I think Hillary can defeat Rubio if Bernie fan salt doesn't sabotage her.
People have short memories.
Remember tony rezko
Or goddamn America
Or gun clinging
Or anything
The worst things have gotten for the democrats this cycle is "Hillary seems desperate."
Eh. I'd say it's going to be about guns, god, gays, taxes and the economy. Like pretty much forever.
I think Bernie fan salt is hugely overstated. Primaries are always contentious. 2008 had a lot more mudslinging and vitriol than this primary has had thus far. I think the only Bernie fans that might abstain if Hillary is the nominee are those who didn't necessarily consider themselves democrats beforehand anyway.
That said (and this is unrelated to your post Jack Remington), in terms of which candidate is more electable, I think we're underestimating the extent to which this election will be about getting money out of politics, campaign finance reform, moving away from the status quo, etc. I'm not sure Hillary is a strong candidate on those metrics.
Sanders: The reason the President has been so ableto move so far to the right is there there is no Primary Challenge.
Eh. I'd say it's going to be about guns, god, gays, taxes and the economy. Like pretty much forever.
Macho Madness said:and Rubio is?
Taxes, economy and guns, yes. Bernie is the better GE option on guns and the economy. Hillary's the stronger candidate on taxes. However, no republican candidate in the GE will be stupid enough to take a stance against marriage equality this late in the game. Maybe I'm giving them too much credit though.
Taxes, economy and guns, yes. Bernie is the better GE option on guns and the economy. Hillary's the stronger candidate on taxes. However, no republican candidate in the GE will be stupid enough to take a stance against marriage equality this late in the game. Maybe I'm giving them too much credit though.
It's weird, according to the Iowa Exit Polls people see Hillary as better for the Economy, Health Care, and tackling Terrorism, but overwhelmingly think Bernie would act in their interests and is better equipped to take on Income Inequality. The hell America...
I watched that video, he wasn't necessarily wrong.
Trump has talked about it. Cruz <3 Kim Davis.
Rubio is secretly on our team though.
Also, the reason Obama wasn't able to magically fix everything is because after campaigning comes governing.
Cruz is the only one who I think is enough of an ideologue to, like, not even try shifting to the center for a general election. The rest of them know better than to say the crazy shit that only works in the primaries.
omg, Jeb's actually out in front! It's all within the margins of error! If Jeb! is actually more at 17% and Trump more like 28%, if all the undecideds up to 11% went to Jeb! he's TIED WITH TRUMP at 28%! omgomgomg... And if the margin of error is 4%? He's GOT THE WIN at 30% to 27%! Jeb!!!!!!JEB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think Bernie fan salt is hugely overstated. Primaries are always contentious. 2008 had a lot more mudslinging and vitriol than this primary has had thus far. I think the only Bernie fans that might abstain if Hillary is the nominee are those who didn't necessarily consider themselves democrats beforehand anyway.
That said (and this is unrelated to your post Jack Remington), in terms of which candidate is more electable, I think we're underestimating the extent to which this election will be about getting money out of politics, campaign finance reform, moving away from the status quo, etc. I'm not sure Hillary is a strong candidate on those metrics.
I strongly believe he would.Don't forget Trump. He won't change his message either.
Don't forget Trump. He won't change his message either.
The thing that worries me is the candidates reaction.
When Hillary lost, she went above and beyond to heal the party. He initial speech, then at the convention - she understood what was at stake, and she healed the party. It didn't happen by accident.
Will Sanders do the same? I worry he won't, and from the comments from colleagues in the senate and house I fear that's the likely result. At best we'd get a tepid endorsement that didn't heal anything, at worse he'd sit out the convention, go back to being an independent and fire parting shots as he went.
Some men just want to see the world Bern.Well.
Well.
Obama thought he could go all the way to the right?
Well.
I remember several years of "Candidate Obama vs. President Obama". He went left on social issues, but on most issues he became a lot more moderate than when he was on the campaign trail. I think there was a bit of hyperbole in Sanders' statement, but Obama undeniably allowed himself to compromise more than a lot of people desired in his early years.
You make it sound so crude! The campaign would call it "connecting with the base."It looks like something some crazed Redditor would have put together.
Yeah cause he got a super-majority in the Senate for like a hot minute.
He wasn't moving right because he faced no Primary challenge and that would have done fuck all to solve the actual problem. And Sanders knows that, he was there.
I don't think the idea was he only moved right because he had no primary challenger, I think it was more he moved right to compromise, and there was no fear of anyone challenging his decision to do such. Sanders' worded it poorly for sure, but I don't think he's implying Obama was secretly a Republican wolf in Democratic sheeps clothing.
@costareports
Santorum world official line is that there are "two major announcements" coming tonight on Fox. Top Rs, tho, tell me he's quitting+endorsing
What I know: Santorum advisers and Trump advisers are very friendly. Santorum has grown friendly with Trump. Both will appear on Greta.
I don't think the idea was he only moved right because he had no primary challenger, I think it was more he moved right to compromise, and there was no fear of anyone challenging his decision to do such. Sanders' worded it poorly for sure, but I don't think he's implying Obama was secretly a Republican wolf in Democratic sheeps clothing.
Parts of that sound so similar to debates this cycle. Some things don't change I guess.Also, lest we forget how much bloodier 2008 was in comparison:
https://youtu.be/MD9F1t9GQzA?t=4m
If Sanders understood it was a matter of compromise he wouldn't be suggesting a primary challenge. When he's talking about contrasting Obama's record with a true progressive, and saying Obama thought he could go all the way to the right that feels exactly like he thinks Obama's progressive credentials are suspect.
He's absolutely right that Obama let down many progressives in his first term, but he's absolutely wrong that the problem lay with Obama himself. Firing a shot across Obama's bow by giving him a primary challenge in 2012 would have done nothing.