• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

OFFICIAL Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

J2 Cool

Member
I dunno, I think that's when the star wars hate was in full gear. Sounded good there imo. Like a hysterical chick about to lose everything.
 

DJ_Tet

Banned
I just got my tickets tonight.

That new trailer is awesome :)

One small detail I've noticed in the newer clips that I haven't seen discussed is the reveal of Darth Vader. He no longer has his arms held in place over his head. I always thought that shot made Vader's arms look short and it kind of looked stupid. I'm glad the arms are gone, the focus of that shot should be the mask, not two midget arms clamped to the table.

I assume they just removed them digitally. Good call, whomever did that.
 

J2 Cool

Member
DJ_Tet said:
One small detail I've noticed in the newer clips that I haven't seen discussed is the reveal of Darth Vader. He no longer has his arms held in place over his head. I always thought that shot made Vader's arms look short and it kind of looked stupid. I'm glad the arms are gone, the focus of that shot should be the mask, not two midget arms clamped to the table.

I assume they just removed them digitally. Good call, whomever did that.

Ah yeah, it looked more bad ass but didn't give it a second though. Definetly looked stupid, and led to a parody already.
 

DJ_Tet

Banned
J2 Cool said:
Ah yeah, it looked more bad ass but didn't give it a second though. Definetly looked stupid, and led to a parody already.


Got a link to that parody? Or description? I thought it made him look like a toddler in a temper tantrum lol

They didn't remove the arms digitally? Did they re-shoot the scene?
 

ManaByte

Member
DJ_Tet said:
They didn't remove the arms digitally? Did they re-shoot the scene?

They reshot it as doing it digitally would be way more complex and cost a lot more, and take more time than they had. It's not just the bed rising, they would also have to fix the arms in the next shot, so they just reshot the entire rising and what happens after that. This was in April on an ILM stage.
 

DJ_Tet

Banned
ManaByte said:
No, they reshot it on an ILM stage last month.


I see. Was the public outcry that bad? I figure if I was a director, I would have had the arms placed like that for a reason and wouldn't have changed it. If Lucas thought it looked stupid, why film it like that in the first place?

Seems like the type of decision you would make during shooting rather than reshooting it later. Obviously they thought it was fine at the time.



edit- yeah that makes sense. I didn't think about the next shot etc.
 

ManaByte

Member
suaveric said:
Wow, they were reshooting things as late as April? Anything else get changed? Why'd they change that?

That was it AFAIK.

However they were tweaking the digital cut as late as the 30th of April.
 

Mifune

Mehmber
There's some clunkiness hinted at in the various trailers and TV spots. But I gotta say I'm starting to get the feeling this movie might not completely suck. In fact, it might be pretty good. At least I'm hoping.

It can't be worse than Attack of the Clones, at any rate. That one is BY FAR the worst Star Wars movie.
 

mrkgoo

Member
I don't see the huge hubbub over Jar Jar in the first place... none of what he said in TPM was ever as dire as the moronic puns C3PO delivered in AOTC. I'd take a Jar Jar, "Peeyousa" over a C3PO "I'm beside myself" anyday.
 

Drozmight

Member
Interesting. I hope theres that one line. You know... that one line in ROTJ where some admiral says "we're not going to attack..." and you can't tell if he's asking a question or giving an order.

Reminds me of Anakin's "Don't you turn against me..."
 

kamikaze

Member
Mifune said:
There's some clunkiness hinted at in the various trailers and TV spots. But I gotta say I'm starting to get the feeling this movie might not completely suck. In fact, it might be pretty good. At least I'm hoping.

there were a few areas where the pacing seemed jumpy (roughly between the 20 & 40 minute mark), but it wasn't too bad. i'm pretty sure most people (not just star wars fans) will like it...at least i think so. i'm hoping that being able to see it early isn't clouding my judgement too much. :)
 

xabre

Banned
Mifune said:
It can't be worse than Attack of the Clones, at any rate. That one is BY FAR the worst Star Wars movie.

This is in your opinion and I don't agree. I don't think AOTC is too bad, yes the love angle was a bit gut-wrenching and many of the technical aspects like acting and pacing left much to be desired, but besides that I can't so what is really SO bad about that movie. IMO the worst one is TPM, but I don't think it is really THAT bad. Sure it had plenty of shit (as all Star Wars have bar the first two) like Jar Jar in particular but it also had its redeeming factors such as the pod race and the final duel with Maul.

I was never obsessed with the series growing up so that's maybe why I can offer a fresh perspective but the way I see it is that a lot of the back story that was told in Episodes I and II simply needed to be told; we needed to see young Anakin’s back story on Tatooine, his relationship with Padme etc; I mean if you want to flush out the back story and do a proper job of it in the lead up to the OT then these aspects of the story needed to be told, plain and simple. They may not be particularly exciting or Star Wars-ish, and the execution wasn't the best on more then one occasion (acting, dialogue, pacing, irrelevant filler etc) but these are aspects that have hopefully laid the foundation for a kick-arse third movie which leads into the OT.

As much as I wanted to see the star destroyers, tie fighters, the rebels and the whole star wars universe as it was when we left off in ROTJ, it was simply not realistic at all to expect this in the PT, this is an entirely different time and universe (before the rise of the empire - so obviously things will look and be different, they should be) and thus the reason why things seem may so unfamiliar relative to the OT. Sure people simply want the Star Wars as they remembered it, but in the overall context of the six films you will see the old republic with its own unique (un-Star Wars-ish) style and atmosphere become completely corrupted and supplanted by the empire. Whinge about the little things all you want (Midichlorians, Jar Jar etc), but I think Lucas hasn't done too bad of an overall job here to be honest. In the first two episodes of the PT he has laid the groundwork for the entire saga and I think ROTS will piece things together nicely.
 

ManaByte

Member
James Berardinelli's full review is up. He gave it 3.5 out of 4 stars:

...Lucas is a masterful storyteller. That aspect of his creativity is in evidence here as he spins a tale as compelling as any Greek or Shakespearean tragedy: a man who attains power only after sacrificing everything dear to him, including his soul. There is bitter irony in Anakin's situation: by embracing the dark side of the Force, he loses the very thing he seeks to protect.

It will not be possible to watch the original trilogy in the same way again. Revenge of the Sith changes everything. It invests so much else in the light saber duel between Obi-Wan and Vader in A New Hope and shifts the dynamic surrounding the Emperor's attempted seduction of Luke in Return of the Jedi. It's during that titanic struggle that Anakin finally emerges as the Chosen One and returns balance to the Force.

It's necessary to say a word or two about Darth Vader. After all, Revenge of the Sith shows us the birth of one of the 20th century's most iconic villains. By avoiding excessive reverence, Lucas makes the first appearance of the black mask and costume a moment of profound sadness. In that moment, we aren't so much experiencing the emergence of Vader as we are seeing the final death throes of Anakin. And, while there's an admitted thrill to hearing the voice of James Earl Jones, the content of some of Jones' lines is unlike anything we have previously heard from the voice-box of Vader. Not all eyes will be dry by the end of Revenge of the Sith. It has an emotional kick that no Star Wars film other than The Empire Strikes Back has achieved.

It has been said that George Lucas is not a great director of actors, yet Revenge of the Sith contains some fine performances. First and foremost is Hayden Christensen, who was maligned in some circles for his petulant interpretation of Anakin in the previous film. This time around, he essays his character as an introspective, tormented man torn between loyalty to his friends and his beliefs and an overwhelming desire to embrace power. Christensen is not daunted by the task of playing an increasingly twisted character, and he makes the transformation to Vader work.

Also impressive is Ian McDiarmid, who never gets enough credit as the frighteningly evil Emperor. Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman are more solid than in previous films - they have grown into their roles. Portman, who occasionally seemed uncomfortable as Padme in Episodes I and II, is now at home in the role, even though her screen time in this installment is limited. And it's always nice to see old friends like Peter Mayhew (Chewbacca), Anthony Daniels (C-3PO), and Frank Oz. Jimmy Smits (as Senator Bail Organa) and Samuel L. Jackson have significant supporting roles.

The movie's tone grows grimmer as the film wears on. This is not a happy movie. Even the victories are tinged with bitterness. There is an element of catharsis at the end, but it's only a taste. Salvation is left for the next chapter. How many people, I wonder, will return from seeing Revenge of the Sith and immediately pop A New Hope into the DVD player. It's almost a necessity. Revenge of the Sith offers little in the way of optimism. I applaud Lucas for taking this route and having the courage to believe that Star Wars fans can accept all of this darkness.

Regardless of how Revenge of the Sith is received at the box office, it represents the conclusion to an unparalleled cinematic achievement. Finally, after 28 long years of waiting that were only occasionally punctuated by the appearance of new story fragments, Lucas has ended with an exclamation point. The tale of a galaxy long ago and far away is complete. Only now can we truly step back and admire the full tapestry that it has taken George Lucas and his ILM wizards nearly three decades to weave.
 

GaimeGuy

Volunteer Deputy Campaign Director, Obama for America '16
What does palpatine say in that trailer in his speech to the senate? I can't understand it clearly.
 

ManaByte

Member
GaimeGuy said:
What does palpatine say in that trailer in his speech to the senate? I can't understand it clearly.

"The Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire"
 

ManaByte

Member
David Ansen of Newsweek:

Lucas closes the 'Star Wars' saga with 'Revenge of the Sith.' As Anakin finally gets bad, the director finally gets good.

Lucas manages to turn the audience's familiarity to his advantage: like a jigsaw puzzle whose final form has always been known, the fun is in discovering how the last pieces fit. When that massive, menacing black Vader helmet clamps down on the deformed head of the boy we used to know as Anakin, the frisson has a mythic kick

This is the most savage and despairing of the "Star Wars" movies. The surviving Jedi knights are forced into exile, and the Empire consolidates its evil power. This glimpse of intergalactic hell inspires moments of epic grandeur that haven't been felt since "The Empire Strikes Back.

Twenty-eight years after "Star Wars," the curtain finally falls. Lucas started by remixing myriad old Hollywood formulas into a hyperspace hybrid that felt new. Now, at the end, his own formula has inevitably become old-fashioned itself. For all the technological changes Lucas has embraced, his wide-eyed, childlike approach to storytelling—cute robots, scary villains, selfless heroics, fortune-cookie wisdom and wild roller-coaster rides through space—has remained the same. You can argue whether it's for better or worse. What you can't argue with is that he's stayed true to his vision, and that that vision has changed the cultural landscape irrevocably.
 

ManaByte

Member
Telegraph UK:

The fans who have been camping out for weeks in front of cinemas across America will not be disappointed. Lucas has created an eminently satisfying, albeit surprisingly violent, final instalment that brings the story back full circle to the first film.

It contains all the ingredients that fans have come to expect: aerial dog-fights, swirling light-sabres, Jedi battles, evil droids -and it packs an emotional wallop.

The first two prequels, Episode I The Phantom Menace and Episode II Attack of the Clones, were disappointments - the first featuring the goofy Jar Jar Binks and the second notable for the wooden acting of Hayden Christensen as the young Anakin Skywalker.

Now, with Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith, Lucas has come up with a masterly conclusion to the complex tale of treachery, heroism and intrigue, although it is considerably darker than anything previously seen in the Skywalker soap opera.

The acting from the human cast is superior to previous films, with a mature Hayden Christensen switching from hero to psychopath with apparent ease and Ewan McGregor appearing more comfortable with his occasionally trite dialogue.

It is a fitting finale to a saga that has enraptured a generation.
 

SickBoy

Member
These early reviews do not sway my cautiously pessimistic approach to the movie. I just have to look at the first two eps, which Tomatometered at 62 and 65% (not bad, generally speaking) to know it could be a trap.

I'm still hoping it wows me, but as always, I think my vastly lowered expectations will only help there...
 

J2 Cool

Member
Prine said:
It that pretty close to episode 3? I think i just spoiled the whole fucking movie :/

Laughed my ass off though.

:(

No, I don't think so. It was posted months and months back on GA. Before the trailer for episode III even.
 

J2 Cool

Member
xabre said:
This is in your opinion and I don't agree. I don't think AOTC is too bad, yes the love angle was a bit gut-wrenching and many of the technical aspects like acting and pacing left much to be desired, but besides that I can't so what is really SO bad about that movie. IMO the worst one is TPM, but I don't think it is really THAT bad. Sure it had plenty of shit (as all Star Wars have bar the first two) like Jar Jar in particular but it also had its redeeming factors such as the pod race and the final duel with Maul.

Eh, on repeated viewings, AOTC is easily the least rewatchable imo. I liked it more than TPM the first time I seen it. Getting caught up in some great action scenes. But realizing there's no real sacrifices or history changing moments, outside of the clone wars starting, the whole movie really wears thin. The love story was supposed to be the heart of that movie, and it's just so rough to watch. I did like a lot about it, but it wasn't tied together well because of the poorly done love story. The Obi-wan/Jango fight, Obi Wan/Jango chase scene, the awe of seeing jedi fight a war the first time, Yoda the first time.. Individually well done but they only saved the movie the first time. I found it hard to watch on repeated viewings.

TPM meanwhile, the heart of it was the beginning of a destiny. I didn't hate Anakin as much as most did in this one. I thought he was fairly decent. Seeing his first coming into contact with jedi and the force is done fine. Jar Jar admittedly was shit, and really didn't need the screen time. But Ewan Mcreggor and Liam Neeson are pretty good lead actors, even if they acted a bit stiff. The Darth Maul duel was terrific too, and really has signifigance.

But yeah, for the most part, this whole prequel trilogy has always boiled down to episode III, and so this is great news to hear this kind of feedback. This thread is killing me though, damn them for starting the tv spots this early!
 
That scene passes quite quickly... I don't think it was that bad.
And I didn't have a problem with the fireside scene either. A bit of a tiny issue with delivery and one line containing the words "I wish I could just wish..." etc, but I really think it's nitpicking. I actually liked "if you're suffering as much as I am, please tell me". I think that will become a good foreshadowing of his anger seeping into the relationship. My favourite scene in the movie is probably Obi Wan meeting Jango on Kamino (my favourite locale of the prequels thus far)

The only thing I don't like in AOTC is the droid factory scene. It's totally unnecessary. It was fun on the first viewing but I skip it every time on DVD. I'm sure they had fun making it though.

Likewise in TPM I don't think so much Tatooine was necessary. In the special editions, New Hope didn't need the jabba reinsertion (I'd of preferred Luke seeing Biggs), some new CG background elements weren't needed (subtle stuff like the little frog outside Jabba's palace, and virtually any ship-related / space-scene enhancement were COOL). I actually don't give a shit about the things some fans care about: Greedo shooting first, Sebastian Shaw's ghost et al. Trivial to most, as the story remains the same to the casual viewer and those just watching for the fun... although I see why these things annoy people who are, well, involved to the point of SW being the center of their universe.
 

ManaByte

Member
About.com:

Almost thirty years later, Lucas pays off the most elaborate setup in film history. He succeeds so completely that anybody who doesn't just love movies but the movies will find reason for celebration—with or without Ewoks.

From the opening breathneck action sequence that dwarfs any space battle seen before and could happily serve as the climax for a half dozen lesser movies, "Revenge of the Sith" rewards all of the exposition that slowed down the Episodes I and II. Finally, the story reaches fever pitch. In retrospect, this final act makes both "The Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones" better films, and rewatching them is now a much more satisfying experience.

It might not be overreaching to call "Star Wars" our first global myth. Anybody who's been born within the last 40 years and has access to a TV or movie screen is familiar with the story. The films' endless sense of wonder is among the best cinema has to offer. With "Revenge of the Sith", the series culminates in its most mature and powerful installment. George Lucas has constructed an extraordinarily sturdy fable that speaks loud and clear to our present situation. The movies don't get much better than that.
 
ManaByte said:
Reviews counted: 16
Fresh: 14 Rotten: 2

It's interesting to note that with EP:1 and 2, at their respective time, they were at about the same proportion that they ended up as i.e. in the mid-60's.

If Sith pulls off a mid to high 80's average, that's a great sign.
 

Prine

Banned
you dont know how hard it is waiting for this fucking movie. I only get excited like this when im anticipating games like Halo, MGS and Zelda. This is the first time any movie has made me this desperate
 

DJ_Tet

Banned
Prine said:
you dont know how hard it is waiting for this fucking movie. I only get excited like this when im anticipating games like Halo, MGS and Zelda. This is the first time any movie has made me this desperate


No doubt. Thank God it isn't online yet. As long as it doesn't hit the net before next weekend I'm pretty sure I'll be able to hold off.
 
I'm not much of Star Was fan (Indy guy here), but I must say the trailers for ROTS is looks mighty fine. There's some very cool footage in them. Could it be, could I actually go watch a Star Wars movie in the theaters? I just might with this one...
 

Ristamar

Member
Remember the lamented Anakin/Obi-Wan saber duel clip from Access Hollywood (or whatever show it was)? Extended version here. Seems like they're looking for openings during the twirl action, or it's a precursor to the "struggle."
 

ManaByte

Member
http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/spielberg weeps at star wars screening

SPIELBERG WEEPS AT STAR WARS SCREENING

Director STEVEN SPIELBERG wept at a premiere of pal GEORGE LUCAS' final STAR WARS movie EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH.

JURASSIC PARK film-maker, Spielberg was so moved by the eagerly-awaited conclusion of the sci-fi saga, he burst into tears at its screening last week (begs29APR05).

But he's unashamed by his tears, insisting fans will also cry at the end of the film, because its moving conclusion marks the end of Lucas' epic story.

Spielberg says, "I saw it about a week ago, and it's absolutely amazing.

"It's the best of the last three episodes. It's the best way you could possibly imagine for George to finish it off, it has a tremendous ending and it's very dark. You'll cry at the end, it's wonderful."
 

DJ_Tet

Banned
I'm sure a lot of the emotion felt by Spielberg is compounded and amplified by the fact that Lucas is a good friend of thirty years or more.
 
I'm looking forward to seeing EpIII, which sounds kind of funny for me to say considering the fact that I never saw any of SW movies before 6 months ago. KotOR's great storyline motivated me to check out the films.

My mini reviews...

The most interesting aspect of Star Wars for me isn't Vader, but Palpatine. I find it stupid that Vader is always thought of as the ultimate movie bad guy when he's nothing more than Palpatine's puppet (the end of ROTJ notwithstanding). Palpatine's the real power player.

The OT
I don't have a lot to say here, since I'm a bit hazy on the details (I only watched each movie once and it was 6 months ago), except that they're very good movies. Nothing mind-blowingly great like the hype could lead one to believe, but good, fun movies. The storylines and action were nice and the acting wasn't bad, especially from Harrison Ford (the best performer IMO). There were some corny/stupid moments, but nothing too bad. ESB is the best of the 3, ROTJ the worst w/ the lame ass Ewoks.

Episodes I-II
I saw these recently, which is why I'll go into more detail. The Anakin in TPM didn't bother me at all, but there's no denying that Christensen was terrible during the love/flirting scenes in AotC. Portman didn't bother me and I liked Nesson, McGregor and the Palpatine actor. Jar Jar Binks sucked, but he didn't completely annoy me.

I thought the stories were told well, since they're all about the way Palpatine manipulated his way into power for me. The lack of action in TPM didn't bother me since I liked the political focus. The Maul fight didn't impress me and I don't get people's excitement over it. AotC needed the cool, extended clones/robots fight to save it from being below average. I like TPH better than AotC.

Overall, the OT is kind of overrated and the prequels somewhat underrated. I don't have the nostalgia issue clouding my judgment, which is why I think I feel this way. As a group, EpIV/V/VI are better than EpI/II, but not by a lot since I like TPM better than RotJ and don't think it's too far from ANH. My rankings after seeing each movie once are ESB>ANH>TPM>RotJ>>AotC.

Here's hoping that the early hype for EpIII is warranted and it turns out very well.
 

Manics

Banned
So the early reviews are in on Rottentomatoes and they're very favourable. Some are incredible..where do they find some of these reviewers?

"Will be remembered as one of the greatest movies ever made. 'Classic' isn't kind enough a word for this gem. The best film to be unleashed onto the public in 25 years!"

Now, granted I haven't seen this movie yet, but 'the best film to be unleashed onto the public in 25 years'???? I seriously doubt that will be the case.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
Manics said:
Now, granted I haven't seen this movie yet, but 'the best film to be unleashed onto the public in 25 years'???? I seriously doubt that will be the case.
lol.. umm.. yeah.. having seen what I have and knowing the story, while it will be great, and while it is a spectacular "ending" to unquestionably THE greatest saga of the past 25 years (yeah, I'm looking at LOTR with that statement), know, I can't see Ep3 being the greatest movie of the last 25 years (clearly that would be Ghostbusters).

Bauer Auction Hour - interesting perspective. To compare it directly sith womeone who grew up with the saga (first movie came out when I was two years old)

The most interesting aspect of Star Wars for me isn't Vader, but Palpatine. I find it stupid that Vader is always thought of as the ultimate movie bad guy when he's nothing more than Palpatine's puppet (the end of ROTJ notwithstanding). Palpatine's the real power player.
this is really interesting, and I agree with you NOW, but before the PT, Vader WAS the ultimate villain. He was the main bad guy for 2 of the movies, and even when ROTJ came into being, while the emperor was truly evil, he was always just this sort of side character who was the catalyst of pitting vader and luke against each other for luke to finally turn his father back. but the emperor for the past 28 years has hardly been the ultimate evil. Even the first two movies of the PT he was more shadowy figure than ultimate evil. Heck, Sidious only appeared in AOTC for like 2 minutes tops.

The OT
I don't have a lot to say here, since I'm a bit hazy on the details (I only watched each movie once and it was 6 months ago), except that they're very good movies. Nothing mind-blowingly great like the hype could lead one to believe, but good, fun movies. The storylines and action were nice and the acting wasn't bad, especially from Harrison Ford (the best performer IMO). There were some corny/stupid moments, but nothing too bad. ESB is the best of the 3, ROTJ the worst w/ the lame ass Ewoks.
the "hype" definitely comes from growing up with the saga. the PT haters INSIST that nostalgia doesn't come into play when comparing the two trilogies, but that is just flat out denial. We were blown away again and again and again by the OT. Each movies building on more of what we never saw before. It had a huge impact on anyone who saw the movies when they first came out. but yeah, there are some flaws in the movies. Unfortunately most of us "there at the time" fans only watch them once a year or so, so we aren't really at all critical of their flaws.. but yeah, when the SE trilogy was released in the theaters I saw ANH 6 times... and by around the 4th time it's flaws (like the entire first half of the movie) started glaring REALLY badly. Actually the last two times I saw it I went with friends.. and after the SE theatrical releases I didn't watch any of them again until a few months before Ep1 was released.

Overall, the OT is kind of overrated and the prequels somewhat underrated. I don't have the nostalgia issue clouding my judgment, which is why I think I feel this way. As a group, EpIV/V/VI are better than EpI/II, but not by a lot since I like TPM better than RotJ and don't think it's too far from ANH. My rankings after seeing each movie once are ESB>ANH>TPM>RotJ>>AotC.
IAWTP I mean really, this is exactly how I feel. Only I am clouded by nostalgi and still feel this way. Well, except for AOTC. I would say it is just barely in last place behind ROTJ.
 

SteveMeister

Hang out with Steve.
Palpatine's been my favorite character in the saga since Return of the Jedi.

And I resent the accusations that people who love the original trilogy are victims of their judgement being "clouded by nostalgia". The first movie was absolutely groundbreaking when it was released. There'd been nothing else like it, ever. It was an epic tale of mythic proportions that captured the imaginations of millions. A New Hope defined the Summer Blockbuster. It pretty much invented merchandising tie-ins. It was and remains a cultural phenomenon. And it was really, really GOOD. I still love watching the original trilogy, even having seen them countless times before. I was 12 when Star Wars was first released, and I saw the movie 14 times in theaters that year. I saw it another dozen times when it was re-released. I saw The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi on opening day.

There is nostalgia, yes -- but it's there not because I have some hazy memory of seeing these movies when I was 2 or 3, but because I have vivid memories of drinking in every aspect of these movies as a teenager. My judgement is not clouded by nostalgia. :)
 
SteveMeister said:
Palpatine's been my favorite character in the saga since Return of the Jedi.

And I resent the accusations that people who love the original trilogy are victims of their judgement being "clouded by nostalgia". The first movie was absolutely groundbreaking when it was released. There'd been nothing else like it, ever. It was an epic tale of mythic proportions that captured the imaginations of millions. A New Hope defined the Summer Blockbuster. It pretty much invented merchandising tie-ins. It was and remains a cultural phenomenon. And it was really, really GOOD. I still love watching the original trilogy, even having seen them countless times before. I was 12 when Star Wars was first released, and I saw the movie 14 times in theaters that year. I saw it another dozen times when it was re-released. I saw The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi on opening day.

There is nostalgia, yes -- but it's there not because I have some hazy memory of seeing these movies when I was 2 or 3, but because I have vivid memories of drinking in every aspect of these movies as a teenager. My judgement is not clouded by nostalgia. :)

Steve, good for you. I didn't actually mean that everyone who is crazy about the OT is being nostalgic. People have a lot of different reasons for liking certain things. The only place where I really feel nostalgia is clouding people is for the prequels. I don't think they're as bad as people make them out to be, nowhere near it. That's all I really mean.
 

SteveMeister

Hang out with Steve.
Bauer Action Hour said:
Steve, good for you. I didn't actually mean that everyone who is crazy about the OT is being nostalgic. People have a lot of different reasons for liking certain things. The only place where I really feel nostalgia is clouding people is for the prequels. I don't think they're as bad as people make them out to be, nowhere near it. That's all I really mean.

OK, cool. Personally I think TPM isn't nearly as bad as people think it is, especially if you can get past Jar Jar. AOTC I don't think is quite as good, but the last hour is great, and I love the part where Anakin infiltrates the Sandpeople camp and his later confession to Padme. Neither film is as good as anything in the OT, but I still like them.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
I didn't mean that as a knock against the OT. Well, ok, maybe a little knock. :p But I didn't mean to imply that the OT was bad and that we only thought it was good because of how young and naive we were. It was and us a great saga. but as BAH is saying, I think many PT haters (not all mind you) definitely let their nostalgia cloud their mind and htink the OT is infallable while the PT, which suffers from many of the same problems the OT suffers from, is a troubled mess of a series.

I also think that ROTS will work for more people than the the previous two movies did because while the finale of the PT, it really just begins the climax of the saga as a whole. The first two movies are definitely the build up. The slow 30-40 minutes of movies like ANH, ROTJ, TPM, and AOTC. ROTS I really think starts the action packed last part of the saga. In that sense it is definitely more akin to the original trilogy, which was the playing out of the climax and finale, than the PT, which was the exposition and buildup.

Though I agree with everyone here about the PT. I for one enjoyed it. For me, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Having an amazing epic story folding out upon the screen over six chapters definitely weighs in for me more than some wooden acting here and there, some horrible dialogue all over the place, and some uneven pacing in most of the individual chapters.

can't believe in 9 days I will be standing in line waiting for this to all come to an end.

and for those who are "Worried" about the ROTS box office.. I don't think there is a question that it will outperform AOTC.. outperforming ANH or TPM may be impossible, though out of ALL the movies (and I do mean ALL the movies) I think ROTS probably has the best chance.

SteveMeister said:
Neither film is as good as anything in the OT, but I still like them.
as an overall story, I still like TPM as a movie better than ROTJ. The only two things ROTJ has to speak up with is only two thirds of the last part of the movie. The space battle and throne room scenes (and celebration in SE) are some of the best scenes of the saga. but really the rest of the movie is just bad. TPM had so much more going for it. and as far as machanics go, the only grating performances for me in Ep1 are Jar Jar, Anakin, and Queen Amidala (note not Padme who I think was done decently).

I just think TPM was a better moviethan ROTJ. Though AOTC is definitely the worst of the bunch. Though still not a terribly bad worst to have in a saga (*coughrevolutionscough*)
 

Manics

Banned
ManaByte said:
Reviews counted: 18
Fresh: 16 Rotten: 2


All indications lean to the fact that the movie will be good, if not great. This is probably the movie that everyone was waiting for way back when Phantom Menace was released to all that hype and then subsequentally crushed so many fans' hopes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom