I think they are poll that has Romney going up.
I think they are poll that has Romney going up.
Yep!If Romney gets in office, I'm going to guarantee him 8 years. He doesn't have to do anything and he will get good economic numbers. Obama did some of the lifting, and Romney will coast in as if he did a good job.
Democrats aren't insensitive jackasses like Republicans, they won't let the fiscal cliff hit us. Once that passes, the only thing that could derail is an implosion in Europe or China. I suppose starting a trade war with China could end up doing that for us, but I don't think Romney will actually go charge China with being a currency manipulator.
If Romney doesn't win the entire thing, it's looking more and more likely that Obama will win the electoral vote and Romney will win the popular vote.
Can't tell if you're serious. But if Obama wins the electoral vote decidedly,
Can't tell if you're serious. But if Obama wins the electoral vote decidedly, which it looks like he will, Romney isn't winning the popular vote...
Yeah I dont buy itSilver discusses that in his latest post
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/oct-10-is-romney-leading-right-now/
.But some of our competitors are issuing forecasts suggestive of a very large difference between the Electoral College and the popular vote to a degree that is frankly not credible, in my view. (Well compare the FiveThirtyEight forecasts against some alternatives in a moment.)
Silver discusses that in his latest post
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/oct-10-is-romney-leading-right-now/
You are such a joke character, much more so than PDStrong number for Romney in Reuters/Ipsos.
Generally, people expect State Polls to come in line with the National Polls. A 2-3 point National margin of victory will translate into EC victory (even Nate says that) because at that kind of a National Margin you have enough vote lead in all the states too.
Very weird, now we have to see if Obama's numbers hold Steady in WI, OH for the PPP polls. And why is nobody polling IA?
Good to hear. I only got to see a bit of the debates, but my understanding is Brown did himself no favors.
Brown is really not smart.Good to hear. I only got to see a bit of the debates, but my understanding is Brown did himself no favors.
Good to hear. I only got to see a bit of the debates, but my understanding is Brown did himself no favors.
The debate days and weekend should be out of the next set of polls right? Every thing released so far has included them?
Very good.Warren 51 - Brown 45 - PPP
Gallup RV 48 (-2) - 46 (+1) O
Gallup LV 48 (+1) - 47 (-1) R
Gallup O Approval - 52 (-1) - 43 (+1)
Warren 51 - Brown 45 - PPP
Warren winning.
Baldwin Winning
Obama blowout
Dems taking back the house.
Blue Dogs voted out
If all five of these were to happen I'd think I could jump for absolute joy.
tnr said:At this stage, it appears that Romney made smaller gains in the battleground states than he did in the national polls. On average, Romney gained 2.1 points in battleground state polls, even though he picked up an average of 5.5 points in the 11 national surveys conducted after the first presidential debate....
Given Obama's pre-debate leads in the key battleground states, a 2.1 point gain would leave Romney well short of 270 electoral votes. In fact, Obama led by more than 4 points in states worth 281 electoral votes.
In particular, the Romney campaign should be distressed about Ohio. Even at what could very well be Romney’s peak, Obama leads in six of eight post-debate surveys in Ohio with CNN and NBC/Marist both showing Obama up by more than four points. On average, Obama leads by 2 or 3 points in Ohio, but right now it would be sufficient to reelect the president despite Romney’s lead in the national polls.
How can so many people change their minds from 90 minutes of grandstanding when you've had months, no, years to get to know the candidates?
I just don't understand the mindset of these people
Dems taking back the house.
Nate Cohn:
When national and state polls don't align, the safe assumption is probably not that the state polls are wrong.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/electionate/108459/romneys-battleground-state-problem
How can so many people change their minds from 90 minutes of grandstanding when you've had months, no, years to get to know the candidates?
I just don't understand the mindset of these people
Warren 51 - Brown 45 - PPP
The debate isn't what helped Romney. The media coverage afterwards was far more beneficial...
Nate Cohn:
When national and state polls don't align, the safe assumption is probably not that the state polls are wrong.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/electionate/108459/romneys-battleground-state-problem
Probably a mix dumbness and the good old fashioned "Root for the winner, root for the underdog" syndrome, Romney is the underdog, and his debate performance lifted his chances so suddenly people are cheering him on, I think a poor performance might give a similar result for Romney where the people he took from debate 1 will suddenly flee him because they don't want to be seen cheering a sure loser. Some people just want to vote based on whim because they have no respect for the office and see both candidates as just politicians that will always do the same thing, so they vote with their gut.
The debate isn't what helped Romney. The over-the-top media coverage afterwards was far more beneficial...
Also, note that the approval is still over 50 and that is just a 3-day average. The horserace numbers still have Friday of last week..
Honestly, if nothing else, Obama's blown debate has probably taken this off the table. Republicans are too engaged right now, when they were previously on the edge of checking out for the year.
i think you also better start playing the lottery