Particle Physicist
between a quark and a baryon
Below 10%? I don't accept
lol
Below 10%? I don't accept
I'm not sure October is any more volatile than normal. It might seem more volatile recently because the focus has been on minor shifts in the polls. So they seem volatile because we're focused, ignoring a few outliers, on minor variations. For all we know, we might be obsessing over noise.I take it October is normally the crazy month for polls. I'm starting to wish I had followed this stuff more closely in previous elections, although I guess I have the excuse of this being the first time I'm voting.
You're correct about the first and last point. Although I'd prefer Biden's victory to shift public opinion, it will likely prove inconsequential. The second, however, is an erroneous characterization. I only miss the tired reference to The Hive.Debates means nothing. Now playingolls means nothing. And launching this thursday night: its not about the vp anyway.
Below 10%? I don't accept
uh, you are the one who said Obama 55-45. It has to be below that. Okay, if it's exactly 55-45, you win too. I don't want you claiming victory at 55.9-44.1 That's all.
Bro, he's got 6 different avatar bets going on. He's playing you.
uh, you are the one who said Obama 55-45. It has to be below that. Okay, if it's exactly 55-45, you win too. I don't want you claiming victory at 55.9-44.1 That's all.
it sure feels like Silver reads Poli-Gaf.
IMO, Ebay Huckster is Silver in disguise.
in the span of 3 hours, what the fuck poligaf! lmao
The drama continues...
Its the same 2 or 3 people over and over again.in the span of 3 hours, what the fuck poligaf! lmao
The drama continues...
Romney talking about more intervention in the ME... more wars is a winning strategy. I expect this being the ground work for his foreign policy debate where he spends 2 hours arguing how he didn't really say that.
Romney talking about more intervention in the ME... more wars is a winning strategy. I expect this being the ground work for his foreign policy debate where he spends 2 hours arguing how he didn't really say that.
pretty hilarious how RCP is using Gallup's tied article as it's Gallup poll, not the +5 one which went up for Obama today. lol
Yeah, I think I am going to do the intrade thing, but funds will take forever to clear. I would love to pick up some Obama stock at around 6.00/share!
Agree, looks like the perfect opportunity to equate Mitt to Bush, who is hated by most Americans.edit: more war and more tax cut. Gives Obama a bigger talking point regarding the Bush policies. Why doesn't Obama even mention Bush? I would say Romney is proposing war and tax cuts just like Bush did. 2 things that killed our deficit and economy (as a talking point).
uh, you are the one who said Obama 55-45. It has to be below that. Okay, if it's exactly 55-45, you win too. I don't want you claiming victory at 55.9-44.1 That's all.
Yep,I an not sure how he though this is a good idea.Romney talking about more intervention in the ME... more wars is a winning strategy. I expect this being the ground work for his foreign policy debate where he spends 2 hours arguing how he didn't really say that.
Relio is right, I have too many bets. I don't want to ruin your avatar with basketball season/Lakers implosion on the horizon.
besides I still have to wear this avatar due to a bet
If you're not spreading war you're projecting weakness.Yep,I an not sure how he though this is a good idea.
Is there any chance Bama ordering some sort of intervention in the m.e if the polls would hit alarmingy low lvls?
Yep,I an not sure how he though this is a good idea.
I love the pivot here.
"It's all about the economy! If the economy sucks, Obama winning the debates won't matter one bit!"
*economy improves*
"It's all about the debates! Nobody cares about unemployment dropping to the lowest level in 4 years!"
I love the pivot here.
"It's all about the economy! If the economy sucks, Obama winning the debates won't matter one bit!"
*economy improves*
"It's all about the debates! Nobody cares about unemployment dropping to the lowest level in 4 years!"
Heh, You noticed that too?
The media is fucking that chicken until the very end of this election cycle.
Oh, and Mitt's stepped in it again;
FACT CHECK: Romney's one-sided story on trade, defense
http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-one-sided-story-trade-defense-190815851--election.html
Bama should stay on top for the foreseeable future. I don't see anyone on their schedule giving them trouble apart from LSU. Oregon has a tougher schedule ahead.Is there any chance Bama ordering some sort of intervention in the m.e if the polls would hit alarmingy low lvls?
https://twitter.com/ppppolls/status/255380627577266176Obama doing *better* on our new MN poll than he was a month ago. This poll was mostly Saturday/Sunday as opposed to Thursday/Friday
-PPP's newest poll on Minnesota's amendment to ban gay marriage finds it running slightly behind, with 46% of voters planning to support it and 49% opposed. That represents a 4 point shift compared to a month ago when it led for passage 48-47.
[...]
Things are starting to get interesting with Minnesota's voter ID amendment. When we polled on it in June it was leading for passage by a 58/34 margin. By September that had tightened to a 56/39 advantage. And now it's leading only 51/43. Democrats are now even more opposed to the voter ID amendment (23/71) than they are to the one on marriage. And although independents continue to support it their 52/41 favor for it is down a good deal from 62/33 a month ago. This fight may end up a lot closer than people initially expected.
Democrats have a 52/40 advantage on the generic legislative ballot, including a 48/34 lead with independents. It's always hard to say exactly what a generic ballot translates to in terms of seats gained, but that should lead to a pretty healthy number of pick ups for the Democrats.
Would Diablos and PD acknowledge something for me? That there is a very high correlation of Democratic Senators winning their states with Obama also winning that state. Currently this is the breakdown of swing state Senators by 538:
State - Senator (Party) - Positive Polling Average
Florida - Nelson (D) - 7.4
Nevada - Heller (R) - 2.6
Ohio - Brown (D) - 7.1
Virginia - Kaine (D) - 2.6
Wisconsin - Baldwin (D) - 2.8
How many people do you think will split their tickets? PD is always talking about Romney winning and having a Republican Congress and Senate. But if Democratic Senatorial candidates are in the lead, then it's also likely that Obama will pick up similar voters. PD, do you honestly think that Romney will win the Presidency and the Republicans won't win the Senate? And conversely, do you honestly believe that Democrats holding the Senate while Obama loses?
My main point is that if the Democrats keep the Senate as the polling shows, then it is more probably that Obama will win. Both are more likely to occur than just one or the other.
Undecided voters shrank from the September survey’s 16% to just 7%.
Detroit Free Press is now reporting that Obama's 10-point lead in Michigan is now down to 3 points after the debate.
On the bright side, maybe this scare means democrats will be more motivated to get the hell out and vote.
It better wake Obama up to actually go on the offensive at the debates.
Seriously, I have no clue what was going on or why they decided to go that route at the first debate. It makes absolutely zero sense.
The one article I read said that Obama was just incredibly back and forth with practice debates. They said he was like his campaign self once and then the next day was like he was for the real debate.
Problem isn't really a concentrated decision, really. The problem for incumbents is that they have to run a country at the same time as campaigning, and so practice gets pushed aside. Hopefully this is the bug in his butt to go harder and better next time, though.