You know the market is creaming itself with anticipation that Romney will be elected. Obviously.
Only held back by the uncertainty that remains that Romney may somehow lose.
You know the market is creaming itself with anticipation that Romney will be elected. Obviously.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/wisconsin-recall-union-attacks-barrett.php?ref=fpbWisconsin Recall Gets Messy As Union Slams Barrett
Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett officially jumped into the recall against Republican Gov. Scott Walker and is already battling attacks from his left ahead of the Democratic primary by the state public employee unions, who are accusing him of having cozied up to Walker himself.
Barrett, who was previously the Democratic nominee against Walker in 2010, has fought with the unions on a variety of city government issues. In the recall campaign, AFSCME and the teachers union WEAC have endorsed former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk, who launched her campaign in January soon after the state Democrats recall petitions were officially turned in.
Now, AFSCME has been e-mailing and linking to a YouTube video, which it says it did not produce, using edited audio of comments by Barrett at a forum last year. The forum was hosted by Milwaukee conservative talk radio host Charlie Sykes, and was held in March 2011, at a time when the states 14 Democratic state senators had fled the state in an effort to block budget quorum on Gov. Scott Walkers anti-public employee union legislation.
In the audio, Barrett is depicted saying that the collective bargaining changes could be passed by stripping them out of the budget repair bill, and passing them on a simple majority quorum as specific non-budgetary legislation. This tactic was being widely speculated about at the time, and ultimately was indeed used to pass the bill two days after Barretts comments.
The video also uses audio of Barrett saying the phrase, and the bill will pass, and the bill should pass.
Not to be that guy but the unions would be complete fools not to line up behind Barrett if he gets the nom.And the circus continues
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/wisconsin-recall-union-attacks-barrett.php?ref=fpb
So when Barrett wins the nomination, unions will...stay home? Support him tepidly?
Not to be that guy but the unions would be complete fools not to line up behind Barrett if he gets the nom.
If they want to support a more pro-labor candidate in the primary, sure (as I know Barrett's relationship with unions has been a little cold), but they'd better be there for the general.
I know shit and all about that guy, but I see nothing wrong with unions getting involved in the primary (in the ridiculous context which is our campaign finance laws).And the circus continues
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/wisconsin-recall-union-attacks-barrett.php?ref=fpb
So when Barrett wins the nomination, unions will...stay home? Support him tepidly?
Cantor comment potentially undercuts Romney attack line
By Kristen Welker
After todays bipartisan signing ceremony for the JOBS Act at the White House, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor made brief remarks that may raise some eyebrows in both Chicago and Boston.
Cantor told reporters, "We have a very difficult economic situation still. The president said today that hes always believed that its the private sector that is the job generator in this country. I agree with him, and I think most Americans agree with him."
The remarks could be seen as inadvertently undercutting one of Mitt Romneys attack lines against the president.
At a campaign appearance in Appleton, Wisconsin last Friday, Romney told the crowd: In Barack Obamas government-centered society, the government must do more because the economy is doomed to do less. When you attack business and vilify success, you will have less business and less success.
In his victory speech in Wisconsin on Tuesday, Romney also added: "When the president attacks business and when his policies make it more difficult for businesses to grow and prosper, he is also attacking the very communities he wanted to help."
Of course, it's important to note that Cantor sponsored the legislation that Obama signed into law today, so that could partly explain his comments today.
Yet Cantor is among a number of top Republicans to endorse Romney in recent weeks as he has emerged as the most likely nominee.
When was the last time a presidential candidate lost his state? Because he would have lost PA if he got the nomination. No one in this state likes this asshole
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9zuHm9ZtiCA
Holy shit, Obama going all out :lol
So, no discussion here of the Republicans declaring war on caterpillars?
I'm surprised at you, GAF.
So, no discussion here of the Republicans declaring war on caterpillars?
I'm surprised at you, GAF.
So, no discussion here of the Republicans declaring war on caterpillars?
I'm surprised at you, GAF.
Obama takes a second to think about what he's going to say before saying it.http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9zuHm9ZtiCA
Holy shit, Obama going all out :lol
It's no Etch-a-Sketch, but it's still pretty damn funny.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rnc-chair-reince-priebus-compares-war-on-women-to-war-on-caterpillars-its-a-fiction/
But wait! There's more...
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/04/the-truth-about-the-republican-war-on-caterpillars/255522/#GOPWarOnCaterpillars
Obama takes a second to think about what he's going to say before saying it.
JEEZ WITHOUT HIS TELEPROMPTER HE'S SO DUMB
/idiot
By the way, I think Obamacare is going to be upheld by virtue of Obama's tone. I figure he's privy to their initial vote (held on Friday) and thought processes. He wouldn't be talking tough if it blows up in his face come June. Still betting on a 6-3 vote to uphold, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas opposed.
Mine is like 50% rent 50% food.
Living the dream.
ANyone see the Maddow bit on the Michigan state government basically breaking their own rules in passing all their legislation? That is pretty fucked up. Can someone declare all those laws as invalid since they did not properly pass them? Crazy separation of powers issues. Constitutional crisis imminent.
I think it's time for you to take a long hard look at yourself and re-evaluate the life choices you made.Guys, should I stay up for job numbers?
Yeah, the WHO cleared it for indoor use in '06.Since the 60's, science has shown that DDT actually wasn't destroying the bald eagle eggs. There are actually legit arguments being made for unbanning it since it is still the safest, most effective form of mosquito control.
If it gets unmanned, there would probably be rules against using it for agriculture or grass lawns or anything. It's a last chance type of pesticide because of how effective it is so you don't want bugs to get used to as they slowly were decades ago.
Well, one thing's for sure.Sounded more like a desperate, nearly unprofessional lunge in response to the upcoming death of the achievement of his first term. Obama certainly knows the government sort of botched their defense of the law. He's pre-emptively laying the groundwork for running against the court
So, no discussion here of the Republicans declaring war on caterpillars?
I'm surprised at you, GAF.
“I find it offensive that the Democratic National Committee is using a term like that to describe policy differences,” said Sean Spicer, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee. “It’s not only bad, but it’s downright pathetic they would use a term like ‘war’ when there are millions of Americans who actually have engaged in a real war. To use a term like that borders on unpatriotic.”
http://goo.gl/a60K8
It's no Etch-a-Sketch, but it's still pretty damn funny.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/rnc-chair-reince-priebus-compares-war-on-women-to-war-on-caterpillars-its-a-fiction/
But wait! There's more...
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/04/the-truth-about-the-republican-war-on-caterpillars/255522/#GOPWarOnCaterpillars
He should. We don't need the president waging a war on the SCOTUS. Also, the best outcome of Obama's remarks was the laughable overreaction from a Fifth Circuit judge who wanted AG Holder to affirm Obama's acceptance of judicial review. Then, conservatives rallied around him. Remember, though, judicial activism is decimating America.LOL @ McConnell telling Obama to "back off" from his SCOTUS commentary.
It's funny that he thinks anything that he says actually matters. He's a troll - no more, no less.
Priebus is terrible. Whenever he gets tough questioning he starts attacking the host and he's quite nasty about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9zuHm9ZtiCA
Holy shit, Obama going all out :lol
I think it's time for you to take a long hard look at yourself and re-evaluate the life choices you made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9zuHm9ZtiCA
Holy shit, Obama going all out :lol
"For another, if Republicans have moved to the right on health care, it's also true that Obama has moved to the left. He strenuously opposed a mandate forcing people to obtain health insurance until he won office and changed his mind."
The fact-check goes on to rebuke Obama for accusing Republicans of wanting to toss out lots of economic regulations (something Republicans want to do) by pointing out that Romney himself doesn't want to literally eliminate every federal regulationonly a lot of them, including the DoddFrank Wall Street reform package, which was designed to prevent a repeat of the practices that led to the 2008 crash. But Obama didn't actually say Romney wanted to eliminate all federal regulationsonly a lot of them.
Job numbers in 2 hours, right?
Finally PD's alt account reveals itself.135k at best for me.
135k at best for me.
Edit: so you decided to stay up then? *popcorn*
Nonfarm payroll employment rose by 120,000 in March, and the unemployment rate was little changed at 8.2 percent
the fuck?
Why must I be so awesome?
120K? What the hell happened?
Wow, huge drop in U-6, broader measure of unemployment, down to 14.5% from 14.9%. Best news in lousy report.
Not only were you closer than everyone else, but you were still high!
The Price is Right rules in effect, so you still lose
Anyone know what the highest know net positive or negative revision ever has been for these types of numbers?Doesn't make any goddamn sense. I'll wait for the revised numbers a month from now.