Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
Take notes. This is how you junior.
Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
Holy shit, nice work. Love to see this on a hoodie.
Dude submit it for the Gaf shop and I will buy a shirt and wear it at Gamescom.Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
That is frickin awesome.Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
Best newcomer?Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
Make the orb at the bottom the GAF logo then submit it to the shirt store.Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
Well you can save films in Reach just my hitting start and going to the file browser. Much much better than Halo 3 were you would actually have to go to theater to save a film.Also, for Halo 4's theater, I hope the organization for films is closer to Halo 3 than Reach. I don't like how Reach organizes your film clips by map. It feels clumsy. Also Bregmann wants the ability to save a film from the post-game carnage report.
That's the point though. Given the maps we have in Reach, Team Objective being 5v5 makes no sense. All the maps play significantly worse, some are borderline ruined given the gametype and some suffer from significant performance issues with 10 players.I never mentioned the map sizes really. I meant that as a gametype since there is that 10 second down time and it requires much more coordination between teammates that 5v5 works for objective.
The entire problem with 5v5 objective in Reach is that the maps cannot support it and that the settings need to be tweaked to accommodate the change of playstyle.
lol perfectNow move to Europe and try to play it.
Agreed, I kind of expected it to be this way in Reach once we learned about how the Elites were in the game.I hate infection but even I know that SvE Infection makes a universe of sense.
From their natural buffs of resistance and speed to the fiction behind it, the gameplay is much more enjoyable and balanced.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJEvt5H6jvk
Although I understand and share you frustration with scrubs in Firefight, if Spartan Ops is using a network model even in the same ballpark as Firefight, even if it is significantly improved, I want all the emphasis of matchmaking on connection. I rarely play Reach Firefight because if you don't get host, it is simply a miserable experience 95% of the time.Since we know that Spartan Ops has matchmaking, I have a question.
Will skill or at least experience be a factor in matchmaking for Spartan Ops? Firefight in Reach does not factor that in, prioritizing connection (understandably, given the networking model). But the number of times I've had a good, skilled player in Reach Firefight is comfortably in single digits, out of thousands of games.
Since Spartan Ops looks to be a less grinding, more co-op Campaign style of mode, good partners will be even more important. Will good players find themselves getting paired with good players? And if not, in what ways will the mode encourage careful play and discourage poor? (Limited, non-pooled lives; pooled points during the mission; and so on.)
Firefight in many ways encourages bad players to go nuts, or at least does not motivate them to be careful. The pooled lives in Limited is one example of this; one bad player can drain the entire life pool, and unlimited lives removes any sense of challenge or consequence, turning the mode into a score attack fest. Whether Spartan Ops is fun in matchmaking will be determined by these kinds of decisions.
Make the orb at the bottom the GAF logo then submit it to the shirt store.
So in a 4v4 the maximum score would be 4? Fascinating.
Edit: I guess you could actually get to 7. You really nerd sniped me with this, I can't stop thinking about it lol
Yea, well it's not like they have someone at 343 and Bungie whose job is specifically to communicate with the Halo fans and communities.
...
Alright, should be done in about 10 minutes.
Got bored, made this. Feel free to use it for whatever.
wow
hype ruined
That's a challenge Devo!
No, I am not even good at this.
I'm usually done in about ten minutes too.
wow
hype ruined
Don't worry, the sequels are better than the original.
Precursor Tech are effected by the Halo array. Cryptums are Forerunner tech. made for Meditation & Self-imprisonment or Exile.Precursors and Forerunners are quite different from what i understood.
So are humans and Forerunners.
And Precursors and Humans.
If Precursors can use Cryptums, why not humans as well?
It also occurs to me, maybe Cryptum technology is not Forerunner tech but actually Precursor tech.
Network model for SpOps; same or vastly different than Reach's FF?
Please help me. I am Halo fan.
Precursor Tech are effected by the Halo array. Cryptums are Forerunner tech. made for Meditation & Self-imprisonment or Exile.
Since we know that Spartan Ops has matchmaking, I have a question.
Will skill or at least experience be a factor in matchmaking for Spartan Ops? Firefight in Reach does not factor that in, prioritizing connection (understandably, given the networking model). But the number of times I've had a good, skilled player in Reach Firefight is comfortably in single digits, out of thousands of games.
Since Spartan Ops looks to be a less grinding, more co-op Campaign style of mode, good partners will be even more important. Will good players find themselves getting paired with good players? And if not, in what ways will the mode encourage careful play and discourage poor? (Limited, non-pooled lives; pooled points during the mission; and so on.)
Firefight in many ways encourages bad players to go nuts, or at least does not motivate them to be careful. The pooled lives in Limited is one example of this; one bad player can drain the entire life pool, and unlimited lives removes any sense of challenge or consequence, turning the mode into a score attack fest. Whether Spartan Ops is fun in matchmaking will be determined by these kinds of decisions.
More or Less. ButAh, true. Forgot that bit.
Hmm. Maybe it is based of Precursor Tech though, i mean, kinda got a vibe Forerunners more or less stole a lot from Precursors, just like the Covenant did with Forerunner tech.
You know what happens when you assume...I think it would be okay to assume that they have worked on the network codes.
"Your DDoS must be more severe."
More or Less. ButInvest research in wikis for more data.Ancient Humans Mostly used Precursor Tech. and were Technologically Advanced as the Forerunners.
The funny thing about Cryptum and Primordium is that i practically forgot everything in them after i read them.
Hard to say whether i liked them or not...
lol I just re-thought it, the score can increase unbounded. After the the initial kill which would boot whoever was killed, two players on opposite teams could trade off killing each other, their K/D spreads oscillating back and forth between 0 and 1 forever.maths is so hard, but this did also make me lol.
Same here. I have PDFs of them but it takes too long to read anything, so I plan to get the Audio Books.The funny thing about Cryptum and Primordium is that i practically forgot everything in them after i read them.
Hard to say whether i liked them or not...
Cryptum is still in my head, but I forgot most of the journey thing in Primordium, didn't understand the "end-phase" that well and some things I don't know if they were answered in the book, like was the name of the Woman ever revealed? edit: I mean the human girl, wasn't her name a mystery?The funny thing about Cryptum and Primordium is that i practically forgot everything in them after i read them.
Hard to say whether i liked them or not...
dude submit it, I NEED ITAlrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
EDIT
THE CENTER TEXT WAS AN EXPERIMENT, I UPLOADED THE WRONG ONE!
Although I understand and share you frustration with scrubs in Firefight, if Spartan Ops is using a network model even in the same ballpark as Firefight, even if it is significantly improved, I want all the emphasis of matchmaking on connection. I rarely play Reach Firefight because if you don't get host, it is simply a miserable experience 95% of the time.
Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
EDIT
THE CENTER TEXT WAS AN EXPERIMENT, I UPLOADED THE WRONG ONE!
Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
Cryptum is still in my head, but I forgot most of the journey thing in Primordium, didn't understand the "end-phase" that well and some things I don't know if they were answered in the book, like was the name of the Woman ever revealed?
Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
EDIT
THE CENTER TEXT WAS AN EXPERIMENT, I UPLOADED THE WRONG ONE!
Don't worry, the sequels are better than the original.
Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
EDIT
THE CENTER TEXT WAS AN EXPERIMENT, I UPLOADED THE WRONG ONE!
Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
Alright, here is the alternate text version.
I like the image overall and the first text is better, but I'm not sure if I like the way the text cuts off image.Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
Its nice, you lazily removed the text in the banner at the bottom so id fix that up and the GAF logo needs to be much shaper or its going to looking horrible on a tshirt.
Original since i have not seen it posted and things like this are mega useful.
No. It was not.Cryptum is still in my head, but I forgot most of the journey thing in Primordium, didn't understand the "end-phase" that well and some things I don't know if they were answered in the book, like was the name of the Woman ever revealed?
I know I need to fix the logo, it's edges are slightly transparent. I am probably going to have to rebuild the logo from scratch.
ALSO, the banner at the bottom. Should it say something? What would be an appropriate HaloGAF motto?
Alrighty, I still need to touch up the NeoGAF logo. Before I do that, what does everyone think?
Alright, here is the alternate text version.
BELI343 but in the way like it's done on the other shirts would be cool.I know I need to fix the logo, it's edges are slightly transparent. I am probably going to have to rebuild the logo from scratch.
ALSO, the banner at the bottom. Should it say something? What would be an appropriate HaloGAF motto?
Thanks Hyper, that wouldn't let me sleep if no one answered this lol <3.No. It was not.