anonymous_abc
Member
Why would they attack Greece when it would be cheaper to buy up large parts of it
You realise I meant petran's statement as being ridiculous, not yours.
Sorry if it wasn't obvious.
Why would they attack Greece when it would be cheaper to buy up large parts of it
Wait, people Believe Turkey will attack Greece if they lover the military budget?
Hah ah haha ha ah
hah a
ha
There are people who think Russia will attack Sweden unless we spend billions on defense and join NATO.
Ridiculous or not this is a very touchy and emotionally charged topic in Greece which is why every political power is scared to address it. Except for manipulating it for easy votes.You realise I meant petran's statement as being ridiculous, not yours.
Sorry if it wasn't obvious.
The two aren't really comparable.
Russia >>>> Turkey and Turkey & Greece are both in NATO.
No, seriously. Don't try to understand Greece-Turkey. Just don't. It doesn't make sense, it's purely emotional.
It's not hard to understand. They hate each other after hundreds of years of dominance by one and more recently border disputes.No, seriously. Don't try to understand Greece-Turkey. Just don't. It doesn't make sense, it's purely emotional.
That kind of applies to Greece's whole handling of this affair IMO, emotional and lacking rationality.
The parts of Greece that weren't taken by Turkey were taken by its catholic allies during the second crusadeThe only part of Greece that was never taken over by Turkey were some Western islands that were lol Catholic
That would've been the best thing for Greece, yes. Would've destroyed the Euro at the time, however.
No, seriously. Don't try to understand Greece-Turkey. Just don't. It doesn't make sense, it's purely emotional.
This is all hindsight admittedly. At the time, the thought that the Euro should forever be made irreversible made sense. But now it looks like that Greece will exit anyway, despite the high costs invested thus far.
Yeah let's try to downplay the deaths of soldiers and fighter pilots in peace times.
Let's forget that they took northern cyprus in the most cowardly manner and slaughtered a lot of people.
I mean it's been over 40 years. That's ages man.
I swear it was just like yesterday when I had to drive to Kephalonia to attend the funeral of my friend who was practically shot down in greek airspace by a a turkish jet. But again, that was 10 years ago. Ages!
So based on your nonsesical logic the reason why the Greeks aren't paying taxes is because they don't know if the state would use that money to kill palestinians?
And indeed you can only talk in absolutes if not paying taxes and corruption damage a country like Greece in the way it did in the past decades.
See? Can of worms. Don't even go there.
I'm sorry man, didn't mean it like that. All I'm saying is that from an outside perspective Greece's fear of being attacked by Turkey can sound ridiculous. I'm not saying Greece shouldn't be afraid of Turkey, not at all.
All sides. You should never forget that the creditors are insisting on measures that have repeatedly failed.
Better to open that can of worms and deal with it than to spend 400bln Euros on a military you can't afford.
At some point, Greece, both it's government and it's people need to realize you've been spending too much and you need to balance the books, properly (not cook them).
France and Germany put a priority on maintaining arms deals after the 2008 financial crisis, rather than see Greece cut spending that would hit their defense companies, European member of parliament Daniel Cohn-Bendit said March 5.
The creditors also want a stable government. If anything is going to work out. Adjustment in certain areas must be eased in or you risk going back to square one. If the creditors had realised this the previous government wouldn't have collapsed on itself and they wouldn't have had to deal with Syriza right now.Better to open that can of worms and deal with it than to spend 400bln Euros on a military you can't afford.
At some point, Greece, both it's government and it's people need to realize you've been spending too much and you need to balance the books, properly (not cook them).
That's what the creditor proposals have been about, bringing some reality to a nation that, judging by it's own counter-proposals, is living in cloud cuckoo land.
You realise I meant petran's statement as being ridiculous, not yours.
Sorry if it wasn't obvious.
I'm pretty certain the creditors would have prefered for Greece not to be a democracy.Unless of course the creditors would like to suggest that Greece is not a democracy.
France and Germany put a priority on maintaining arms deals after the 2008 financial crisis, rather than see Greece cut spending that would hit their defense companies, European member of parliament Daniel Cohn-Bendit said March 5.
Better to open that can of worms and deal with it than to spend 400bln Euros on a military you can't afford.
Aaah, so that's Greece's plan! They're going to invade the US!
Better to open that can of worms and deal with it than to spend 400bln Euros on a military you can't afford.
At some point, Greece, both it's government and it's people need to realize you've been spending too much and you need to balance the books, properly (not cook them).
That's what the creditor proposals have been about, bringing some reality to a nation that, judging by it's own counter-proposals, is living in cloud cuckoo land.
Strategic plans have been made to strike major US gyros processing facilities.US Gyros is an insult to all of us Greeks so yes that's the plan
I keep thinking the 'Strap yourself in, Europe - it's gonna get hot' thread is about this crisis, lol.
And yes, that Juncker speech shows that it's getting pretty hot.
Turkey's military budget is the 10th largest in the world. They are not impressed by Greece's current military budget either.With Turkey as neighbour this amounts to suicide
The combined length of period under which Greece was in default during the modern era totaled 90 years, or approximately 50% of the total period that the country has been independent.
Well I guess another default coming up tomorrow. That will make it 6 times they have now defaulted in the last 189 years. Here is an interesting piece from an online article:
LINK
Something is serious wrong with their culture and the government they vote to put in place. Time after time, they get into serious dept. And looking at the current amateurish government and how they dealt with the current issues just highlights their problems. Calling a referendum on something, which none even knows anything about, 5 days after the financial deadline is clearly a joke of some sort.
I guess the EU will now have to start handing out even more money, food etc, to stop them from starving. How did they manage to get them self in such a mess....unbelievable. It will make austerity look like a holiday paradise after they default.
Please try to avoid the general fallacies pertaining to "lazy dirty smelly greeks, they didn't do nothing" and that sort of thing.
Juncker's speech about his tragic betrayal surely wasn't as hot as the people's who set themselves on fire to commit suicide in Athens.
I have very limited sympathy with Juncker.
It's nice for Juncker that you have limited sympathy with him. I have none.
I like how Krugman put it. The troika offered the 'reverse Corleone' - An offer you can't accept. Or perhaps it was the Michael Corleone - 'My offer, Senator, is nothing.'
If you try to force a government out of office with an unacceptable deal so that you can get a set of pliant yes-men you run the risk of exactly this kind of chaos happening. Unless they really, REALLY believe that these offers went far enough or that austerity has been working, in which case they are delusional and incompetent.
I remember studying the EU as part of EU Law studies for my law degree. The cracks in the edifice have always been so blatant - the democratic deficit at the heart of it, the issue of competing national interests in the areas of monetary and foreign policy, the lack of economic freedom for smaller nations when they run into trouble. All that has happened is that these cracks have been exposed. How can they now be ignored, now that we know where they can lead? How can one support the EU as currently constituted?
I'm someone who loves the idea of Europe and, in particular, loves the jurisprudence of European Law and its strong pro-human rights, pro-consumer stance. (Even if I think the result of the Van Gend en Loos decision should have been put to a vote in the first place.) I love the idea of the single market from a trade perspective, I love the free borders, I love the fact that the close union keeps war a distant memory. But the set-up as currently built is not functioning correctly, and no union that cuts another member adrift like this can be considered a true union.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has expressed his support for the Greek governments decision to carry out a referendum next week in an article for the New York Times.
In his article Krugman begins by noting that it has been obvious for some time that the creation of the euro was a terrible mistake and that Europe never had the preconditions for a successful single currency before explaining how the creditor demands for harsh austerity have failed to yield the necessary result.
Mr. Krugman argued that despite carrying out budget cuts, raising taxes and reducing the public sector by 25%, which if all added up would be more than enough to eliminate the original deficit and turn it into a large surplus, the Greek economy collapsed largely as a result of those very austerity measures, dragging revenues down with it.
The problem with Grexit has always been the risk of financial chaos, of a banking system disrupted by panicked withdrawals and of business hobbled both by banking troubles and by uncertainty over the legal status of debts. Thats why successive Greek governments have acceded to austerity demands, and why even Syriza, the ruling leftist coalition, was willing to accept the austerity that has already been imposed. All it asked for was, in effect, a standstill on further austerity he added.
The economist then explained that the Greek people should vote No in Sundays referendum for three reasons: First, we now know that ever-harsher austerity is a dead end: after five years Greece is in worse shape than ever. Second, much and perhaps most of the feared chaos from Grexit has already happened. With banks closed and capital controls imposed, theres not that much more damage to be done. Finally, acceding to the troikas ultimatum would represent the final abandonment of any pretense of Greek independence.
I'm someone who loves the idea of Europe and, in particular, loves the jurisprudence of European Law and its strong pro-human rights, pro-consumer stance. (Even if I think the result of the Van Gend en Loos decision should have been put to a vote in the first place.) I love the idea of the single market from a trade perspective, I love the free borders, I love the fact that the close union keeps war a distant memory. But the set-up as currently built is not functioning correctly, and no union that cuts another member adrift like this can be considered a true union.
I like how Krugman is constantly referred to by his title, "Nobel Prize winning". Unlike, say, Hayek or Friedman, who more commonly get referred by their titles "Wankstain General". I mean, is it an important indicator of authority or not?
(I'll give you a hint: It's not.)
I can promise you that Turkey is literally the least of your worries.
Problem with the referendum is it was needed prior to now. Too late.