A
A More Normal Bird
Unconfirmed Member
Would it be wise for me to read the whole book before starting 'Starting Strength'? Should I focus on what to to know for warm ups, form of each exercise and other things?
Is this how the routine works? Quoted from Scooby's Home Workouts
http://scoobysworkshop.com/starting-...mark-rippetoe/
The real meat of the book is learning and understanding the basics and not so basics of the main lifts. The programming itself is simple: train three times a week (ABA one week, BAB the next) and add weight every time you train unless you failed to reach your specified reps the previous session.
It's cool, but there is a difference between being direct and just being rude for no cause. It doesn't help somebody who is saying "I'm not doing very well, here is what I am doing currently" to be told "You're doing it wrong, stop fucking around." If I thought I knew as much as you seem to think I believe, I wouldn't have asked questions and just posted some beefcake pics or something.
And I think you may be a bit unaware of how technical some of the information in the OP is. If you don't know what a conflabburator is, it doesn't help to be told to read text that tells you to use the confabburator with standard widget installation. I freely admit that I may have missed something, but if that's the case, you could just point out where you think my question was answered.
As you said, my main method for tracking progress is by increasing the amount of time I can do AMRAP excercises (started at 10, now can do the same workouts with more rounds in 20) and by being able to lift more. I haven't charted it, which I take is very important - but I guess I don't really know why that is, either.
I have to say I don't really see much rudeness in Petrie's post, only bluntness. Do bear in mind that in the end he was using his time to try and help you for no real reward, so any perceived rudeness wouldn't really be out of spite. If you have any questions about the OP don't hesitate to ask; most of the more complex passages in there aren't really relevant to programming, they're just there to dispel myths like "bulky" or "toned".
From what I can gather you do 3x5 or 5x5 on heavy compounds before doing CF WODs and you're also running 1 day a week. That's a lot of work, and I'd put it as the main culprit for both your soreness and your plateaus. If you could tell us what sort of numbers you're putting up on the compounds you do before the WODs, that would give some sort of idea about what level you're at. As I see it, these are your options:
1) Switch to a more conventional lifting program (depending on your level, something like SS, Greyskull LP, 5/3/ or Texas Method) and balance it with your conditioning/running.
2) Carry on with a Crossfit style program, but try and make it more effective. AFAIK, there are a number of programs out there that rework CF around a more scientifically sound basis, but as I'm not into CF myself this is the only one I can think of off the top of my head (forewarning, it will make Petrie's posts seem like a love letter). The WODs are at the bottom of each blog post, scroll back a few weeks to find the one that starts a new cycle and go from there. If you were to do a program like that, you should drop your pre-WOD 3x5/5x5 lifts, as the program already combines strength and met-con work.
Another thing to consider is your form for all lifts, but especially for the compounds and even more especially for the Olympic lifts. Due to combination of often lax coaching standards ad the very nature of the program itself, CF has a tendency to produce some pretty sub-par form, which will hinder your progress even if you escape injury. Of course, you could have darn good technique for all I know, but it's just another thing to consider.