• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Doctor Who 50th Anniversary |OT| Splendid Chap, All Of Them

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fiktion

Banned
I hope the rumors of an additional male companion in series 8 are false. Three is a crowd, and 12/Clara could be a great match.
 

Fiktion

Banned
I dunno about that. Rose & Jack was a nice pair of companions. Same with Amy & Rory.

Rose and Jack had only a few episodes together, Jack really felt more like a guest star. Amy and Rory got to shine one by one but rarely together, and I feel it only worked at all since they had an established relationship to build on.
 

Symphonia

Banned
I dunno about that. Rose & Jack was a nice pair of companions. Same with Amy & Rory.
Jack worked because he wasn't there all the time, and Rory worked so well because of the chemistry with Amy. I don't think we'll see a chemistry with Twelve/Clara like we did with the previous male companions.
 
Just saw this on Twitter, and I don't think it was mentioned.

Trenzalore is basically French for "Treize alors".

It translates to "Thirteen, then."
 
Adric, Nyssa & Tegan?
Ian, Susan & Barbara?
Sarah & Harry?

There's plenty of proof that multiple companions can and does work. I'm sure you could go down the list and point out negatives, things that didn't land quite right, but you can do the same with single companions, too.

The "Formula" as it were says one doctor, one companion - but upon closer examination, that formula isn't as rock-solid as it would seem upon first glance, and axiomatically suggesting "Three's a crowd" doesn't hold, for me. It doesn't so much matter WHY it works, just that it does, and Amy & Rory (and River) worked. Adric, Nyssa & Tegan worked. Rose, Mickey & Jack worked.

Yes, I'd like some time for Capaldi and Coleman to establish a relationship that isn't solely based on Capaldi trying to figure out Coleman - but it's also possible that relationship can be expanded upon with a third party in there for BOTH people to bounce off of.
 

Fiktion

Banned
Adric, Nyssa & Tegan?
Ian, Susan & Barbara?
Sarah & Harry?
Different times, different format, different showrunner. Moffat struggles sometimes with characters, I'd rather he keep it simple.

Oh man, if the one thing on there is true, i will be so fucking happy.

You will see who the voice in the TARDIS was.

Bugged me for fucking years.

What exactly is that referring to? Which episode?
 
Just saw this on Twitter, and I don't think it was mentioned.

Trenzalore is basically French for "Treize alors".

It translates to "Thirteen, then."

I love stuff like this. Even if it wasn't intentional it makes all the over analysis and believing one thing to mean another totally worth it.
 

Boem

Member
I don't think Adric, Nyssa & Tegan worked, but that's mostly due to some wonky storylines and writing at the time. Both the classic series (the first two Doctors rarely had a single companion, and the fifth Doctor is a famous example as well, even if that one didn't work that well for me) and the modern series (Amy & Rory) showed that it could work. As long as the writing is good enough it'll work. I mean, Clara doesn't have that much depth by herself, and her storyline so far was all about the mystery that was solved in Name of the Doctor. There really wasn't anything else going on there. Giving her more to work with can only be a good thing, in my opinion.
 
Different times, different format, different showrunner. Moffat struggles sometimes with characters, I'd rather he keep it simple.

I know. I allowed for that. But wanting Moffatt to "keep it simple" seems pretty wildly unrealistic, considering you have 3 years of evidence he's kept NOTHING simple. And that's without looking at things like Sherlock, where he ALSO doesn't "keep it simple."

So long as he's on the show "Keep it Simple" is not on the books, and won't ever be. And since one of the better examples of multiple companions working is in fact Amy & Rory, I don't know that a second companion possibly joining Clara & Capaldi is necessarily the road to disappointment.

Hell, he's got a secondary triumvirate of Jenny, Vastra, and Strax working right now.

I'm not saying it WON'T fail. It could. But it seems shortsighted to say the possibility of a third companion is automatically negative. There's plenty of examples, even if you want to nitpick at 'em (they're ripe for that) that prove it CAN work.
 

Symphonia

Banned
What? lol

No, that was House, we know who that was!
tumblr_m08xamKkCU1qiunvpo1_500.gif


I totally knew that.
 

Mariolee

Member
Idk you guys, that whole synopsis
really sounds unfulfilling. I mean, I'm sure it's leaving out a lot of plot points, but it feels like it might be like The Wedding of River Song where Moffat does these big long things over a somewhat long period of time and it's too much to fit in one episode and it feels bloated and badly paced.
 
Idk you guys, that whole synopsis
really sounds unfulfilling. I mean, I'm sure it's leaving out a lot of plot points, but it feels like it might be like The Wedding of River Song where Moffat does these big long things over a somewhat long period of time and it's too much to fit in one episode and it feels bloated and badly paced.

That's how we know it's legit.
 
On a slightly off current topic note, has anyone got the website / list of the Big Finish stories in the best order to listen to them?

I saw it posted around here before the 50th, but its exploded since then and I cant find it.
 

Mariolee

Member
That's how we know it's legit.

Ugh. I feel like Moffat does better with pacing when he has more time like in the Pandorica two parter, Day of the Doctor, or Sherlock. However, when he only has like 40ish minutes to play with it always feels rushed. Outside of the Eleventh Hour which was perfect.
 
On the regeneration issue, he said: “Paul McGann turns into John Hurt so they’re not the same incarnation. He used up another regeneration and I expect he’ll be in trouble shortly – you can’t break rules laid down in ‘The Deadly Assassin’.”
Well huh--I thought they'd ignored/retconned that by now with something said in the Sarah Jane show, but--the Doctor lies.
That's not true, he specifically refers to himself as 'The Eleventh' in that episode where he moves in with James Cordon.
Yeah, I recall him being unusually explicit about the numbering in that episode too. There was also the more jokey fact that when playing football in the same episode he was #11.
 
Oh for fucks sake if this is true, its fucking disgusting and stupid.

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/11/25/how-season-eight-of-doctor-who-will-play-out-over-two-years/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

This is how we are hearing Doctor Who Series Eight will break down. Again, nothing official, nothing released, don’t regard this as gospel. Or we’ll send Malcom Tucker round.

Fourteen episodes, split across two years.

Seven episodes, including a Christmas Special in 2014, including that two parter Dalek story. And similarly, seven episodes, including a Christmas Special in 2015.

And that is how long Peter Capaldi is locked down to play the character. Doesn’t mean he won’t extend it, of course.

GIVE IT A FULL SERIES FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.
 
Oh for fucks sake if this is true, its fucking disgusting and stupid.

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/11/25/how-season-eight-of-doctor-who-will-play-out-over-two-years/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

This is how we are hearing Doctor Who Series Eight will break down. Again, nothing official, nothing released, don’t regard this as gospel. Or we’ll send Malcom Tucker round.

Fourteen episodes, split across two years.

Seven episodes, including a Christmas Special in 2014, including that two parter Dalek story. And similarly, seven episodes, including a Christmas Special in 2015.

And that is how long Peter Capaldi is locked down to play the character. Doesn’t mean he won’t extend it, of course.

GIVE IT A FULL SERIES FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.

Um

Confirmed: Doctor Who’s season 8 will have ‘at least’ 13 episodes in 2014
 
.
BBC Worldwide, Tiny Rebel Games and Seed Studio have announced that their brand new, free to play, puzzle-RPG adventure game for Android and iOS - Doctor Who: Legacy will be launching on Nov 27.

“The Eleventh Doctor’s regeneration is approaching fast. With decades of epic adventures to draw from, Doctor Who: Legacy is a loving homage created by loyal Whovians, and is rich in the show’s creative legacy and fun. Combining easy to learn, hard to master mechanics with beloved characters and cunning villains, Doctor Who: Legacy will be a treat for fans, casual players and even the most hard-core gamers alike” says Lee Cummings, Creative Director and Co-Founder of Tiny Rebel Games.

Build a team of your favourite companions and allies drawn from the extensive and illustrious history of the show; face the Doctor’s most notorious enemies; and relive the Doctor’s greatest triumphs. Doctor Who: Legacy will launch with episodes and characters from the most recent two seasons of the show. Season 5 will be released as further free to play content in the New Year as we go backwards through fifty beloved years of Doctor Who lore.

Visually striking, with meticulous attention to character detail, Doctor Who: Legacy is a feast for the eyes of any fan, and features a brand new score by acclaimed video game composer Chris Huelsbeck as well as the iconic theme song from the show as recorded by Murray Gold.

 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
I'm sorry but those are completely different things. Lines of dialogue used to build up the time war and nothing more. What you're complaining about is what has been happening since the series was revived. Series long arcs like Bad Wolf, Torchwood and the disappearing planets/bees are always explained in the same series they were introduced in.
They turned into plot arcs after starting off as Cruciform/Nightmare Child-esque namedrop mysteries from River's diary. And it's not just the existence of plot arcs that I find a bit iffy, it's the fact that they become significant and important and then a few episodes later they are explained. I feel that it's just become very formulaic: mystery is presented, mystery is resolved by end of series. Every other episode of the present shorter season format seems to be a season plot-arc episode, and I think that only really worked well for the 6th season, where plot-arc elements were included in adventure-of-the-week episodes too, before the finale.

RTD, by comparison, was happy to name-drop events in the Doctor's life, and then never return to them. He would, I suspect, have been happy to leave River's relation to the Doctor, and to Amy, as a mystery. The Doctor might have found out that he would die on Trenzalore, but I suspect that we would never have seen it.

I don't want to turn this into a RTD vs. Moffat thing again because that's not at all what I'm saying. They each have their own way of doing it and I appreciate them both. They've both been fantastic. But I am beginning to feel fatigue, I think, from Moffat's vision of the show, and in fact, I feel like it's changed a lot from Series 5 and the first half of Series 6, in ways that I don't feel are entirely positive. And we're now at a point where, for me, a lot of the mystery and excitement is beginning to drain from the show, because I know that when I hear about Big Event in the Doctor's Life X, that in a handful of episodes time I'll be watching it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom