by the end of the 5th season, having set them up at the beginning of the same season.
He explained who River Pond was (Amy and Rory's daughter/why she can regenerate/how and why she married the Doctor), who the Silent are, where the mystery time machine from 'The Lodger' and what the question is by the end of the 6th season, having set them up at the end of the 5th season.
He explained what Trenzalore is by the end of the 7th season, having set it up as significant at the end of the 6th, and what makes Clara special by the end of the season too having set it up the first time we meet her.
Every time something mysterious appears, by the end of the next season we've discovered what it is. Nothing is allowed to remain mysterious, like the end of the Time War (although that's now explained), or what the Cruciform is, or what the Nightmare Child was. Something becomes mysterious and significant, then a year later it's explained and gone. It just feels like forced plotting to me. The Doctor just lurches from significant event to significant event.
Those Christmas spoilers kinda make it sound like=/we won't see Capaldi
Yeah but see Power of Three! How would he keep amused?
This is brilliant. Guess it was in front of the cinema screenings, nice of Paramount to put it online though.
Those Christmas spoilers kinda make it sound like=/we won't see Capaldi
Yeah, it was. The cinema screening had a pre-show bit with Strax & his clone batch showing what Sontarans do to people who use their phones and stuff in the cinema, plus a lovely bit with 10 & 11 'activating' the 3D. It's about 10 minutes extra stuff.
The Anchorman thing - he's done tons of them for tons of different films in a similar vein!
I hope we get an explanation next season about ....how the TARDIS blew up in the first place. That's still never been explained.
:lolHere's your explanation:
![]()
Can someone please create a Christmas Special OT? Trying to avoid all these spoilers is killing me. =P
Aren't OTs generally kept until a week or two before transmission?
Every day can be Christmas if you believe! =3It's been the 50th Anniversary all year long.![]()
It's been the 50th Anniversary all year long.![]()
Another thing to take note of is the way Rose was always and understanding and calming figure for the Doctor and Rose was what essentially the person who helped him get over what he thought he did. As a form to choose from the Moment did a great choice instead of going for the pushier and more aggressive Donna who would've gone: "Oy! What the hell do you think you're doing?".
But again, it was mostly for the fans.