That's why they call him "One-Take Trump."
Are you all even aware of how many awful bills would be passed over the years because reluctant Senators would have no choice but to go along with their rabid bases on something? It would be bad for everyone.
Apparently there's a poll w/ the GOP only up by 1 point in Kansas: https://t.co/zRNyBkLsbI
Apparently there's a poll w/ the GOP only up by 1 point in Kansas: https://t.co/zRNyBkLsbI
Democrats have used the image of Estes standing in the swamp and superimposed Gov. Sam Brownbacks head on an alligator swimming alongside him.
What?!Apparently there's a poll w/ the GOP only up by 1 point in Kansas: https://t.co/zRNyBkLsbI
I actually liked Martin O'Malley's presence during the DNC debates. He Just needs to be fired up a little more in the age of "i'm angry but i dont know why" politics.Martin has the charisma of a car salesman but I'd still vote for him if I had to
Apparently there's a poll w/ the GOP only up by 1 point in Kansas: https://t.co/zRNyBkLsbI
Jeb Bush is the only one who can stop Trump.
It's like PoetryJeb Bush is the only one who can stop Trump.
I guess you're not voting.Jeff Merkley 2020 or I'm not voting
Jeff Merkley 2020 or I'm not voting
I think Franken should be the VP pretty much regardless of who wins.The best bet would be Franken or Gillibrand imo. I think Booker would have a good shot as well, except the Bernie crowd might not go for him and him being unmarried probably hurts his chances quite a bit. Bottom line, it needs to be someone with Charisma and/or that doesn't pull their punches with that bullshit "when they go low, we go high" mindset.
I think Franken should be the VP pretty much regardless of who wins.
Since Kasich isn't running against him, it's likely he'll win. If Kasich were, Sherrod would have been boned..That would be a good idea. I could see Booker/Franken or Gillibrand/Franken having a good showing. I'm not sold on Sherrod Brown, because I'm worried he won't even win his Senate seat in 2018. But then again, I don't know exactly how well he's viewed in Ohio.
this is a plus imoSherrod Brown would be a good candidate if he didn't sound like Tom Waits
Let's resurrect Mo Udall
It'll be interesting to see what happens between her and Cuomo if they both run.
Jeff Merkley 2020 or I'm not voting
This deserves massive protests. In fact a lot deserves massive protest but the sheep have proved complacent. Little hope as democracy will slowly die and the crazies take complete control. They better not do this.
As an oregonian, Ron Wyden is the man #teamron
"This is an important election. There's really few very much more important and I need your vote..."
After Brown I don't really have much of a preference other than CCM. Gillibrand will probably get hurt from her Blue Dog days after campaigning against amnesty and to withhold funding from sanctuary cities, though I might be wrong. It's possible just saying you're pro free college and $15 minimum wage will make up for past transgressions. It'll be interesting to see what happens between her and Cuomo if they both run.
this is a plus imo
I unironically love hearing Brown's gravelly voice
The crowd that might be mad about Gillibrand's past on paper didn't seem to mind that Liz Warren was an actual Republican, complete with some insane free market quotes. I don't think it'll end up mattering, though I also don't think we'll elect a woman in my lifetime anymore
Warren said those things as a private citizen a long time ago, Gillibrand did that stuff as an elected official. I don't know if it sinks her but I definitely think Bernie voting against the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill hurt him with Latino voters. Maybe it doesn't stick though!The crowd that might be mad about Gillibrand's past on paper didn't seem to mind that Liz Warren was an actual Republican, complete with some insane free market quotes. I don't think it'll end up mattering, though I also don't think we'll elect a woman in my lifetime anymore
Like Warren, Gillibrand wasn't really in the public eye when she said that stuff. Plus when confronted on it she more or less has the best answer there is. I think the amount of time Clinton was in the public eye mattered far more than almost anything else when it comes to that crowd.
Warren said those things as a private citizen a long time ago, Gillibrand did that stuff as an elected official. I don't know if it sinks her but I definitely think Bernie voting against the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill hurt him with Latino voters. Maybe it doesn't stick though!
Though if you want a woman president, trends from other countries who've had women as head of government would suggest that we're more likely to get our first female head-of-government from the right rather than the left. Thatcher, Merkel, etc. There's a couple exceptions but it is a sort of observable trend.
I think the difference is that Warren probably actually did just have her political views change (since she had nothing really to gain from it) while Gillibrand's looks more cynical. I'm not even anti-Gillibrand really, I just don't know if she won't get hurt from being a Blue Dog.Right, I'm saying it won't matter for Gillibrand.
I don't think very many people actually care if you say things as a private person or elected official. I don't think it would end up mattering, at least any more than anybody else's typical problems would.
And the reason the right can elect women is because they like to prop up token examples as a means of deflection. "We don't hate women, we picked Thatcher!" It's as thinly veiled as Rubio's hype (which was certainly due to him being young and Cuban, which GOP strategists hoped would head off any racism charges).
Though, to be honest, I'd at least be a little happy if we elected a woman, even from the right. It is absolutely a pathetic failing of the US that our Presidents are so unrepresentative.
Some might argue here that's an important part of why he lost the primary!If having an anti immigration reform past mattered then St Birdie wouldn't be a thing.
Imo it had less to do with this and more to do with Bernie just straight up conceding minorities.Some might argue here that's an important part of why he lost the primary!
@Nate_Cohn 5h5 hours ago
Day 12 of in-person early voting in GA-6 is R 47, D 39--highest turnout and best GOP day yet
Over all, D 49, R 34 with 26717 ballots cast.
I'd expect this continue, given who is left to vote. Among voters who haven't voted yet with a >80% of voting in midterm: R 78, D 21
Oh RIP my dream candidate. Maybe you're right or maybe my favored candidate is fucked come 2020.Oh Brown voted no on Comprehensive Immigration Reform too, lol.
I wouldn't say he conceded the Latino vote at all, he did a lot better with them than he did with black voters and came close in Nevada, heavily contested California, etc.Imo it had less to do with this and more to do with Bernie just straight up conceding minorities.
He also voted for the crime bill and literally no one gave a shit about it.
Bernie lost because (among other things) he wanted to reframe race issues as class issues.
Franken supporting the Iraq War should be a serious issue in the primary, which makes me disinclined towards supporting him even though I'd otherwise think he'd be a strong candidate.
Have I told you the good news about Sherrod Brown however
Apparently there's a poll w/ the GOP only up by 1 point in Kansas: https://t.co/zRNyBkLsbI
I expected a 7-8 point victory for GOP in Kansas.
GA.
I expect Ossof to hit 45-46% on 1st round.
The majority of voters now left to vote ar Republican, e-day turnout will be very R heavy.
I think the difference is that Warren probably actually did just have her political views change (since she had nothing really to gain from it) while Gillibrand's looks more cynical. I'm not even anti-Gillibrand really, I just don't know if she won't get hurt from being a Blue Dog.
Maybe you're right, I guess we'll see in 2020! It's why I'm interested in seeing how she and Cuomo will interact if they both run since they seem pretty similar.The bold is why Gillibrand's explanation of her changes is so good. It's literally a mea culpa, her whole explanation is that she didn't have enough information or empathy and she changed by learning from and communicating with the people her previous views hurt. She doesn't even pretend to justify it like Clinton or that she never held the position like Bernie, she just admits she was wrong and goes into how she changed.
That's why she's so scary, she's not only willing to admit fault but she's also generally a step ahead of everyone else when it comes to political positioning. If she had Obama's oratory skill on top of her political insight she'd walk through the primary and into the Oval.
I liked her before, but I'm more impressed with seeing her operate now.