You are so much younger looking than I expected.
haaaaa
You are so much younger looking than I expected.
That kid actually grew up enough to think for himself and became a liberal.He reminds me of this
lol.
He's a liberal now
Yeah, they made it seem like there was this dramatic downturn in the tech sector. I hope SOMEBODY brings it up significantly though. Everyone's walking on egg shells besides trump it seems.
YOYou are so much younger looking than I expected.
He's a liberal now
Did I tell you all abut the 1984 Reagan Rally I attended, and how the local campaign people gave us Reagan signs to hold up to block line of sight to the protesters?
Or the essay I won a couple of hundred bucks for writing, about how to dismantle unions?
Yeah, my views are different now.
The first political rally I ever went to was a Bush rally in '99. My grandmother's brother was the GOP speaker of the house in Connecticut. People change.
You and me both buddy Did both of those things when I was younger.Ah, youth...
I remember vehemently arguing against same sex marriage on forums much like this when I was young!
I also voted for Bush my first time voting
"If more of our voters show up, we win" is not an "approach to a solution". It's a tautology. Why are you ignoring the fact that Obama said the same things? Why was his identical "approach to a solution" not successful? Why would you expect Bernie's version to be? Has there ever even been a candidate that didn't emphasize turnout, and didn't endorse downticket allies? Why do you want something so obvious to somehow be new and unique? Are you even reading other peoples' responses?
The last political revolution in this country was when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed, and the Dixiecrats abandoned the Democratic party, causing a complete realignment of the political axis.
You seem to be conflating political success with revolution. Furthermore, you just can't seem to let go of the desire for Bernie to somehow be doing something special, new, and untried, when he really, really isn't. He's a good candidate. I'm voting for him in the primary. But he is in no way unique in history. You are getting caught up in a cult of personality driven by those very same intransigent voters who have more idealism than political knowledge or experience, who don't vote downticket, who don't vote in midterms, who complain that both sides are the same and vote third party unless some rockstar candidate shows up, who they are inevitably disappointed in and criticize when they don't get all their idealistic fantasies fulfilled. These people are there to make themselves feel good for joining in with a perceived righteous cause where everyone cheers at the end of the movie, instead of really examining and undergoing the work of governing their country. They are entertaining themselves. Governance is work.
If you want to continue trying to assert the existence of some nebulous "revolution" with further semantic quibbling, please don't.
You and me both buddy Did both of those things when I was younger.
Around that election though was where I was starting to slide into being more liberal. I suppose because that's about when it started to matter, so I started to look into things. My ultimate reason or voting Bush over Kerry was so stupid, though. I knew Bush screwed things up, but I didn't think it was right letting someone so profoundly against what Bush had done in to try and clean it up. I thought things would go more smoothly to have Bush continue on with the plan rather than switching gears half way and pulling out of Iraq quickly.
I didn't come around until 2006-2007. Registered democrat to vote for Obama in the primary and never looked back. Came around to same sex marriage because I had a buddy who was gay and I think that's what started to change everything for me. That and Obama is a hell of a charismatic guy who convinced me he was the best guy for the job.
I voted for Dukakis in my first election. I didn't identify as liberal until the 2000s, but I All of the mess of the back half of the Reagan years turned me off the GOP, and it's gotten worse since then.
I wasn't politically engaged during the 1988 election, but in '92 I voted for Clinton, I've voted Democratic ever since.
I do remember when Carter beat Ford, and I was a little disappointed because Ford looked serious and also was named after a car.
My first vote was for Bill Clinton in '96.
(although I'd wanted Paul Simon in '88 & '92. Yes, I was at one time an idealist, too.)
Did Congress work back then? Was the fever pitch in polarization hit when Clinton lost Congress?
My first vote was for Bill Clinton in '96.
(although I'd wanted Paul Simon in '88 & '92. Yes, I was at one time an idealist, too.)
Which prompted this reply from Muppetwarior:The face you make when you know better how to run people's lives than they do, but pesky things like liberty and freedom obstruct you.
Lolololololyou sound like a man that doesn't like sucking bernie dick. that don't fly around here.
Bernie, hair comb... ever heard of one? Jesus the man needs to work on his appearance. Truly unkempt. You're running for president for God's sake!
Bernie, hair comb... ever heard of one? Jesus the man needs to work on his appearance. Truly unkempt. You're running for president for God's sake!
but I thought commenting on a candidate's attire or appearance is out of bounds
but I thought commenting on a candidate's attire or appearance is out of bounds
I miss Benji. I can't do this by myself.
This has probably been posted but:
http://www.democracynow.org/2015/9/17/kids_who_had_privilege_like_you
Like, I'm typically no fans of libertarians but Paul makes sense on a decent amount of issues. Also on foreign policy.
Of course, that just means he really has no shot.
Paul makes up for his enlightened stance on drug decriminalization with economic policies that will hurt the fuck out of underprivileged people. And yes, thankfully, he has no shot.
What the fuck was Carly talking about the alive fetus on the table in a PP video, as people were discussing harvesting its brain? I havent seen any leaked PP videos so far. Is it true?
Yahoo said:Donald Trump says he is the victim of a "double standard" after comments he made about Carly Fiorina's looks - pointing out that she has also made remarks about the appearances of her female rivals.
On Hannity on Thursday night, he said Fiorina had called California Senator Barbara Boxer's hair "so yesterday" during her failed Senate bid in 2010.
Hannity asked: Do you think there's a bit of a double standard in terms of people make fun of you all the time?
Trump said: Well, its not only a double standard, it's being politically correct. Last night I was very nice to her [during the debate] and some people thought I was being sarcastic.
But actually if you look back at the records on Carly, she was brutal on Barbara Boxer. She was very nasty. She was running against Barbara Boxer. She lost in a landslide but during the run she was really horrible about Barbara Boxer's looks."
Me too bro. Nobody else posts with me til 3 in the morning about nixon or old firing line clips.I miss Benji. I can't do this by myself.
How did i get this impression you were older than me all this time.You guys are all old farts.
My dad voted for Bill Clinton in 1997. I was in the voting booth but I was too young to figure out the levers.
In other words, she lied through her teeth? Disgusting. Media treating Carly with kiddie gloves because Trump is old news now.There is a shot in a separate documentary of a fetus that is moving (due to being alive or just reflex is unknown) but it is stock footage and not from PP and there is no conversation or even people in the shot. In that same documentary there is an interview with a woman who worked for a company (again, not PP) who was asked to harvest a brain. The bit about keeping the fetus alive is not in any video.
There's been two articles I've seen today from Vox and Bloomberg both saying that we shouldn't read too much into Fiorina's HP record because she actually was a victim of the economic times.
Her defense of her record was pretty well-delivered at the debates though. Trump & co. should go for HP's actions in Iran and how they curbed sanctions.