The Librarian
Banned
My JFK thread is being filled with conspiracy types.
I literally watched this movie for the first time two days agoSo I wake up this morning to find that the senate majority leader has been replaced by Alec Baldwin's character from Glengarry Glen Ross.
I'm ok with this.
My JFK thread is being filled with conspiracy types.
Enrollments have doubled since the end of October, from 106,000 to more than 200,000. That figure comes from the 14 states that have set up their own exchanges, and will be higher when the federal numbers are added in. Some of those states have experienced their own technological glitches (Oregon is only able to take paper applications at the moment) but the quickened pace of enrollment shows that demand is stronger than frustration over technology.
Great news for Reince Preibus:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/22/1257664/-Obamacare-enrollments-double-in-last-three-weeks
The media have been buzzing with stories many of them wildly exaggerated of people facing higher premiums as a result of Obamacare. But theres a story about rates you may not have heard: According to Jonathan Gruber, a leading health care wonk at MIT, all private insurance premiums in the 25 red states that are refusing to expand their Medicaid programs will be 15 percent higher as a direct result of that decision.
Not surprising at all given this board's propensity for conspiracy.My JFK thread is being filled with conspiracy types.
David Mamet dialogue is so enjoyable to listen to. His daughter is also a pretty good actress.I literally watched this movie for the first time two days ago
Plato, Machiavelli, James Madison, myself, anyone who has a long-term vision for how governance should be performed and is able to refrain from being inflamed by whatever latest issue of the day that the media whips up, anyone who requires a certain degree of certainty in their lives as to how the government is going to act...
In other words, when you have the same laws being enacted every two years and then repealed during the next two years like you have here in New Hampshire, that is what I would consider "too rapidly". At least give the executive branch some time to enact your legislation before you go telling them something different.
Then Madison shouldnt have created a system that will lead to two party rule where people fluctuate back and forth when people are pissed off at the government.
It'll be interesting to see if electoral reform ever happens at a national level, but there have been some positive steps at the state level. All I can say is thank fucking christ for federalism, because if we didnt have that, we would be totally fucked
I can't help but feel nostalgic about Kennedy's time in the White House today, I long for a time where the majority of Americans trusted the government and saw it as a force for good, where we have a strong social safety net, where we have no income inequality, where good, high paying jobs are plentiful, and college education is cheap...
I can't help but feel nostalgic about Kennedy's time in the White House today, I long for a time where the majority of Americans trusted the government and saw it as a force for good, where we have a strong social safety net, where we have no income inequality, where good, high paying jobs are plentiful, and college education is cheap...
I can't help but feel nostalgic about Kennedy's time in the White House today, I long for a time where the majority of Americans trusted the government and saw it as a force for good, where we have a strong social safety net, where we have no income inequality, where good, high paying jobs are plentiful, and college education is cheap...
Great news for Reince Preibus:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/22/1257664/-Obamacare-enrollments-double-in-last-three-weeks
Medicare and Medicaid were created during LBJ's presidency, as was the modern food stamp program.I was...I was just trying to channel my inner baby boomer.
Yeah I wrote that badly, what I was trying to say was that there were elements of life back then, like the welfare programs, the lack of income inequality, strong economic growth that wasn't based on a bubble, and people's overall feelings towards government, that I long for today. I wasn't trying to say everything was awesome back then.
I was...I was just trying to channel my inner baby boomer.
Yeah I wrote that badly, what I was trying to say was that there were elements of life back then, like the welfare programs, the lack of income inequality, strong economic growth that wasn't based on a bubble, and people's overall feelings towards government, that I long for today. I wasn't trying to say everything was awesome back then.
To those saying that this is just like the modern GOP, I would say to you that there's one major difference-- only one word is misspelled.
So there is some truth in terms of blue states being more spending wreckless than red states.
I will pimp this docu series always and forever----things have been teetering if not careening towards trouble for a looong time now.
http://www.sho.com/sho/oliver-stones-untold-history-of-the-united-states/home
"Marraige" was the one I found. And now looking at it again, I also notice "consistantly".Looking back at it, I find two: "Missle" and "marraige".
Is that saying the total cumulative enrollments have doubled or that the amount of enrollments this month have doubled from last? Because if it's the former the pace hasn't actually increased since that's pretty much the same amount of people enrolling this month as last.
I made a post on RIFS
http://www.readingisforsnobs.com/2013/11/president-obamas-if-you-like-your-plan.html
Basically, I try to use some rough math to argue that Obama's "if you like your plan, you can keep your plan" claim is true for 99% of people and that we're talking about fless than 1% of people being adversely affected.
It came out of my frustration that the media is constantly talking about these cancellations.
Dylan Matthews piece on Kennedy is pretty good.
http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/w...-was-one-of-our-greatest-presidents-he-wasnt/
The slow pace of legislating comes despite huge problems facing Washington: A $17 trillion debt, the prospects of a second government shutdown in mid-January, the bumpy rollout of the health care law and overseas threats from places like Iran. Meanwhile, congressional inaction on a new farm bill is poised to upend rural America and send milk prices soaring. Even legislation that would seem appeal to some in both parties — like an immigration overhaul — is stuck.
Tech surge czar Jeff Zients said that HealthCare.gov will be able to handle 50,000 users at a time by the end of this month up from 25,000 now, thanks to hardware additions and software additions the team is putting in this weekend and next week.
He said that will enable the site to handle 800,000 people a day a conservative estimate, he said in a conference call with reporters.
"Let's say, let's take 10 people in a room and they're a group," he said on his radio show. "And the room is made up of six men and four women. OK? The group has a rule that the men cannot rape the women. The group also has a rule that says any rule that will be changed must require six votes, of the 10, to change the rule.
"Every now and then, some lunatic in the group proposes to change the rule to allow women to be raped," he added. "But they never were able to get six votes for it. There were always the four women voting against it and they always found two guys."
"Well, the guy that kept proposing that women be raped finally got tired of it, and he was in the majority and he was one that [said], 'You know what? We're going to change the rule. Now all we need is five,'" he continued. "And well, 'you can't do that.' 'Yes we are. We're the majority. We're changing the rule.' And then they vote.
"Can the women be raped? Well, all it would take then is half of the room. You can change the rule to say three," he said. "You can change the rule to say three people want it, it's going to happen. There's no rule. When the majority can change the rules there aren't any."
So much for healthcare.gate:
It's used for shock value by borderline sociopaths who have no sympathy for people who have been raped.What the hell does rape have to do with anything? That is just arbitrarily thrown in there to evoke sympathy. An elected majority doing nondiscriminatory things is not rape.
To be fair, he's probably used to almost all the men he knows saying rape is ok.
What the hell does rape have to do with anything? That is just arbitrarily thrown in there to evoke sympathy. An elected majority doing nondiscriminatory things is not rape.
But they can rape the economy. Just think, if democrats get 51% of the seats in the house and senate and keep the white house they can shove pre-k, carbon tax, immiigration reform, expanded social security and all of these terrible things that will destroy our economy!
And given that Republicans are the silent majority to begin with, then any legislative majority is a supermajority!Taking that line of thinking one step further, isn't Limbaugh arguing that pretty much EVERYTHING should be run by supermajority?
Why do you guys take the bait?
Good point. Liberals should pledge to stop watching right-wing news and listening to right-wing radio shows for six months. I bet the ratings would take a notable dip!A friend of mine always says that liberals probably make up a solid % of Rush viewers and Fox listeners, waiting to be outraged. I couldn't care less what Rush has to say, and neither does most of the country (thankfully).