Jeff Albertson
Member
See this arguing over medal tables is silly to me as the Olympics has always been about individual or sometimes team performances in their chosen field not a dick measuring exercise
You're still shopping this idea around?The silver and bronze medals just help decide a tie between two nations with the same amount of gold medals.
What's wrong with it?
See this arguing over medal tables is silly to me as the Olympics has always been about individual or sometimes team performances in their chosen field not a dick measuring exercise
Except that's far from perfect but ok.
I wanted Raonic to advance.
Shit, both of them should've advanced, lol.
A country with 9 bronze is just as successful as a country with 3 gold? I don't consider them equal at all. You might as well go by total medals then.
A country with 9 bronze is just as successful as a country with 3 gold? I don't consider them equal at all. You might as well go by total medals then.
Better that either other system since Gold is obviously more important than silver or bronze while at the same time the other medals ARE NOT meaningless.
A country with 9 bronze is just as successful as a country with 3 gold? I don't consider them equal at all. You might as well go by total medals then.
Gold : 1pt
Silver: Thanks for trying
Bronze: Thanks for coming
I think the Egyptian has got this semi-final. A 5 point lead is damn hard to overcome in only a minute and a half.
In the way it's done now, and the best way, the other medals aren't meaningless.
Silvers are used to place nations who are tied on Golds. Same with Bronze for Gold AND Silver ties.
Hahaha, wonder if they're going to run into this situation like they did in Vancouver?dont worry, i'm sure the many women in the olympic village will comfort him. he might be the real winner here.![]()
Holy shit at Choi. The guy's in berserk mode.
Statistically speaking that's pretty unlikely anyway.
A second in fencing can last looong time...
A country with 9 bronze is just as successful as a country with 3 gold? I don't consider them equal at all. You might as well go by total medals then.
If Silver and Bronze are used to rank countries just as much as Gold, then why stop there? Why is third place so much better than fourth? Because people decided to make a medal for it? Going by anything but Gold will be totally arbitrary.
I think it fits. I mean sure, while the medals are gold, they only have 3 medals overall. You're comparing that to a country that was able to get 9 medals (even though they're bronze). Meaning there were able to place in the top 3 9 times in constrast to a country that was only able to do it 3 times.
Hahaha, wonder if they're going to run into this situation like they did in Vancouver?