If Vettel does get a one race ban - who'll drive his car? Hmmmm.
Giovinazzi
If Vettel does get a one race ban - who'll drive his car? Hmmmm.
It's very even between Hamilton and Vettel right now. If not for the headrest they would have finished ahead of each other an equal amount of times. There is no favorite between them.Jokes on you haters, whether he gets banned or not I'm pretty sure he will win the championship. Quote me for shame or glory. Actually that could be a nice tag.
Hamilton at Spa 2008 is also a heated debate still.And there will always be people to blame Hamilton like they blame Glock for Brazil 2008.
I disagree with banning him from a race or deducting points. The decision was made during the race, they could of black flagged him, they didn't. If he gets a points reduction or a one race ban it's actually penalising him in two successive races. They made the mistake of giving him a stop go penalty, what they should of done is either black flagged him or waited till the end of the race and decided on the punishment.
I disagree with banning him from a race or deducting points. The decision was made during the race, they could of black flagged him, they didn't. If he gets a points reduction or a one race ban it's actually penalising him in two successive races. They made the mistake of giving him a stop go penalty, what they should of done is either black flagged him or waited till the end of the race and decided on the punishment.
Just wanted to randomly comment on how much I love F1 for being so ridiculously detailed that it would go through that much telemetry data for this. Not only just the data on that lap, but compared to the other safety cars around the same corner for control data? Talk about thorough. I'm sure they could have put on traces of other drivers through the corner for comparison, too. Seems the car telemetry is 20 data points a second, but the positional data is much more frequent than that.
Road Rage Vettel is weird. He was still pretty chill at the end of his RBR run and in "gives zero fucks" mode the past few seasons. I wonder what's changed. He doesn't need to win any more championships to prove anything to anyone, so why be such a dick now? Is the culture at Ferrari that toxic and competitive? This is largely a conspiracy theory, but I think the reason they've kept Kimi around like this is because they feel obligated to support the team's most recent champion (even if it's been an entire decade).
Issue with vettel and it's down to the casuals spectators saying "if that was on the road he would lose his licence and more" etc...it's road rage and the FIA need show it's not acceptable for the sponsors and what not
Well for the last few seasons he hasn't had a championship-capable car. This year he does.
He's always been petulant when things don't go his way
Has nothing to do with "casuals" or sponsors. This kind of behaviour is unacceptable, period. Hitting a competitor, going on the radio and calling a competitor and the race official all kinds of names for minutes on end. Vettel has done both of these things in less than a year.
Do that in another sport and see what happens. They were very lenient after the Mexico incident, I think, and they put him on probation instead of giving him a red card. The more I think about it, the more I feel like he broke that probation. He should get a race ban, because maybe then he'll learn.
With respect, a lot of F1 drivers are like this - especially those used to winning.
Oh yeah I agree completely. I think if you were to search for F1 champions who haven't been bastards at some point you'd find a very short list.
As F1's new owner, Liberty Media, gradually makes changes, Auto Motor und Sport reports that a show event is being planned before next year's winter tests begin.
Rather than the staggered team presentations witnessed in recent years, often closed off to media, all cars would be presented in one place, with fans invited.
What is this "we saw emotion its good for the show" crap from some former drivers?
I mean i am all for emotion. Like Vettel going ham (no pun intented) on Verstappen in Mexico. But for me there is a limit of talking or side sweeping somebody with cars.
Liberty Media continues to win: http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/355162/formula-1-considers-launch-show-for-fans/
(been a long time since I watched wrestling)>
So the question is why did the race director contiually use the SC when the VSC would have been just as effective and arguably safer?
Answer: it's all about the show. It's like WWE with Vettel as the Undertaker and Crashtappen as Mr Perfect. #Blessed can be Ted Dibaze or IRS.
(been a long time since I watched wrestling)>
Liberty Media continues to win: http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/355162/formula-1-considers-launch-show-for-fans/
Doesn't put that unnecessary pressure on the teams to have the new car ready for the event? Some of them usually present it on the first or second test. I assume they'd simply opt out of that event?
Hamilton calling on Charlie Whiting really rubs me the wrong way. Call it out to your race engineer, your team, Toto or whoever but communicate with the team. Let the governing bodies do what they are supposed to do and if they don't, then absolutely call them out. I can't recall what it was Vettel had said in Mexico to/about Charlie but obviously my stance is the same. You show enough respect for the governing bodies to do the right thing. I don't want to see drivers calling on him for decisions, ever, like that what their race team is there for.
Hamilton calling on Charlie Whiting really rubs me the wrong way. Call it out to your race engineer, your team, Toto or whoever but communicate with the team. Let the governing bodies do what they are supposed to do and if they don't, then absolutely call them out. I can't recall what it was Vettel had said in Mexico to/about Charlie but obviously my stance is the same. You show enough respect for the governing bodies to do the right thing. I don't want to see drivers calling on him for decisions, ever, like that what their race team is there for.
did Ham call Charlie or something?
did Ham call Charlie or something?
During the race, when they told him about VET's 10s stop and go penalty, he said something like "that's not enough, you know that Charlie!"
Hamilton calling on Charlie Whiting really rubs me the wrong way. Call it out to your race engineer, your team, Toto or whoever but communicate with the team. Let the governing bodies do what they are supposed to do and if they don't, then absolutely call them out. I can't recall what it was Vettel had said in Mexico to/about Charlie but obviously my stance is the same. You show enough respect for the governing bodies to do the right thing. I don't want to see drivers calling on him for decisions, ever, like that what their race team is there for.
Liberty Media continues to win: http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/355162/formula-1-considers-launch-show-for-fans/
Plenty of drivers call out Charlie in their radio messages if they feel aggrieved. Even if they don't, what they say is often with the intent of making sure he's aware of how they feel.
But nah it's Hamilton so let's take a shit on him.
Liberty Media continues to win: http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/355162/formula-1-considers-launch-show-for-fans/
So the question is why did the race director contiually use the SC when the VSC would have been just as effective and arguably safer?
Answer: it's all about the show. It's like WWE with Vettel as the Undertaker and Crashtappen as Mr Perfect. #Blessed can be Ted Dibaze or IRS.
(been a long time since I watched wrestling)>
Hamilton calling on Charlie Whiting really rubs me the wrong way. Call it out to your race engineer, your team, Toto or whoever but communicate with the team. Let the governing bodies do what they are supposed to do and if they don't, then absolutely call them out. I can't recall what it was Vettel had said in Mexico to/about Charlie but obviously my stance is the same. You show enough respect for the governing bodies to do the right thing. I don't want to see drivers calling on him for decisions, ever, like that what their race team is there for.
Vettel: Move, move. For f*ck sake. Hes a little f*cker thats what he is.
Vettel: I mean am I the only one or are you not seeing what I am seeing? He is just backing me up into Ricciardo? For f*ck sake.
Vettel: Here is a message for Charlie: F*ck off! F*ck off! Honestly. I mean honestly, I am going to hit someone. I think I have a puncture, rear left.
Ferrari: Tyres are fine, tyres are fine
Vettel: Here is a message for Charlie: F*ck off! He has to give me the position. End of the story.
Ferrari: Charlie says no.
Vettel: Well heres a message for Charlie. F*ck off! Honestly, f*ck off.
I literally pointed out Vettel had done it but was bringing Hamilton up as his was the most recent occurrence of it.
And yeah, plenty of drivers probably do it when they feel aggrieved and I can understand why they would do it but I still believe like it's not 'great' behaviour. It's ultimately ok in the grand scheme of things but like seeing soccer players pointing out stuff to a ref, I feel like there should be a level of respect shown to arguably one of the most intensely observed regulatory practices in sports. Maybe that's the rugby fan in me hah.
Like I said, that behaviour rubs me wrong. Not specifically Hamilton, just that instance of him doing it. Don't mean to ruffle the feathers of HAM fans, my apologies.
This is nothing to do with Hamilton/Vettel. But since they've got the VSC system. Wouldn't it make more sense for the field to have to do a time of arrival lap when the SC pulls in, instead of putting the release into the control of the lead car?
Seb was SCREAMING towards the end of the exchange.
Ok, so why is 90% of the Hamilton-Vettel discussion about the blame game?
Does it really matter after Vettel just bumped his car into Hamilton the second time?
Ok, so why is 90% of the Hamilton-Vettel discussion about the blame game?
Does it really matter after Vettel just bumped his car into Hamilton the second time?
The real answer is that the track is narrow and there were marshals on-track and it's easier to direct traffic to a side of the road around the danger if they're all bunched up and following a pace car that can slow down where necessary.
Yeah seemed to work well, so . . . .
No.
It worked fine, what are you on about?
Even Hamilton had no issue with the first crash, it happens. What he and everyone else actually cares about is Vettel losing his top.
So the question is why did the race director contiually use the SC when the VSC would have been just as effective and arguably safer?
Answer: it's all about the show. It's like WWE with Vettel as the Undertaker and Crashtappen as Mr Perfect. #Blessed can be Ted Dibaze or IRS.
(been a long time since I watched wrestling)>