No.
If your mindset is to set everything to the maximum without some common sense then you'll have a very bad time. Some settings are extremely demanding e.g. running Deus Ex: MD with 4xMSAA and the highest contact hardening shadow settings will cripple every GPU/CPU combo. The same goes for Watch Dogs 2, native 1080p resolution, TXAA and HFTS shadows are stuff for the future, no single GPU is able to handle that right now.
BUT you can very easily set setting to a reasonable mix of ultra and v.high (a.k.a. mostly ultra) with descent AA and get very good results. I'm using my 1070/6700k for 1440p and I'm satisfied, even 3200x1800/60 and 4k/30 seems to be doable in many games, so no matter what you'll get the better experience then playing on PS4PRo, but it's also more expansive and you you'll have to play around with settings.
Is the 6700k worth it? Well, as always that's a very hard question. Currently no. An overclocked 6600k will get the job done, no doubt about that. But old i7s (e.g. 2600, 3770) hold out exceptionally well, while their i5 counterparts begin to struggle so an i7 could hold out longer. Just think about it, when the 2500k/2600k came out most games didn't even utilize more than two cores, today some games refuse to start on CPUs with just two cores.
Games also start to utilize multiple cores/threads better and I believe that the ability to handle 8 threads at once will come in handy (in the future). But that's just speculation and maybe AMD is going to have the better CPU in that regard anyway... We'll see.