Jonneh3003
Banned
Little Inferno and World of Goo..... I almost feel insulted to see these.
You are a fool.
Little Inferno and World of Goo..... I almost feel insulted to see these.
As a handheld, the Switch is a powerful piece of hardware with a gorgeous screen, but it's too large and power hungry to feel like you can really take it anywhere. As a console, its underpowered, unreliable, and lacking basic features and conveniences that all of its competitors offer. Its nicely built and cleverly designed to be used in a variety of ways, but the bottom line is that the Switch doesnt do any one of the many things it can do without some sort of significant compromise. Our testing will continue for the next few days as we try out the online features and other functions enabled by the day-one patch, but if I had to score it now Id give it a 6.7.
At the time of this writing, Nintendo has not officially confirmed the exact specifications of the Nvidia Tegra-based chipset that powers the Switch. That said, it's fairly clear that the Switch is almost as far behind the power curve of its competitors as the original Wii was when it first came out.
Yea....... I don't believe that one.So the IGN review claims the power gap between the Switch and the Xbox One is the same as the original Wii and the 360
Isn't that obvious? It seems only slightly more powerful than WiiU judging from the games we seenSo the IGN review claims the power gap between the Switch and the Xbox One is the same as the original Wii and the 360
The most shocking thing about the Switch might be how many obvious pitfalls Nintendo has managed to elegantly avoid. Going from playing on the tablet to the TV is completely effortless, and there's no sense of compromise whichever way you choose to play. Once you hold and use the Switch, it just makes sense.
Great hardware alone isn't enough, of course. I have little doubt Nintendo's first-party lineup will be amazing — Breath of the Wild alone is almost worth the cost of admission here — but the company's weak spots have always been continuing and expanding third-party support, as well as providing a robust online service. Those are the potential pitfalls to come.
The Switch has all the makings of something truly great. Now Nintendo just needs to support it.
So the IGN review claims the power gap between the Switch and the Xbox One is the same as the original Wii and the 360
Thaaaaaaaats interesting and really disappointing actually.That DF review raised some pretty head-scratching design decisions. Like, why it the world would the OS UI be upscaled 720p instead of native 1080p when docked?
Wow I'm surprised the reviews are so lukewarm. Does not bode well, IMO
Thisisneogaf.gifDoesn't seem that negtative to me. Glad I pre-ordered.
How was the reception of the Wii U during it's launch?
Are screenshots 720p or 1080p? Wonder if it has to do with that.That DF review raised some pretty head-scratching design decisions. Like, why it the world would the OS UI be upscaled 720p instead of native 1080p when docked?
I think Nintendo should be getting a lot more stick for not addressing the joycon issues.
They've got millions of terrified customers with no idea if their £280 brand new system will even work as advertised. If I wasn't a Nintendo fanboy I would have cancelled my pre-order at this point.
Almost every review is a review in progress but they all agree the tech as is is impressive... what lead you to this conclusion exactly?
So the IGN review claims the power gap between the Switch and the Xbox One is the same as the original Wii and the 360
Joycon issues, flimsy kickstand, poor battery life combined with a dearth of content at this point.
You're reading what you want to read, bud.Wow I'm surprised the reviews are so lukewarm. Does not bode well, IMO
Don't let them bait youYou are a fool.
Sounds like I expected!
Will probably pick this up next year. It's clearly inheriting Vita's spirit but right now, is a bit too pricey for what I'm after.
The potential is there at least, which is all I need.
What a dumb idea to lift an embargo when you're not even distributing the patch that would enable a full review.
Agreed. This does not favor them to allow these before the console was a little more fleshed out in its features.
The Good
- Extremely thin portable form factor makes the system quite easy to pick up and play.
- 6.2-inch, 720p screen is easily the most beautiful display ever on a portable game console.
- Breath of the Wild is a potential system seller, even if it's available on another system.
- Holding two Joy-Cons completely separately in two hands is a revelation.
- HD rumble haptics are a cute party trick.
The Bad
- Three-ish hours of portable battery life on high-end games could have you hunting for outlets.
- As a TV-based console, the system is underpowered compared to similarly priced competition.
- Extremely tiny shoulder buttons get in their own way.
- Holding the Joy-Con horizontally is an invite to hand cramp city.
- The left Joy-Con frequently disconnects when playing on a docked console.
- Initial software support is neither deep nor broad, and the future is uncertain.
- The incredibly flimsy kickstand can snap off quite easily.
The Ugly
- Having to wait a few more months for the true Super Mario 64 follow-up we've been craving for years.
Verdict: Definitely don't buy it as your first and only console. As a second console, consider holding off until the end of the year unless you simply can't live without a fully portable Zelda right this very moment.
Review scores for hardware is such a strange concept to me.
Wow I'm surprised the reviews are so lukewarm. Does not bode well, IMO
That's actually false but I guess this thread is more fond of doom and gloom.
Nothing to see here, see you tomorrow.
Isn't that obvious? It seems only slightly more powerful than WiiU judging from the games we seen
Excellence. Thanks Vook you legend. Been a fan of your site for years. Best read so far.
Kobun's review was hilarious. Not a way to launch a piece of hardware in 2017.
Are screenshots 720p or 1080p? Wonder if it has to do with that.
What a dumb idea to lift an embargo when you're not even distributing the patch that would enable a full review.
The Verge written review, very positive.
http://www.theverge.com/2017/3/1/14772530/nintendo-switch-review-zelda-breath-of-the-wild
Millions aren't terrified, hundreds at most are even vaguely aware it's a thing.
Right now the system really does seem like a blank slate that does nothing but play Zelda. That just screams "early adopter product".
I'm starting to think that Nintendo really is executing the strategy theorized about by a few commentators. Do a soft launch of the Switch and let the hardcore get theirs, stock up big games for the next 8 months, then really push it at christmas after a major OS update that rolls out the full online network and features.
Right now the system really does seem like a blank slate that does nothing but play Zelda. That just screams "early adopter product".
I would say it's also and equally dumb idea to "review" it when you are well aware everything won't be available before March 3rd.
I just watched Digital Foundry's video review (almost 18 minutes).
It's a very well presented review. Watch it guys.
Hardware reviews absolutely include OS and functionality. It's not just a physical design and form review.I don't expect Nintendo to decrease on pricing. They barely even have sales on their games.
A patch doesn't change hardware.