D
Deleted member 231381
Unconfirmed Member
Suggest a temporary exit. Obviously.
Well, they have a lot of experience with German unifications at this point.
Suggest a temporary exit. Obviously.
I didn't actually know that - I mean, I did know German states issued separate bonds but I wasn't aware that the federal German government refuses to act as a backer. What would the federal government actually do if one of the states entered a bankruptcy proceeding?
I didn't actually know that - I mean, I did know German states issued separate bonds but I wasn't aware that the federal German government refuses to act as a backer. What would the federal government actually do if one of the states entered a bankruptcy proceeding?
What would the federal government actually do if one of the states entered a bankruptcy proceeding?
Not mutually exclusive!
Probably the same they did after the German unification to deal with the costs: introduce a special tax ("solidarity surcharge") for as long as it's necessary. Some politicians demand that the same is done to make the money Germany spent for doomed Euro bailout loans explicit.
Currently, that tax is 5.5% of income tax, corporate tax, and capital gains tax. (It started at 7,5%). Politicians suggest that if would make the bailout expenses explicit, it would have to rise to ~8%.
Wait.
Y'mean that the whole time that they were on the Deustche mark and pumping money into East Germany.... there was an amply visible tax that west germans had to pay to explicitly help the east?
They may look favorably on the Euro because its impact has not been all negative. The Euro also fixed their inflation problem and - for a time - significantly reduced borrowing costs. Five years before the Euro, Greece was paying 20% yield on treasury bonds. Five years after, it was paying 4%.
In hindsight, people say that making it much cheaper for the governments to borrow created a moral hazard and ultimately got them into this debt mess, but if that money had primarily been used for modernization of infrastructure and increasing the competitiveness of export industries rather than for social programs, their economy might have come out of this in a stronger position than when it entered. For all the condemnation of austerity in these discussions, few people acknowledge that if you are in a position where you have to pay double-digit yields on government bonds, you are going to be forced into de facto austerity because of how expensive it becomes to take on debt. The Euro enabled almost a decade of stimulus spending.
Well, in any case, that probably no longer applies for Greece. Although their bond prices had recovered back to 5% as recently as last fall, I imagine this crisis will keep them higher for a while.
Arguably both are necessary. Loan repayments limit the amount of stimulus that can be applied after all.This is true. Debt relief would be nice as well as a stimulus.
They still don't like them much.Wait.
Y'mean that the whole time that they were on the Deustche mark and pumping money into East Germany.... there was an amply visible tax that west germans had to pay to explicitly help the east?
Fml, and people wonder why it took the population so fucking long to warm up to the east. Twats, the lot of them.
Yes. We are still doing it. That here is a scan of the first row of my income tax overview on my last pay slip.
The amount of money I pay for that tax is explicit and visible to me every month, and it is ... not irrelevant.
Depends who you ask, really.East Germans are Germans. Greeks are Greeks, so...
That is really quite stupid. I think one of the reasons why you don't hear a peep about transfer payments in America is that barely anyone actually realizes that it is a thing, and most of the people who do realize it is a thing know that it is an essential part of a large, functioning economy.
Once in a lifetime politicians decided to introduce a tax that is readily visible for all people, instead of hiding it as much as they can, and you call that stupid ^^
Once in a lifetime politicians decided to introduce a tax that is readily visible for all people, instead of hiding it as much as they can, and you call that stupid ^^
Haha, in this case they shouldnt have! I am quite sure if every New Yorker realized that they were massively subsidizing Mississippi there would either be some sort of movement to end it or just create more state/regional tension. I can hear it now.
New Yorker: "These morons are complaining about welfare and government spending, but my taxes are the only thing that is keeping this pathetic state afloat? Fuck that shit!
Mississippian: "Fuck those elitist New Yorkers! We are allowing you dipshits to stay competitive with a lower currency and are being exploited by the wealthier states! If there werent transfer payments, then it would be pointless for us to be in this stupid union! Secession soon.
Maybe I am pessimistic, but I don't have enough faith in people that most everyone will take the time to figure out why transfer payments are necessary.
Haha, in this case they shouldnt have! I am quite sure if every New Yorker realized that they were massively subsidizing Mississippi there would either be some sort of movement to end it or just create more state/regional tension. I can hear it now.
New Yorker: "These morons are complaining about welfare and government spending, but my taxes are the only thing that is keeping this pathetic state afloat? Fuck that shit!
Mississippian: "Fuck those elitist New Yorkers! We are allowing you dipshits to stay competitive with a lower currency and are being exploited by the wealthier states! If there werent transfer payments, then it would be pointless for us to be in this stupid union! Secession soon.
Maybe I am pessimistic, but I don't have enough faith in people that most everyone will take the time to figure out why transfer payments are necessary.
USA is a superpower for a reason.Haha, in this case they shouldnt have! I am quite sure if every New Yorker realized that they were massively subsidizing Mississippi there would either be some sort of movement to end it or just create more state/regional tension. I can hear it now.
New Yorker: "These morons are complaining about welfare and government spending, but my taxes are the only thing that is keeping this pathetic state afloat? Fuck that shit!
Mississippian: "Fuck those elitist New Yorkers! We are allowing you dipshits to stay competitive with a lower currency and are being exploited by the wealthier states! If there werent transfer payments, then it would be pointless for us to be in this stupid union! Secession soon.
Maybe I am pessimistic, but I don't have enough faith in people that most everyone will take the time to figure out why transfer payments are necessary.
That should be happening, actually. Make people in the Bible belt realize that their Republican leaders are nothing more but idiots, who preach water and drink wine (from California, for free). They should be asking their MPs why they take all that money from "socialist" states.
What about food stamps?Just the idea of transfer payments is 'socialist'. Rich states give to the poor states so that the United States economy can function. Well, at least republicans would consider it socialist.
What about food stamps?
Maybe I am pessimistic, but I don't have enough faith in people that most everyone will take the time to figure out why transfer payments are necessary.
I think, as in most cases, trying to educate the public is the more sensible choice than hiding this stuff. Of course it's difficult, but I believe that, in the long run, it's not only more beneficial but absolutely necessary for a democracy to work.
Case in point: Here in Switzerland we have these transfer payments as well, of course - both among the individual districts of a cantons (= states) as well as on a federal level between the cantons. Now, due to our political system, adjustments to the underlying law usually have to pass a referendum (in general, everything that matters has to pass a referendum). Now the funny thing is that it's only the politicians that are being total shitheads regarding this whole business, because it's a cheap way for them to score political points. The voting populace, however, usually passes every referendum that has to do with transfer payments with *very* sizable majorities (> 65% yes votes, in some cases even around 75% yes votes). So count me among the optimists here
Of course, all of this doesn't mean that the people from one canton do not hate the people from the neighbouring cantons and vice versa. That is still a given.
Austerity?
I really don't know, afaik this hasn't happened yet.
We already had 2 world wars. The second one gave birth to the EU. We need WWIIIUSA is a superpower for a reason.
50 separate states a la Eurozone wouldn't grant them that prestigious status...
Maybe Europe needs its own Civil War to become unified.
BILD knows its readers and launches the Schäuble hype train. The comments are... typisch BILD.
USA is a superpower for a reason.
50 separate states a la Eurozone wouldn't grant them that prestigious status...
Maybe Europe needs its own Civil War to become unified.
A united Europe would be quite a thing.
A united Europe would be quite a thing.
It'd be interesting, but I don't see how it could happen without a huge war. It's rare governments agree to merge without conflict.
Haha, in this case they shouldnt have! I am quite sure if every New Yorker realized that they were massively subsidizing Mississippi there would either be some sort of movement to end it or just create more state/regional tension. I can hear it now.
New Yorker: "These morons are complaining about welfare and government spending, but my taxes are the only thing that is keeping this pathetic state afloat? Fuck that shit!
Mississippian: "Fuck those elitist New Yorkers! We are allowing you dipshits to stay competitive with a lower currency and are being exploited by the wealthier states! If there werent transfer payments, then it would be pointless for us to be in this stupid union! Secession soon.
Maybe I am pessimistic, but I don't have enough faith in people that most everyone will take the time to figure out why transfer payments are necessary.
No, that's where you are wrong. America is a single country, and they are a proud and patriotic country. They all know that rich states subsidise poor states and they are ok with it. That's what patriotism is, the act of giving up something for civic society.
Australia is the same. Canada is the same. In every single country around the world, money gets redistributed from the richer parts to the poorer parts. The problem here is that no one is a patriotic European.
Australia is the same. Canada is the same. In every single country around the world, money gets redistributed from the richer parts to the poorer parts. The problem here is that no one is a patriotic European.
I just had a closer look at today's vote in the German parliament, and I realized that one of the CDU MPs is named Cajus Julius Caesar. His oldest son and grand son have the same name. What the hell, lol...
I feel more European than German, lol.
It's time for Varoufakis and Schäuble to team-up at Valve then. Realtime economic model in HL3 confirmed.Schäuble said in an interview published in the current issue of Der Spiegel that he would resign if forced to act against his convictions. He admitted that he and Merkel have had some differences in opinion over the last weeks.
Well, he was there 42 years, it's time to say goodbye and join some corporation like everyone else. There are surely a lot of pleases were they could use his sharp tongue.Schäuble said in an interview published in the current issue of Der Spiegel that he would resign if forced to act against his convictions. He admitted that he and Merkel have had some differences in opinion over the last weeks.
The UK has always been only there for their own benefits. You don't believe in the European project, that could benefit Europe as a whole and help us stay relevant in this fast evolving, globalised world. To this day the UK is entitled to many privileges, which is absolutely ridiculous. It can't be, that one country has more rights and less commitments than others. Yet you are the most vocal country, which never stops complaining. Can't wait for the UK to leave in 2017, tbh.
Would be really helpful is that referendum manages both to get scum like Cameron and Farage out of the Union and manages to split up the UK.England will vote out. Scotland will vote to stay in. Interesting times are ahead.
The problem that got Greece into this mess is the currency in the first place. It was accepted into the Euro under false pretenses as they believed the report given by Greece that vastly over-estimated the wealth of the drachma.
Can we stop with the hilarous blame shifting ?
Noone forced them to falsify financial reports and noone forced them to take more debt that they can pay.
The problem that got Greece into this mess is the currency in the first place. It was accepted into the Euro under false pretenses as they believed the report given by Greece that vastly over-estimated the wealth of the drachma.