Nocturnowl
Member
I feel the same way.Yes, there is. That phrase will inherently turn some people off of a game that they may have otherwise played and loved. It's not a legitimate criticism of the game, yet people see it that way. It takes a game that is better than its predecessor and makes it seem worse, or less worth your time. And honestly, it's a phrase that I mainly really see applied to Nintendo games, and while some people complain about how derivative CoD has become, I don't see anyone complaining that a game like Dark Souls 2 is just a level pack.
And it's honestly not a legitimate criticism, and it's disrespectful to all the hard work the developers put into the game.
Thing is "level pack" tends to carry negative connotations as if it should have been some hastily smashed out DLC or something that's being shadily released as a full product (so NSLU then). When it comes down to it a sequel is a sequel, some strive to reinvent and others to refine, in any case I find the term direct sequel makes more sense than level pack for that particular angle where the game is very similar from a gameplay standpoint to a previous entry.
With the level pack logic you could demote a whole host of sequels in various genres from last gen to the NES days as being packs of some variety and platformers especially so.