• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT2| Well, maybe McMaster isn't a traitor.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plumbob

Member
Except he and right wing media are already starting the "blame Ryan and the Freedom Caucus" game. His supporters will as well. He will lose almost no support from republican voters over this.

No but to the people he works with this makes it clear he isn't capable of making policy work
 
Except he and right wing media are already starting the "blame Ryan and the Freedom Caucus" game. His supporters will as well. He will lose almost no support from republican voters over this.
He's the master deal maker though. I don't see how his approval doesn't measurably drop if he can't repeal Obamacare despite controlling both chambers and the White House. Mitch McConnell's insight that voters over-attribute all events to the president applies to Trump, too. And Trump is looking impotent if this bill crashes.
 
There'll definitely be plenty of people willing to excuse Trump's failure here and blame Ryan and the HFC, but this is going to shake his image as some master deal maker and negotiator. Losing his first big public policy fight in what was supposed to be his strongest area is gonna harm his base's faith in his abilities.
 

Wilsongt

Member
But as some people were quick to note, directly lobbying Congress in support of (or opposition to) a bill using federal dollars—including White House staff who earn federal salaries—is strictly forbidden under 18 U.S.C. § 1913.

Oops.
 

Ecotic

Member
There'll definitely be plenty of people willing to excuse Trump's failure here and blame Ryan and the HFC, but this is going to shake his image as some master deal maker and negotiator. Losing his first big public policy fight in what was supposed to be his strongest area is gonna harm his base's faith in his abilities.

Plus he gave up after 48 hours of difficulty. Dare I say a lack of that much-vaunted stamina?
 
If Hillary won, 2018 at the least would have been an unmitigated disaster. I could have easily seen all the vulnerable Senate Dems getting wiped out.

I'm not so sure. At least Hillary would have been competent, and I think Republicans would have been at least as dysfunctional. At worst she may have gotten Obama'd where she got stonewalled. But after 4 years I think she still would have won re-election and maybe Democrats turn it around in 2020.
 

dramatis

Member
Except he and right wing media are already starting the "blame Ryan and the Freedom Caucus" game. His supporters will as well. He will lose almost no support from republican voters over this.
It doesn't have to revolve around a direct line of causation.

For instance, Trump losing credibility costs him on the long run. Domestically maybe he could get away with it for a while because of full Republican control, but internationally nobody thinks he has credibility and therefore ignore his demands or rants or proposals.

If a domestic or foreign crisis happens, and Trump can't address it properly because he has no credibility, then the consequences of that can be further reaching than just the failure of a hastily put together healthcare bill.
 

Vixdean

Member
Hillary would not have been a drag on the Democratic party in '18 unless things just went horribly wrong her first 2 years. Remember, the economy is still doing great and a hypothetical Hillary administration isn't going to be manufacturing crises left and right. The same caveats apply to her that apply to Trump, and any external event affecting her Presidency will affect his well. She'd at least be over 50% approval right now based on the economy alone.
 

Blader

Member
Hillary would not have been a drag on the Democratic party in '18 unless things just went horribly wrong her first 2 years. Remember, the economy is still doing great and a hypothetical Hillary administration isn't going to be manufacturing crises left and right. The same caveats apply to her that apply to Trump, and any external event affecting her Presidency will affect his well. She'd at least be over 50% approval right now based on the economy alone.

Midterms are almost always bad for the party in the White House. And if a recalcitrant House refused to work with her and spent all their time investigating emails, Benghazi, the foundation, et al. then voters are going to be inundated for two years with more manufactured Clinton scandals and little, if any, legislative action to show for it.

Barack Obama rescued the economy from the worst financial crisis in nearly a century, passed a landmark piece of legislation to reform the American health care system, and scored a number of significant policy wins that most people *still* know little, if anything, about. And he was rewarded for it with the Tea Party wave. Hillary wouldn't be able to get nearly as much done, and she'd incite, on name alone, even more Republicans to turn out in '18 to vote against her/the Democrats.
 

Blader

Member
Could work
Might work
Don't know that it will work

This has been the thread running through all the negotiations this week. :lol
 

ukOAPW4.png


This isn't going to pass

Also that Tweet
"could work"
"might work"
"don't know if it will work"

That's not confidence at all.
 

sazzy

Member
Anyone remember sometime last year during the campaign Bannon said something like, Ryan will be gone by April?
 
No matter what happens it's bad for them, so they can pass it if they want. It's a garbage bill and there's no winning condition for them.
 
Anyone remember sometime last year during the campaign Bannon said something like, Ryan will be gone by April?

Looks like he is personally going to try to do it. My question is who would replace Ryan if it were to happen? Not many jump after the opportunity for speaker of the house.

This feels like a season finale. Will it pass or not? Tune it at 5PM!

Now it's 5? Thought i was 2. I can't keep up with all these changes.
 
No matter what happens it's bad for them, so they can pass it if they want. It's a garbage bill and there's no winning condition for them.

After the election, no celebration until like 2020 when we hopefully have a Dem President again.

For all talk of "debacles," possible that House passes #AHCA, McConnell rewrites it in conference with all Senate Rs, passes, House accepts.
 
After the election, no celebration until like 2020 when we hopefully have a Dem President again.

There isn't time to do this.

There isn't a secret McConnell bill hiding somewhere

This isn't the plan

McConnell wasn't even going to take it to conference, the plan was to do a straight vote because there is no time to do anything else.

McConnell would need to rewrite the entire bill in a week and a half, make sure it passes for reconciliation, send it back to the house, and make sure they agree with the changes (which the FC won't)
 

Maledict

Member
The notion that McConnel could shift the bill significantly to the left, and the house would then accept it, is such utter nonsense it staggers belief. Firstly, the HfC thinks THIS bill is too left wing, why the hell will they go for a worse bill (in their eyes).

And secondly, if McConnel could craft a healthcare bill to pass the senate and house he would have done! It wouldn't be some ultra secret thing that no-one can see.

This theory is honestly one of the most insane and ludicrous ever.
 
It actually is best case for them. This plan is terrible and will turn republicans against him.

Leaving ACA in place is far more beneficial for Trump politically.
There is no benefit here. Trump losing on healthcare, his first foray into legislative politics, at a time when his WH is facing pressure on all sides, would be a disaster. It would ruin the party's entire legislative strategy which hinges on this law passing so they can move to tax reform.

Of course passing it would be a disaster too, there is no way to win here. But the president failing to pass his first major law in either body of congress would be the end of his ability to influence his party.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
There is no benefit here. Trump losing on healthcare, his first foray into legislative politics, at a time when his WH is facing pressure on all sides, would be a disaster. It would ruin the party's entire legislative strategy which hinges on this law passing so they can move to tax reform.

Of course passing it would be a disaster too, there is no way to win here. But the president failing to pass his first major law in either body of congress would be the end of his ability to influence his party.

If it fails, Trump can shift blame (like he always does) on to Ryan and Freedom Caucus. The idea that it would "end his ability to influence his party" is laughable.

If it passes and it hurts millions of his own voters, he can't do that--he signed the bill.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Well he barely has any legislative influence as it stands to begin with based on the response to this turd and his turd budget.

This, too. Behind the scenes, House members are bristling about the forcefulness of how the White house is going about this.
 
Some people seem to actually want this to pass just to fulfill their weird depressing world view that everything is terrible and nothing good will ever happen again because one time something bad and unexpected happened
 
Some people seem to actually want this to pass just to fulfill their weird depressing world view that everything is terrible and nothing good will ever happen again because one time something bad and unexpected happened

For real. People keep forgetting how terrible this bill is. Fucking Breitbart is rallying against it.
 
Some people seem to actually want this to pass just to fulfill their weird depressing world view that everything is terrible and nothing good will ever happen again because one time something bad and unexpected happened
It's frustrating because all the other discussion seems at least a tad hopeful, and then a comment like that is like a "oh, right, best to expect the worst" splash of cold water
 

tuffy

Member
The AARP is against it. The Heritage Foundation is against it. Their own constituents are against it by something like 10 to 1. It didn't have the votes to pass yesterday after a lot of last-minute strong-arming. The only reason it's getting a vote today is because Trump demanded it. But somehow it's going to pass today because... reasons.
 
It's frustrating because all the other discussion seems at least a tad hopeful, and then a comment like that is like a "oh, right, best to expect the worst" splash of cold water

I think people reading random tweets from random people gives them a roller coaster of emotions because they're getting random bits of scattered stories told second hand, sometimes in passing or being overheard.

Looking at just these factors

- The country's largest lobby, AARP, is very much opposed to this law, and is threatening to shame every single person who votes for it
- The Heritage Foundation, the Conservatives "go to" think tank, is opposed to the bill and is threatening to score votes for the bill against people (and they take these scores seriously)
- The Koch brothers, the best known and one of the largest GOP donors is against it and is actively promising PAC support to anyone who votes against this
- Paul Ryan has stopped saying it's going to pass and has instead moved onto "it's going to be voted on" which means he's done
- The White House has completely given up. Trump is bored (and made that well known) and is already blaming people for the bill failing
- The yes/nos have only changed +/- a couple of votes over the last 24 hours, with it trending towards nos more. This isn't a good sign for a healthy bill that's about to pass

If this was any other bill, all those factors would mean it never even saw a vote, let alone passed.
 
I think people reading random tweets from random people gives them a roller coaster of emotions because they're getting random bits of scattered stories told second hand, sometimes in passing or being overheard.

Looking at just these factors

- The country's largest lobby, AARP, is very much opposed to this law, and is threatening to shame every single person who votes for it
- The Heritage Foundation, the Conservatives "go to" think tank, is opposed to the bill and is threatening to score votes for the bill against people (and they take these scores seriously)
- The Koch brothers, the best known and one of the largest GOP donors is against it and is actively promising PAC support to anyone who votes against this
- Paul Ryan has stopped saying it's going to pass and has instead moved onto "it's going to be voted on" which means he's done
- The White House has completely given up. Trump is bored (and made that well known) and is already blaming people for the bill failing
- The yes/nos have only changed +/- a couple of votes over the last 24 hours, with it trending towards nos more. This isn't a good sign for a healthy bill that's about to pass

If this was any other bill, all those factors would mean it never even saw a vote, let alone passed.

Also, Tom Price was out last night getting shitfaced instead of fervently trying to drum up support for this.

He announced nothing interesting, other than Manafort volunteered to be interviewed by the intel committee.

That's pretty interesting though!
 

Anoregon

The flight plan I just filed with the agency list me, my men, Dr. Pavel here. But only one of you!
I think people reading random tweets from random people gives them a roller coaster of emotions because they're getting random bits of scattered stories told second hand, sometimes in passing or being overheard.

Looking at just these factors

- The country's largest lobby, AARP, is very much opposed to this law, and is threatening to shame every single person who votes for it
- The Heritage Foundation, the Conservatives "go to" think tank, is opposed to the bill and is threatening to score votes for the bill against people (and they take these scores seriously)
- The Koch brothers, the best known and one of the largest GOP donors is against it and is actively promising PAC support to anyone who votes against this
- Paul Ryan has stopped saying it's going to pass and has instead moved onto "it's going to be voted on" which means he's done
- The White House has completely given up. Trump is bored (and made that well known) and is already blaming people for the bill failing
- The yes/nos have only changed +/- a couple of votes over the last 24 hours, with it trending towards nos more. This isn't a good sign for a healthy bill that's about to pass

If this was any other bill, all those factors would mean it never even saw a vote, let alone passed.

Those are facts. We live in a post-facts world. You should know better.
 

Slacker

Member
Devin Nunes looks like the most in-over-his-head person in history. He constantly looks like the kid whose mom ran to get one more thing at the store and asked him to wait in line for her, and he's almost to the front of the line and she's not back yet.
 

DonShula

Member
Devin Nunes looks like the most in-over-his-head person in history. He constantly looks like the kid whose mom ran to get one more thing at the store and asked him to wait in line for her, and he's almost to the front of the line and she's not back yet.

I've been thinking he looks like he kid who just hit a baseball through a garage window whose dad is rounding the corner of the garage to see what happened.
 
The notion that McConnel could shift the bill significantly to the left, and the house would then accept it, is such utter nonsense it staggers belief. Firstly, the HfC thinks THIS bill is too left wing, why the hell will they go for a worse bill (in their eyes).

And secondly, if McConnel could craft a healthcare bill to pass the senate and house he would have done! It wouldn't be some ultra secret thing that no-one can see.

This theory is honestly one of the most insane and ludicrous ever.

I think we need to just start being a lot more specific here when we say "republicans" because for all intents and purposes we have 3 parties in Congress right now; The Dems, the GOP, and the HFC, and those last 2 are far enough away from each other to make this a legitimate separation. Nothing that the Senate would do to this bill would get HFC support; literally fucking nothing.

The "republicans fall in line" nonsense needs to go away. Their voters aren't particularly elastic, but the actual people will take stands when it threatens their jobs. No one who expects to get re-elected in red states with the Medicaid expansion is going to back this thing if it's got HFC support. It's political suicide. And to get those people on board, you lose the HFC.

If it fails, Trump can shift blame (like he always does) on to Ryan and Freedom Caucus. The idea that it would "end his ability to influence his party" is laughable.

If it passes and it hurts millions of his own voters, he can't do that--he signed the bill.

This doesn't really happen though. It bit us in the ass for the last 6 years, but now it can help us; most Americans think the Presidency is a dictatorship where the President is responsible for everything that happens under them. Literally everything is their fault; it's why Donny can't get his approval ratings up by tweeting about "Dems keep blocking our shit, so sad!" because most Americans think that because he won the election, he can't be blocked.

He owns the next 4 years of shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom