PlayStation 5 more powerful than Xbox Scarlet, according to Game Informer editor

*Most of the time, yes.

Personally speaking, I like how Microsoft has always focused on pristine visual quality with its generations of consoles.

I always feel like I'm making some kind of visual sacrifice/trade-off to play Sony games. Whereas Microsoft always seem to offer a bridge to a more PC-like experience without having to power up my rig. As someone who prefers pristine image quality, I really want to see Sony focus on fixing this for the PS5.

Pure comedy here. Now the barrage of 720p games on Xbox one is pristine IQ while poor PS4 running at full HD is a visual sacrifice.
 
So what? These machines have more horsepower than anybody wants or could possibly use. What's the point?
To be fair there is not changes to the be opposite... these machines doesn't have power enough :(

AMD's GPUs are still too hungry in power for the performance delivered... that is a big issue for a console form factor.
 
Last edited:
Life is a walkie-talkie, Gears is a walkie talkie. Nearly all games are... so you make no sense. It's a stupid term that shows how bitter some people are towards PlayStation because they can't gloat about their own games.

MS wishes they had a walkie talkie game, it's why they created a new studio, The Initiative. It's also why they paid for a time exclusive with Tomb Raider. Let them make fun of walkie talkie games, it sells more than Gears, Halo, Forza.
 
Y
*Most of the time, yes.

However, cheaply done "remasters"/ports on the PS4 in the early period to middle of this console generation suffered greatly from non-existent levels of anisotropic filtering. In the same games, the Xbone versions had crisp, clean textures. Whilst the PS4 equivalent textures looked like they came from a Dreamcast game from the early 2000s. As a former PC gamer, smudgy floor textures a meter away from my feet offend me greatly, so I "upgraded" to the Xbone versions for those games affected.

Personally speaking, I like how Microsoft has always focused on pristine visual quality with its generations of consoles. I love Playstation but Sony has *always* suffered in this area (PS1's forced dithering + "polygon jitter", PS2's emotional jaggies, PS3's horrid GPU + vaseline smear post-process AA, PS4's 2002 levels of anisotropic filtering, PS4 Pro with fake 4k and sub-standard image quality).

I always feel like I'm making some kind of visual sacrifice/trade-off to play Sony games. Whereas Microsoft always seem to offer a bridge to a more PC-like experience without having to power up my rig. As someone who prefers pristine image quality, I really want to see Sony focus on fixing this for the PS5.
your simply an idiot, numbers don't lie PS4 is 1.8 teraflops xbone is 1.3 teraflops PS4 pro is 4 teraflops Xbox one X is 6 teraflops so stop creating a stupid utopia in Ur head about xbone having better textures than ps4, get over it. 360 was great xbone is pure manure shit
 
Y your simply an idiot, numbers don't lie PS4 is 1.8 teraflops xbone is 1.3 teraflops PS4 pro is 4 teraflops Xbox one X is 6 teraflops so stop creating a stupid utopia in Ur head about xbone having better textures than ps4, get over it. 360 was great xbone is pure manure shit
The fact MS copied the same design of PS4/Pro to create X shows how bad the Xbox One design was and how it suffers to play actual games.

If you put in a upgrade way it should be: PS4 >> Pro >> X
Xbox One is nowhere to be found... it born and it will be dead alone.
 
Last edited:
[QUOTE="FranXico, post: 254546011, not "taking it" like that.
I guess he's not the only troll around here then. Thank you for your wonderful insight, have a nice day.
[/QUOTE]as some one else said if it bothers you that much put them on ignore bra
 
The fact MS copied the same design of PS4/Pro to create X shows how bad the Xbox One design was and how it suffers to play actual games.

If you put in a upgrade way it should be: PS4 >> Pro >> X
Xbox One is nowhere to be found... it born and it will be dead alone.
I don't think changing to GDDR5 and putting a 580 in there is really copying. They released At two different price points.
 
IKR? Sony ponies will get into a tizzy but I feel XBox has much better diversity of games. The only thing Sony has right now is bigger AAA titles which kinda all look the same yo.

Raise your signal : noise ratio please.

Your point can be valid based on taste without divulging into juvenile warz.
 
What I never understood is why Microsoft don't build much more powerful consoles considering the incomparable amount of money they have???? They could sustain those initial losses better than any other player in this industry.
 
What I never understood is why Microsoft don't build much more powerful consoles considering the incomparable amount of money they have???? They could sustain those initial losses better than any other player in this industry.
Xbox =/= MS
Xbox division exists on a budget, and in the end its not as big or as important as other divisions inside MS.
 
I don't think changing to GDDR5 and putting a 580 in there is really copying. They released At two different price points.
They are the same design... there are very few differences like MS with own custom changes and Sony with own custom chantes.

X, Pro and PS4 shares the same design while Xbox One has an unusual design.

Not power or price point.... you can increase the power with the same design or the price point.
 
Last edited:
What I never understood is why Microsoft don't build much more powerful consoles considering the incomparable amount of money they have???? They could sustain those initial losses better than any other player in this industry.
I don't thing Xbox division can even tough a finger of that MS money.

Xbox division is like to be a child of a super rich penny-pincher... it has it own allowance but for more than that it will be really difficult to get.
 
Last edited:
They are the same design... there are very few differences like MS with own custom changes and Sony with own custom chantes.

X, Pro and PS4 shares the same design while Xbox One has an unusual design.

Not power or price point.... you can increase the power with the same design or the price point.
Other than the move engines which were for the DDR3 l, what was significantly different? AFAIK the X was just a more powerful version of the S.
 
Last edited:
Other than the move engines which were for the DDR3 l, what was significantly different? AFAIK the X was just a more powerful version of the S.
X is a more powerful version of PS4/Pro.

Xbox One had a complete different chip with eSRAM, 9 DMAs (that includes the Moves Engines), DDR3 controller, Audio Unit for Kinect, etc... it is not even alike.

PS4 / XBI APUs side by side

diecomparison.jpg


Scorpio APU

750px-scorpio_engine_die_shot.png


750px-scorpio_engine_die_shot_%28annotated%29.png


X and Pro APU side by side

jpg


PS4 = Pro = Scorpio <> Xbox One

MS trowed on trash the Xbox One's design to use a design similar to PS4/Pro on Scorpio.
 
Last edited:
X is a more powerful version of PS4/Pro.

Xbox One had a complete different chip with eSRAM, 9 DMAs (that includes the Moves Engines), DDR3 controller, Audio Unit for Kinect, etc... it is not even alike.

PS4 / XBI APUs side by side

diecomparison.jpg


Scorpio APU

750px-scorpio_engine_die_shot.png


750px-scorpio_engine_die_shot_%28annotated%29.png


X and Pro APU side by side

jpg


PS4 = Pro = Scorpio <> Xbox One

MS trowed on trash the Xbox One's design to use a design similar to PS4/Pro on Scorpio.
That SRAM my Lord. It takes up like 30% of the space.
 
That SRAM my Lord. It takes up like 30% of the space.
I keep thinking today what the MS engineers were thinking... waste that much of space will never be a good think lol
They could have twice the GPU power without eSRAM... like near 2.5 TFs without increase the size of the chip.
 
Last edited:
X is a more powerful version of PS4/Pro.

Xbox One had a complete different chip with eSRAM, 9 DMAs (that includes the Moves Engines), DDR3 controller, Audio Unit for Kinect, etc... it is not even alike.

PS4 / XBI APUs side by side

diecomparison.jpg


Scorpio APU

750px-scorpio_engine_die_shot.png


750px-scorpio_engine_die_shot_%28annotated%29.png


X and Pro APU side by side

jpg


PS4 = Pro = Scorpio <> Xbox One

MS trowed on trash the Xbox One's design to use a design similar to PS4/Pro on Scorpio.
Thanks for the info! That's pretty interesting.
 
I keep thinking today what the MS engineers were thinking... waste that much of space will never be a good think lol
They could have twice the GPU power without eSRAM... like near 2.5 TFs without increase the size of the chip.

Doing what the bosses ordered they had to have 8 gigs of ram for the TV and other crap. It was not until the last minute 8 gigs of ddr5 at a reasonable cost became a reality. So they went with the sram and regular ram to ensure 8 gigs of ram. If the consoles launched 6 months earlier it would been only 4 gigs of ram in the ps4.
 
The fact MS copied the same design of PS4/Pro to create X shows how bad the Xbox One design was and how it suffers to play actual games.

If you put in a upgrade way it should be: PS4 >> Pro >> X
Xbox One is nowhere to be found... it born and it will be dead alone.

Considering all of the other changes to the CPU cores and the Hovis method, saying they copied it isn't being completely honest.
 
Top Bottom