• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Penny-Arcade: "Marketers of the Avenger Controller are thieves and liars".

Seik

Banned
ybEVF.png


Never saw that one when it came out. I died! XD At least he deleted it.
 

bishoptl

Banstick Emeritus
It's just another bullet point on a long list of deplorable human waste performed by such internet obsessed assholes.

It's just sad and pathetic.

"Look at me, I'm attacking somebody's Facebook from mother's basement!!!!! And then tonight I'm going to sit in a park and shit myself while yelling at rich people to give me free money!!!!!"

How somebody can perform such actions and have any respect for themselves as a human being afterwards escapes me.

lol wut
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
You know what would have made everything so much easier for him? If he genuinely said sorry. An open letter to PA apologising for the way he behaved. Sure, some people still wouldn't be satisfied with that, but it would bring this whole sorry affair to an end far quicker.

But he didn't do that. He didn't apologise. Because he doesn't feel apologetic. That's the kicker.

So...he's a douchebag. You know this. Many other people know this. Everyone knows what a complete asshole he is now. Hopefully anyone who investigates him for employment in the future will learn that as well, thanks to this whole series of events.

At this point what purpose does continued aggression serve?
 
Don't know what's transpired after yesterday, so I'll just say I feel bad for the company that employed the services of this asshat. Apparently it's a good product, especially for people with disabilities, he's tarnished the reputation of. This guy really should not be working in customer relations.
 
This is like seeing a confirmed murderer executed by a corrupt regime without due process of law. You can be happy that justice was done and the guy got his while at the same time worrying that there's nothing stopping them from doing the same thing to you for much worse or no reason at all.

The internet lynch mob, of which PA is one of the more distilled examples, have gone after people for less (see: the Dickwolves dustup). That's why I find the whole thing distasteful. Reveling in this kind of collective id vigilante justice only legitimizes it, and legitimizing it just leads to more lynchings- some of which aren't going to be justified.

Just as bad if not worse, than Al Queda AMIRIGHT?!
 

scy

Member
Honestly man, I don't think ANYONE is going to listen to what Me, You and Technomancer have to say (faceless too, you need a AV man) without thinking "are these guys defending Paul? THEY R NUTZ!"

I think quite a few of us have and still disagree. Much of the information "dug up" was a simple search away. There's not prying into the lives of them and we keep getting false information about posted fiancee information (barring the bits on her working with him at Ocean Market(t)ing), there's been no physical violence against him or his family, no death threats, and so-on. I feel fairly safe in saying that, as of right now, his family is alive and well and the internet hasn't harmed anyone.

There's a lot of cart before the horse arguing going on here. That the information found was purposefully sought after. Not necessarily so. Much of it came about from honest to god simple searches and then shared. Not to say there aren't people out there looking for more and more dirt under the misguided illusion of "THIS IS SCHADENFREUDE" but it is definitely getting blown out of proportion on the extents of this "probing" being done.

I agree that perhaps it has gotten excessive but, at the same time, we're in like hour 30 of this fiasco. It's kind of the internet's thing to latch onto it and run it into the ground like that. Not to say that's a justification of the actions taken but it is the reality of the situation. Since more details are surfacing about N-Control and Paul's replacement, who knows where the rabbit hole will take us now.
 
It's really weird how a lot of you have been assuming that Ocean Marketing is a big company of which Paul is merely an employee amongst many...

From all I've been reading and seeing, it really rather sounds like a one-man operation ran by Paul alone, or perhaps assisted by his wife at most.

The fact that he, himself, attends events, responds to mails, answers the phone, operates the twitter account, and that his poor grammar is seen in everything that the company has put out (and that wasn't plagiarized (like most of their wwebsite is)), really makes it seem like he's been running this out of his basement alone.

It reeks of shadiness. I can't imagine this guy getting a job at any serious marketing company with the kind of poor writing and ethics that he has. Heck, my English is better than his, and it's not even my first language!
 

SYNTAX182

Member
So...he's a douchebag. You know this. Many other people know this. Everyone knows what a complete asshole he is now. Hopefully anyone who investigates him for employment in the future will learn that as well, thanks to this whole series of events.

At this point what purpose does continued aggression serve?

The purpose it serves is a reminder for people that if you want to act like a douche, this is what you get. Always remember, never forget. Maybe?
 

Osiris

I permanently banned my 6 year old daughter from using the PS4 for mistakenly sending grief reports as it's too hard to watch or talk to her
This kind of reminds me of the treatment Sam Jain got during the leak of his IM's and the resulting collapse of eFront.

SJ also had the internet dogs of war unleashed upon him, and found his treatment by the masses was equally applauded/disapproved of.

Of course Sam Jain went on to drop the cover of "legitimate, but unethical businessman" and became a straight out no-holds-barred criminal and I believe is still a fugitive on the run from the law.
 

Seik

Banned
The purpose it serves is a reminder for people that if you want to act like a douche, this is what you get. Always remember, never forget. Maybe?

That's exactly the way I'm seeing this whole situation. Be a douche, deal with it.

I suspected Princess Skittles being Paul, but then I saw the good orthography.
 
It's really weird how a lot of you have been assuming that Ocean Marketing is a big company of which Paul is merely an employee amongst many...

From all I've been reading and seeing, it really rather sounds like a one-man operation ran by Paul alone, or perhaps assisted by his wife at most.

The fact that he, himself, attends events, responds to mails, answers the phone, operates the twitter account, and that his poor grammar is seen in everything that the company has put out (and that wasn't plagiarized (like most of their wwebsite is)), really makes it seem like he's been running this out of his basement alone.

It reeks of shadiness. I can't imagine this guy getting a job at any serious marketing company with the kind of poor writing and ethics that he has. Heck, my English is better than his, and it's not even my first language!

No one is assuming this. At this point it's blindingly obvious that his claims of being a 125 man operation are completely BS.
 
Don't know what's transpired after yesterday, so I'll just say I feel bad for the company that employed the services of this asshat. Apparently it's a good product, especially for people with disabilities, he's tarnished the reputation of. This guy really should not be working in customer relations.

Let's not give the company a pass. Yes, he first made the controller for a disabled boy, but nowhere has it been marketed for the disabled. Someone had to scrounge up an old news article for that.

Countless shipping delays (months at a time even) are what caused this blow up in the first place. It sounds more and more like a poorly run company from a guy who thought he could make it big because he won 20k for his controller.
 

ymmv

Banned
It's really weird how a lot of you have been assuming that Ocean Marketing is a big company of which Paul is merely an employee amongst many...

From all I've been reading and seeing, it really rather sounds like a one-man operation ran by Paul alone, or perhaps assisted by his wife at most.

The fact that he, himself, attends events, responds to mails, answers the phone, operates the twitter account, and that his poor grammar is seen in everything that the company has put out (and that wasn't plagiarized (like most of their wwebsite is)), really makes it seem like he's been running this out of his basement alone.

It reeks of shadiness. I can't imagine this guy getting a job at any serious marketing company with the kind of poor writing and ethics that he has. Heck, my English is better than his, and it's not even my first language!

I don't think the company that's making and distributing that controller addon is much bigger.
 
Reddit.

False equivocation in a matter of clear moral imbalance is a full-throated defense of something indefensible. When you look at a situation in which one person has misbehaved and another has acted to counteract that misbehavior in some way, boiling it down to "well, everyone misbehaved" is in fact a technique for reducing culpability of the original bad actor.
By this logic, vigilante justice is always acceptable because it is accurately described as "acting to counteract that misbehavior in some way." In general, one bad act does not justify another.

Paul is a douche of epic and unbelievable proportions. Gabe is a douche of far, far lesser proportions. I can't seen any reason to self-censor the latter statement other than people want this thread to be exclusively and entirely a hate-fest against one party, in which case, what's the point of the fucking discussion? Any attempt by you to mischaracterize and dismiss that stance into a defense of Paul by some bullshit "Well he's worse!" fallacy is just a more eloquent version of "white knight."

On this particular topic, that defense involves pointing to things that individual people have done and drawing a bright line back to Gabe for exposing Paul's malfeasance in the first place, then claiming that these people's actions in response to Gabe's posting make him morally equivalent with Paul's
I expect better than straw men from you. No one has claimed the bold. Certainly not me. If you're so locked into binary thinking that you can't see how criticizing two parties while still acknowledging that they are not equivalently wrong is possible there isn't much more I can say.

In any case, your defense of Gabe seems to be that he posted the e-mail chain purely as an informational PSA to a curious public and therefore bears no responsibility at all for what his readers did with the information. That argument might have worked the first time he sicced the mob on an unsuspecting target, but he can't claim ignorance anymore.
 
Let's not give the company a pass. Yes, he first made the controller for a disabled boy, but nowhere has it been marketed for the disabled. Someone had to scrounge up an old news article for that.

Countless shipping delays (months at a time even) are what caused this blow up in the first place. It sounds more and more like a poorly run company from a guy who thought he could make it big because he won 20k for his controller.

It's looking more and more like the company is complicit in Paul's actions also. After claiming to have "fired" him, it looks like the new company PR mouthpiece is another shell account for Paul.

I really hope this thing seriously backfires on everyone involved in that operation at this point.
 

spirity

Member
So...he's a douchebag. You know this. Many other people know this. Everyone knows what a complete asshole he is now. Hopefully anyone who investigates him for employment in the future will learn that as well, thanks to this whole series of events.

At this point what purpose does continued aggression serve?

None, I suppose. But its not like people are being harassed into doing it. People are voicing their opinions on it. Commenting. Some instead are creating memes or making videos. Thats what happens, and it doesn't always have to have a purpose. Venting, and like I said, it will all be ancient history in a day or two. Kicking a guy when he's down? Yeah, perhaps there's a bit of that. But he openly asked for the kicks. He goaded people into publicizing this, and even threatened to get 120 people to help him with a smear campaign. Now he's facing the backlash.
 

SHAZOOM

Member
Where?



False equivocation in a matter of clear moral imbalance is a full-throated defense of something indefensible. When you look at a situation in which one person has misbehaved and another has acted to counteract that misbehavior in some way, boiling it down to "well, everyone misbehaved" is in fact a technique for reducing culpability of the original bad actor.

On this particular topic, that defense involves pointing to things that individual people have done and drawing a bright line back to Gabe for exposing Paul's malfeasance in the first place, then claiming that these people's actions in response to Gabe's posting make him morally equivalent with Paul's long history of unacceptably poor customer service. That's a fundamentally disingenuous argument that serves no purpose but to shield the original target from blame, and it's fundamentally distinct from the "well I hope the internet randoms don't go too far" argument.

And no one is disagreeing with the fact that Paul is a douchebag. We're mostly concerned that when dealing out justice, there doesn't ever seem to be a "enough is enough" quota. People will take it too far when someone is unpopular, and will have no problems sinking to or even below that person's level of disrespect.

For example, Me acting disrespectful to you doesn't automatically justify you digging around for information about my personal life or my Significant Others life to slug around "to get justice". Most of the info (such as email/phone number) are out there in public, but that doesn't mean sending harrassing emails/calls is considered "in the right" (outside of the original email exchange in the OP).


If he gets fired from his position, ruin his career. Fine, fits the crime (being a disrespectful asshat in a customer service industry).

Anything after that (Gabe gloating about the whole bit, while Tycho seems to know that its a bit much w/ joke added)? A bit unnecessary and puts PA in a bad light.

And remember, Gabe posting the Original e-mail is NOT the problem. Sticking up for the little guy is not the problem. The problem is knowing when "enough is enough" instead of letting "it all burn to the ground and taking you with me" and just moving on. Its an issue that puts most Gamers in a bad light, since our biggest reps (Tycho & Gabe) seem to don't have a lot of self control when dealing with things that anger them (or maybe its just Gabe, I don't know).
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
What continued aggression? I thought we were just discussion what had gone down.

For me the "continued aggression" was anything after it was clear that his reputation was ruined, and likely with it his job. If we're saying it was "just like investigative journalism" then the point of the endeavor in the first place was to make sure that people were aware so he couldn't pull this shit again. I mean, I don't even have a huge problem with people still spamming him on Twitter, there's just no way to control a group like this. But while there may not have been anything "wrong" about digging up personal information about him on Facebook and the like, I'm really at a loss to think of a reason why that information helped in the endeavor.
 
No one is assuming this. At this point it's blindingly obvious that his claims of being a 125 man operation are completely BS.

I'm too lazy to go back the 40 pages of this thread to dig up posts to quote, but I saw many posts from people seemingly believing the 125-man thing. It's obviously bullshit.

Also that youtube vid portraying him as being a mere call center agent.
 

scy

Member
Let's not give the company a pass. Yes, he first made the controller for a disabled boy, but nowhere has it been marketed for the disabled. Someone had to scrounge up an old news article for that.

To be fair, if I was trying to market this for actual profit, I'd go for the CoD crowd too and not the disabled gamer crowd.

By this logic, vigilante justice is always acceptable because it is accurately described as "acting to counteract that misbehavior in some way." In general, one bad act does not justify another.

It's a fine line, really. "Justice" is great and so is the idea of the common man bringing it about. But we've probably all seen it get taken way too far out of proportion at some point thanks to the Internet as a whole. Or saw it on some cop drama. So, yes, "one bad act does not justify another" indeed.

Paul is a douche of epic and unbelievable proportions. Gabe is a douche of far, far lesser proportions. I can't seen any reason to self-censor the latter statement other than people want this thread to be exclusively and entirely a hate-fest against one party, in which case, what's the point of the fucking discussion? Any attempt by you to mischaracterize and dismiss that stance into a defense of Paul by some bullshit "Well he's worse!" fallacy is just a more eloquent version of "white knight."

What did Gabe do? He posted it and then he's reveling in the destruction that has rained down. Now, I've accepted that I'm probably a shitty human being and all but I don't see the former as a big enough deal to condemn him for anything; sure, the latter is a bit in poor taste but I've come to accept that that response is basically par for the course.

I just can't equate Gabe to being responsible for the behavior of the Internet as a whole. Kotaku broke the steroids bit and they were part of Dave's original emailing; is that Penny-Arcade's fault? At least one of the parody twitter accounts is someone from GAF; is that Penny-Arcade's fault? Some of troll reviews of the product on Amazon are from GAF; is that Penny-Arcade's fault? Sure, Gabe was rather passive aggressive in this and got the ball rolling on it all but I'm not ready to condemn him for guilty of the actions of everyone else, regardless of this not being his first internet witch hunt.

I expect better than straw men from you. No one has claimed the bold. Certainly not me. If you're so locked into binary thinking that you can't see how criticizing two parties while still acknowledging that they are not equivalently wrong is possible there isn't much more I can say.

Actually, quite a few people were claiming that Gabe was just as bad, if not worse, than Paul. Maybe you haven't but others have made the claim.
 
I'm too lazy to go back the 40 pages of this thread to dig up posts to quote, but I saw many posts from people seemingly believing the 125-man thing. It's obviously bullshit.

yeah, it blew up incredibly fast. Internet detectives pretty know just about everything about this guy and his operation by now.

Both N-control and "Ocean Marketing" appear to be the same one or two man operation working out of the home.
 
For me the "continued aggression" was anything after it was clear that his reputation was ruined, and likely with it his job. If we're saying it was "just like investigative journalism" then the point of the endeavor in the first place was to make sure that people were aware so he couldn't pull this shit again. I mean, I don't even have a huge problem with people still spamming him on Twitter, there's just no way to control a group like this. But while there may not have been anything "wrong" about digging up personal information about him on Facebook and the like, I'm really at a loss to think of a reason why that information helped in the endeavor.

Such as?
 

GuardianE

Santa May Claus
"Oh my! Death threats on the family"
"Not true"
"Oh my! Private information made public!"
"That didn't happen"
"Oh my! He's had enough, he's apologized!"
"He apologized for being caught, not the same"
"Oh my! Nobody deserves this!"
"He said in the original email I hope you post this"
"Oh my! Let it rest! Can we move on!"
"Don't click on the thread? There's only one on the entirety of GAF"
"Look at me, I'm attacking somebody's Facebook from mother's basement!!!!! And then tonight I'm going to sit in a park and shit myself while yelling at rich people to give me free money!!!!!"
"Dude ... what the ... ?"
"We're just bullying bullies who bully now you bullies!"
"You obviously haven't read the thread."

I'm quoting this because it addresses 95% of Paul Cristoforo sympathizers.
 

Roto13

Member
What is this "continued aggression" anyway? People talking about what a fuckstain he is? Googling his name and finding public records about him? Oh no!

Come back when someone blows up his car or leaves a horse head in his bed.
 

Kosh

Member
What continued aggression? I thought we were just discussing what had gone down.

I think it's more about the aggression from the internet and not from this thread specifically. I think we all agree the guy is a douche, we just don't all agree on how long the harassment should continue.
 
With all these crazy updates and reveals going on behind whats happening at Ocean Marketing/N-Control, the next thing we'll find out is that they were behind 9/11 or something.
 

scy

Member
For me the "continued aggression" was anything after it was clear that his reputation was ruined, and likely with it his job. If we're saying it was "just like investigative journalism" then the point of the endeavor in the first place was to make sure that people were aware so he couldn't pull this shit again. I mean, I don't even have a huge problem with people still spamming him on Twitter, there's just no way to control a group like this. But while there may not have been anything "wrong" about digging up personal information about him on Facebook and the like, I'm really at a loss to think of a reason why that information helped in the endeavor.

The Facebook stuff came up before his reputation was ruined. Like I said, there seems to be a lot of cart before the horse going on here. Can we get examples of further ridicule of the man after the dust had settled? Perhaps we're using different ending points or something but I figure everything after his actual firing to be where we can talk of "excessive." And, as far as I know, nothing came about after that point besides the parody video; no new information has surfaced besides the now "Hmm, is N-Control themselves shady?!" bits.
 

Kinyou

Member
I think it's more about the aggression from the internet and not from this thread specifically. I think we all agree the guy is a douche, we just don't all agree on how long the harassment should continue.
I wouldn't worry about this too much. It's not like the Internet has a long attention span.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
The Facebook stuff came up before his reputation was ruined. Like I said, there seems to be a lot of cart before the horse going on here. Can we get examples of further ridicule of the man after the dust had settled? Perhaps we're using different ending points or something but I figure everything after his actual firing to be where we can talk of "excessive." And, as far as I know, nothing came about after that point besides the parody video; no new information has surfaced besides the now "Hmm, is N-Control themselves shady?!" bits.

Yeah, I shouldn't depict this so linearly, you're right about the timing. Basically I feel that a good segment of the people who jumped on the hate train were in it to satisfy themselves somehow emotionally.
 

spirity

Member
Yeah, I shouldn't depict this so linearly, you're right about the timing. Basically I feel that a good segment of the people who jumped on the hate train were in it to satisfy themselves somehow emotionally.

No. EVERYBODY commenting on the issue was in it to satisfy themselves emotionally.
 

scy

Member
Yeah, I shouldn't depict this so linearly, you're right about the timing. Basically I feel that a good segment of the people who jumped on the hate train were in it to satisfy themselves somehow emotionally.

Mind you, I do agree that some things we did find out were a bit much but a lot of people arguing about what was found seem to think we knew what was expected to be found; "I don't know why you had to dig that up!" doesn't really make sense. I did some Googling of his email address, real name, and his screename; maybe much but, honestly, it was like three Google searches in total :/

And, personally, I felt that Myspace, Facebook, Twitter, etc. were all open for hunting since ... he did consider himself a Social Media Expert. Just feels fitting to go through those avenues here.

I think right about now would be good for a summary of what has happened after the OP. Did this guy get fired?

His "firm" has been let go by N-Control. He still has his "job" though since it is his own company/basement and all.
 
So no private information was posted anywhere, you just don't think that people should have collated the public information they googled up. I don't think that's a reasonable standard at all.

There is nothing implausible or unreasonable about establishing a strict norm of respect for privacy and vigorously enforcing it.

I agree that a basic level of personal privacy should be respected where it bears no relation to the matter in hand; that's why GAF are fine with post histories to demonstarte bias or hypocrisy, but playing internet detective to conduct an ad hominem attack is bannable.

You know what would have made everything so much easier for him? If he genuinely said sorry. An open letter to PA apologising for the way he behaved. Sure, some people still wouldn't be satisfied with that, but it would bring this whole sorry affair to an end far quicker.

But he didn't do that. He didn't apologise. Because he doesn't feel apologetic. That's the kicker.

So the apologies he sent to the people directly involved 'weren't real', but an open letter to PA would be?

Surely the person here who actually deserves the fucking apology is Dave, the consumer who was belittled and treated shabbily, not fucking Gabe because someone didn't know who he was? Or does the actual flashpoint point of this shitstorm not even matter anymore to the crusaders?
 
I think right about now would be good for a summary of what has happened after the OP. Did this guy get fired?

there was a communication that he was "let go" by N-control, though some digging by internet detectives has made it obvious that this new person handling communications (eli schwartz) is still him.
 

Kosh

Member
I wouldn't worry about this too much. It's not like the Internet has a long attention span.



I don't know, this guy might have a couple of years planned out. He even added Anonymous_UK to his tweet hoping they may want to get in on the fun.
 

scy

Member
So the apologies he sent to the people directly involved 'weren't real', but an open letter to PA would be?

Surely the person here who actually deserves the fucking apology is Dave, the consumer who was belittled and treated shabbily, not fucking Gabe because someone didn't know who he was? Or does the actual flashpoint point of this shitstorm not even matter anymore to the crusaders?

I think a lot of people treat Penny-Arcade as ground zero rather than the staging grounds :/

And they both did get apologies. However, Dave's was basically "I didn't take you seriously" and Gabe's was "Didn't know you were bigger than me." Those are not apologies by any means. People want to see a real, actual apology letter. Though, at this point, it's probably too little, too late.
 

spirity

Member
So the apologies he sent to the people directly involved 'weren't real', but an open letter to PA would be?

Surely the person here who actually deserves the fucking apology is Dave, the consumer who was belittled and treated shabbily, not fucking Gabe because someone didn't know who he was? Or does the actual flashpoint point of this shitstorm not even matter anymore to the crusaders?

I was talking about if the guy wanted to save his hide publicly, he should use the PA website to get his message across. Of course I think Dave deserves a proper apology. Get real.
 
Didn't see this posted yet, had a look but no sign:

I wwebsite as on the internet
Gabe
Wednesday, December 28 2011 - 11:33 AM

Wow, that escalated quickly! There is even a humerous web video! Kotaku has an article that covers how this whole Ocean Marketing thing is winding down. It seems Ocean Marketing is “out of business” and Paul is no longer representing the Avenger. A new PR guy has been brought in to try and right their sinking ship. I think it’s fair to try and separate Paul’s actions from the actual product. It’s very possible that he was simply the marketing guy here but I’ve also heard that he is at least a part owner in N-control the company that makes the Avenger. I’ll be very curious see how this all shakes out.

I don’t know if anyone is actually attacking Paul’s wife and kid. Honestly I don’t even know if he has a wife and kid. Maybe the mayor of Boston is his wife? Anyway, If they are real, none of this is their fault and I think we can all agree that they should be left alone.

The comic today is 100% true. I was grinning all night as Paul sent me each new email. I am absolutely an unapologetic asshole, but I try as best I can to be your asshole.

Hmm, that didn’t come out quite right.

-Gabe out
http://penny-arcade.com/2011/12/28/i-wwebsite-as-on-the-internet
 

Figboy79

Aftershock LA
For me, I think that people like Paul sometimes need to learn the hard lessons hard.

What I mean is, do you think that Paul limits his douchebaggery to the customers he dealt with at work? I feel sorry for his wife and kids (if he has kids). I'm sure they deal with the worst of his egomania and narcissism. He's more than likely the type of guy who treats anyone who isn't "in the loop," like shit and enjoys it. I've worked with people like him. I've had to serve people like him back when I worked in customer service.

Those type of selfish, hateful douchebags don't have my pity. While I certainly empathize with his family for having to go through whatever the fallout may be, assholes like Paul get none from me.

Just because you may be in a position of power, and you may have genuinely worked hard to get there, and you are proud of your "connections," doesn't give you a free pass to sneer down at people who are just trying to do their thing and live their lives. Accomplishment is not a ticket to ride for douchebaggery.

I think Paul is learning this lesson the hard way. I approve. I don't approve of actually physically harming him or his family; that's not cool, but I certainly approve of a self-centered egomaniac being taken down a peg or three.

Maybe he'll learn to treat people in all areas of his life better, not just the customers he dealt with at work. If anything, it will be a humbling experience for him. Or at least, I hope it is.
 
Honestly man, I don't think ANYONE is going to listen to what Me, You and Technomancer have to say (faceless too, you need a AV man) without thinking "are these guys defending Paul? THEY R NUTZ!"

What other shit?!? People keep saying "his family" or "personal information" ... Where the fuck is this? I've seen nothing he hasn't made completely public actually be ... you know, publicized.

Is it wrong that people find out about his business connections? His family is BARELY mentioned and if it is it's in passing about how it sucks about his family.

I'm still waiting from pages and pages ago for people to list this shit. Not just heresy, not just a reddit link, not just some person from GAF making assumptions ... but what has actually happened besides this guys professional career going down the drain because of (wait for it) how he treated people while conducting business?

I'll wait.

I don't remember people being sad for Jack Thompsons family when he was disbarred. Funny.

(Edit: You personally - SHAZOOM - may not have said all the things I've mentioned but the people you are quoting and others that have taken that 'side' have)
 
Top Bottom