Heh.Tuesday Reuters/Ipsos daily tracking poll
46-43 O
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/16/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE89F14C20121016
Heh.Tuesday Reuters/Ipsos daily tracking poll
46-43 O
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/16/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE89F14C20121016
Tuesday Reuters/Ipsos daily tracking poll
46-43 O
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/16/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE89F14C20121016
He's got a huge built-in lead in Iowa. And he leads in Nevada polls even though those have a history of lowballing Democratic support.http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_predictions.php?mapid=JjL
This is the most realistic win for Romney without Ohio, which I don't think is very realistic. If Obama is going to win Ohio I don't see him losing Iowa, Nevada, and New Hampshire.
If Mitt continues to widen his already 4-point LV lead the firewall is up for grabs.He's got a huge built-in lead in Iowa. And he leads in Nevada polls even though those have a history of lowballing Democratic support.
I still think he wins Florida and Virginia but it doesn't matter, his firewall's holding strong.
I have no idea.Isn't approval "all adults" and not RV/LVs?
Tuned into Rush and I think he has a good point about Romney's ability to control the debates, owing it to his time at Bain. How many 'flim flam" (Rush's word, I've never heard it before) men do you think Romney has had to deal with - guys in business who we all know that try and get by on BS, their companies are in the tank and asking Bain for more capital, etc. - people Romney needed to see through and shoot down as part of his business (suspend belief that he shut down companies for his own profit for a minute)?
Now, whether or not you agree that Obama is running on a failed record and trying to sell it, Romney may have more experience in actually controlling the room, versus being "given the room" as happens with a President.
I think we discount Romney's ability in this respect because he's awkward as a campaigner at times (most of the time). He might have a hard time relating to Joe Main Street, but we shouldn't project that on his ability to control a room when something is being sold/pitched/debated.
Fucking hell, you're right. We should all give up now.If Mitt continues to widen his already 4-point LV lead the firewall is up for grabs.
Seriously wtf is going on.
Gallup really scares me because they're the holy grail of polling at this point in a Presidential race. PPP is pretty damn good too.
If Mitt continues to widen his already 4-point LV lead the firewall is up for grabs.
Draw us a map?
Gallup is the only one showing thisBlack Mamba?
This election was completely changed by the debate
Agreed!Fucking hell, you're right. We should all give up now.
If Romney wins, probably won't just be sneaking Ohio and getting to 271 - it could be a wave election.
He's got a huge built-in lead in Iowa. And he leads in Nevada polls even though those have a history of lowballing Democratic support.
I still think he wins Florida and Virginia but it doesn't matter, his firewall's holding strong.
They have to know something. I don't think they are one to bluff. And the Obama campaign calling them out reeks of panic/desperation.Gallup is the only one showing this
Remember, Gallup also said Obama had no bounce from the convention after a week when everyone else had Obama up big.
Obama is up in five of the seven trackers and only Gallup is bigger than three.
Either Gallup knows something no one else has all year or they're missing something. Guess well find out
If Romney wins, probably won't just be sneaking Ohio and getting to 271 - it could be a wave election.
They have to know something. I don't think they are one to bluff. And the Obama campaign calling them out reeks of panic/desperation.
Gallup is the holy grail for this, they would not fabricate their numbers or use sketchy stats.
I'm guessing they're just polling idiots.They have to know something. I don't think they are one to bluff. And the Obama campaign calling them out reeks of panic/desperation.
Gallup is the holy grail for this, they would not fabricate their numbers or use sketchy stats.
Idiots who vote that the other pollsters aren't talking to, sure.I'm guessing they're just polling idiots.
Gallup is the only one showing this
I don't think it'll be above that on Election Day though. I think we're seeing the early signs of the public, specifically independents and white voters, divorcing a likable incumbent right now. Romney can seal the deal tonight.
Voters agree with Obama on most issues yet he has failed to effectively communicate it effectively. I don't see that changing tonight; he won't bomb, but he'll be the same unclear and unfocused candidate he's been since late August.
Romney doesn't need Ohio to win
I still stand by my 303 EV prediction.
http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_predictions.php?mapid=JjY
Obama can lose like four states with this map and still win, too. Sure, I don't like that this race has tightened, but Obama's electoral firewall will keep me from taking anxiety meds.
Their 2010 polls were complete shit.They have to know something. I don't think they are one to bluff. And the Obama campaign calling them out reeks of panic/desperation.
Gallup is the holy grail for this, they would not fabricate their numbers or use sketchy stats.
Why is all of a sudden Gallup is some go to poll?
Idiots who vote that the other pollsters aren't talking to, sure.
With Gallup it's much better to just look at the trends then focus on day-to-day aberrations. However we're getting closer to crunch time so people are attaching undue significance to the horserace numbers.Reuters, Rand, USB/tippz and even google has shown a clear shift back to Obama. The national polls from abc and NBC has too. He'll even raw has just held steady. Gallup is literally the only poll to show a shift to Romney in the past seven days.
It really makes no sense cuz Gallup isn't bad.
Scholastic Student Vote picks Obama 51-45
They've predicted the winner in all but two of the presidential elections since 1940. Sorry PD.
@PollTracker
US President '12: Obama (D) 46.0% Romney (R) 43.0% (Oct. 16 - Reuters/Ipsos) http://tpm.ly/S1KbVN
Perhaps, I'm talking about their Presidential polling though.Their 2010 polls were complete shit.
So why do people think they are infallible?Their 2010 polls were complete shit.
Reuters, Rand, USB/tippz and even google has shown a clear shift back to Obama. The national polls from abc and NBC has too. He'll even raw has just held steady. Gallup is literally the only poll to show a shift to Romney in the past seven days.
It really makes no sense cuz Gallup isn't bad.
A massive shift like this demands a high level of proof, so we should see a similar shift in the other polls before reaching a conclusion. Yet Gallup is the only one showing that Romney is more than +1. In comparison to the ABC/WaPo and the Reuters polls, Gallup show Romney in a position that is seven points better. I don't care how much credibility they have. There is no way that every other poll, which has generally shown an even race or a slight shift back to Obama, is wrong. Even Gallup's RV has stopped making sense.I think Gallup is much more credible at this point in the game.
So out of five polls, only one shows any sizable lead for Romney, and you think the other four are the ones that got it wrong.
Can ask you something?
Are you a fucking idiot?
My post is talking about the trends. Every poll but ras has trended big back to Obama. Some over five points. Ras shows no trend. Only Gallup is showing a Romney trend. It's weird.With Gallup it's much better to just look at the trends then focus on day-to-day aberrations. However we're getting closer to crunch time so people are attaching undue significance to the horserace numbers.
so are we back to this current discussion
for about the tenth fucking time in this thread
Yep,same time tomorrow?so are we back to this current discussion
for about the tenth fucking time in this thread
Seriously wtf is going on.
Gallup really scares me because they're the holy grail of polling at this point in a Presidential race.
If I didn't love you guys so much I'd vow to bail out of this thread until November 7. I love punishing myself, though, so I stay.
You love punishment? I'm gonna watch the entire debate WHILE following along here.
He's the king of chickenlittles. If he isn't panicked he isn't happy.
Because they are, in presidential elections?So why do people think they are infallible?