• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT8| No, Donald. You don't.

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/759213418444357632

Wow. Would love to see Ryan/McConnell as they're watching this.
Ryan wants to probably bury his head in the sand and hope the next 3 months just disappear from his calendar.

It's amazing to me that no one had the courage to say these words until now. What he's saying is absolutely correct. We're headed for a total chaos when this fascist wants to ban the next group he deems dangerous.
 
John Marshall is right he's gonna start demanding 3rd parties be let in claiming "rigged" debates

Gary Johnson: *Takes a huge hit on the debate stage* "Woah... Chemtrails in this building and... our water and-my hands, have you seen them before... I think I forgot something wh-Trump is a pussy, that's it!"

Jill Stein: "This dumb bitch Hillary Clinton, and I can say that because I'm a woman and a leftist, she doesn't get the best way to stop climate change is to make sure that we stop using nuclear power so that we have to using way more coal. Also, fluoride in water is bad!"

... Can't see how this would be helpful for Trump if Hillary looks like the only sane person up there.
 

Sibylus

Banned
Hillary leads only by 17 points, my fellow Canadians? Stop jerking your lose cannons (that's right, I know what demo is fucking this up) and go plant a tree.
 

Boke1879

Member
Ryan wants to probably bury his head in the sand and hope the next 3 months just disappear from his calendar.

It's amazing to me that no one had the courage to say these words until now. What he's saying is absolutely correct. We're headed for a total chaos when this fascist wants to ban the next group he deems dangerous.

I don't see what's wrong with Ryan saying he doesn't support Trump. It's ok man. You can say it.
 
I don't see what's wrong with Ryan saying he doesn't support Trump. It's ok man. You can say it.

He's the leader of the Republican House. If he comes out and says he doesn't support their parties nominee it sends a bad signal. It indicates that the Republicans have lost control, and completely destroys any chance of joint appearances for down ticket races--not that I think many of them want Trump and Pence there to stump for them...
 

Boke1879

Member
He's the leader of the Republican House. If he comes out and says he doesn't support their parties nominee it sends a bad signal. It indicates that the Republicans have lost control, and completely destroys any chance of joint appearances for down ticket races--not that I think many of them want Trump and Pence there to stump for them...

Fuck it. Have some dignity. Because this man literally has the potential to destroy their party if he loses in November.
 
He's the leader of the Republican House. If he comes out and says he doesn't support their parties nominee it sends a bad signal. It indicates that the Republicans have lost control, and completely destroys any chance of joint appearances for down ticket races--not that I think many of them want Trump and Pence there to stump for them...

It'd be worse in that Trump would go scorched earth and wouldn't let Ryan repudiate him without answer.
 
Hillary leads only by 17 points, my fellow Canadians? Stop jerking your lose cannons (that's right, I know what demo is fucking this up) and go plant a tree.

Those results are totally out of line with what a Canadian polling company found back in May:

Slide2-3.png

Admittedly, our pollsters don't have the greatest track records generally, but that seems about in line with general sentiment up here. The Conservatives only got about 30% in our election last fall, and that poll found that Trump wouldn't even crack 40% with them.
 

Slacker

Member
Probably nothing, but from twitter:

@Bencjacobs (Political reporter for The Guardian)
Trump is now complaining "we pay rent for our base to Saudi Arabia"

@yarotrof (Greater Middle East columnist of The Wall Street Journal)
If there is now a US military base in Saudi, it is classified and mentioning it should have legal consequences.
 
Probably nothing, but from twitter:

@Bencjacobs (Political reporter for The Guardian)
Trump is now complaining "we pay rent for our base to Saudi Arabia"

@yarotrof (Greater Middle East columnist of The Wall Street Journal)
If there is now a US military base in Saudi, it is classified and mentioning it should have legal consequences.

I doubt he knows of a classified base, unless briefings already started?

If they did and this is top secret, it'll be fun
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
No clue how reliable this site is, but apparently Trump is already leaking classified info.

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/07...efing-trump-likely-leaked-classified-secrets/

Probably nothing, but from twitter:

@Bencjacobs (Political reporter for The Guardian)
Trump is now complaining "we pay rent for our base to Saudi Arabia"

@yarotrof (Greater Middle East columnist of The Wall Street Journal)
If there is now a US military base in Saudi, it is classified and mentioning it should have legal consequences.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag1o3koTLWM
 

Bowdz

Member
Probably nothing, but from twitter:

@Bencjacobs (Political reporter for The Guardian)
Trump is now complaining "we pay rent for our base to Saudi Arabia"

@yarotrof (Greater Middle East columnist of The Wall Street Journal)
If there is now a US military base in Saudi, it is classified and mentioning it should have legal consequences.

I'd lose my shit if Trump leaked classified information on the first day of his briefings.
 

Piecake

Member
HOLEE SHEET.

This is bad. Like really bad.

I would put good money that Trump doesnt know what the fuck he is talking about and is just blowing a bunch of BS in the air for some point or to look important.

I highly doubt he has this info.

Still, that should scare everyone that he is perfectly fine with making up a bunch of bullshit and saying it out-loud when that bullshit, if true, would be a government secret.
 

Geg

Member
So did classified briefings actually start? Is that the kind of thing we know when it happens?

I guess it might be time to bring back the conversation about what happens if one of the candidates is arrested lol
 

Piecake

Member
I mean we have bases in saudi arabia, that's common knowledge. There's enough latitude for him to easily skate this one.

According to WSJ's reporter for the ME that would be classified info though and would automatically come with penalties.

I think it is all a bunch of BS, but I trust that WSJ to know the consequences of that.
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
I have never wanted a secret military base in Saudi Arabia more in my life.

THIS.

I mean, I don't want anyone to get hurt from this (aside from Trump, of course), but holy shit would this be entertaining to see the fallout.
 

VRMN

Member
I mean we have bases in saudi arabia, that's common knowledge. There's enough latitude for him to easily skate this one.

Even if this is true, if he got the information from a briefing, it's unlikely he'd stop there with the random blurting out of US secrets. The man has no self-control.
 

johnsmith

remember me

Balphon

Member
I think only the first presidential debate overlaps. I am not sure about the vp. But these debates were announced last October. Not sure what Hillary has to do with them.

The first debate is 9/26 (a Monday) and the second is 10/9 (a Sunday), so they will presumably occur opposite NFL games.

That said, starting in the beginning of September there will be NFL/college football games essentially every Monday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, so how the CPD would avoid scheduling against football.
 

Tamanon

Banned
I think he's just an idiot. Also, not sure why a security briefing would even have that information in it. It's all a broad strokes thing, not every base we have.
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
I think he's just an idiot. Also, not sure why a security briefing would even have that information in it. It's all a broad strokes thing, not every base we have.

Who says the most recent report they gave him listed all our bases? It might have just referenced the one in Saudi Arabia.
 

aliengmr

Member
Pretty sure the briefings have not happened yet. Read somewhere they were going to take place in either a few days or a few weeks after both conventions are over.

Even if they were to give them ASAP, I highly doubt he would have had one today.

I'm waiting to see if there is any marked change in tone after the briefings though. Would be a bit interesting if there was.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
"We're going to win so big we're going to make the Denver Broncos wins not look so big with their win percentage." ~ Donald Trump in Denver this evening
 
It's amazing to me that you can type this with a straight face. Have you perhaps noticed the catastrophic, literally country-threatening disaster that is Donald Trump and how the far right wing foisted him on the GOP?

Why would you want more of that?

Trump isn't far right. He's anti-free trade, once proposed the largest tax hike in American history, significantly to the left of anyone in his party on health care, isolationist, pro-Russia, anti-NATO, moderate on abortion rights, the list goes on. I mean, he's not centrist or leftist, either. His brand of populism is kind of sui generis and defies easy political categorization. And it's precisely that the various interest groups in the Republican party are willing to defect against their party when they're not pursuing their interests that there are so many Republican NeverTrumpers.

It's not something the left is likely to repeat, and even if they succeed in getting an outsider nominated it's going to be someone like Sanders rather than a proto-tankie or whatever the communist equivalent of proto-fascist is.

The real analogy is to the tea party which, yeah, should be a model for far-left organizing going forward. The next time Democrats are tempted to sign off on some latter day Melian expedition I want them quaking in their boots about a primary challenge from a Bernie-branded leftist.

..That's not likely to happen because the far left is pretty cynical about electoral politics and never seems to show up for midterms, much less primaries for state representatives, but if anyone can make it happen it's Bernie.

If you're far left, why would you hope for the Republicans to choose a better candidate? Is this that accelerationism idiocy again?

No. I never advocated for accelerationism. I'm hoping the Republicans nominate people better than Trump going forward because they're going to win at least a few elections, and if they are I'd much rather it be Romney than Trump.

I was just thinking about how this is the perfect year that Hillary could have won the presidential nomination. Not 2008, but now. Eight years ago, the Republican Party still had an effective enough leadership to stress their commitment to patriotic values and American exceptionalism. Hillary is just seemingly hawkish enough to appear genuine in seizing the opportunity to label the Democrat party as the patriot's party, and still keep to her core values and champion progressive values.

I don't condone war unless all other meaningful options have been exhausted, but this is fantastic. I'm still in awe that we have become the party of everyone. Excluding bigots and the uncompromising, of course.

She's hardly the candidate for everyone. This is still the candidate that is neck and neck with Barry Goldwater for favorability ratings. Throughout the entire primary season, in a head-to-head matchup with the opposing party's presumptive nominee, she was trailing five points behind a self-identified socialist that had nice things to say about Castro and the Sandinistas (yes, Bernie would have tanked the moment the attack machine revved up and been in an even worse position than Hillary, but attack machine or no that polling is atrocious). She's turned what should be the easiest layup in American electoral history into a tossup. She's as unelectable as McGovern, and if she makes the White House it will only be because the Republicans were feeling mildly more suicidal than the Democrats this cycle.
 

Iolo

Member
She's turned what should be the easiest layup in American electoral history into a tossup. She's as unelectable as McGovern, and if she makes the White House it will only be because the Republicans were feeling mildly more suicidal than the Democrats this cycle.

What win margin would be required for you to view her presidency as legitimate, or is there any such margin?
 
I hope that Rachel Platten is on stage when Hillary wins.

EDIT: A recent poll had Obama up only 4 over Trump in Ohio in a hypothetical matchup. Spare me the lecture about how she's the only one who could lose this election.
 

pigeon

Banned
Trump isn't far right. He's anti-free trade, once proposed the largest tax hike in American history, significantly to the left of anyone in his party on health care, isolationist, pro-Russia, anti-NATO, moderate on abortion rights, the list goes on. I mean, he's not centrist or leftist, either. His brand of populism is kind of sui generis and defies easy political categorization.

This is staggeringly incorrect. Trump is easy to categorize. He's a white nationalist fascist. All of his policies fit perfectly into that bucket.

And it's precisely that the various interest groups in the Republican party are willing to defect against their party when they're not pursuing their interests that there are so many Republican NeverTrumpers.

This is also completely wrong. The NeverTrumpers exist because they know that their party was taken over by a white nationalist fascist. That is bad! More to the point it's disqualifying for Republicans who associate with him in future elections.

The real analogy is to the tea party which, yeah, should be a model for far-left organizing going forward. The next time Democrats are tempted to sign off on some latter day Melian expedition I want them quaking in their boots about a primary challenge from a Bernie-branded leftist.

Since everything you understand above about the currently political situation is wrong, unsurprisingly, this is also wrong. Ideological crusades are exactly how the Republican party got led out onto a limb that the rest of America won't go out on, which weakened their institutional control to the point that their underlying white nationalism became the dominant force. It's part of the party realignment currently taking place. I have no idea why people feel the desire to accelerate the Democratic Party's downfall by insisting on ideological persecution of Democratic politicians when all the evidence shows they're going to move left along with the rest of the country.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
Who says the most recent report they gave him listed all our bases? It might have just referenced the one in Saudi Arabia.
Problem is they literally can't prosecute him right now. Can you imagine the conspiracy theories and absolute insanity from the right about making him a "political prisoner" I would expect militia groups in the streets that night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom