Ziltoidia 9
Member
I'm really surprised people are so outraged by this. Its freaking ISIS.
It's because he has a profile outside of VA.
I'm not loving the way in which local races are getting nationalized. (Ossoff getting attention is great, but is this going to be how everything is done from now on?)
Not if they're a mismatch with the actual electorate.What's the problem with it? Excitement over these house races is how you get people to turn out. Also, having candidates with ample money and volunteers can only be a good thing.
I'm really surprised people are so outraged by this. Its freaking ISIS.
"The bomb dropped today in the middle of nowhere, Afghanistan, cost $314,000,000"
"Those mujahedeen tunnel networks we're bombing in Afghanistan? We paid for them"
Not if they're a mismatch with the actual electorate.
The strike had been in the works for a number of months, with planning dating back to the Obama administration, CBS News correspondent David Martin reports. The weapon was brought into Afghanistan specifically for Thursdays mission.
I do not agree.Good thing Perriello isn't.
Not if they're a mismatch with the actual electorate.
Ed Snowden has some interesting tweets about the MOAB bomb
https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/852586455197261825
"If you think back, Brian, to Henry Kissinger's famous triangulation in 1972, the opening to China: It was strengthening our relationship with China in order to leverage the ... Soviets, in many ways. ... Time after time in the last few days, we've seen very tough rhetoric by Rex Tillerson against the Russians ... So, a very tough line against Russia. A very soft, friendly, conciliatory line against China. ... I think Trump feels he's got an opening with China and really not much business to do with Putin at this time."
Very interesting speculation from Nicholas Burns. Would be fascinating to see how Putin responds if Trump buddies up with China and leaves him in cold.
https://www.axios.com/operation-normal-trump-goes-al-2358875985.html
Yeah I see Periello pulling it off. I was previously undecided/either but I'm moving towards him myself.hot damn
I do not agree.
My opinion also won't matter if he's the only one running an actual campaign in the primary.
CIA Director going after wikileaks and Russia?
People have passion and drive for VA governor candidates?I mean, he's polling better than Northam against Gillespie, so like, based on what?
Why are we taking a chance on Northam, a candidate no one really has any passion or drive for and polls worse against Gillespie?
People have passion and drive for VA governor candidates?
Our elections are boring./I]
Yes, I think promising a bunch of shit to your easily dissuaded base who will only be disappointed and upset when it doesn't pass the GOP-controlled House is a bad long-term strategy.If you don't think people should be passionate about your candidates, then that's probably a bad strategy.
At the White House, President Trump called the mission another very, very successful mission. Asked if he personally authorized the strike, Mr. Trump said everybody knows exactly what happened.
What I do is I authorize my military, Mr. Trump said. We have the greatest military in the world and theyve done their job as usual. So, we have given them total authorization and thats what theyre doing.
Yes, I think promising a bunch of shit to your easily dissuaded base who will only be disappointed and upset when it doesn't pass the GOP-controlled House is a bad long-term strategy.
Isn't that kind of what we've been doing this whole time, though? At least, economically speaking. I mean something truly incredible like a joint military operation in North Korea would rustle Vlad's jimmies but it's not like we can shift any flows of commerce.
I mean I'm not really up to date on Russia-China relations but hasn't there only been mild warming since the Sino-Soviet Split?
Very interesting speculation from Nicholas Burns. Would be fascinating to see how Putin responds if Trump buddies up with China and leaves him in cold.
https://www.axios.com/operation-normal-trump-goes-al-2358875985.html
Former Kansas Democratic gubernatorial candidate Paul Davis confirmed Thursday formation of an exploratory committee ahead of a campaign for the 2nd District congressional seat to be vacated by Republican U.S. Rep. Lynn Jenkins.
Davis said in an exclusive interview with The Topeka Capital-Journal that Kansans deserved representation from elected officials with the skills and inclination to work across partisan divides to improve federal policy on taxes, health care and other complex issues.
Now, more than ever, we need good people who are going to go to Washington, D.C., and really represent the interests of the people that live in their district, Davis said. Too many elected officials on both sides of the aisle have forgotten how to work together to move our country forward.
In 2014, Davis was defeated by Republican Gov. Sam Brownback in the campaign for governor. The 2nd District in eastern Kansas is not overwhelmingly Republican, but Davis carried the congressional district by 6 points in the race against Brownback.
Davis served six terms in the Kansas House and is employed in the private sector as an attorney in Lawrence. Over the course of his career, Davis said hed become familiar with the districts prominent agriculture, higher education and military interests.
He said the federal governments necessary realignment of health care policy under Medicaid and overhaul the national tax code shouldnt forsake middle- and low-income Kansans.
It is heart wrenching to watch families worry about their economic stability, Davis said. Its upsetting to stand by as special interests corrupt our system of government. It is discouraging to hear students worry about their futures. And it is infuriating to watch our elected officials bicker, divide and betray their constituents.
We have off-off-year elections. You think Dem turnout is bad for congressional midterms? You ain't seen nothing.kirblar, can you articulate why you think Perriello sucks? What makes him a bad fit? Are his policies or stances completely unrealistic/divorced from reality? Does he have some bad/weird scandals under his belt? Like wouldn't a candidate that people are passionate about (and is good which is of course important) be the exact type of candidate you want in this climate?
EDIT: Isn't the Virgina State House + Senate also having elections this year? Won't they both trend blue or do y'all have a NC situation down there? Are Virginia Republicans crazy or more like New York Republicans?
Gee, I can't imagine why they didn't want to give money to KS-04. /sKS-02 is an open seat.
http://cjonline.com/news/local/stat...davis-initiates-campaign-rep-lynn-jenkins-2nd
Here. We. Go.
My first introduction to Pierrello was his 9/11-Trump analogy
The second sentence might illuminate why this was a really bad introduction for him to me?Honestly, it's bizarre you're still hung up on this when no one else cares/is talking about it.
The second sentence might illuminate why this was a really bad introduction for him to me?
I don't trust him. I don't trust him not to say stupid shit. I don't trust him to be able to enact an agenda. I don't trust him to be able to leave coat-tails. (Warner almost didn't get re-elected a few years back and he's super fucking popular) I would rather have lower expectations that are lived up to then aim for the moon and come crashing down given the state of VA politics.Yeah, no, I had friends whose parents and family members died in NYC that day and my mom was in the city for work that day because of my proximity to the city. Let it go. You're being extremely hyperbolic considering no one actually cares about this gaffe anymore.
This sounds like pretense. I'm not in your mind, but that's exactly what it seems like it is. And that's fine! Just be honest.
Let's say Perriello never said this. What's the actual reason you'd want to vote for Northam?
Did anyone post this here yet. Bernie is now predicting trump will be a one term president.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-predicts-trump-will-only-be-a-one-term-president/
I don't trust him. I don't trust him not to say stupid shit. I don't trust him to be able to enact an agenda. I don't trust him to be able to leave coat-tails. (Warner almost didn't get re-elected a few years back and he's super fucking popular) I would rather have lower expectations that are lived up to then aim for the moon and come crashing down given the state of VA politics.
Northam has won elections repeatedly in the state and didn't shank us when given the opportunity. So yes, I'm willing to go for the boring option when I think there are massive downsides to pushing left in a state where I'm terrified of losing that block on the GOP's power, because that's really what the position is. You aren't passing anything. (McAulliffe couldn't get Medicaid expansion through!) You are there to say no.
One of the big reasons Warner managed to rise in power/popularity was because Jim Gilmore attempted to remove the state property tax on cars and it was a disaster. In came the Technocrat Ds and people liked that things weren't in crisis mode anymore! VA is boring. I don't think that's a bad thing.
Probably more like this eight months ago:Discussion about dropping the bomb probably went something like this:
"Shit, how do we distract from our colossal fuck up that killed 18 of our allies in Syria?"
"Let's drop a bigass bomb on Afghanistan!"
"But we don't have any real targets."
"Just drop it on a mountain and say it was littered with ISIS. Done and done!"
You're....actually making the "Bernie Polls Better" argument from the '16 primaries?You say you're voting exclusively pragmatically for the person who's polling worse against Gillespie?
Seems dumb.
"I don't trust him" seems like a really stupid thing to say when it causes you to support the less electable candidate!
You're....actually making the "Bernie Polls Better" argument from the '16 primaries?
I didn't trust Bernie either and I went with the other option because I trusted her more. She won my state.
Is it better to exceed low expectations or to fail high ones?I'm making the argument that if you want to vote pragmatically, you should vote for the candidate who is actually polling better and your "feelings" about "I don't trust him!" are silly.
Perriello is polling better than Northam in every single poll taken in the state. Why wouldn't you support him if you're worried about losing as your number one concern? I'm sorry, but that seems unbelievably stupid. It's your decision, but I legitimately cannot understand if you don't have actual policy issues.
Did anyone post this here yet. Bernie is now predicting trump will be a one term president if he continues to run his administration the way he is right now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-predicts-trump-will-only-be-a-one-term-president/
REPORTING!Sen. Bernie Sanders predicted Wednesday that President Trump would be a one-term president even though Mr. Trump has made clear hed like to run for reelection in 2020.
Is it better to exceed low expectations or to fail high ones?
The rule includes several changes insurers have pushed for including:
-Reducing the duration of the sign-up period for 2018 by half, lasting from Nov. 1 to Dec. 15.
-Requiring people who sign up for coverage in special enrollment periods to prove they qualify (for example, if they moved and needed new a new plan.) This change is intended to cut down on people only signing up for coverage once they get sick.
-Allowing insurers to require people pay past due premiums before enrolling in a new plan with the same insurer the following year.
-Allowing insurers more flexibility to offer somewhat less generous health insurance plans.
Democrats warn that because of the structure of ObamaCare's subsidies, this change could actually lead to a reduction in subsidies for some people
Insurers called the rule a good first step when it was proposed in February, but they are still waiting to hear back about how the administration will handle ObamaCare's insurer payments.
I promise you XYZ.It's better to vote for the person who is polling better if you care about electability.
I promise you XYZ.
Can't actually deliver XYZ.
Legislatures don't take the blame for that.
What I am looking for in a '16 pres candidate or a '17 gov candidate (hold the door) is very different than what I'm looking for in a '20 pres candidate. (break the doors down)Oh boy.
Okay, you do you. Your funeral.