slavesnyder
Member
If EA was clever they already prepared an update for Battlefront with some stuff from the new film as fan service or microtransactions.
7 Dollar per Kylo.
Could work.
7 Dollar per Kylo.
Could work.
The whole bundle concept for TR (price, content, timing, availability) should have been a reason to sue microsoft.The other stab in the back for TR was that the bundle came with the 1TB Xbone, which is good for enthusiasts, but bad for sales since it was $50 more than almost every other bundle.
That took a while, but was certainly worth the wait. Carry on.
I'm glad this has blown up in their faces. What the fuck.So back the fuck up. SE delayed Tomb Raider on the PS4 for even longer just so they could mention that the PC/PS4 versions are coming in 2016?
What?
The other stab in the back for TR was that the bundle came with the 1TB Xbone, which is good for enthusiasts, but bad for sales since it was $50 more than almost every other bundle.
So back the fuck up. SE delayed Tomb Raider on the PS4 for even longer just so they could mention that the PC/PS4 versions are coming in 2016?
What?
That would make the contract risk free for square. Why would you make that deal if you're Microsoft?Can someone explain to me how apparently SE didnt put in tangible contractual stipulations regards how TR was going to be marketed/bundled/sold by MS because unless theyve received it monetary in lieu, it seems it was sent to its death irrespective of U4 being there or not.
While I guess they now have the funds to ensure a third game to end the trilogy how is any of this growing the IP?
ps3ud0 8)
Can someone explain to me how apparently SE didnt put in tangible contractual stipulations regards how TR was going to be marketed/bundled/sold by MS because unless theyve received it monetary in lieu, it seems it was sent to its death irrespective of U4 being there or not.
While I guess they now have the funds to ensure a third game to end the trilogy how is any of this growing the IP?
ps3ud0 8)
Can someone explain to me how apparently SE didnt put in tangible contractual stipulations regards how TR was going to be marketed/bundled/sold by MS because unless theyve received it monetary in lieu, it seems it was sent to its death irrespective of U4 being there or not.
While I guess they now have the funds to ensure a third game to end the trilogy how is any of this growing the IP?
ps3ud0 8)
Honestly I looked back and aside from some literally insane mgs fans who are insane most people agreed with me. So I guess I just have a thing for insane mgs fans. I used to be one so it hurts.
LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
This industry apparently has terrible analyst who can't into basic maths of 400 million. And they're probably paid 4-5x of what I'm paid.
This whole industry is a goddam shitshow.
Burn it all down.
Splatoon selling more than Bloodborne would've been shocking months ago. Right now the whole drama of Splatoon being a pre-launch potential bomba IP for Nintendo has washed away and is now seen as a huge success story.
LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
Both collectors and standard?
Makes sense. Splatoon is a better game. Come at me Bloodborne bros.
Well I was wondering that there should be some expectations from SE what MS needed to do with RotTR to ensure it at least gets value from the exclusivity deal including perhaps a sliding bar of requirements to at least make sure it doesnt bomb (SE/CD at least ensured it was a good game), ultimately to me TR as an IP is far weaker than before this deal which seems obviously avoidable.That would make the contract risk free for square. Why would you make that deal if you're Microsoft?
Man I thought Nintendo/Sony contract issues were unique then seemingly comes SE/Microsoft. SE doubled down if the latest insider info is wholly true.Because it's clear from how things transpired who's the more stupid party in this contractual relationship.
It's not MS.
You know what, Ive assumed completely that SE were holding the cards (MS approached SE for a UC answer) and I dont know why. I thought they had enough faith in the TR IP to keep on with series development and that issues like it not meeting expectations revolved more around their exaggerated estimates more than anything. I guess the longer dev and sales are heavy discounts as well as throwing on PS+ and GWG didnt really make it that profitable...What makes you think that SE was negotiating from a position of power? Everything we have read and seen so far indicates that they weren't.
LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
We have a not so old casefile about something like that.
- Microsoft dude leaves Microsoft to be CEO of Nokia
- Google the "Elop Effect"
- he returs to microsoft after Nokias shares fell 90% or so
- Microsoft buys Nokia for small change
Splatoon selling more than Bloodborne would've been shocking months ago. Right now the whole drama of Splatoon being a pre-launch potential bomba IP for Nintendo has washed away and is now seen as a huge success story.
What Black Friday boost for Tomb Raider? Game every week sinks deeper and deeper.
Xbone was reported 10 million to retailer last November and Microsoft did some pretty good numbers in last year December and they have done over 1.5 million this November in UK and USA. So I believe 6 million for the whole year is quite probable. I think 16 - 18 million should be the range. 14 million is just ...PS. loled at Xbone 20m like some guys seems to hint here... Xbone sales are around 14-16m at end of November.
Because it's clear from how things transpired who's the more stupid party in this contractual relationship.
It's not MS.
No. More around 16 million as of the end of November.So, you guys think that Xbone sales numbers are between 18-20 mil.?
LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
Also: why the hell does microsoft want to piss off square enix?Imru al-Qays;189336854 said:Does Microsoft really want to buy Crystal Dynamics?
System shipped to retailers alone don't create MAUs.Xbone was reported 10 million to retailer last November and Microsoft did some pretty good numbers in last year December and they have done over 1.5 million this November in UK and USA. So I believe 6 million for the whole year is quite probable. I think 16 - 18 million should be the range. 14 million is just ...
I don't know, you tell me?Imru al-Qays;189336854 said:One of the more sordid corporate intrigues, for sure. And some of the stuff Microsoft did to the TR bundle certainly reeks of sabotage. But why? Does Microsoft really want to buy Crystal Dynamics?
Also: why the hell does microsoft want to piss off square enix?
You'd guess that a good relationship to such an important publisher should be reasonable.
This deal and how MS interpreted it seems to be more like a middle finger than a shaken hand.
Third week was BF here
http://neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1148991
Just saying the decline in the third week would've been less than usual thanks to many titles selling more and would boost TR a little bit. Also ROTR UK only dropped 39% in the second week and is holding well.
No. More around 16 million as of the end of November.
I mean quite obviously the game isn't performing to their expectation. They shipped what, 5M after 2 months? Even if it's at 3M sold through now which is likely very generous, that's fairly bad.
I don't know, you tell me?
http://venturebeat.com/2014/08/18/xbox-boss-on-uncharted/
Keeping in mind that, when possible, MS is all about the shortcuts (buying an established IP/ established studio).
Crystal Dynamics is also at the core of the Uncharted-ization of Tomb Raider, is a very capable studio technically, and their last two games were favorably received generally.
So, again not saying that's the case, but there are "hints" imho.
...Spencer said that Microsoft’s investment in Rise of the Tomb Raider means the game will be at the level of other triple-A titles, with marketing to match.
“I know a lot of people won’t like this,” he said, “but I’ll say it — I think it can be good for the franchise and good for gaming all up because it’s a franchise that’s meant something, and we’re going to be able to work with them and invest and try to put the marketing and everything else at a level, and we’re active in working with them on the development of the game as well, to try to make it one of those franchises that stands out.”...
Also: why the hell does microsoft want to piss off square enix?
You'd guess that a good relationship to such an important publisher should be reasonable.
This deal and how MS interpreted it seems to be more like a middle finger than a shaken hand.
Well, you said it's a little more. I'm reffering to that 2 mil. Xbones are around 10% of total install base.
They're completely different types of games; you can't objectively compare them like that.Makes sense. Splatoon is a better game. Come at me Bloodborne bros.
Seriously pretty amazing since Splatoon has barely had any sales and bloodborne has been 20 bucks multiple times already.
They're completely different types of games; you can't objectively compare them like that.
Xbone was reported 10 million to retailer last November and Microsoft did some pretty good numbers in last year December and they have done over 1.5 million this November in UK and USA. So I believe 6 million for the whole year is quite probable. I think 16 - 18 million should be the range. 14 million is just ...
What's the point of "good" 39% drop cuz sales are damn low. I know that 3rd week was a Black Friday week. Game didn't got any boost during that week.
.
> or < 1m?LTD, Splatoon > Bloodborne
retail
MS reported they WILL sell 10 million soon last November (they didn't give any target and most probably they were talking about sell-in).Xbone was reported 10 million to retailer last November and Microsoft did some pretty good numbers in last year December and they have done over 1.5 million this November in UK and USA. So I believe 6 million for the whole year is quite probable. I think 16 - 18 million should be the range. 14 million is just ...
You can't spell Spencer without PR.From the article:
...Spencer said that Microsoft’s investment in Rise of the Tomb Raider means the game will be at the level of other triple-A titles, with marketing to match.
“I know a lot of people won’t like this,” he said, “but I’ll say it — I think it can be good for the franchise and good for gaming all up because it’s a franchise that’s meant something, and we’re going to be able to work with them and invest and try to put the marketing and everything else at a level, and we’re active in working with them on the development of the game as well, to try to make it one of those franchises that stands out.”...
Monthly Active Users. Microsoft's new metric of success for Xbox instead of HW numbers.Also, what does MAU stand for? It's been mentioned a lot in here.