I would love to see their analysis on this situation, though.
Here's Friedman on the Euro.
http://www.vox.com/2015/6/29/8859741/greek-financial-crisis-euro
I would love to see their analysis on this situation, though.
You only need look to Greece's modern history for the answer to that.Seriously. Like how is this even a thing?
I remember studying the EU as part of EU Law studies for my law degree. The cracks in the edifice have always been so blatant - the democratic deficit at the heart of it, the issue of competing national interests in the areas of monetary and foreign policy, the lack of economic freedom for smaller nations when they run into trouble. All that has happened is that these cracks have been exposed. How can they now be ignored, now that we know where they can lead? How can one support the EU as currently constituted?
I'm someone who loves the idea of Europe and, in particular, loves the jurisprudence of European Law and its strong pro-human rights, pro-consumer stance. (Even if I think the result of the Van Gend en Loos decision should have been put to a vote in the first place.) I love the idea of the single market from a trade perspective, I love the free borders, I love the fact that the close union keeps war a distant memory. But the set-up as currently built is not functioning correctly, and no union that cuts another member adrift like this can be considered a true union.
False. It would be against the constitution if it were proposed without going through parliament first, which it did.Problems with the referendum are:
a) its against the constitution
Article 44
1. Under extraordinary circumstances of an urgent and unforeseeable need, the President of the Republic may, upon the proposal of the Cabinet, issue acts of legislative content. Such acts shall be submitted to Parliament for ratification, as specified in the provisions of article 72 paragraph 1, within forty days of their issuance or within forty days from the convocation of a parliamentary session. Should such acts not be submitted to Parliament within the above time-limits or if they should not be ratified by Parliament within three months of their submission, they will henceforth cease to be in force.
* 2. The President of the Republic shall by decree proclaim a referendum on crucial national matters following a resolution voted by an absolute majority of the total number of Members of Parliament, taken upon proposal of the Cabinet.
A referendum on Bills passed by Parliament regulating important social matters, with the exception of the fiscal ones shall be proclaimed by decree by the President of the Republic, if this is decided by three-fifths of the total number of its members, following a proposal of two-fifths of the total number of its members, and as the Standing Orders and the law for the application of the present paragraph provide. No more than two proposals to hold a referendum on a Bill can be introduced in the same parliamen- tary term.
Should a Bill be voted, the time-limit stated in article 42 paragraph 1 begins the day the referendum is held.
* 3. The President of the Republic may under exceptional circumstances address messages to the People with the consent opinion of the Prime Minister. Those messages should be countersigned by the Prime Minister and published in the Government Gazette.
You only need look to Greece's modern history for the answer to that.
I like how Krugman is constantly referred to by his title, "Nobel Prize winning". Unlike, say, Hayek or Friedman, who more commonly get referred by their titles "Wankstain General". I mean, is it an important indicator of authority or not?
(I'll give you a hint: It's not.)
Are there any news yet on what the wording of the referendum will be?
I'm not sure I'm following, can you elaborate?
I'm not sure I'm following, can you elaborate?
Sir I would like to drink a beverage of your choosing with you.
That sounds rather a lot like you like the EU but not the Eurozone, no? I mean, the UK has all the things you mentioned - free borders, free trade, no wars, pan-european jurisprudence etc. without being in lockstep with the rest of Europe's economies lest we either find ourselves priced out of the market or with tiny wages. I mean, we do find ourselves with tiny wages, but for different reasons...
I'm not sure I'm following, can you elaborate?
Seldom have I met anyone as dense as you seem to be.
So either you have never heard about what an analogy is (seeing as you failed to recognize it, since the idea of greek tax money killing palestinians. Fyi, I used this analogy because I didn't want to play the third reich card), or you ran out of arguments and read something that I've never said, leading this discussion ad absurdum.
Either way, you seem not to understand the most basic of principles and you're wasting my time and energy. Off to the blacklist with you to the other morons.
![]()
Here's the ballot. No is on top!
Looking at the program my hand cannot go to yes. Let's see what happens...
![]()
Here's the ballot. No is on top!
Looking at the program my hand cannot go to yes. Let's see what happens...
Invasion of Cyprus,Imia crysis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_invasion_of_Cyprus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imia/Kardak
Yes?Are you serious right now?
Thanks.
REFERENDUM of July 5, 2015 must be accepted THE DRAFT AGREEMENT NOT TO tabled by the European Commission, the European CENTRAL BANK AND THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND ON THE EUROGROUP 25,062,015 and consists of two parts which make up the SINGLE PROPOSAL FOR THE FIRST DOCUMENT TPLOFOREITA REFORMS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE CURRENT PROGRAM AND BEYOND (REFORMS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE CURRENT PROGRAMME and beyond.) AND THE SECOND PRELIMINARY DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS («PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS DEBT SUSTAINABILITY).
Say what you want about him but he certainly nailed it.
Is there a translation available?
Should the proposal that was submitted by the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund at the Eurogroup of June 25, 2015, which consists of two parts that together constitute their comprehensive proposal, be accepted?
NO / YES
In all seriousness Turkey really is the last thing Greece should be concerned with at the moment. Turkey has their own issues to deal with in their southern border and I don't think any military action would be taken as a) it would be seen as an offensive action and b) both are NATO members.
Yeah being under a dictatorship didn't do it any good. Did you make an effort?
Oh I'm greek btw.Because of its cultural history is it impossible for Greece to etablish a working tax system. Sure.
What an racist idiot you are.
My point was, and I'll say it one last time:
There people didn't trust the government.
The people exploited an easily exploitable system.
Nothing was done by the parties to combat either problem.
THIS IS POLITICAL SCIENCES 101.
Nice to see that the Greek people will have sufficient time to debate on the yes and no answer to a question that no one has put forward.
More democracy in the EU probably means a closer union and a sacrifice of further national sovereignty. I'd take that, if it was properly implemented. Problem is that such things would have to be voted on, and there's no way the people of Europe would vote for closer Union and less sovereignty, neither before, nor especially after, this Greek fiasco. So where does that leave us?
But this is kind of getting off-topic from the Greek issue at hand.
yes. and now they have to live with the consequences.
Oh I'm greek btw.
And once again, you failed to see the point. I have reached the point where I believe you are borderline retarded.
I mean this insult-free, as far as that's possible. Your argumentation is almost logic-free.
My point was, and I'll say it one last time:
There people didn't trust the government.
The people exploited an easily exploitable system.
Nothing was done by the parties to combat either problem.
THIS IS POLITICAL SCIENCES 101.
That the Greeks don't have a corruption and paying taxes genes somewhere is obviously.
But history is never an excuse for not fixing a broken system.
There is not much to discuss about that topic. But now I slowly understand why that system is still broken in Greece.
I guess most will just see it as:Most Greeks won't even be able to understand these documents, especially in the limited time given. Are they even handing out translated versions of these proposals in advance? This is all ridiculous. What are they doing...
How about voting in a government that does something about that corruption. Might be a start.And who is responsible for this? Say it.
Most Greeks won't even be able to understand these documents, especially in the limited time given. Are they even handing out translated versions of these proposals in advance? This is all ridiculous. What are they doing...
Most Greeks won't even be able to understand these documents, especially in the limited time given. Are they even handing out translated versions of these proposals in advance? This is all ridiculous. What are they doing...
I don't think it is necessarily a reasonable concern. The trouble is that for a lot of Greeks convincing them of this would be nigh impossible. It is a very very delicate matter. The 70s are very recent. Just look at how long and hard Britain and France fought to ensure that German unification could not and should not under any circumstance happen. They kept such matters under wraps but even with Germany in NATO and a peaceful ally of theirs they would not accept it on fears of the fourth Reich. It's easy to laugh before you start putting matters into perspective.Ahh I see, thanks. I wasn't sure if you mean the issues from the past decade or so or dating back to Istanbul/Constantinople.
Yes?
Thanks.
In all seriousness Turkey really is the last thing Greece should be concerned with at the moment. Turkey has their own issues to deal with in their southern border and I don't think any military action would be taken as a) it would be seen as an offensive action and b) both are NATO members.
Most Greeks won't even be able to understand these documents, especially in the limited time given. Are they even handing out translated versions of these proposals in advance? This is all ridiculous. What are they doing...
How about voting in a government that does something about that corruption. Might be a start.
While they had tons of other stuff to work in, it isn't like you can only focus on one task at a time as a government. You have a whole taxation department that can be instructed to crack down on those things. As far as I know, that didn't happen, or at least not yet or too little.Which is why they just ousted Pasok and went in a bold new direction. Attacking corruption and tax evaders was one of syriza's campaign promisses.
"but nothing was done!".
True. alas, they have had far bigger fish to fry in these turbulent times.
Coming up next: even more radical parties.
Greece had been politically stagnant for several decades at that point. It's hardly surprising either, that phenomenon can be seen in a large majority of western developed nations. In the first place voters are risk averse when times are good, and the status quo firmly rooted.While they had tons of other stuff to work in, it isn't like you can only focus on one task at a time as a government. You have a whole taxation department that can be instructed to crack down on those things. As far as I know, that didn't happen, or at least not yet or too little.
And that does not excuse the decades before where they didn't vote for such parties because times were better.
LOL, yeah that's a big risk. It's like having NK as a neighbor.
So either Tsipras/Varoufakis are the poster boys for ineptitude and should be the first search result for incompetency on Google and Wikipedia - or they did it on purpose, forcing their country out of the Euro against the will of their populace.
as a Turkish/American I send my deepest sympathies to my fellow Greek brothers & sisters. They have showed their solidarity with us when we were hit the '99 earthquake (which led to "earthquake diplomacy") and now it's our time.
I think it can easily be interpreted both ways. We just don't know what everyones motivations are. If you support Syriza, you can see it like they tried their best and the Troika never wanted to help. If you are more in line with the Troika, it is easy to see Syriza as incompetent or even sabotaging the negotiations.I've been following this pretty closely the last few weeks, and if anyone comes across as incompetent it's the troika. Syriza tried, but it's obvious that the troika is trying to force them out of office, and if they pull the offer off the table now it just shows how insincere they were from the beginning. I think Krugman is spot on in his analysis of this clusterfuck.
"Fuck democracy, money rules" is the message we're being given here.
But he's one sexy beastWasn't Samaras the guy who burnt all the hard drives and stole all the toilet paper before vacating the PM's office?
I wouldn't trust that guy to tell me whether water is wet.