Far be it from me to understand GOP strategies, but do Senate Republicans like Cruz and McCain openly talking about blocking Hillary's SCOTUS nominees indefinitely not see how that bites them on the ass when the shoe's on the other foot? If a Republican president ends up with SCOTUS seats to fill but a Democratic Senate outright refuses to hold hearings for partisan reasons, don't Cruz et al. see that said Dems would be completely justified by the precedent they themselves set?
I don't know if this is general Repubicans are better than Democrats thing, or something particular to Hillary being an illegitimate president therefore her nominees are illegitimate, or what. But I just don't understand how blocking SCOTUS nominees indefinitely doesn't immediately set a president that allows any opposition party to indefinitely block SCOTUS nominees.
How does it bite them in the ass when one party adheres to norms because they believe in government and social responsibility, and the other party has become a group of nihlist who literally want to break the federal government to starve the beast and return all federal power to the states.
Have we so soon forgotten about the debt ceiling fight?
Now I don't think McCain supports that scorched earth policy in so far as he can use it to his political advantage. But as we've seen, the monster is out of the cage and its pretty hard to control. There are plenty of do-nothings in congress there with the specific task of breaking the federal government for everything except the payouts to their own districts.
They're there to sabotage and break federal politics, because thats what their constituents want. Their view is all yhe ills are due to the feds and nothing bad will happen from crippling Washington. They're DCexit-ers. They give no fucks to the damage that would cause economically, socially, ect.