Good, but what will it achieve in the end? It will never stop another attack, we need more than just air strikes.
The public will likely never find out the dirty work the clandestine services undertake to drip dry these fuckers.
Good, but what will it achieve in the end? It will never stop another attack, we need more than just air strikes.
Reports coming out is that the french Airforce is pounding the hell out of the capital right now. Something like 30 consecutive bombardments.
Oil fields, pipelines, refineries, ISIS makes $3 million a day selling oil in the black market but then the greedy bastards part of the coalition lack the resolve. Choke off the finances, destroy infrastructures, supply lines.The US has been leading a coalition dropping bombs on ISIS, but it doesn't look they have any real targets.
France is part of the coalition.
Russia is bombing the rebels who oppose Bashar Al-Assad while claiming to be bombing ISIS. It looks like ISIS placed a bomb in a Russian passenger plane out of Egypt and killed 224 Russians.
The coalitions has been stalling because they don't have targets to drop bombs on.
France is now picking up the pace, but it looks like they just drop bombs on Raqqa--the capital of ISIS.
ISIS doesn't have factories to bomb.
The Prime Minister of France used the words "total war". That's the expression Hitler used to justify the bombing of civilian targets. I would understand leveling up Raqqa, but that's well beyond what the agreed laws of war permit. I don't think anybody will pick up that case though.
Oil fields, pipelines, refineries, ISIS makes $3 million a day selling oil in the black market but then the greedy bastards part of the coalition lack the resolve. Choke off the finances, destroy infrastructures, supply lines.
The Prime Minister of France used the words "total war".
how is it horseshit? 15 years after 9/11 and we are actually worse off. there has to be more than just dropping bombs.
edit: you edited. you should stand behind your words, it's not like what you said would get you banned.
More than 2,000 women remain in Isis captivity.
Dropping bombs is just what we see on the news. I'm sure there is much more going on in the background.
Something needs to be done though to stop actions like this.
This is simply unacceptable. Something must be done.
http://video.lefigaro.fr/figaro/vid...ges-de-tirs-devant-le-bataclan/4614018760001/
video of shooting exchange with cops in front of Bataclan
brave men, facing an AK-47 with only a shotgun or a 9mm
Link?The Prime Minister of France used the words "total war". That's the expression Hitler used to justify the bombing of civilian targets. I would understand leveling up Raqqa, but that's well beyond what the agreed laws of war permit. I don't think anybody will pick up that case though.
That has nothing do to with the plight of Muslims in France. Read the release from ISIS.
ISIS kills more Muslims than non-Muslims.
.
Basically, they do this out of the purity of their heart.
Welp this happened : http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ont-deliberately-set-on-fire/article27265878/
Can't say for certain if its a reaction to Paris, but the the timing would make sense, reigniting old passions and whatnot. Between this and how successful the Conservatives were this past election, I am beginning to see a new side of Canada.
Not to belittle this hate crime, but the Conservatives got crushed in the last election.
http://video.lefigaro.fr/figaro/vid...ges-de-tirs-devant-le-bataclan/4614018760001/
video of shooting exchange with cops in front of Bataclan
He said war (don't know if the word "total" was used) but it's already an abuse of language. Unless we're ready to admit that ISIS is a country, and we're not.
Valls is in character, he's supposed to be the bad cop (and Hollande the good cop). Don't listen to everything he says.
Holy shit, these guys are amateurs. No tactical discipline.
Holy shit, these guys are amateurs. No tactical discipline.
Holy shit, these guys are amateurs. No tactical discipline.
lol shameWe very much should fight back against ISIS. We will not win the war against violent extremism by responding in kind though. The Islamic world needs to unite on the side of civilization and shame these people into irrelevance, that is the only way this will ever end.
However, Iraqi intelligence officials told the AP that they also warned France about specific details: among them, that the attackers were trained for this operation and sent back to France from Raqqa.
The officials also told AP that a sleeper cell in France met with the attackers after their training and helped them to execute the plan. There were 24 people involved in the operation, they said: 19 attackers and five others in charge of logistics and planning.
It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
Shame? Come on guyWe very much should fight back against ISIS. We will not win the war against violent extremism by responding in kind though. The Islamic world needs to unite on the side of civilization and shame these people into irrelevance, that is the only way this will ever end.
What's up with Belgium, seems like most of the terrorists came from there?
It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
Oh people do. Its just that people that say this don't let us know how to stop this with their insight, being super smart and all.Shame people won't get this.
It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
Really? What word(s) would be more suitable?It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
It's inevitable. Anyone who thinks 9/11 is going to be the last major terror attack in the US is a fool. Something else is bound to happen someday.I go back and forth between NJ and the WTC every day and I'm kind of petrified. I feel like it's just a matter of time before something is attempted. I was in the WTC station yesterday and I was astonished by how little security there was. I feel like we're at the end of a terrorist cycle where everyone is lax because a major event hasn't happened in the U.S. in 15 years.
Oh people do. Its just that people that say this don't let us know how to stop this with their insight, being super smart and all.
Someone earlier suggested the key to stopping IS was doctors, food and jobs.
Sure, sure. That'll change their perversion.
In the meantime, intelligence used to stop terrorist threats and actions before they happen is relevant.
you might not be able to prevent their ideology but can you stop their criminal enterprise by destroying facilities and personnel and giving the people of the counties they've invaded a chance to fight back.
or we can cynical sit back and expect our governments to do nothing while people are slaughtered at a rock concert.
That's not gonna cut it. The main sponsors of this are swimming in money.While I agree, I would also argue IS are two things: one of them is a state, a caliphate that has sources of income and can (and imo should be) neutralised.
IS as an idea, is a totally different thing, and indeed a bigger problem.
Imo we should neutralise IS, and help rebuild the area in a proper way, giving it a future, something the west neglected with afghanistan/iraq.
You're not fighting "terror" or an ideology, the aim is to kill those who are acting on this ideology, you attack the players/actors and infrastructure (physical/financial) that supports their operations, not the concept.It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
Don´t get me wrong, i am not suggesting even more open arms for the poor and mistreated civilizations of the middle east.. IS is not the problem. The virulent, violent, misanthropic, medievil ideology that is fueling those nutjobs is the problem. You can´t kill an idea with bombs. Well, bombs help but they won´t kill it.
can you translate that into english
You can rigorously prosecute domestic terrorists with harsh, long sentences, or even revocation of citizenship, those that go over to the middle east to fight are going to put themselves at risk of being killed like any other terrorist.Don´t get me wrong, i am not suggesting even more open arms for the poor and mistreated civilizations of the middle east.. IS is not the problem. The virulent, violent, misanthropic, medievil ideology that is fueling those nutjobs is the problem. You can´t kill an idea with bombs. Well, bombs help but they won´t kill it.
You can kill the IS in Rakka. But the real IS is everywhere. In Paris, Belgium, New York, Madrid, London, Berlin etc. And it´s growing bigger,
Or we could actually talk about the problem instead of (just) bombing the areas already way past the point of no return.
It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
http://video.lefigaro.fr/figaro/vid...ges-de-tirs-devant-le-bataclan/4614018760001/
video of shooting exchange with cops in front of Bataclan
In addition to foreign policy in that part of the world as well as domestic policy.I suspect he/she means that unless one gets to the root cause of what creates these Jihadist terror groups we'll never be able to win. AQ, the Taliban, Boko Haram, and ISIS are merely symptoms of a bigger problem, namely violent Wahabbism/Salafism. Until the international community begins cracking down on the proliferation of this extremist form of Islam then groups like ISIS will pop up no sooner than another has been defeated.
You're not fighting "terror" or an ideology, the aim is to kill those who are acting on this ideology, you attack the players/actors and infrastructure (physical/financial) that supports their operations, not the concept.
What should it be then.?It´s sad to see so many still believing in fighting the "terror" by killing some physical entities in a desert in Syria. You can´t beat the IS. There is no IS you could kill with bombs or guns. IS is a manifestation - not the source of the problem.
We also need to let go of the word "terror". This is far beyond terror.
That wasn't GIGN taking care of that?Don't they have SWAT or whatever their version is do deal with this?
I suspect he/she means that unless one gets to the root cause of what creates these Jihadist terror groups we'll never be able to win. AQ, the Taliban, Boko Haram, and ISIS are merely symptoms of a bigger problem, namely violent Wahabbism/Salafism. Until the international community begins cracking down on the proliferation of this extremist form of Islam then groups like ISIS will pop up no sooner than another has been defeated.