• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EDGE: The next Xbox: Always online, no second-hand games, 50GB Blu-ray and new kinect

Balb

Member
To those who talk about Steam in relation to this situation: Steam games don't sell nearly as well as Xbox 360 games -- especially at $60.
 
Unless by doing it nets them publisher support above and beyond what they're giving Sony, in which case it gets them a huge check in the positive category. Imagine (and this is just a hypothetical) if CoD or GTA was a timed exclusive for Microsoft. That's enormous.

Then GTA and COD will sell about half what they used to. Battlefield´s sales on the other hand will increase significantly.
 

Vinci

Danish
I feel like people saying "This is okay on Steam because the games are cheaper" are exhibiting the very reason stuff like this happens. If you really were opposed to this it wouldn't matter if the game were $1 or $100. The fact that your principles are conditional tells corporations that you can pretty much be talked into anything.

This isn't about principles for most people, though it may be for you. This is simply a calculation of Utility lacking the benefit of resell on the other side.
 

ACH1LL3US

Member
No GameFly means no purchase. Period. That's fucking insane. I'm actually mad.

If Sony is doing the same i will just skip the next gen.

well i guess no microsoft console next gen for me then....

On this page alone.. once they show stuff like Halo, Gear, Uncharted, Gran Turismo, Forza, etc on next gen... your gonna say those look awsome BUT I can't buy the system because I cant resell the game when I beat it or get tired of it?

Steam has shown this business model can work. I would imagine Sony and MS have watched that as-well as devs.
 

gundalf

Member
...

Studios working with the next-gen Xbox are currently being forced to work with only approved development libraries, while Sony is encouraging coders to get closer to the metal of its box. Furthermore, the operating system overhead of Microsoft’s next console is more oppressive than Sony’s equivalent, giving the PlayStation-badged unit another advantage.

...

http://www.edge-online.com/news/the...hand-games-50gb-blu-ray-discs-and-new-kinect/

Why does it say "currently"? For a very obvious reason, this rule is set to stay forever.
 
No used games? No buy for me. And this is coming from someone who buys their games new or waits for them to price to drop.

However.. I often buy used once games are less out of print or when I decide to try out some more retro games. Realistically there will be a generation of gamers who will grow up with this system and in 10 years.. I highly suspect they will want to come back to try it. (Just like a lot of Genesis / SNES / NES etc collectors do.) Going to suck when that happens and it'll be impossible to have the retro games exist for a new or someone wanting to reexperience games tries to do.


Then the further question posed is what are the details of this. Are they doing a games for windows live thing where it is account thing, or do they want to do some type of console nonsense like Nintendo?



Online only though? That pretty much seals the deal I'm just not interested. My net isn't a 100% reliable, and I don't exactly have the options to switch carriers because there is no other carrier. So without some sort of offline mode.. no thanks.

I'm hoping this isn't true, and if it unfortunately is, hope the PS4 doesn't go this route.
 

Mesoian

Member
I understand what your saying, but look at it from Sony and Microsofts point of view, those families that just buy used games don't help MS or Sony or the devs or the publishers. It helps gamestop. If those gamers that ONLY buy used games or mostly used games decide not to buy a system that Sony and MS are probably going to take a loss on anyway... I don't think the companies will miss consumers like that.

It sucks but that is how they see it, used games they get NO cut on.

Not necessarily. let's look at microsoft specifically. They're spending a whole lot of time and effort making the xbox into the box you want under your TV whether you game or not. They want at least 1 box in your house regardless if you're the guy who buys Madden and that's it, or if you buy 5 games a month. This paradigm shift pretty much scares off a huge section of that population, the demographic who uses the xbox as a netflix player when their kids aren't playing. They risk losing the household name that the xbox is right now. Microsoft totally gains from the solely used game market because their hardware is still required. They want increase the revenue on every unit sold by forcing people to go through their own portal and making them buy at their prices. Even if Microsoft keeps the price at 60 dollars and lowers the price in the exact same time table that gamestop or game would, they will still make more money not having to deal with those people. and if they do that, there's not really any reason to get angry.

But their business practices say that they won't. And thus people do, and they stamp their feet about it. It's early to get too upset with Microsoft doing this because we don't know the specifics of what they'll do, but it's not unreasonable to say that once a game goes up on their portal at 60 dollars, it'll stay at 60 dollars indefinitely, and any discount given to the game will be inconsequential (pennys on the dollar here and there). THAT'S what's going to scare away the demographic who only occasionally buy games here and there as a treat.
 
On this page alone.. once they show stuff like Halo, Gear, Uncharted, Gran Turismo, Forza, etc on next gen... your gonna say those look awsome BUT I can't buy the system because I cant resell the game when I beat it or get tired of it?

Steam has shown this business model can work. I would imagine Sony and MS have watched that as-well as devs.

Believe it or not, yes there are people who stick by such decisions... I haven't bought a single capcom game in nearly 2 years because of how shitty they've treated their fans lately. I can easily do the same with 720 and PS4.

Video games are only entertainment, and in this day and age there are millions of entertainment options I can turn to if one of them becomes (by my standards) unpalattable.
 

ACH1LL3US

Member
No, it doesn't. It's been shown time and time again how a used sale =/= one less new sale. When games are purchased they have been purchased. Someone buying a used game doesn't take away from that purchase. If a company sells X number of games and someone buys a used version it is not X-1.



And if I love football but don't support the NFL's decision to support SOPA, am I less of a football fan for not watching the Superbowl?



That is really not fair. I love gaming and it's my only hobby, but I have beliefs and I don't like where the industry is headed with DRM, digital distribution, etc.. This is more about no more used games, I don't buy used games nor do I trade my games in. This is about the landscape as a whole and where it is headed. If someone doesn't support that, their passion shouldn't be called into question. If anything, they're more passionate to give up something they love for what they believe in.

So your saying your more passionate gamer because your willing to give it up because the next gen systems will more then likely have DRM and have to be online.

Your loss.... so do you plan to play PS3 and Xbox 360 for the next 20 -30 yrs or are you going to go cold turkey?
 
Then GTA and COD will sell about half what they used to. Battlefield´s sales on the other hand will increase significantly.

Initially they'll sell tons. Tons of copies that can't be traded or sold used. Then they'll sell another ton later that can be traded/sold.

Aren't there laws and shit against this?

fuck.

I am like really mad right now...wtf

You're aware that Steam has existed for quite some time, right? And iTunes.
 
Diablo 3 is awful. If you live in a country with shit internet on average (Australia) then the game is pointless.

NOW IMAGINE YOUR CONSOLE WORKS LIKE THAT!

21st century y'all.

On this page alone.. once they show stuff like Halo, Gear, Uncharted, Gran Turismo, Forza, etc on next gen... your gonna say those look awsome BUT I can't buy the system because I cant resell the game when I beat it or get tired of it?

god forbid anyone make a stand on principles, right? GOTTA BUY THE LATEST SHIT
 

Mesoian

Member
To those who talk about Steam in relation to this situation: Steam games don't sell nearly as well as Xbox 360 games -- especially at $60.

But they sell INCREDIBLY well on that weekend where the same game on steam is 40, or 30, or 20 while it's still 60 on the 360.

And that's the point. That it's happening isn't the issue. The issue is how it will be run.
 
If this is just a rumor and the new console is not going to do this and Gamestop's stock has dropped for no reason, wouldn't you want to put a stop to those rumors?

At the very least, I think a lack of a statement implies that the situation will be a little complicated - they can't simply say "the rumors are false" if they are planning on some form of mild license control.
 

legend166

Member
If you want to cut out Gamestop, make it a transferrable licence. Then you can still sell it on eBay but don't have Gamestop pushing used games over new.

Everyone wins.
 
NOW IMAGINE YOUR CONSOLE WORKS LIKE THAT!

21st century y'all.

If that's how this ends up working, yes, it's terrible and Microsoft deserves to fail. If they can implement it better than that, i.e Steam or any other distro service, I'm all for it. I'm interested to see if MS or Sony can pull that off.
 

Deuterium

Member
No, it doesn't. It's been shown time and time again how a used sale =/= one less new sale. When games are purchased they have been purchased. Someone buying a used game doesn't take away from that purchase. If a company sells X number of games and someone buys a used version it is not X-1.

Hmmm, I would imagine that Publishers and Game Developers have looked at this issue in incredible detail, and have accumulated studies and a mess of stats. They all seem to feel (quite strongly), that the Used game market is cutting into their potential Sales and revenue.

Now...are there more ideal solutions, of course. The best solution would be if Gamestop, Gamefly, and other purveyors of Used games were to come to an agreement with the Publishers and Developers, and enter into some type of profit sharing.

Failing that, I can definitely see Microsoft capitalizing on this issue. I strongly expect Sony to join Microsoft in this, otherwise they expose themselves to the possibilty that 3rd Party studios will start providing Microsoft exclusive or timed exclusives, which would only hurt Sony.
 

ACH1LL3US

Member
Believe it or not, yes there are people who stick by such decisions... I haven't bought a single capcom game in nearly 2 years because of how shitty they've treated their fans lately. I can easily do the same with 720 and PS4.

Video games are only entertainment, and in this day and age there are millions of entertainment options I can turn to if one of them becomes (by my standards) unpalattable.

What you are describing shows that your not a passionate gamer, if you were you would deal with this. PC gamers went through this years ago and none of them are worse for wear now.

Its a shock that people on here ( a gaming forum) is saying they will give it up. Do you think that MS and Sony will change their mind when they realize your not buying games anymore?
 

Mesoian

Member
If you want to cut out Gamestop, make it a transferrable licence. Then you can still sell it on eBay but don't have Gamestop pushing used games over new.

Everyone wins.

Then the piracy issue starts anew. The one thing that both sony and Microsoft did a pretty good job of this time around was culling the ease of piracy.
 

Fox Mulder

Member
On this page alone.. once they show stuff like Halo, Gear, Uncharted, Gran Turismo, Forza, etc on next gen... your gonna say those look awsome BUT I can't buy the system because I cant resell the game when I beat it or get tired of it?

Steam has shown this business model can work. I would imagine Sony and MS have watched that as-well as devs.

How is it so hard to believe that people have a line they won't cross.

I love stuff like forza and halo, and own like 40 games on the 360 alone, but absolutely will not buy any console that ever does this shit. I've put up with awful dlc, stupid exclusive retailer preorder content, paying to play online, ads, 5 or 6 dead consoles, but will not go for always online and no used games. I can turn my money to plenty of other hobbies.
 
It won't doom the console, did it doom PC gaming?

If both Sony and MS do it your really going to not play next gen games?

Your response is so melodramatic. Your stating such extremes that you more then likely wont follow. If you really were into gaming... then these new practices wouldn't deter you from it. Maybe curb how many games you buy but not deter you.

As for Edge... don't you think they are staking their rep on the line by putting this out there? It has already affected Gamestop's stock value and Forbes ran with their article too. So no.. this won't hurt their credibilty because for all intents and purposes this news will come to be true.

I'm 90% there with you. I love PC gaming in that it survived a shift to DRM. Then again, I hate draconian DRM.
 

Suzuki Yu

Member
The only thing this will do is concentrate sales on the most AAA(AAA...) of games while everything else that can't compete in marketing or production values (lol) will be moved to digital and other platforms. If you thought B/C-games were coming back, this would be the final nail in their coffin.
i think it's totally the opposite.
what you call B/C-games will benefit big time from this move.
likely those games will be affordable with reasonable prices.
 

ACH1LL3US

Member
NOW IMAGINE YOUR CONSOLE WORKS LIKE THAT!

21st century y'all.



god forbid anyone make a stand on principles, right? GOTTA BUY THE LATEST SHIT

My whole point is they wont! Its all knee jerk reactions and anger right now.

Most of these people will be buying and playing next gen games which makes their statements all the more melodramatic.
 

Yasae

Banned
In many cases, it's ok because the games are sold digital-only at a lower price, so consumers get some benefit for the anti-used game marketplace. Take Virtua Fighter- without DD, there's no way it would have been sold at all after VF5 bombaed on 360. Just one of many examples. In the case of the $60 AAA game with $20+ of DLC, it does fine even with used sales, and we all know the prices will go up not down, so consumers are seeing no benefit, this is not win-win, it's win-lose, which is why you're seeing so much hate.

It's less of an issue for me than many folks, but I do think the end result of such a policy will be the complete death of retail for non-AAA games next gen, and many of those folks will move to PC, where the market conditions are much more favorable. I'm not upset, especially if this isn't bait and switch, but it would impact my value of the console, enough to where I wouldn't find it worth the money. Now, if VF6 wows me in 2-3 years time, I might change my tune, but by then the consoles may have suffered so much it gets a PC port instead or as well.
Excellent point. There's also a false dichotomy going on for the Valve critics: I can still install second-hand games on my PC. Just because we're trending towards a digital future (whether someone agrees with this or not) doesn't lock my platform off entirely. That's essentially what MS is doing.

There are used games for PC all over. I still have Baldur's Gate II (2000), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion (2006!), Dungeon Siege (2002) and quite a few others in physical form. If I wanted to buy them now and didn't have those around, sure digital is a much more convenient (and likely cheaper) alternative, and it's now the preferred method of purchase. However, there are used PC games well into the 2000s and Valve isn't stopping anyone from installing them, playing them, and even linking Steam to them.

The used console game market still dwarfs used PC games and that's where the real outrage comes in. It's justified.
 
My whole point is they wont! Its all knee jerk reactions and anger right now.

Most of these people will be buying and playing next gen games which makes their statements all the more melodramatic.

I won't be for one. Games over the past generation have slowly gotten worse, and this would just be the final nail in the coffin.
 
Maybe Microsoft will allow you to "trade" your digital games for a $5 fee. Think of Goozex, if you buy a trade token for $5, you can trade your game to anyone else (who purchased the token for $5).


That would work with Digital Download Titles. I dont know, I am trying to find some way that you would still be able to trade your games, or sell them, and the Pubs still make loot.


I have said this about 5 times now, but I still think all of this will simply be tied to activation codes. Buy a game new, you get the code. Buy a game used, you have to buy the code. We have activation codes this generation, to play games online. The Next Generation will offer activation codes, but they will probably be more than $10 each and will be necessary to start a game (Unless Sony's Patent is executed, then you could play a demo with the disk without a code). I like the idea of getting a couple of activation codes when you buy a game, so you could maybe sell it, trade it, or let someone borrow it. After that second code is used, someone has to buy a new one.

I could also see where you would get a timed "trial" if you use a disc without an activation code. Say, you can play for 90 minutes, but after that, you must buy a $15-$20 code to activate the game to continue.


Publishers get paid, Microsoft (and even Sony if they are on board) gets paid, Used Game sale prices drop (You wouldn't pay $20 for a used game, knowing you have to pay $20 to activate it).



Lets just hope nobody is going to do this. I thought this was a rumor at first, until Gamestop Stock Dropped, Nobody in the "know" was denying it, then EDGE ran a second story basically saying, "YES ITS TRUE!"
 
MS is playing hardball. They're trying to get Gamestop to concede and negotiate a share in its used game business.

Hopefully, at some point before the release of the 720, Gamestop execs determine that it's not worth testing whether Microsoft is bluffing or not.
 

SoulPlaya

more money than God
Man, if MS and Sony, then only Wii U would be left for me as a console option, and Nintendo games never go down in price, even used since few people sell them back, lol.
 
Top Bottom