Lol. Again, just having fun with it, but man. If this turns out to effect things, I might seriously be able to believe that Trump was the one that posted the Melania pic in the first place.
I don't know, that's a small version of Bush is responsible for 9/11.
Yeah. This is the same rag that claims Hillary Clinton is going to die every week and that Obama really is a secret Muslim. Grain of salt at most.We rightfully dogpile on Republicans for this bullshit (especially when it comes to outlandish claims about Benghazi or Emails or whatnot)...it's hypocritical as hell to start gleefully using the freaking National Enquirer as a source when it says something bad about Cruz.
Seems a little odd that the story would put Trump's campaign manager in such an awkward position, if this is bullshit. It lowers the odds that this actually being coordinated by Trump, I guess? So, hey, good to know he draws the line somewhere!Gonna say this is proooobbbably bullshit
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/10/trumps-alliance-with-the-national-enquirer.html
I think it's more that we're interested in the theory of this being real, not that we're all particularly convinced the story is accurate. Just looking for entertainment. There's little harm in "ooh, that would be hilarious (were it real)!" We're not actually taking it seriously, which I'd say is a difference between it and some Clinton conspiracy theory. For example, last night I went for #teamreal but with a disclaimer that it was solely for entertainment purposes.We rightfully dogpile on Republicans for this bullshit (especially when it comes to outlandish claims about Benghazi or Emails or whatnot)...it's hypocritical as hell to start gleefully using the freaking National Enquirer as a source when it says something bad about Cruz.
OK a couple things:
1) I don't think anyone actually thinks it is true
2) People seem to mostly be muckraking about trump dragging it into the election
Seems a little odd that the story would put Trump's campaign manager in such an awkward position, if this is bullshit. It lowers the odds that this actually being coordinated by Trump, I guess? So, hey, good to know he draws the line somewhere!
And aww, I was having so much fun thinking about how it would destroy his campaign. Always knew it was probably nonsense but I'd still love an explanation of that random donation to Fiorina.I think it's more that we're interested in the theory of this being real, not that we're all particularly convinced the story is accurate. Just looking for entertainment. There's little harm in "ooh, that would be hilarious (were it real)!" We're not actually taking it seriously, which I'd say is a difference between it and some Clinton conspiracy theory. For example, last night I went for #teamreal but with a disclaimer that it was solely for entertainment purposes.
oh look, the politico caucus here to shit out an article
It'd be cool if we banned Politico not because they're constantly lying per se but just because they suck so bad.
While it is OT Main - OT seems to have people who believe it's true.
As for here - it's more of the entire "we rightfully pile on GOP supporters for believing and reading the news sources that tell what they want to believe", but then, we all sort of then do it ourselves given the opportunity. While folks have started to sort of admit to themselves that this is probably just wishful thinking; it definitely wasn't earlier in the thread. That's the part that sort of bugs me, I guess.
As for the Trump bit - that's because the Enquirer has been doing hit jobs the entire primary for Trump. Trump's been canny enough to not drag the specific Enquirer comments out; just hint at them vaguely and go from there.
politico and polygon are the two sites I wish GAF would ban, tbh.
I don't think any of us think it's legit, I'm mostly in it for he fuckery that will result and think most of us are the same way. I do think there's a lot of hope beyond hope going on with regards to people praying this is legit, but that's mostly because Cruz is an unrepentant asshole who deserves to have his career flushed down the drain.
Twitter seem to be suppressing the #CruzSexScandal hashtag. In the space of about 10 minutes it's gone from top trending to nowhere in sight and isn't even suggested on searches. Interesting...
I don't think any of us think it's legit, I'm mostly in it for he fuckery that will result and think most of us are the same way. I do think there's a lot of hope beyond hope going on with regards to people praying this is legit, but that's mostly because Cruz is an unrepentant asshole who deserves to have his career flushed down the drain.
I'd totally be cool with ditching polygon, politico is always good for a laugh though.
Oh no, I absolutely positively think this is legitimate.
WAY too much smoke for there not to be fire here.
Threads are also actively being removed from reddit.
This seems a bit odd, given Reddit typically has no problem leaving libelous nonsense around, except when it involves Reddit staff. Why for this? Ditto for Twitter.Threads are also actively being removed from reddit.
Needs a NSFL tag.
Courtesy of KaufLive in OT.
How long until the telepaths are online and the psychoreactor charged?
Weirdly this would sort of humanize ted.
Like I said last night in the other thread, this is a garbage story that's only trending on Twitter because Trump's NeoNazi army is really good at making things trend on Twitter (see: the early days of #GamerGate). No one will cover this.
It'd be more surprising if a Presidential candidate was actually faithful to his wife. I pretty much expect that all of them cheat.
Twitter seem to be suppressing the #CruzSexScandal hashtag. In the space of about 10 minutes it's gone from top trending to nowhere in sight and isn't even suggested on searches. Interesting...
Threads are also actively being removed from reddit.
Could be because the word sex is in it? Not a big twitter user, so I'm not sure if they care about that, but maybe they'd want to keep the top trending tags clean?
I see it on reddit. Maybe duplicate threads were removed? Or just poorly sourced articles?
FWIW every thread on it's been removed on r/politics, even one that was up for a while.
Could be because the word sex is in it? Not a big twitter user, so I'm not sure if they care about that, but maybe they'd want to keep the top trending tags clean?
I see it on reddit. Maybe duplicate threads were removed? Or just poorly sourced articles?
I think that was the first H.A. Goodman article I've actually read. Lots of garbage in there
/r/politics really is trash anyway. An article about Bernie smiling could make it to the front page easily.
Elizabeth Warren says "I'm still rooting for Bernie" is the top article today because of course lmao
That's it. That's the entirety of the content.
SHE SAID A POSITIVE THING ABOUT BERNIE SANDERSI thought she was in the dog house because of Massachusetts
All this retroactive momentum will help Sanders win Massachusetts 24 days ago.Elizabeth Warren says "I'm still rooting for Bernie" is the top article today because of course lmao
That's it. That's the entirety of the content.