Are you for real?
Last time I checked, yes.
You'll notice that I only asked questions. I didn't provide any answers, or draw any conclusions. Feel free to provide your own answers and conclusions, its the questions that interest me more.
Are you for real?
Never mind the rest of the inanity of this post (note: playing FPS with dual analog is inferior to infrared, and playing virtual sports are often improved by motion controllers, as you're going to see if VR takes off). Are you honestly trying to argue that the wii ecosystem (gaming console) in any way matches that of mobile? Good lord, are you 12? Do you have any idea what the ps2, ps1 or any successful gaming console constitutes of in terms of library? Hint: it involves a lot of software you don't like. Almost none of your post is analytically relevant.
We know it sold other 10,000 copies in January, and (to be more accurate), back in December it was <135,000, not 135,000 (digital excluded). It was probably around that, though. I hope we get some hints about how much it sold in February too
my point was that wii was built on the same idea as mobile gaming, simple low budget games making huge profits with low end hardware for gaming, thats how third party's treated the wii, cause of nintendo hardware decision
No. Mobile gamers aren't graduating to consoles, and they expect cheap or free software. The mobile market is drastically different from the console market, of which the wii was a part of.
This is such a terrible argument.
It's like saying everyone who bought a PSP was a casual user and didn't buy a PS Vita because they're only casual gamers.
I'm not saying the majority of sales on Wii weren't from a casual user base and that the console sold on hype, it very much did. But to imply that 100 million users who bought the Wii are all casual and will not buy any other console is wrong.
Where the hell do you buy your games? I've never paid more than £35 for a PS4 game.
Because numbers aren't public, so the best we can do is extrapolate from what info we get;
- at the start of last gen it wasn't just PS3 + 360; it was PS3 + 360 + PS2, and we know that 360 and PS3 numbers this gen have fallen off a cliff.
- A stagnant industry is - by definition - not a healthy one
- Link for software tie ratios
- software revenue falling; the last x months of NPD results stating YoY decline in software + overall lack of retail releases + aforementioned collapse of last gen sales
Total retail software is higher, but that's also a function of the much greater hardware sales. The tie ratio itself is lower, not including digital (of course).
Tie Ratios:
360 @ 16 months - 5.4
PS3 @ 16 months - 4.4
PS2 @ 16 months - ~5
XB1 @ 14 months (i.e. after December) - 3.9
PS4 @ 14 months (i.e. after December) - 3.7
No it doesn't. Software is software. You don't go and say "well the ps2 didn't sell that much software because the success of sing star doesn't count and sony bundled socom a bunch of times". It's not a challenge at all.
Where the hell do you buy your games? I've never paid more than £35 for a PS4 game.
The theory I would propose would be that a large chunk of the Wii audience in the US switched to the 360 with the launch of the Kinect (thanks largely to both advertising and a lack of games for the Wii), who then got exposed to traditional console gaming through the rest of the 360's library.
people keep on arguing about the wii, as if was healthy for the industry, this really depends how you look at things, this was not a traditional console, it was a repackaged GC with motion controls, it didn't sell cause it had all the great third party's games and Nintendo, it didn't sell cause it was a huge jump in power compared to it's predecessor, most of the thirdparty games that sold on it were shovelware, it really sold cause of motion controls, people went crazy for it, now nobody cares, its not something i would judge a console industry being healthy as, cause the wii wasn't about what gamers want from tradition consoles it didn't fit that trend at all.
Good lord, learn to write properly so your shitpost can be understood.
wii sold to old people and soccer moms, they aren't coming back.
Hell, The Order: 1886 is still in the region of £55 on the High Street here (Game/HMV).
(PS for other discussion see edit in my previous post for an example graph).
Seriously, a statement like that borders on the offensive since it's basically a lie that's been adressed in the past. And one would expect a better degree or quality of discourse in a sales thread.I can't believe this myth is still so commonly parroted on GAF of all places
Ouch...that is troubling.
Seriously, a statement like that borders on the offensive since it's basically a lie that's been adressed in the past. And one would expect a better degree or quality of discourse in a sales thread.
-the collapse of last gen may be due to the longer life cycle and consequent sudden uptake of the current gen. Don't see how this supports your "thesis" especially when PS360 LTDs > Ps2's LTD and PS360 are still selling in the US.
-Are you saying that the only healthy industry is one that is growing? Disagree.
I also think software comparisons are quite fickle as a large part of them depend on the release schedule.
I can't believe this myth is still so commonly parroted on GAF of all places
lol "Price goes down sales go up"Looks like IGN sucked MS's PR :
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/03...nt-increase-month-over-month-in-february-2015
At least it seems to be mostly fanboys who repeat this stuff, and based on the posts many of them seem to be very young and simply unable to accept that Nintendo demolished the competition last gen.
It doesn't excuse it, but it does explain it a bit.
I never implied or said that, wii won last gen fare and square, I don't care who it appealed too or if it died to quickly, it won. What does annoy me is when people say xbox 360 won. In terms of sales its wii.
Oh yeah its NPD, but I meant world wide.This makes no sense, because 1) 360 did end up winning in the US and 2) nobody says this outside an NPD thread anyway
What are you talking about? THAT was a demographic that wii appealed to that is now lost for who knows how long. None of the current consoles would appeal to them. Wii's success was because it appealed to new people that never cared about gaming before that.
lol "Price goes down sales go up"
Price has been $350 since November.
Ugh those comments on IGN are toxic.
Is either ps360 tracking enough to overtake wii ww? We still dont have $99 sku yet for either console. Last time I saw the were around 90m compare 100m.
Is either ps360 tracking enough to overtake wii ww? We still dont have $99 sku yet for either console. Last time I saw the were around 90m compare 100m.
That's certainly one way to look at it.
Most of the detailed reports I've seen are very much interested in genre, price point and store front, however. If I'm making a $60, stand alone retail, FPS, does the collapse in the market for under $20, controller pack in, party games affect my sales expectations, marketing and budget decisions?
Is either ps360 tracking enough to overtake wii ww? We still dont have $99 sku yet for either console. Last time I saw the were around 90m compare 100m of wii. Seems very doable.
Sony has supported the consoles for many years past releasing a new console. Ps2 didnt hit $99 until 2 years after the ps3 launched.Not anymore. If either had done a better job of getting their price down, they probably could have, but both have basically collapsed.
Sony has supported the consoles for many years past releasing a new console. Ps2 didnt hit $99 until 2 years after the ps3 launched.
If they need 10m more its not crazy to think it will. Ps3 still has major releases coming from japan.
Please note that Gen 5 is not included here hence lower sales of Gen 6 vs when Gen 7 comes in.
Sony has supported the consoles for many years past releasing a new console. Ps2 didnt hit $99 until 2 years after the ps3 launched.
If they need 10m more its not crazy to think it will. Ps3 still has major releases coming from japan.
Interesting question. Directly you'd say no. But indirectly perhaps not being able to obtain millions in revenue by selling a million units of casual fare like Carnival Games means you can't afford to budget money towards Bioshock 3 and have to cut back on budget and AAA or even mid tier games/development teams.
It's really not. It just reflects the total fail of the wii to convert previous non-owners of consoles into lifelong console owners.
I have one brother that is a perfect example. My parents nearly were.
Don't ask me for source but I'm pretty sure I read once here Forza 2 is over 2M in U.S alone (NPD).
All Donny is saying is that the majority of Halo fans don't turn up for remakes, based on Halo Anniversary's performance on the 360 vs Halo 4. Ergo, Halo 5 will be a better representation of the franchise's performance than MCC. I agree with him.
http://xkcd.com/605/
This applies to sales threads in general
It really annoys me when people say the Wii was 100% casual users.
He** the PS2 was more casual in ways.
(No i'm not saying everyone who bought PS2 was a casual gamer, just people who assume 100% of people who bought PS3/360 are core gamers and 100% of Wii were casual users who will never buy another console are very wrong).
No reason IMO not to count the Wii when comparing generations.
Includes all 3 gens, pink line specifically excludes Wii from Gen 7. (Gen 8 includes Wii U)
But then as a company, I might still be making money from casual, only the platform has switch from Nintendo to Apple and Google. I might in fact be making a lot more. I still might be taking money from Bioshock 3's marketing budget, but it would be because I need more dollars allocated towards mobile, where if you aren't on the top apps list you're invisible without marketing.
I am not ignoring anything. The matter of the fact the Wii, software wise, had no effect on most publishers. That is a fact not a fantasy. You are just ignoring financial reports. Ubisoft, EA, Acti, Sony, MS, WB etc have all made new IP. Reducing the market to shooter and sports is ridiculous. Not only big publishers make money. Indy developers are making money with their games. It´s a fact that the absence of the Wii audience had zero effect on the bottom line of most publishers. Their financial results don´t lie.This is brazenly incorrect. The publishers are selling (are making!) less software, even for the 14-30 male demographic. Every loss is felt, especially when you're not heavily involved in the mobile market. EA is making inroads (or trying to) in that sector but it wasn't just grandma buying just dance when you're talking about a piece of hardware moving 900 million pieces of software. That's felt, whether you want to pretend to ignore it or try to say that the console market ONLY consists of a few mega publishers selling a yearly shooter and a couple yearly sports titles and that's it. Well yeah, if we continue down the path we seem to want to here, that's all that's going to be left. And when that happens, it will be impossible to get to a state of growth or expansion because the software will get even more insular to the aging male demographic. That does not warrant a Baghdad bob kinda attitude but rather a legitimate cause for concern, because software is what drives hardware.
The point is, when you're looking at a market's health it's unwise to selectively ignore things based on your own personal beliefs. A console is a console is a console. Labels notwithstanding.
I am not ignoring anything. The matter of the fact the Wii, software wise, had no effect on most publishers. That is a fact not a fantasy. You are just ignoring financial reports. Ubisoft, EA, Acti, Sony, MS, WB etc have all made new IP. Reducing the market to shooter and sports is ridiculous. Not only big publishers make money. Indy developers are making money with their games. It´s a fact that the absence of the Wii audience had zero effect on the bottom line of most publishers. Their financial results don´t lie.
Sony has supported the consoles for many years past releasing a new console. Ps2 didnt hit $99 until 2 years after the ps3 launched.
If they need 10m more its not crazy to think it will. Ps3 still has major releases coming from japan.
Zero effect? Citation needed. Please include years 2006-2010 in your analysis
You totally ignored markets realities, EA Results: Above expectations, $750 million buyback, stock up 15% afterhours. EA among others did not get affect by the absence of the Wii.A console is a console is a console. Again, if you want to look at the market at large and judge its health, you ignore the labels on the front of the boxes.
I can't believe this myth is still so commonly parroted on GAF of all places
Jesus it's not a myth. It didn't sell to *only* soccer moms and old people, but it's the one damn console my grandmother ever bought. Seriously, old people and soccer moms ought the Wii like they were going to stop making them. It was crazy.
Wii tent had room for everyone.
Let me see: Just Dance a title with relative minor investment to develop ended up selling millions for Ubisoft. Then there's the fitness craze started with Wii Fit, a slice of the pie where publishers such as EA and Ubisoft took part. Then there's MS which boarded the motion arena with Kinect, which in the Xbox 360 days became one of the most successful peripherals ever. Or Capcom with the endless "million seller" experiments.I am not ignoring anything. The matter of the fact the Wii, software wise, had no effect on most publishers. That is a fact not a fantasy. You are just ignoring financial reports. Ubisoft, EA, Acti, Sony, MS, WB etc have all made new IP. Reducing the market to shooter and sports is ridiculous. Not only big publishers make money. Indy developers are making money with their games. It´s a fact that the absence of the Wii audience had zero effect on the bottom line of most publishers. Their financial results don´t lie.
Take a look at the sales of Nintendo's traditional series on the Wii. Then get back to us. Yes, it expanded the audience but there were a ton of "traditional" sales in there.Jesus it's not a myth. It didn't sell to *only* soccer moms and old people, but it's the one damn console my grandmother ever bought. Seriously, old people and soccer moms ought the Wii like they were going to stop making them. It was crazy.