Shock. Rush supported the idea of the nuclear option back when Reps had control.
Shock. Rush supported the idea of the nuclear option back when Reps had control.
- Sean Hannity: I Believe Its Unconstitutional To Filibuster.
- Rush Limbaugh: The Constitution Says Nothing About This. The Constitution Says Simple Majority, 51 Votes.
- Wall Street Journal: Using Nuclear Option Is Better Than Letting A Willful Minority Deny The Presidents Nominees A Vote On The Senate Floor.
- National Review editor Rich Lowry: Judicial Filibusters Are A Perversion Of Traditional Checks And Balances And Should Be Eliminated Through The So-Called Nuclear Option.
- Karl Rove: We Believe That Fairness Means That [Nominees] Deserve An Up-Or-Down Vote.
- Pat Robertson: These Filibusters Have Been Unconstitutional. And The Senate, I Just Think The Majority Should Say, `Look, We Want An Up And Down Vote.
I admit I watch fox. But rush and many of the right wing "crazy statements" are of zero consequence and more of a symptom than a cause of right wing radicalism.A friend of mine always says that liberals probably make up a solid % of Rush viewers and Fox listeners, waiting to be outraged. I couldn't care less what Rush has to say, and neither does most of the country (thankfully).
Considering how much more federal aid red states get per capita, I wouldn't say this is the whole story.
Anyone know where I can go to follow senate progress for judicial confirmations?
Heh heh heh.He wasnt the only one:
I believe most of those are from 2005.
Madison was well aware of the evils of "faction" (as he called it) and thought that having an "extensive republic" would mitigate the problems of factions. Of course now that the Internet has made geographical distance irrelevant, it looks like no amount of extensive-ness will be able to prevent the same factions from being the only two factions nation-wide...Then Madison shouldnt have created a system that will lead to two party rule where people fluctuate back and forth when people are pissed off at the government.
Millions of people do take him seriously. I is worth hearing what they say to understand how they think. And no....He isn't trolling.You guys are taking Rush Limbaugh seriously? I laughed when I saw the video. The man's trolling knows no bounds.
I laughed, but then I was sad.
The new chair of Washington state's Republican party accused her colleagues this week of playing into the "war on women" narrative against the GOP by denying her equal pay for equal work.
Susan Hutchison pulls in a salary of $75,000 a year -- a $20,000 cut from the salary earned by her male predecessor -- and tried unsuccessfully to request a pay raise last weekend, according to an internal party memo sent Monday and obtained by the Seattle Times.
The pay cut defies the concept of equal pay for equal work, playing into the war on women narrative against Republicans," Hutchison wrote in the memo, as quoted by the newspaper. She also argued the vote to deny the pay raise violated the party's bylaws and could be construed as "discriminatory and vindictive.
Jeez, did they justify the cut?I laughed, but then I was sad.
The new chair of Washington state's Republican party accused her colleagues this week of playing into the "war on women" narrative against the GOP by denying her equal pay for equal work.
Susan Hutchison pulls in a salary of $75,000 a year -- a $20,000 cut from the salary earned by her male predecessor -- and tried unsuccessfully to request a pay raise last weekend, according to an internal party memo sent Monday and obtained by the Seattle Times.
The pay cut defies the concept of equal pay for equal work, playing into the war on women narrative against Republicans," Hutchison wrote in the memo, as quoted by the newspaper. She also argued the vote to deny the pay raise violated the party's bylaws and could be construed as "discriminatory and vindictive.
Jeez, did they justify the cut?
Maybe there's a problem with your party and it's stance towards people who are not white males?
Budgetary reasons.Jeez, did they justify the cut?
Maybe there's a problem with your party and it's stance towards people who are not white males?
Aka made up stuffBudgetary reasons.
Aka made up stuff
They simply couldn't afford to pay her as much as a man. Budgetary reasons!
Gotta pay her less so that you save money on her temp worker when she starts popping out babies
The campaign manager for Rep. Bill Cassidy's (R-LA) Senate campaign tweeted out a link to a photo of Sen. Mary Landrieu's (D-LA) face superimposed on the body of Italian dictator Benito Mussolini an hour after a conservative Louisiana blog posted the image.
It's in our instincts to earn less than men.Women are just willing to work for less, see?
I laughed, but then I was sad.
The new chair of Washington state's Republican party accused her colleagues this week of playing into the "war on women" narrative against the GOP by denying her equal pay for equal work.
Susan Hutchison pulls in a salary of $75,000 a year -- a $20,000 cut from the salary earned by her male predecessor -- and tried unsuccessfully to request a pay raise last weekend, according to an internal party memo sent Monday and obtained by the Seattle Times.
The pay cut defies the concept of equal pay for equal work, playing into the war on women narrative against Republicans," Hutchison wrote in the memo, as quoted by the newspaper. She also argued the vote to deny the pay raise violated the party's bylaws and could be construed as "discriminatory and vindictive.
I completely missed that she only claimed it 'played into' rather than actually being a war on women (which is a stupid name anyways, not everything is a war)I wonder what it would take for her to have an epiphany about the implications of her pay cut. You'd think this would do it. She thinks it just plays into the Democratic framing around the 'war on women', rather than being the kind of thing they're actually talking about.
This is true, sometimes it's a jihadI completely missed that she only claimed it 'played into' rather than actually being a war on women (which is a stupid name anyways, not everything is a war)
Typical Republican comeback
The candidates in Montana and West Virginia look good on paper but I don't know.Yeah with the way the website's going and another shutdown that's probably gonna happen I think the Dems will probably regain their lead in 2014.
The only incumbent I can see losing is Pryor, and maybe we can reverse the Dems fortunes in the South Dakota, Montana and West Virginia races because they're fielding strong candidates.
The candidates in Montana and West Virginia look good on paper but I don't know.
Hoping all the incumbents hold their seats and we can pick off Georgia or Kentucky.
Montana? There was a PPP poll just the other day that said the Dem was getting his ass handed to him. Or was that North Dakota?
Yeah that's why I don't know. Like I said Walsh is a good candidate on paper but he might not be able to overcome the state's lean. Same with Tennant in West Virginia.Montana? There was a PPP poll just the other day that said the Dem was getting his ass handed to him. Or was that North Dakota?
Luckily there are four teabaggers in that race!PhoenixPause said:Georgia could be a pick up but it'll be very tough. One of the prominent tea party candidates just had his campaign essentially blown up by resigning advisers. Kentucky...not going to happen, let it go.
Rand doesn't even like private charity. They can't go full Rand.Stossel is dedicating a whole show to #realcharity
One segment he says philanthropy is bad. Its better for rich people to grow their business than to give to charity since charity doesn't work (He literally said it can't work). He chided bill gates for his foundation.
The next is why government aid to places like Africa will never work and only private charity can work and government has NO place.
This man is a vile ayn rand clone.
Just last week on his show he was talking about how the government shouldn't have welfare because rich people will pick up the slack.
Now he brought on a guest to talk about Libertarians are the truly caring people.
Btw why are libertarians almost always white rich guys?
Always doomed.Also, Kay Hagan is doomed.
Rand doesn't even like private charity. They can't go full Rand.
Also, Kay Hagan is doomed.
Obamacare retroactively filibusteredShe'll actually have all the votes she has cast reversed when she loses.
"Lets not forget who do the most for the poor, capitalists. Not the fake capitalists who get government help but real free market capitalists" <-Real Quote
Also, Kay Hagan is doomed.
Will Mario 3D World pass the House?more or less doomed than Nintendo?
Montana.
Georgia could be a pick up but it'll be very tough. One of the prominent tea party candidates just had his campaign essentially blown up by resigning advisers. Kentucky...not going to happen, let it go.
Will Mario 3D World pass the House?