What if he refuses to attend and shows up live on Fox or something and baits her into HIS debate?This seems like Diablosing to me. Trump won't have anywhere to hide in a 1-1 debate.
In Plouffe we trust. He is pretty smart. He wouldn't just throw that prediction around to make us feel okPlouffe saying +350, and how she gets there:
358.
Rubio tried that and failed miserably.Shower thought: I don't think Hillary can beat Trump by being herself. There was a ton of GOP candidates and noone could beat him. I think that the only way to beat Trump is being Trump.
I hope that she will beat him in upcoming debates by being factual, but I won't be suprised if she can't.
Shower thought: I don't think Hillary can beat Trump by being herself. There was a ton of GOP candidates and noone could beat him. I think that the only way to beat Trump is being Trump.
I hope that she will beat him in upcoming debates by being factual, but I won't be suprised if she can't.
Heh not sure why you made a topic though.I don't think Nate's model was built to handle this election. What the hell is going on?
I don't think Nate's model was built to handle this election. What the hell is going on?
He literally can't help it. The guy that wrote Art of the Deal said his (I'm paraphrasing here) narcissism won't allow him to not respond to anything, good or bad. He HAS to be involved. It's a pathology.
No.
Trump can't debate anyone. He's never been in a debate. The shitshows during the primaries weren't debates.
This should not be in your top 100000000 of your worries
What if he refuses to attend and shows up live on Fox or something and baits her into HIS debate?
Second.Can we ban 538 on neogaf?
Why would you make a thread about this? You just posted a screenshot and that was it. I'm disappointed this is now TWO poligaffers who think it is thread worthy to make threads about 538 in July.
Can we ban 538 on neogaf?
Second.
(At the very least, close threads dedicated to the "nowcast", because it's statistically worthless and just enables obnoxious chicken littling)
I might have laughed at this if I hadn't just listened to Keepin it 1600 and hearing the Hillary pollster talk about how it's probably better if liberals are scared, because we really, really need to beat Trump.Maybe Silver is doing this on purpose to scare liberals and make them go to the polls. Maybe he's so scared of a Trump presidency that he is willing to ruin his own reputation in order to help prevent it
Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?
Edit: A second has been made.
Edit: And a third.
All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY
In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted
: bangs :
I don't know. More like second guessing myself. No one knows. You see how we are all in here checking ourselves but we all know he's so unconventional. We have nothing to compare this election to.Wait, are you actually Diablosing right now or are you doing a schtick as a joke?
Nate fucked the Republican primary up something awful. Now he's frantically flailing.Can somebody run down how 538 went from the goldenboy of elections to shit?
I don't think it's wise to ban an entire election site because you don't like their methodology. Just don't create daily threads about it.
Btw this includes if it shows her way up in a week
Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?
Edit: A second has been made.
Edit: And a third.
All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY
In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted
: bangs :
Can somebody run down how 538 went from the goldenboy of elections to shit?
Agreed.I don't think it's wise to ban an entire election site because you don't like their methodology. Just don't create daily threads about it.
Btw this includes if it shows her way up in a week
Nate fucked the Republican primary up something awful. Now he's frantically flailing.
Johnson has that crossover ish libertarian and liberal vibe. I do wonder if he will draw from both Hillary and Trump. Low info young liberal voters, stubborn far left children and conservative minded voters who can't vote for Trump. Plus actual libertarians. It's concerning. If it was just Stein, lol. But that's not the case.
I'm in favor of banning the daily threads and I'd be in favor of that if they had Clinton at 99% while everyone else had her between 60-80% right now - all they do is enable concern trolling on one side and chicken littling on the other.I don't think it's wise to ban an entire election site because you don't like their methodology. Just don't create daily threads about it.
Btw this includes if it shows her way up in a week
The good thing about Johnson is that he'll suck up the Mormon vote in NV, AZ, and UT.
I don't think Nate's model was built to handle this election. What the hell is going on?
I don't know why the Now-cast shows better odds for Clinton than the Polls-only one.Yeah, banning 538 really would make us crazy unskewers. No to that.
Mostly I would like to ask why they're being so weird. The last two polls that came out showed a large bounce for Clinton. Why did the polls-only model move towards Trump? That makes no sense.
We'll need to make sure Wisconsin elects a Dem governor by then, and hopefully a Dem State Senate (it happened during the Walker recall). The State Assembly is probably a bit far-flung, unfortunately.HylianTom said:Too much panic/focus on 538.
Side question: is there any chance that Paul Ryan's district could be redrawn after 2020? I think that'd be a fitting fate.
Every poligaffer on Twitter, spam him with this question.Yeah, banning 538 really would make us crazy unskewers. No to that.
Mostly I would like to ask why they're being so weird. The last two polls that came out showed a large bounce for Clinton. Why did the polls-only model move towards Trump? That makes no sense.
Can somebody run down how 538 went from the goldenboy of elections to shit?
Pursuant to the rules of the Convention, a motion has been made to ban 538 on NeoGaf. Do I hear a second?
Edit: A second has been made.
Edit: And a third.
All those in favor say AYE
All opposed say NAY
In the opinion of the chair, the AYES have it and the motion is adopted
: bangs :
*Drowns out dubbedenglish*NO TPP
NO TPP
Donald J. Trump, confronting a daunting electoral map and a significant financial disadvantage, is preparing to fall back from an expansive national campaign and concentrate the bulk of his time and money on just three or four states that his campaign believes he must sweep in order to win the presidency.
Even as Mr. Trump has ticked up in national polls in recent weeks, senior Republicans say his path to the 270 Electoral College votes needed for election has remained narrow — and may have grown even more precarious. It now looks exceedingly difficult for him to assemble even the barest Electoral College majority without beating Hillary Clinton in a trifecta of the biggest swing states: Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.
President Obama won all three states in 2008 and 2012, and no Republican has won Pennsylvania in nearly three decades.
With a divisive campaign message that has alienated many women and Hispanics, Mr. Trump appears to have pushed several traditional swing states out of his own reach. According to strategists on both sides of the race, polling indicates that Mrs. Clinton has a solid upper hand in Colorado and Virginia, the home state of Senator Tim Kaine, her running mate. Both states voted twice for George W. Bush, who assiduously courted Hispanic voters and suburban moderates.
In addition, Trump allies have grown concerned about North Carolina, a Republican-leaning state that has large communities of black voters and college-educated whites — two audiences with which Mr. Trump is deeply unpopular.
While Mr. Trump is not ready to give up entirely on any of the major battlegrounds, advisers have become increasingly convinced that his most plausible route to the presidency, and perhaps his only realistic victory scenario, involves capturing all three of the biggest electoral prizes on the map, and keeping North Carolina in the Republican column.
Mr. Trump and his running mate, Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana, are expected to campaign intensively across those four must-win states, with Mr. Trump trumpeting a set of blunt slogans through mass media and Mr. Pence focused on shoring up support from conservatives and right-of-center whites.