Any update on this? And lol why is he even trying.
Not yet, will be coming up "later".
Any update on this? And lol why is he even trying.
Translation: They flipped Flynn.Mike Quigley (D-IL) on MSNBC right now reiterating that there is evidence of coordination. He said not only is there evidence, but that they have probable cause.
Translation: They flipped Flynn.
Well yeah we gotta defend Dems in states like PA (Casey). But I mean forget about expanding the number of Dems. Focus on the House and Govs.Um, no. We need to protect our red state Dems as much as we can as well as playing offense in Nevada, Arizona, and Texas.
The first paragraph is real and promoted the fake second paragraph.
The first paragraph shows that Bannon is a jerkoff who pretends to be wise by making references he doesn't understand (and not making the reference with even the correct author!) and that inspired the second (fake) paragraph.
The question is who coordinated. Person or persons.Translation: They flipped Flynn.
Well yeah we gotta defend Dems in states like PA (Casey). But I mean forget about expanding the number of Dems. Focus on the House and Govs.
Where?A lot of ignorance in OT when it comes to basic things like the difference between House/Senate and who serves in which, basic functions of government, etc. Pretty disappointing.
Where?
Except it's not?The first paragraph is real and promoted the fake second paragraph.
The first paragraph shows that Bannon is a jerkoff who pretends to be wise by making references he doesn't understand (and not making the reference with even the correct author!) and that inspired the second (fake) paragraph.
A lot of ignorance in OT when it comes to basic things like the difference between House/Senate and who serves in which, basic functions of government, etc. Pretty disappointing.
Two weeks in a row I had to cook for Steven Miller and tonight it's John McCain.
I suppose that's an improvement.
Translation: They flipped Flynn.
Has the rest of the committee seen what Nunes saw?
How would Flynn flipping not be evidence to go to trial with?
Awww shit, I missed this. I hope it doesn't stick.
A lot of ignorance in OT when it comes to basic things like the difference between House/Senate and who serves in which, basic functions of government, etc. Pretty disappointing.
There's probably enough for an indictment, but not enough to convict.How would Flynn flipping not be evidence to go to trial with?
The frightening thing is that on average GAF is wealthier and more educated than most of the US.
I think that characterization is not correct.
What I heard Schiff say previously was that he has evidence to indict, not evidence to convict. This is slight code -- it means that they have probable cause (a reasonable person would believe that the crime was probably committed) but not evidence beyond reasonable doubt (a reasonable person could not possibly doubt that the crime was committed).
More one-kneed groveling?
I met McCain at his home in the Phoenix area on the job once. He at least was a nice individual in person. I can't imagine the same can be said of Miller.
They need more than evidence from an alleged accomplice and they need to corroborate what Flynn is saying if I had to guess?Isn't testimony from Flynn considered evidence beyond "reasonable doubt" though?
Isn't testimony from Flynn considered evidence beyond "reasonable doubt" though?
They need more than evidence from an alleged accomplice and they need to corroborate what Flynn is saying if I had to guess?
They need more than evidence from an alleged accomplice and they need to corroborate what Flynn is saying if I had to guess?
If there's no corroborating evidence then it's Flynn's word vs the White House's word.
They need a secondary source or physical evidence or whatever to prove that Flynn is telling the truth.
This is assuming Flynn is testifying. I actually think that he is, but I'm not necessarily sure the evidence that everybody's talking about is Flynn's evidence.
This is as well..Not to mention the target of the investigation who'll scream about the FBI being Obama stooges.
Paul Ryan said:Ninety percent of our conference was very, very upset with about 10 percent, and I didnt want things being done and said that people would regret, he said. So I sent folks home for the weekend to just kind of soak in what had happened, appreciate the situation and start over and get back to work again.
How much lower does it have to get before Republicans abandon ship?
We've got to be getting close.
So intelligence agencies are flat out saying they have zero idea what Nunes is even talking about, as they have no clue what intelligence reports he is referring to.
This is getting weirder by the hour.