• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT8| No, Donald. You don't.

Status
Not open for further replies.
His adjustments in North Carolina are even more infuriating. The only poll with Trump ahead is from March and he insides it to favor Trump by more and weighs it more heavily than polls from June and July!
 
Shower thought: I don't think Hillary can beat Trump by being herself. There was a ton of GOP candidates and noone could beat him. I think that the only way to beat Trump is being Trump.

I hope that she will beat him in upcoming debates by being factual, but I won't be suprised if she can't.
Rubio tried that and failed miserably.
 

gcubed

Member
Shower thought: I don't think Hillary can beat Trump by being herself. There was a ton of GOP candidates and noone could beat him. I think that the only way to beat Trump is being Trump.

I hope that she will beat him in upcoming debates by being factual, but I won't be suprised if she can't.

No.

Trump can't debate anyone. He's never been in a debate. The shitshows during the primaries weren't debates.

This should not be in your top 100000000 of your worries
 
I don't think Nate's model was built to handle this election. What the hell is going on?

It's still pretty good. I think I've seen you mention Sam Wang too so why all the alarm and concern? Nate is just talking a lot and you can't deny Trump is seeing traction unless you engage in motivated reasoning. Time will tell so let's all take a deep breath and see what Mr. Trump can do.
 

Fuchsdh

Member
He literally can't help it. The guy that wrote Art of the Deal said his (I'm paraphrasing here) narcissism won't allow him to not respond to anything, good or bad. He HAS to be involved. It's a pathology.

Yep. I admit I really thought he would actually be able to rein it in for the general, but he seems incapable. I dunno how such a guy even managed to be as successful in business as Trump has been; seems like he'd torpedo himself way more than he has.
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
Why would you make a thread about this? You just posted a screenshot and that was it. I'm disappointed this is now TWO poligaffers who think it is thread worthy to make threads about 538 in July.
 
Maybe Silver is doing this on purpose to scare liberals and make them go to the polls. Maybe he's so scared of a Trump presidency that he is willing to ruin his own reputation in order to help prevent it
 
Can we ban 538 on neogaf?

Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?

Edit: A second has been made.

Edit: And a third.

All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY

In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted

: bangs :
 

VRMN

Member
Maybe Silver is doing this on purpose to scare liberals and make them go to the polls. Maybe he's so scared of a Trump presidency that he is willing to ruin his own reputation in order to help prevent it
I might have laughed at this if I hadn't just listened to Keepin it 1600 and hearing the Hillary pollster talk about how it's probably better if liberals are scared, because we really, really need to beat Trump.

Most persuasive argument for Diablosing/bed wetting I've heard.
 

Crayons

Banned
q6YjB2q.png

Trump's true motives revealed!
 

royalan

Member
Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?

Edit: A second has been made.

Edit: And a third.

All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY

In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted

: bangs :

THE NAYS HAD IT. I HAVE SEVERAL CELLPHONE VIDS PROVING IT.

RIGGED

*Picks up chair*
 

Iolo

Member
I don't think it's wise to ban an entire election site because you don't like their methodology. Just don't create daily threads about it.

Btw this includes if it shows her way up in a week
 

Diablos

Member
Wait, are you actually Diablosing right now or are you doing a schtick as a joke?
I don't know. More like second guessing myself. No one knows. You see how we are all in here checking ourselves but we all know he's so unconventional. We have nothing to compare this election to.

Ahhhhhhh
 

Rebel Leader

THE POWER OF BUTTERSCOTCH BOTTOMS
Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?

Edit: A second has been made.

Edit: And a third.

All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY

In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted

: bangs :

qF6rrY7.gif
 

Cerium

Member
538 may have jumped the shark this election, but their forecasts should help drive turnout. This is a good thing. Let people be scared; scared voters don't stay home.
 

daedalius

Member
Johnson has that crossover ish libertarian and liberal vibe. I do wonder if he will draw from both Hillary and Trump. Low info young liberal voters, stubborn far left children and conservative minded voters who can't vote for Trump. Plus actual libertarians. It's concerning. If it was just Stein, lol. But that's not the case.

He definitely has some stubborn far left children that I know of in Washington state.
 
I don't think it's wise to ban an entire election site because you don't like their methodology. Just don't create daily threads about it.

Btw this includes if it shows her way up in a week
I'm in favor of banning the daily threads and I'd be in favor of that if they had Clinton at 99% while everyone else had her between 60-80% right now - all they do is enable concern trolling on one side and chicken littling on the other.
 

pigeon

Banned
Yeah, banning 538 really would make us crazy unskewers. No to that.

Mostly I would like to ask why they're being so weird. The last two polls that came out showed a large bounce for Clinton. Why did the polls-only model move towards Trump? That makes no sense.
 

HylianTom

Banned
Too much panic/focus on 538.

Side question: is there any chance that Paul Ryan's district could be redrawn after 2020? I think that'd be a fitting fate.
 

ampere

Member
The good thing about Johnson is that he'll suck up the Mormon vote in NV, AZ, and UT.

I was gonna say, what would a Romney endorsement even do, get more Mormons to vote for him? But you make a good point about Mormon votes being potential swing factors in those states.

I don't think Nate's model was built to handle this election. What the hell is going on?

Now-cast is pure garbage. I want to know what Nate is smoking
 
Yeah, banning 538 really would make us crazy unskewers. No to that.

Mostly I would like to ask why they're being so weird. The last two polls that came out showed a large bounce for Clinton. Why did the polls-only model move towards Trump? That makes no sense.
I don't know why the Now-cast shows better odds for Clinton than the Polls-only one.

In any case, Nate says the one to follow is Polls-plus which still shows a higher than 60% chance of Clinton winning, and it's subject to the least amount of noise. So whatever. Let people panic for a couple of days.

HylianTom said:
Too much panic/focus on 538.

Side question: is there any chance that Paul Ryan's district could be redrawn after 2020? I think that'd be a fitting fate.
We'll need to make sure Wisconsin elects a Dem governor by then, and hopefully a Dem State Senate (it happened during the Walker recall). The State Assembly is probably a bit far-flung, unfortunately.
 

Diablos

Member
Yeah, banning 538 really would make us crazy unskewers. No to that.

Mostly I would like to ask why they're being so weird. The last two polls that came out showed a large bounce for Clinton. Why did the polls-only model move towards Trump? That makes no sense.
Every poligaffer on Twitter, spam him with this question.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Can somebody run down how 538 went from the goldenboy of elections to shit?

They started showing results people don't like. Its the same reason the GOP ignored Nate in 2012. He was saying things they didn't like so they said he was crazy and wrong.
 
Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?

Edit: A second has been made.

Edit: And a third.

All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY

In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted

: bangs :

NO TPP

NO TPP
 
So yall should chill, but looking at recently added (adjusted) polls:

Arizona Trump +8

Ipsos National Trump +1

Because their model goes with the idea that states follow the national trend and adjusted polling average has them tied nation-wide (look at the highest valued national polls, most of them older and tied, that's one part I don't really get), states are trending towards Trump. We should just chill for about 1-2 weeks for most of the post-DNC polls.
 
That's the thing where I'm concerned, though (to the extent that I care about the models, not the polls): why take national polls into account to that extent when you know full well Wang is doing just as well as you just taking averages of state polls?
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
We are in the most notoriously unreliable polling period of the election cycle. I'm not going to worry about it that much until we get to the debates and such.
 

itschris

Member
New York Times: Electoral Map Gives Donald Trump Few Places to Go

Donald J. Trump, confronting a daunting electoral map and a significant financial disadvantage, is preparing to fall back from an expansive national campaign and concentrate the bulk of his time and money on just three or four states that his campaign believes he must sweep in order to win the presidency.

Even as Mr. Trump has ticked up in national polls in recent weeks, senior Republicans say his path to the 270 Electoral College votes needed for election has remained narrow — and may have grown even more precarious. It now looks exceedingly difficult for him to assemble even the barest Electoral College majority without beating Hillary Clinton in a trifecta of the biggest swing states: Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

President Obama won all three states in 2008 and 2012, and no Republican has won Pennsylvania in nearly three decades.

With a divisive campaign message that has alienated many women and Hispanics, Mr. Trump appears to have pushed several traditional swing states out of his own reach. According to strategists on both sides of the race, polling indicates that Mrs. Clinton has a solid upper hand in Colorado and Virginia, the home state of Senator Tim Kaine, her running mate. Both states voted twice for George W. Bush, who assiduously courted Hispanic voters and suburban moderates.

In addition, Trump allies have grown concerned about North Carolina, a Republican-leaning state that has large communities of black voters and college-educated whites — two audiences with which Mr. Trump is deeply unpopular.

While Mr. Trump is not ready to give up entirely on any of the major battlegrounds, advisers have become increasingly convinced that his most plausible route to the presidency, and perhaps his only realistic victory scenario, involves capturing all three of the biggest electoral prizes on the map, and keeping North Carolina in the Republican column.

Mr. Trump and his running mate, Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana, are expected to campaign intensively across those four must-win states, with Mr. Trump trumpeting a set of blunt slogans through mass media and Mr. Pence focused on shoring up support from conservatives and right-of-center whites.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom