• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2012 |OT4|: Your job is not to worry about 47% of these posts.

Status
Not open for further replies.

schuelma

Wastes hours checking old Famitsu software data, but that's why we love him.
Guys I told you last night the trackers had to move up for Romney today because of the math. The trackers took out the last very good polling day before the debate factored into their numbers.

I thought today's polls are the first to exclude last Thursday which was a big day for Romney.
 

Zzoram

Member
Debate Transcript said:
BIDEN: And I love my friend here. I — I'm not allowed to show letters but go on our website, he sent me two letters saying, "By the way, can you send me some stimulus money for companies here in the state of Wisconsin?" We sent millions of dollars. You know...
RADDATZ: You did ask for stimulus money, correct?
BIDEN: Sure he did. By the way...
RYAN: On two occasions we — we — we advocated for constituents who were applying for grants. That's what we do. We do that for all constituents who are...
BIDEN: I love that. I love that. This was such a bad program and he writes me a letter saying — writes the Department of Energy a letter saying, "The reason we need this stimulus, it will create growth and jobs." His words. And now he's sitting here looking at me.

K.O.

This is the moment of the night that all the "Biden was rude" talk is trying to hide. The moment where Paul Ryan admitted that the stimulus created jobs and that he asked TWICE for stimulus money in private despite publicly saying the stimulus was bad.
 
I thought today's polls are the first to exclude last Thursday which was a big day for Romney.
The first polls the after the debate were good for Obama. Gallup and ras. unchanged or went up last Thurs. Rand went up. It was on Saturday we saw movement (friday polling)
 

Effect

Member
Monday then I guess is when we'll see the results of the decline Romney had after the debate and the day after. That should start to factor in any increase, if there was one from the VP debate. If Obama does well then we should be okay or at least back to where we were pre-debate with Romney perhaps a bit higher (do to republicans not being considered undecided anymore) but with Obama still higher.

I wonder if we're ever going to get any polls that include third party candidate like Gary Johnson. Then there is the guy in Virginia. They certainly pull from Romney.
 

Diablos

Member
Gallup LV 49-47 R+1
Gallup RV 48-46 O
Obama Approval 50-44 (-3)
Fuuuuuuuck. The LV model for Mitt is almost at 50. No no. Can't have this.

Monday then I guess is when we'll see the results of the decline Romney had after the debate and the day after. That should start to factor in any increase, if there was one from the VP debate. If Obama does well then we should be okay or at least back to where we were pre-debate with Romney perhaps a bit higher (do to republicans not being considered undecided anymore) but with Obama still higher.
Wait, wasn't everyone saying by today Romney's bounce should have faded?
Nate is also making the case that it's probably a bit wrong to assume that's going to happen, it seems.
 

schuelma

Wastes hours checking old Famitsu software data, but that's why we love him.
The first polls the after the debate were good for Obama. Gallup and ras. unchanged or went up last Thurs. Rand went up. It was on Saturday we saw movement (friday polling)


Wait, I was sure that the consensus was that Thursday and Friday right after the debate were the strong Romney days while the weekend saw Obama improve. I am positive that was what people on this board were saying.
 

Diablos

Member
Wait, I was sure that the consensus was that Thursday and Friday right after the debate were the strong Romney days while the weekend saw Obama improve. I am positive that was what people on this board were saying.
Me too. Now it's Monday.

Just keep moving the deadline I guess is how some people cope with it. Haha.
 

pigeon

Banned
Wait, I was sure that the consensus was that Thursday and Friday right after the debate were the strong Romney days while the weekend saw Obama improve. I am positive that was what people on this board were saying.

We were being forgetful if we did so. Look back in the thread and youll see that Obama ticked up in Gallup with the Thursday numbers.
 
Silver
The case that Mr. Romney’s bounce is evaporating after his debate last week in Denver continues to look a bit thin. The tracking polls aren’t perfect by any means. Some are better than others, but they are a below-average group of polls on the whole. But they do provide useful information about the day-to-day trend in the race, and so far they haven’t shown the sort of reversal that Democrats might have hoped for.

I'll wait until Monday before pushing the point; by then it'll be pretty much undeniable whether Romney changed the projection of the race long term, or whether this was just a very long bump. But right now Romney is near 50% in Gallup against a sitting president, mere weeks from election. That's not irrelevant
 

Diablos

Member
http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_predictions.php?mapid=Hpd

If Bams wins, this is what I think the EV's will look like. NH is a question mark to me so I just assumed worst case scenario for the time being.

I have a feeling Nov 6 is gonna be a long night.

Silver


I'll wait until Monday before pushing the point; by then it'll be pretty much undeniable whether Romney changed the projection of the race long term, or whether this was just a very long bump. But right now Romney is near 50% in Gallup, mere weeks from election. That's not irrelevant
The first debate was over a week ago, I can't imagine Obama getting saved by some weekend magic this time. I think the polling overall suggests Mitt's performance put him right back in the game, and then some.
 

RDreamer

Member
This'll probably be Obama's low point. There's no way he's going to shit the bed again in the next debate. He won't be declared winner and champion overall or anything like Romney got in the first one, but it'll likely be a nice comeback narrative since it'll be compared to his first bout. He'll grab some of his support back. He won't hit the high he got before, but no one should have thought he'd ever win like that.

Nothing is really going to happen between now and election day to sway it a ton either way, so Obama's not going to suddenly drop like a stone or anything. Both campaigns will play it relatively safe and just say the same stuff they have been saying.

And other than that Obama's got enough money and ammo to run some great ads in the swing states.
 

Slime

Banned
It's definitely looking more and more like Romney's gains are more lasting than we'd hoped. I can see why people were cautioning folks like Diablos then, but I think there genuinely is cause for concern right now. Even Nate seems to agree that the "temporary Romney bounce" narrative doesn't seem to have much evidence in the polling.
 

AlteredBeast

Fork 'em, Sparky!
It would be so odd to see this election become a battle, since it has been a forgone conclusion for so long, I haven't really thought of it.

Regardless, until Romney goes back in time and makes sure the title of his op-ed resembles something closer to "Managed Bankruptcy is Best for Detroit" instead of "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt", Ohio will not be in play.

If it were within 2 or 3 points, maybe I would start sweating, but naahhhhh.
 
So I asked my girlfriend last night "why Is Romney running for president?".

She's conservative but voted for Kerry and Obama last elections. She is leaning toward Romney but isn't committed. She was a poli sci major turned nurse major in college.


She couldn't answer the question... I think a lot a of people if asked that question will draws blanks too.

So what do you guys think? Why is Romney running for President?
 
Silver again
The Florida poll, which was conducted by Mason-Dixon, a good polling firm, showed Mr. Romney with a lead and was a helpful reminder of this. Mr. Obama probably does not trail in Florida by seven points. Some other polls published this week showed him with a small lead there. But there is reason to think that he has become the underdog, since Mr. Obama led in Florida by two or three points before the debates and because Mr. Romney’s bounce since then has been a little larger than that. In fact, the FiveThirtyEight forecast had flipped to calling Mr. Romney a slight favorite in Florida a couple of days ago.
 

AniHawk

Member
The first polls the after the debate were good for Obama. Gallup and ras. unchanged or went up last Thurs. Rand went up. It was on Saturday we saw movement (friday polling)

you meant the poll results on thursday were good, or the results from thursday were good? because the polls released on thursday would have only included up to october 3, which was still pre-debate. friday was the first day of aftermath from the debate.
 
It would be so odd to see this election become a battle, since it has been a forgone conclusion for so long, I haven't really thought of it.

Regardless, until Romney goes back in time and makes sure the title of his op-ed resembles something closer to "Managed Bankruptcy is Best for Detroit" instead of "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt", Ohio will not be in play.

If it were within 2 or 3 points, maybe I would start sweating, but naahhhhh.

Ehh... according to Silver's projections, Ohio is within 2-3 points now.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...e-firewall-has-brittle-foundation/#more-35900
 

ezekial45

Banned
So I asked my girlfriend last night "why Is Romney running for president?".

She's conservative but voted for Kerry and Obama last elections. She is leaning toward Romney but isn't committed. She was a poli sci major turned nurse major in college.


She couldn't answer the question... I think a lot a of people if asked that question will draws blanks too.

So what do you guys think? Why is Romney running for President?

Cause he wants to be President.
 

Owzers

Member
The party who convinced the public and every "news" organization that weapons of mass destruction were in Iraq and we had to go to war are now the same party who are complaining that it took 2 weeks to tell the american people the correct intelligence behind the Libya attack.

Sometimes i don't like people.
 

AlteredBeast

Fork 'em, Sparky!
So I asked my girlfriend last night "why Is Romney running for president?".

She's conservative but voted for Kerry and Obama last elections. She is leaning toward Romney but isn't committed. She was a poli sci major turned nurse major in college.


She couldn't answer the question... I think a lot a of people if asked that question will draws blanks too.

So what do you guys think? Why is Romney running for President?

Romney wants to do a few things:

Legacy.

The idea that he knows best what to do.

Cause his Dad dropped out and couldn't get it done.
 
Wait, I was sure that the consensus was that Thursday and Friday right after the debate were the strong Romney days while the weekend saw Obama improve. I am positive that was what people on this board were saying.
No. I'm sure last week was good for Romney but it was t as good as the week prior which showed Obama drop that day.

I checked the numbers last night on Gallup and rand. Gallup stayed put. This indicated it was about the same as the one it replaced.

big movement came the second day. The media narrative drove this more than anything and it took a day to settle in.
 

Diablos

Member
still so pissed at Obama. He really shat the bed at the debate. Everyone has done their job except him when it matters. Ugh.
It's so true. From Clinton to Biden, the Democratic party came out in spades to give Obama a huge advantage coming into the last month of campaigning and look at where we are. It's almost like a bad dream!
 

RDreamer

Member
So what do you guys think? Why is Romney running for President?

To be the first Mormon President.

I forget who it was, but someone said it was the same thing as Kennedy, whose father told him he didn't think Catholics were truly a part of America until they had a president representing them. Now, that's not to say Kennedy had other reasons, but I think that might be Mitt's overriding reason. That's really the only thing I can come up with. There certainly isn't an overarching ideology he abides by that he wishes to follow out, as evidenced by his views changing depending on who he's talking to and which political position he's going for. I don't think he really wants to change anything, for the sake of making it better. I feel like he probably jumped on the healthcare stuff in Massachusetts because it was a historic issue that he could ride into the White House (that frontline documentary kind of played that angle, too). So, even his biggest accomplishment doesn't seem to be done because he wants something better for the American people. It's just because he has ambitions.
 

Snake

Member
If tomorrow Obama doesn't get a bit of a boost at least in RV on gallup then we'll know there's a bit of a problem since last Friday was a big polling day for Romney, and a lead despite the loss of that day would mean he's holding steady in the present. The bigger worry is that once last sunday's polling cycles out Obama will probably see a big single-day drop, since that seemed to be a sort of positive outlier for Obama.

But I think it's safe to say that either way we're going to have problems until the narrative changes, meaning Obama really needs to step up on Tuesday. If CNN is pushing an Obama comeback narrative on wednesday morning then Romney's good press will be erased and national polling will return to a Obama narrow lead. Finally, if Obama can win or tie the foreign policy debate then the election will pretty much be over for Romney.

If Obama loses the next two debates then Romney will take a decisive lead in the polls and it will be all about the ground operations in determining whether Obama can eke out a win.
 

Cloudy

Banned
Ugh, these national numbers are scary. Hope Obama can eek it out with a map like this in the worst case scenario!

e3Szy.png
 

Diablos

Member
Nate Silver said:
Iowa, in particular, is a crucial state that has been thinly polled all year. (The FiveThirtyEight model, in fact, calculates that Iowa is slightly more essential to the Electoral College than Florida, despite having many fewer electoral votes.) There has been just one poll of Iowa since the debates, and while it gave Mr. Obama the lead, it was an automated poll that probably does not merit too much weight.
What the hell? Poll Iowa already, ffs, there's enough pollsters out there perfectly capable of doing it...

This is the most fucked up election cycle ever. More nail biting than 2000 perhaps, but I wasn't politically engaged back then (nor could I vote).
 

codhand

Member
I feel like Silver must be laughing as he writes these. I really don't see Wisconsin, Iowa or New Hampshire going red, total gut-call but....
 

Snake

Member
Personally, I am flirting with going on a media blackout to as much of an extent as is possible for the next couple of weeks. This last week has probably been hell on my blood pressure.
 
To be the first Mormon President.

I forget who it was, but someone said it was the same thing as Kennedy, whose father told him he didn't think Catholics were truly a part of America until they had a president representing them. Now, that's not to say Kennedy had other reasons, but I think that might be Mitt's overriding reason. That's really the only thing I can come up with. There certainly isn't an overarching ideology he abides by that he wishes to follow out, as evidenced by his views changing depending on who he's talking to and which political position he's going for. I don't think he really wants to change anything, for the sake of making it better. I feel like he probably jumped on the healthcare stuff in Massachusetts because it was a historic issue that he could ride into the White House (that frontline documentary kind of played that angle, too). So, even his biggest accomplishment doesn't seem to be done because he wants something better for the American people. It's just because he has ambitions.

Mitt Romney is a man who wants the TITLE of President of the United States, but absolutely NONE of the actual responsibilities.
 

schuelma

Wastes hours checking old Famitsu software data, but that's why we love him.
No. I'm sure last week was good for Romney but it was t as good as the week prior which showed Obama drop that day.

I checked the numbers last night on Gallup and rand. Gallup stayed put. This indicated it was about the same as the one it replaced.

big movement came the second day. The media narrative drove this more than anything and it took a day to settle in.

Hmm..fair enough, though my head hurts trying to determine whether that gain last Friday was more reflective of a good Romney day dropping out.
 
If tomorrow Obama doesn't get a bit of a boost at least in RV on gallup then we'll know there's a bit of a problem since last Friday was a big polling day for Romney, and a lead despite the loss of that day would mean he's holding steady in the present. The bigger worry is that once last sunday's polling cycles out Obama will probably see a big single-day drop, since that seemed to be a sort of positive outlier for Obama.

But I think it's safe to say that either way we're going to have problems until the narrative changes, meaning Obama really needs to step up on Tuesday. If CNN is pushing an Obama comeback narrative on wednesday morning then Romney's good press will be erased and national polling will return to a Obama narrow lead. Finally, if Obama can win or tie the foreign policy debate then the election will pretty much be over for Romney.

If Obama loses the next two debates then Romney will take a decisive lead in the polls and it will be all about the ground operations in determining whether Obama can eke out a win.


That's the problem I have. It seems like he just wants to be president to fill in a footnote in his résumé. It doesn't seem like any real agenda or issues he wants to solve or fix.

The presidency shouldn't be taken so lightly.
 

Diablos

Member
I feel like Silver must be laughing as he writes these. I really don't see Wisconsin, Iowa or New Hampshire going red, total gut-call but....
Silver isn't one to troll himself or his readers. I take him at his word when he makes projections like this. Could he be wrong? Sure. But I sincerely doubt it.

I hope this is just chicken little Poli-GAF.
We've got less than a month to go and it's getting closer by the day, if not Mitt getting a slight lead every time a new poll drops. This is far beyond chicken little, there's real cause for concern.
 
Hmm..fair enough, though my head hurts trying to determine whether that gain last Friday was more reflective of a good Romney day dropping out.
A good day for Romney dropped out but it wasn't that good based on the week prior.

Last thurs was the same. Good but not great. Friday was great.

If by Monday Obama doesn't tick up a bit it's time to worry.
 

Diablos

Member
If it comes down to OH you really have to wonder if the state GOP is going to pull any last-minute bullshit to invalidate votes. They've been tenacious in their efforts to do so thus far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom