Like I said earlier, those who rank the PS3 higher than the PS5 are those who only played on PS3 at that time.
Only three games have a PS4 version. But I can't understand why this is bad. Capcom is praised and the only new gen game game they have launched so far is Dragon's Dogma 2.
Out of all the posters, who said PS3 is the best generation ever? Pretty hyperbolic. In the poll, it's a clear second place for worst system. Skimming the posts people are just talking about the huge variety in new IP Sony made back then vs now. And that doesnt even include all the small scale and Move games, which technically can go on top of it. Sony sure doesnt make a lot of small games or VR2 games this gen that's for sure. And their big SP game are mostly sequels, come out sparsely and are practically all cross gen anyway. For anyone who posted their ranking, how many people ranked PS3 at #1? Most people I think posted PS2. And them from their the rest are a toss up with PS5 often near the bottom or last.
Based on what? I always played on both PC and PS and I think PS3 generation was better, at least so far. Looking at the second half of PS3 and what's scheduled for PS5, I doubt it's going to change.
Yeah… but that's not the case here. It's been a dreadful generation on the big production side of things. There's been times like that before but then you could always find shelter in the kind arms of one of the big three. Many times in Sony's. Not anymore. I'm personally taking cover on Civ VII and wait until the fallout has gone.You can still be great and have a worse comparable console hierarchy.
If worse means best then yes
But I played those second half games on the PS4. It skewed my perception of the Sony generations.
That's not me, bro.
Has the PS5 already cemented itself as the worst Playstation generation in history?
Please don't bring logic here, we should hate Sony only !!! Lol At least he making good points....not the victim card and blaming fanboys. Is ok to have a different opinion and don't blame fanboys, because fanboys are everywhere, don't take personally the poll mate. Pretty much most of...www.neogaf.com
Actually not Sony, published by Koei Tecmo with Sony localizing it for the West. Different from say, Rise of the Ronin, which is actually a WWS production published by Sony everywhere.
Xbox 360 was winning until the end when the PS3 had caught up to where the line was blurred. But were comparing Sony to itself not others. The Ps3 gave people access to a cheaper Blu Ray, it had free online, it started the Resistance, Uncharted, Infamous, Little Big Planet and SOULS IP. It arguably has the best God of War game, it has quantum dreams best game with Heavy Rain. The Ps5 has Returnal and Astro Bot. The only cons I can think of for PS3 where its dumb beginning price and its slow start but hell even then it started with Resistance Fall of Man and MGS4
. Also never forget the amount of PS1/PS2 classics for that thing.
Woah! F1 2006. I didn't remember that shit. Made by Liverpool Studio before WipEout HD. Now it won't look like it but it was a technical marvel of its time. Fuck Sony for closing Liverpool.
so why did they almost end the brand? explain why this matters lol
*This is a list of Sony Published games ( exclusives at the time ) for PS3, not all games are first party studios.
? who or what almost ended the brand ? if you are talking about the ps3 they were selling the console on almost U$300 loss, two years into the console life cycle Sony reported a loss of U$3.3bi due selling at loss, there were also poor management back in the day and the fact the the processor ( CELL ) was way more difficult to program than the one in X360, and imo even if this almost ended the brand, it also made Sony the behemoth that they are today on console gaming.
I thought you wanted to know Analog's list.
Yes, I see that you and many others are comparing only exclusives. I'm not, I think a console generation that plays 3rd party games worse than the competition is a worse console generation overall.
imo ppl who buy Playstation are primary interested on exclusives, nowaday most gamers have one or two consoles, or even a PC, so, we can play multplat wherever we want , Sony brand is their exclusives and how good they are and that why PS3 had a better gen than PS5 atm.
If you can't enjoy great games because other machines play them 5 fps better:
IMO i said, i have a PS5 and a PC, i didnt bought the PS5 to play multplat, i bought it to play their exclusives and thats why nowadays my PS5 is my expensive dust collector, everything else i play on my PC
a: Yep that's why I currently play on PC, including the available PS5 'exclusives'.
I own all the consoles for thier exclusives. The others Ill play on whatever.
Xbox 360 was winning until the end when the PS3 had caught up to where the line was blurred. But were comparing Sony to itself not others. The Ps3 gave people access to a cheaper Blu Ray, it had free online, it started the Resistance, Uncharted, Infamous, Little Big Planet and SOULS IP. It arguably has the best God of War game, it has quantum dreams best game with Heavy Rain. The Ps5 has Returnal and Astro Bot. The only cons I can think of for PS3 where its dumb beginning price and its slow start but hell even then it started with Resistance Fall of Man and MGS4
Not true at all. Penging the study 47-61% of gamers are multiplatform gamers. And across core gamers, another site said about 80% will play on more than one system.
1. PC gets almost everything sooner or later. Especially now that Sony officially started porting.
I thought my wife was yelling at me and turning up the heat every time I played my ps4.
