Does it, though? Democrats fighting over this will make them seem petty and does nothing to sway moderates to their side or energize people to vote for them.
Let's ask Mitt Romney what he thinks.
Does it, though? Democrats fighting over this will make them seem petty and does nothing to sway moderates to their side or energize people to vote for them.
Trita Parsi‏
@tparsi
BREAKING: Iraqi, Iranian and Russian outlets report that ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi has been arrested.
Trita Parsi‏
@tparsi
BREAKING: Iraqi, Iranian and Russian outlets report that ISIS leader Al-Baghdadi has been arrested.
At this point, I am not seeing any benefit politically for forcing Trump to release his tax returns. Even if something is there, the GOP congress will do nothing and try to explain everythin away.
All it will do is show the masses how an alleged billionair cheats the system, and how his proposed tax reform plan benefits him even more.
Does it, though? Democrats fighting over this will make them seem petty and does nothing to sway moderates to their side or energize people to vote for them.
Democrats should block the tax reform because it's bad, not because Trump won't release his taxes.
Does it, though? Democrats fighting over this will make them seem petty and does nothing to sway moderates to their side or energize people to vote for them.
Democrats should block the tax reform because it's bad, not because Trump won't release his taxes.
Not entirely convinced.
Seeing conflicting reports.
HOT TAKE: My guess is Ossoff gets 47% tonight.
HOT TAKE: My guess is Ossoff gets 47% tonight.
What do you think that bodes for the runoff?
Not great if he can't get past the hardcore; every Dem gets at least 47%.
Also, expect more Rs will vote in runoff vs. today.
Why? One party is enthusiastic right now to be the opposition. The other is on fire.
What do you think that bodes for the runoff?
50/50. There's probably no reason or evidence to suggest less than a tossup.
Which is why I was hoping he'd manage to win today outright.
Why is everyone downbeat? I thought KS06 coming to 6℅ bode well for democrats nationwide.
I don't think anyone is expecting a win outright.
Why is everyone downbeat? I thought KS06 coming to 6℅ bode well for democrats nationwide.
They got a nice interactive graphPrices former seat has become an improbable battleground because it ranks so high on both lists: Nearly 65 percent of whites in the district hold at least a four-year college degree, and Trumps margin of victory there was nearly 22 points lower than Romneys. Trump won the district by just 1.5 percentage points, and Hillary Clinton took nearly 47 percent of its votean almost 10-point bump from then-President Barack Obamas performance there in 2012.
Heavily white-collar districts that were cool to Trump arent the only seats Democrats will contest next year: They are also targeting less urban and more blue-collar seats, including a few in upstate New York. And Democrats are not planning to challenge all of the 48 GOP-held seats that share the two key characteristics; that list includes several suburban seats in Texas, as well as in South Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia, that lean even more strongly Republican than Prices former district.
Overall this again is looking like 2016 Election, EV heavily Democratic but Rs will make up ground on election day.
How many terrorists leaders have the US killed? You kill one and the next one in line is even worse than his predecessor. Shit is like wack-a-mole. You can't bomb ideas.
No Dem has cleared 40% in this district since Price has had it.
Completely missed my R-Money joke
My own personal reason to worry, I just don't think Ossoff is a very good candidate.
Cross post:
So, turnout in GA-06 could be anywhere from 130,00 to 157,000. As of now, we have 54,000 votes from the EV.
Total turnout in GA-06 at the prez level was 331,000. Let's say that it'll be 157,000, which is 47% of the total vote in 2016.
73,901 people voted in DeKalb in 2016, which is the most Dem part of GA-06. Right now, about 16,000 people have voted in DeKalb, which is about ~50% of where the turnout should be. Given that post people vote in the afternoon/night, this is generally a good thing and is mostly matching turnout of a midterm.
It's going to be close, even though I think that Ossoff will end up around 47%.
And to add: If turnout is lower than 157,000 (which seems a bit generous), then this is an even better number for Ossoff.
Does it, though? Democrats fighting over this will make them seem petty and does nothing to sway moderates to their side or energize people to vote for them.
Democrats should block the tax reform because it's bad, not because Trump won't release his taxes.
Cross post:
So, turnout in GA-06 could be anywhere from 130,00 to 157,000. As of now, we have 54,000 votes from the EV.
Total turnout in GA-06 at the prez level was 331,000. Let's say that it'll be 157,000, which is 47% of the total vote in 2016.
73,901 people voted in DeKalb in 2016, which is the most Dem part of GA-06. Right now, about 16,000 people have voted in DeKalb, which is about ~50% of where the turnout should be. Given that post people vote in the afternoon/night, this is generally a good thing and is mostly matching turnout of a midterm.
It's going to be close, even though I think that Ossoff will end up around 47%.
And to add: If turnout is lower than 157,000 (which seems a bit generous), then this is an even better number for Ossoff.
The lower turnout today the better for Ossoff.
Any idea of turnout till now?
Higher turnout in DeKalb is better for Ossoff...
@Nate_Cohn 22s22 seconds ago
Northern DeKalb county is just getting hammered by a slow moving thunderstorm
Lower turnout overall is fine I think. Ossoff hopefully has 60% EV vote.
Oh fuck.
Congressional critics of the Department of Homeland Security should shut up and assume the agency is acting appropriately and following the law, the agencys chief said in a combative public speech Tuesday.
If lawmakers do not like the laws theyve passed and we are charged to enforce, then they should have the courage and skill to change the laws, Secretary John F. Kelly said. Otherwise they should shut up and support the men and women on the front lines.
In a combative speech at George Washington University, Kelly laid out the threats facing the United States from international criminal networks to homegrown terrorists.
Several times in the speech, he took on critics of the agency, following months of complaints from Congress, civil rights groups and protesters that DHS is targeting Muslim travelers for unfair scrutiny.
I might summarize his message to Congress and the public as "shut up, trust and never verify." So nice to have a very militaristic mindset applied to DHS.For too long, the men and women of my department have been political pawns, he said. My people have been discouraged from doing their jobs for nearly a decade, disabled by pointless bureaucracy and political meddling, and suffered disrespect and contempt by public officials who have no idea what it means to serve.
Kelly, a retired Marine general, said criticism of the agencys work is often misguided and based on inaccurate reporting.
Lawmakers, politicians and advocacy groups may hear a partial or inaccurate media report and assume the men and women of DHS are intentionally abusing innocent individuals while breaking or ignoring U.S. laws or court orders, instead of assuming as they should that the men and women of DHS are carrying out their assigned mission in accordance with the law.
Just trust us. We're the government, we would never try to exploit or deceive youWaPo: DHS Secretary Kelly says congressional critics should shut up or change laws
I might summarize his message to Congress and the public as "shut up, trust and never verify." So nice to have a very militaristic mindset applied to DHS.
Lower turnout overall is fine I think. Ossoff hopefully has 60% EV vote.
Oh fuck.
Bernie Sanders‏Verified account @BernieSanders 15m15 minutes ago
.@RobQuistforMT understands we need a government that works for all Montanans and Americans, not just special interests and billionaires.
@BernieSanders
.@RobQuistforMT understands we need a government that works for all Montanans and Americans, not just special interests and billionaires.
But not GA. Because of course not.Bernie is tweeting about MT today.
It's been a dark time, yaI haven't laughed at a joke since November 8th, 2016.