It's just another bullet point on a long list of deplorable human waste performed by such internet obsessed assholes.
It's just sad and pathetic.
"Look at me, I'm attacking somebody's Facebook from mother's basement!!!!! And then tonight I'm going to sit in a park and shit myself while yelling at rich people to give me free money!!!!!"
How somebody can perform such actions and have any respect for themselves as a human being afterwards escapes me.
You know what would have made everything so much easier for him? If he genuinely said sorry. An open letter to PA apologising for the way he behaved. Sure, some people still wouldn't be satisfied with that, but it would bring this whole sorry affair to an end far quicker.
But he didn't do that. He didn't apologise. Because he doesn't feel apologetic. That's the kicker.
This is like seeing a confirmed murderer executed by a corrupt regime without due process of law. You can be happy that justice was done and the guy got his while at the same time worrying that there's nothing stopping them from doing the same thing to you for much worse or no reason at all.
The internet lynch mob, of which PA is one of the more distilled examples, have gone after people for less (see: the Dickwolves dustup). That's why I find the whole thing distasteful. Reveling in this kind of collective id vigilante justice only legitimizes it, and legitimizing it just leads to more lynchings- some of which aren't going to be justified.
Honestly man, I don't think ANYONE is going to listen to what Me, You and Technomancer have to say (faceless too, you need a AV man) without thinking "are these guys defending Paul? THEY R NUTZ!"
So...he's a douchebag. You know this. Many other people know this. Everyone knows what a complete asshole he is now. Hopefully anyone who investigates him for employment in the future will learn that as well, thanks to this whole series of events.
At this point what purpose does continued aggression serve?
The purpose it serves is a reminder for people that if you want to act like a douche, this is what you get. Always remember, never forget. Maybe?
It's really weird how a lot of you have been assuming that Ocean Marketing is a big company of which Paul is merely an employee amongst many...
From all I've been reading and seeing, it really rather sounds like a one-man operation ran by Paul alone, or perhaps assisted by his wife at most.
The fact that he, himself, attends events, responds to mails, answers the phone, operates the twitter account, and that his poor grammar is seen in everything that the company has put out (and that wasn't plagiarized (like most of their wwebsite is)), really makes it seem like he's been running this out of his basement alone.
It reeks of shadiness. I can't imagine this guy getting a job at any serious marketing company with the kind of poor writing and ethics that he has. Heck, my English is better than his, and it's not even my first language!
If he keeps digging that hole he got himself in he'll soon show up in China
Never saw that one when it came out. I died! XD At least he deleted it.
Don't know what's transpired after yesterday, so I'll just say I feel bad for the company that employed the services of this asshat. Apparently it's a good product, especially for people with disabilities, he's tarnished the reputation of. This guy really should not be working in customer relations.
It's really weird how a lot of you have been assuming that Ocean Marketing is a big company of which Paul is merely an employee amongst many...
From all I've been reading and seeing, it really rather sounds like a one-man operation ran by Paul alone, or perhaps assisted by his wife at most.
The fact that he, himself, attends events, responds to mails, answers the phone, operates the twitter account, and that his poor grammar is seen in everything that the company has put out (and that wasn't plagiarized (like most of their wwebsite is)), really makes it seem like he's been running this out of his basement alone.
It reeks of shadiness. I can't imagine this guy getting a job at any serious marketing company with the kind of poor writing and ethics that he has. Heck, my English is better than his, and it's not even my first language!
Reddit.Where?
By this logic, vigilante justice is always acceptable because it is accurately described as "acting to counteract that misbehavior in some way." In general, one bad act does not justify another.False equivocation in a matter of clear moral imbalance is a full-throated defense of something indefensible. When you look at a situation in which one person has misbehaved and another has acted to counteract that misbehavior in some way, boiling it down to "well, everyone misbehaved" is in fact a technique for reducing culpability of the original bad actor.
I expect better than straw men from you. No one has claimed the bold. Certainly not me. If you're so locked into binary thinking that you can't see how criticizing two parties while still acknowledging that they are not equivalently wrong is possible there isn't much more I can say.On this particular topic, that defense involves pointing to things that individual people have done and drawing a bright line back to Gabe for exposing Paul's malfeasance in the first place, then claiming that these people's actions in response to Gabe's posting make him morally equivalent with Paul's
Let's not give the company a pass. Yes, he first made the controller for a disabled boy, but nowhere has it been marketed for the disabled. Someone had to scrounge up an old news article for that.
Countless shipping delays (months at a time even) are what caused this blow up in the first place. It sounds more and more like a poorly run company from a guy who thought he could make it big because he won 20k for his controller.
This is like seeing a confirmed murderer executed by a corrupt regime without due process of law.
At this point what purpose does continued aggression serve?
So...he's a douchebag. You know this. Many other people know this. Everyone knows what a complete asshole he is now. Hopefully anyone who investigates him for employment in the future will learn that as well, thanks to this whole series of events.
At this point what purpose does continued aggression serve?
Where?
False equivocation in a matter of clear moral imbalance is a full-throated defense of something indefensible. When you look at a situation in which one person has misbehaved and another has acted to counteract that misbehavior in some way, boiling it down to "well, everyone misbehaved" is in fact a technique for reducing culpability of the original bad actor.
On this particular topic, that defense involves pointing to things that individual people have done and drawing a bright line back to Gabe for exposing Paul's malfeasance in the first place, then claiming that these people's actions in response to Gabe's posting make him morally equivalent with Paul's long history of unacceptably poor customer service. That's a fundamentally disingenuous argument that serves no purpose but to shield the original target from blame, and it's fundamentally distinct from the "well I hope the internet randoms don't go too far" argument.
What continued aggression? I thought we were just discussion what had gone down.
No one is assuming this. At this point it's blindingly obvious that his claims of being a 125 man operation are completely BS.
Let's not give the company a pass. Yes, he first made the controller for a disabled boy, but nowhere has it been marketed for the disabled. Someone had to scrounge up an old news article for that.
By this logic, vigilante justice is always acceptable because it is accurately described as "acting to counteract that misbehavior in some way." In general, one bad act does not justify another.
Paul is a douche of epic and unbelievable proportions. Gabe is a douche of far, far lesser proportions. I can't seen any reason to self-censor the latter statement other than people want this thread to be exclusively and entirely a hate-fest against one party, in which case, what's the point of the fucking discussion? Any attempt by you to mischaracterize and dismiss that stance into a defense of Paul by some bullshit "Well he's worse!" fallacy is just a more eloquent version of "white knight."
I expect better than straw men from you. No one has claimed the bold. Certainly not me. If you're so locked into binary thinking that you can't see how criticizing two parties while still acknowledging that they are not equivalently wrong is possible there isn't much more I can say.
I'm too lazy to go back the 40 pages of this thread to dig up posts to quote, but I saw many posts from people seemingly believing the 125-man thing. It's obviously bullshit.
For me the "continued aggression" was anything after it was clear that his reputation was ruined, and likely with it his job. If we're saying it was "just like investigative journalism" then the point of the endeavor in the first place was to make sure that people were aware so he couldn't pull this shit again. I mean, I don't even have a huge problem with people still spamming him on Twitter, there's just no way to control a group like this. But while there may not have been anything "wrong" about digging up personal information about him on Facebook and the like, I'm really at a loss to think of a reason why that information helped in the endeavor.
"Oh my! Death threats on the family"
"Not true"
"Oh my! Private information made public!"
"That didn't happen"
"Oh my! He's had enough, he's apologized!"
"He apologized for being caught, not the same"
"Oh my! Nobody deserves this!"
"He said in the original email I hope you post this"
"Oh my! Let it rest! Can we move on!"
"Don't click on the thread? There's only one on the entirety of GAF"
"Look at me, I'm attacking somebody's Facebook from mother's basement!!!!! And then tonight I'm going to sit in a park and shit myself while yelling at rich people to give me free money!!!!!"
"Dude ... what the ... ?"
"We're just bullying bullies who bully now you bullies!"
"You obviously haven't read the thread."
What continued aggression? I thought we were just discussing what had gone down.
I think it's more about the aggression from the internet and not from this thread specifically. I think we all agree the guy is a douche, we just don't all agree on how long the harassment should continue.
For me the "continued aggression" was anything after it was clear that his reputation was ruined, and likely with it his job. If we're saying it was "just like investigative journalism" then the point of the endeavor in the first place was to make sure that people were aware so he couldn't pull this shit again. I mean, I don't even have a huge problem with people still spamming him on Twitter, there's just no way to control a group like this. But while there may not have been anything "wrong" about digging up personal information about him on Facebook and the like, I'm really at a loss to think of a reason why that information helped in the endeavor.
I wouldn't worry about this too much. It's not like the Internet has a long attention span.I think it's more about the aggression from the internet and not from this thread specifically. I think we all agree the guy is a douche, we just don't all agree on how long the harassment should continue.
The Facebook stuff came up before his reputation was ruined. Like I said, there seems to be a lot of cart before the horse going on here. Can we get examples of further ridicule of the man after the dust had settled? Perhaps we're using different ending points or something but I figure everything after his actual firing to be where we can talk of "excessive." And, as far as I know, nothing came about after that point besides the parody video; no new information has surfaced besides the now "Hmm, is N-Control themselves shady?!" bits.
Yeah, it's just like that.
rollseyes.gif
Yeah, I shouldn't depict this so linearly, you're right about the timing. Basically I feel that a good segment of the people who jumped on the hate train were in it to satisfy themselves somehow emotionally.
The point being that one can support the result a process achieved while being worried that that process will not reach such positive conclusions in the future.
Yeah, I shouldn't depict this so linearly, you're right about the timing. Basically I feel that a good segment of the people who jumped on the hate train were in it to satisfy themselves somehow emotionally.
I think right about now would be good for a summary of what has happened after the OP. Did this guy get fired?
So no private information was posted anywhere, you just don't think that people should have collated the public information they googled up. I don't think that's a reasonable standard at all.
There is nothing implausible or unreasonable about establishing a strict norm of respect for privacy and vigorously enforcing it.
You know what would have made everything so much easier for him? If he genuinely said sorry. An open letter to PA apologising for the way he behaved. Sure, some people still wouldn't be satisfied with that, but it would bring this whole sorry affair to an end far quicker.
But he didn't do that. He didn't apologise. Because he doesn't feel apologetic. That's the kicker.
I'm located 7.9 miles away from the address listed:
What do, GAF?
I think right about now would be good for a summary of what has happened after the OP. Did this guy get fired?
I think right about now would be good for a summary of what has happened after the OP. Did this guy get fired?
So the apologies he sent to the people directly involved 'weren't real', but an open letter to PA would be?
Surely the person here who actually deserves the fucking apology is Dave, the consumer who was belittled and treated shabbily, not fucking Gabe because someone didn't know who he was? Or does the actual flashpoint point of this shitstorm not even matter anymore to the crusaders?
So the apologies he sent to the people directly involved 'weren't real', but an open letter to PA would be?
Surely the person here who actually deserves the fucking apology is Dave, the consumer who was belittled and treated shabbily, not fucking Gabe because someone didn't know who he was? Or does the actual flashpoint point of this shitstorm not even matter anymore to the crusaders?
http://penny-arcade.com/2011/12/28/i-wwebsite-as-on-the-internetI wwebsite as on the internet
Gabe
Wednesday, December 28 2011 - 11:33 AM
Wow, that escalated quickly! There is even a humerous web video! Kotaku has an article that covers how this whole Ocean Marketing thing is winding down. It seems Ocean Marketing is out of business and Paul is no longer representing the Avenger. A new PR guy has been brought in to try and right their sinking ship. I think its fair to try and separate Pauls actions from the actual product. Its very possible that he was simply the marketing guy here but Ive also heard that he is at least a part owner in N-control the company that makes the Avenger. Ill be very curious see how this all shakes out.
I dont know if anyone is actually attacking Pauls wife and kid. Honestly I dont even know if he has a wife and kid. Maybe the mayor of Boston is his wife? Anyway, If they are real, none of this is their fault and I think we can all agree that they should be left alone.
The comic today is 100% true. I was grinning all night as Paul sent me each new email. I am absolutely an unapologetic asshole, but I try as best I can to be your asshole.
Hmm, that didnt come out quite right.
-Gabe out
Honestly man, I don't think ANYONE is going to listen to what Me, You and Technomancer have to say (faceless too, you need a AV man) without thinking "are these guys defending Paul? THEY R NUTZ!"