• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT3| You know what they say about big Michigans - big Florida

Status
Not open for further replies.

studyguy

Member
Jeb's bad voodoo had to go somewhere. Looks like it went to Hillary this week.
His gaffes are just too similar, sad Jeb! lives on in spirit.
 

Cerium

Member
Hillary does do better when running from behind, and I would worry what that would mean in a general election, except that against Trump you could probably run O'Malley and win.
 
He's largely correct. A quick example of this is back in... '90, when Fernando Collor became president, after a campaign that had this kinda coverage (thats not a shop, btw. dudes legit posed for it. dude on the left also had an ad where he sported a keikogi and started karate chopping fools, but the yt aint kind. also had another where the beardie's ex-wife stated that he had forced her to commit an abortion. Was elected on an anticorruption platform. was impeached when his brother tattled on the massive corruption scheme he was a part of. that whole period was amazing. Anyway). One of the first things he does is call our cars, quite literally, shitty carriages. Largely because they were/are. Massively protected industry, borders closed to imports thanks to the dictatorship and rampant inflation will do that to a market.

Also, because those great military minds excelled at everything, they kinda sorta thought it would be a good idea to prohibit the importation of computer software and hardware back in 84. The idea is that it would help Brazil develop its own market and stuff. Yeah... went about as well as you think.

Solution? Drop taxes on imports, which were at... 85% at the time... to 0. Also drop the prohibition on importing vehicles, which was in place since '76, and on computer stuff.

Result? well, the car industry kinda instantly started firing reams of people, because of course they would.

Result one... month later, after massive backlash? Tax went up to 35%, but now we gots a taste, and car imports became commonplace, forcing the local industry to catch up.

tbh the more you look at the late 80's early 90's fuckery going on in brazil, the more benj's positions make sense. And that scares me.

BUT THE POINT IS brazil isn't so much an example of why free trade is necessary as it is a shining example of what endemic corruption at all levels of society will do to a place, especially when allied with low education. Lack of free trade is but a symptom.

Huh. Very interesting. Thank you for the insight. :0)

although I hope things do improve for Brazil soon. :0(
 
If a pollster called me up and asked me what issues were important to me, #1 would be making sure motherfucking Jeb is not allowed to be president. We simply could not allow the coolest president ever to be succeeded by that dweeb. Al Gore and Mitt Romney probably picked on him in school. We all know W tortured him. Even his own mom was on record saying he shouldn't be president and he wasn't her favorite kid. I am grateful to Donald Drumpf for burying him. Bury isn't even an accurate account of what happened. He hired Haliburton to dig a 150 foot well on the Crawford Ranch and then Spartan kicked him into it while yelling "NERDDDD"

The thing that annoys me the most about him is that he didnt stick around long enough to be dragged over the coals for Schiavo.
 

royalan

Member
All these Hillary gaffes in OT are making me Diablos guys. Reassure me Bernie can't win. :(

I mean, he could. I think his campaign's new strategy is to shrink Hillary's lead as much as they can and then appeal to those evil superdelegates to switch support.

Good luck with that, though.
 

Teggy

Member
Oh, I forgot to mention this before, but how did I get spoiled on Xenoblade in the safe confines of Poligaf? About
Fiora not being dead
<shakes fist>
 

Iolo

Member
Bernie's going to win more than 80% of the states that vote after March 15th.
Diablos!!! Diablos!!!

Again, this is his strategy now--not to win pledged delegates, not even to win the majority of votes, but to simply win the greatest number of states in the greatest number of regions, and then convince supers to switch sides based on this perceived electability and Hillary "only winning red states" or regionally in the south.
 

Makai

Member
I will forgive Jeb if he endorses Trump - the most humiliating act I can imagine him doing.

Wait, I already have one better. Jeb becomes Trump's running mate and Trump bullies him through the general.

"They say I'm unhinged and I need to calm down. It's fine. I'll let Jeb take over for a day and they won't call me that anymore. What does the VP do, anyway? I guess I can let him handle the White House Myspace account. It's an important job...a very important job."
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
I will forgive Jeb if he endorses Trump - the most humiliating act I can imagine him doing.

Wait, I already have one better. Jeb becomes Trump's running mate and Trump bullies him through the general.

"They say I'm unhinged and I need to calm down. It's fine. I'll let Jeb take over for a day and they won't call me that anymore. What does the VP do, anyway? I guess I can let him handle the White House Myspace account. It's an important job...a very important job."

I've had dreams about this and they were amazingly funny. Trump should just pick him so he'll have a punching bag in the general.
 
Again, this is his strategy now--not to win pledged delegates, not even to win the majority of votes, but to simply win the greatest number of states in the greatest number of regions, and then convince supers to switch sides based on this perceived electability and Hillary "only winning red states" or regionally in the south.

That's a bad strategy. His best strategy would be to close the gap considerably leading into June and then pour literally tens of millions into California. If he can win big there after closing the gap to <100 delegates, he might have a shot.
 

studyguy

Member
I just don't see where the Trump is suddenly Lee Atwater reborn level political strategist idea is coming from. It just sounds like the internet echo chamber is getting the best of people and they're drawing parallels where there's nothing but smoke. Maybe I'm wrong and he is a master manipulator, NIMBLE NAVIGATOR and the like, but I just don't see it.
 

Iolo

Member
That's a bad strategy. His best strategy would be to close the gap considerably leading into June and then pour literally tens of millions into California. If he can win big there after closing the gap to <100 delegates, he might have a shot.

I would agree that this is his only shot and it would be a legitimate win. A strategy that relies on winning from behind with the help of supers would contravene everything his campaign has been saying about the responsibility of supers, and would probably tear the party apart. But it seems like he may be pursuing this strategy based on comments made after Michigan. :/
 
That's a bad strategy. His best strategy would be to close the gap considerably leading into June and then pour literally tens of millions into California. If he can win big there after closing the gap to <100 delegates, he might have a shot.
Are you expecting him to win California by like 20 points in this scenario... :/
 
Again, this is his strategy now--not to win pledged delegates, not even to win the majority of votes, but to simply win the greatest number of states in the greatest number of regions, and then convince supers to switch sides based on this perceived electability and Hillary "only winning red states" or regionally in the south.

Flimsy argument given that Clinton has been competitive in most Northern states hence why Sanders hasn't actually been able to catch up
 

Drakeon

Member
That's a bad strategy. His best strategy would be to close the gap considerably leading into June and then pour literally tens of millions into California. If he can win big there after closing the gap to <100 delegates, he might have a shot.

How is California within reach with it's rather significant minority populations?
 

pigeon

Banned
Again, this is his strategy now--not to win pledged delegates, not even to win the majority of votes, but to simply win the greatest number of states in the greatest number of regions, and then convince supers to switch sides based on this perceived electability and Hillary "only winning red states" or regionally in the south.

I don't believe this is really Bernie's strategy because it's a non-strategy. There's zero possibility that the supers will switch if Bernie doesn't have a lead. He probably needs a large lead! And the Democratic establishment is, frankly, not dumb enough to buy the electability or regionalism arguments. They're really bad arguments!

So I guess Bernie may be SAYING this is the plan, but either his campaign team is idiots or they have some other plan. Which might just be to keep running knowing they they can't win.
 
I don't believe this is really Bernie's strategy because it's a non-strategy. There's zero possibility that the supers will switch if Bernie doesn't have a lead. He probably needs a large lead! And the Democratic establishment is, frankly, not dumb enough to buy the electability or regionalism arguments. They're really bad arguments!

So I guess Bernie may be SAYING this is the plan, but either his campaign team is idiots or they have some other plan. Which might just be to keep running knowing they they can't win.

Correct
 
I would agree that this is his only shot and it would be a legitimate win. A strategy that relies on winning from behind with the help of supers would contravene everything his campaign has been saying about the responsibility of supers, and would probably tear the party apart. But it seems like he may be pursuing this strategy based on comments made after Michigan. :/

The supers won't jump ship. It would be one thing if Hillary was a Donald Trump-type character, but she's not. The more I look at the schedule going forward, the more I think California (and the other states voting that day to a lesser extent) are going to decide the nomination. Hillary's lead will basically do nothing but narrow from now until June. How narrow that lead is determines how seriously California will be fought for. Kind of exciting for me, given that I'm in CA.
 
Are you expecting him to win California by like 20 points in this scenario... :/

How is California within reach with it's rather significant minority populations?

Winning CA big is his best shot. Especially compared to the super delegate strategy. I'm also assuming he'll pour unprecedented amounts of money into the state if he's still competitive at that point. There's only one primary after June 7th (DC), so whatever money he has is going to be dumped into California, with some scraps tossed at the Dakotas, New Mexico and New Jersey.
 
Do you think dws will resign soon?

Also, when are we getting those paid speeches ...
DWS is what you get when you let your daughter play with mommies make up and you just want to take a nap because you had too many margaritas and the pool boy is coming over. It's cute at first, but it is never a substitute for good parenting.
 
I don't believe this is really Bernie's strategy because it's a non-strategy. There's zero possibility that the supers will switch if Bernie doesn't have a lead. He probably needs a large lead! And the Democratic establishment is, frankly, not dumb enough to buy the electability or regionalism arguments. They're really bad arguments!

So I guess Bernie may be SAYING this is the plan, but either his campaign team is idiots or they have some other plan. Which might just be to keep running knowing they they can't win.

That probably doesn't stop them to thinking it is a viable strategy.
 
Winning CA big is his best shot. Especially compared to the super delegate strategy. I'm also assuming he'll pour unprecedented amounts of money into the state if he's still competitive at that point. There's only one primary after June 7th (DC), so whatever money he has is going to be dumped into California, with some scraps tossed at the Dakotas, New Mexico and New Jersey.
Yes, but even in the unlikely scenario he's only at a 100 delegate deficit, there are 475 delegates proportionally allocated. And while many of these are at CD level you're still talking about basically a 20+ pt victory. Basically unlikely scenario squared.
 

Cerium

Member
Trump better not puss out on the next debate. I need one more.

They'll be asked about the violence. Cruz will have to decide if he wants to condemn it and lose his crazy voters, or if he'll sell whatever remains of his soul and defend Trump.
 
But he also is losing Hispanic/Latino numbers by pretty significant margins. You can't with a Dem primary in CA losing Latinos and black voters.

I'm not aware of how he's doing with hispanic voters, to be honest. I'd like to see some of the data on that.

We have no idea how he does with Asians (correct me if I'm wrong, but they are 13% of the state).

And doesn't Clinton typically beat him with latinos by 15-20 points?


California and New York are the only two states with sizable asian populations as far as I'm aware, so it'll be a while before we know.
 

Cerium

Member
We have no idea how he does with Asians (correct me if I'm wrong, but they are 13% of the state).

qv0ndspskumyr-hzhtuiiw.png


Cruz already condemned last night on Fox News.
He sort of walked it back today. He'll have time to decide what he's going to do before the debate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom