• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT5| The Man In the High Chair

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
He knows the end is near. I'm guessing this has made he rethink things and not want to be a part of the whole game of party politics. In your final days you tend to see what's important.

He wants a legacy celebrated by both sides of congress, its just that, a PR thing.
 

kirblar

Member
I.E. fuck minorities.

Do people really not get history. The progressive New Deal was written to exclude minorities. Same with social security. And the progressives SURE do love to ignore FDR's internment camps.

Obamacare had to be watered down just to get the Blue Dogs, (all of who were white and most from the South) to sign it.

Not to mention, ignoring white supremacy is how we got into this mess of Trump anyway.
To be fair to them, Blue Dogs weren't the issue w/ the ACA aside from the Stupak Amendment, they passed the public option. The big problems were in the Senate and were people like Nelson, Baucus, Lieberman, etc.
 

NoName999

Member
To be fair to them, Blue Dogs weren't the issue w/ the ACA aside from the Stupak Amendment, they passed the public option. The big problems were in the Senate and were people like Nelson, Baucus, Lieberman, etc.

Still all white men with two of them from the South.

And that's not ignoring the fact that the Blue Dogs, for voting to keep the public option, were thanked for their services by being decimated in 2010 due to, once again, white voters thinking out of control spending was caused "welfare queens"

Maybe the economic progressives can make more headway, if they don't chase the fickle white worker vote and focus their message towards people who already vote Democratic and excite them the fuck up. After all, you really think civil rights activists and feminists are thinking "Yeah, I'm making less on average than a white male, but fuck it. Go capitalism! LOL!"?
 

kess

Member
I think it's worth examining if capitalism will make the inevitable drive toward human augmentation and eugenics better or worse for equality in the long run. In our system, capitalism compounds a system where people are made unequal by birth.
 

jtb

Banned
He knows the end is near. I'm guessing this has made he rethink things and not want to be a part of the whole game of party politics. In your final days you tend to see what's important.

or put more simply: he's not running for re-election

I think it's worth examining if capitalism will make the inevitable drive toward human augmentation and eugenics better or worse for equality in the long run. In our system, capitalism compounds a system where people are made unequal by birth.

I always side with Tracer Tong at the end of Deus Ex
 

Valhelm

contribute something
You know what, counterpoint: Valhelm, how do you explain the de facto policy of Russian supremacy in the USSR such as the ethnic cleansing of Poles, Germans, and Ukrainians? That's a racial supremacy model without a clear economic impetus.

Stalin-era deportations were very material, moving different ethnic groups throughout the Soviet empire to facilitate easier control and resource production. In Central Asia, tribal divisions were exploited to prevent a mass popular movement against popular control, while cultural characteristics that unified Central Asians (like Islam and Turkic languages) were smoothed over through deliberate policies of secularization and Russification.

I think it's worth examining if capitalism will make the inevitable drive toward human augmentation and eugenics better or worse for equality in the long run. In our system, capitalism compounds a system where people are made unequal by birth.

It's very possible that the world's wealthiest people will become effectively immortal and immune to disease. I doubt that these medical luxuries will be available to the rest of us.
 

dramatis

Member
I think you should remove 'economic' from the driving motivations behind the subjugation of 'other peoples'.

China having the long history it has, shows that capitalism isn't the motivating force behind everything. Prior to the ascent of Qin, the other kingdoms called them barbarians, chiefly Chu, because Chu had a long history and rich culture, so they considered Qin people uncultured swine. It was not a discrimination motivated by capitalism; after all, the most prosperous and powerful kingdom at the time was Chu.

When the Manchu took over and established the Qing dynasty, forcing all of the people to adhere to Manchu customs, such as the way of dress and hairstyles, was not motivated by capitalism, it was motivated by political power enforcing a top-down cultural change to society to stamp out rebellion in any shape or form.

Looking at the world through 'capitalism' and 'socialism' ascribes a very modern and narrow lens to the complexities of human nature throughout history.
 
So is taking pictures of your junk and sending it to women considered locker room talk at fox news?

I'll never understand this phenomenon, for gods sakes buy them flowers or something.
 

sphagnum

Banned
I think you should remove 'economic' from the driving motivations behind the subjugation of 'other peoples'.

China having the long history it has, shows that capitalism isn't the motivating force behind everything. Prior to the ascent of Qin, the other kingdoms called them barbarians, chiefly Chu, because Chu had a long history and rich culture, so they considered Qin people uncultured swine. It was not a discrimination motivated by capitalism; after all, the most prosperous and powerful kingdom at the time was Chu.

When the Manchu took over and established the Qing dynasty, forcing all of the people to adhere to Manchu customs, such as the way of dress and hairstyles, was not motivated by capitalism, it was motivated by political power enforcing a top-down cultural change to society to stamp out rebellion in any shape or form.

Looking at the world through 'capitalism' and 'socialism' ascribes a very modern and narrow lens to the complexities of human nature throughout history.

All of that is true, but again, we're talking about what happened in the context of America. Of course ethnic tensions in China aren't going to have to do with white supremacy.

It's true that xenophobia, hatred of the other, etc exist and have existed across history for a variety of reasons. At the same time it is also true that $$$ was a driving force in American history.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
All of that is true, but again, we're talking about what happened in the context of America. Of course ethnic tensions in China aren't going to have to do with white supremacy.

It's true that xenophobia, hatred of the other, etc exist and have existed across history for a variety of reasons. At the same time it is also true that $$$ was a driving force in American history.

Sure but, and I'm diving into this a bit because this is a thing that has been on my mind lately, I do think you can claim that things like wealth inequality and imperialism might have been much less of an issue in hypothetical alternate histories where the dominant economic forms were socialism, or syndicalism, or other non-capitalist means of organization, but I don't think you can quite make the same argument for white supremacy and honestly I'm also unsure about global warming. An oil industry that was controlled by its workers instead of by its owners would still be very invested in all of their jobs not suddenly becoming obsolete; we're seeing worker level resistance to this sort of thing right now
 

NoName999

Member
Feminists and civil rights activists have been saying that the system is rigged towards the rich for DECADES now. They point out that it actively works against the interest of the common white male worker as well.

And after all this time, the wwc STILL haven't listened really. For their thanks, the social activists are called man-haters or reverse racists.

Like EVERYONE ELSE in the damn country knows this blatantly obvious flaw but them. We all grew up on the same patch of dirt, embraced the same culture, yet still only the wwc is the ones who still aren't getting it.

So either the only reason they're not on board is because they're either completely STUPID or something much more malicious that you can't just ignore if you want to win and keep some form of dignity.

So is taking pictures of your junk and sending it to women considered locker room talk at fox news?

I'll never understand this phenomenon, for gods sakes buy them flowers or something.

Or, since the guy is married, he could be faithful to his wife. lol
 
Feminists and civil rights activists have been saying that the system is rigged towards the rich for DECADES now. They point out that it actively works against the interest of the common white male worker as well.

And after all this time, the wwc STILL haven't listened really. For their thanks, the social activists are called man-haters or reverse racists.

Like EVERYONE ELSE in the damn country knows this blatantly obvious flaw but them. We all grew up on the same patch of dirt, embraced the same culture, yet still only the wwc is the ones who still aren't getting it.

So either the only reason they're not on board is because they're completely STUPID or something much more malicious that you can't just ignore if you want to win and keep some form of dignity.
Well, it boils down to this:

President Lyndon B. Johnson said:
If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.
 

chadskin

Member
DGgAhOgUMAAdzjC.jpg


DGgAlMQXoAAAQnB.jpg
 

sphagnum

Banned
Sure but, and I'm diving into this a bit because this is a thing that has been on my mind lately, I do think you can claim that things like wealth inequality and imperialism might have been much less of an issue in hypothetical alternate histories where the dominant economic forms were socialism, or syndicalism, or other non-capitalist means of organization, but I don't think you can quite make the same argument for white supremacy and honestly I'm also unsure about global warming. An oil industry that was controlled by its workers instead of by its owners would still be very invested in all of their jobs not suddenly becoming obsolete; we're seeing worker level resistance to this sort of thing right now

Whiteness as a construct exists primarily because of the particular historical circumstances that arose surrounding the conquest of the New World. That wasn't purely capitalistic, of course, but it's also harder for me to see how people of European descent who never cared much for each other come to embrace a singular racial identity without the motivations that did lead to it. It's totally plausible that there could have been some other chauvinistic thing that would've popped up, but then we'd have to analyze how that thing is upheld by social and economic factors, which would be different than those upholding white supremacy.

As for global warming, I agree with that - state central planning obviously had an obsession with factories as part of its drive towards modernization, which they needed. It was going to happen either way. But its easier to transition away when you don't have giant energy companies who want to cling to their profits funding fake science to confuse undereducated people (thanks to other capitalists who hate taxes) into making them think they need those fossil fuel jobs or else, or a capitalist culture that promotes the job cult. A lot of the continuing plummit into global temperature hell is directly tied to capitalism.
 

Kusagari

Member
Is he seriously trying to sell his golf resort trip as a temporary work space? God damn.

His supporters buy this hook, line, and sinker. I've tried debating with them and they say his golfing trips aren't like Obama's or Clinton's or Bush's, because they just relaxed and did nothing the entire time. The Donald doesn't know the meaning of the word relax and is making calls while he's sinking hole-in-ones.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
Whiteness as a construct exists primarily because of the particular historical circumstances that arose surrounding the conquest of the New World. That wasn't purely capitalistic, of course, but it's also harder for me to see how people of European descent who never cared much for each other come to embrace a singular racial identity without the motivations that did lead to it. It's totally plausible that there could have been some other chauvinistic thing that would've popped up, but then we'd have to analyze how that thing is upheld by social and economic factors, which would be different than those upholding white supremacy.

As for global warming, I agree with that - state central planning obviously had an obsession with factories as part of its drive towards modernization, which they needed. It was going to happen either way. But its easier to transition away when you don't have giant energy companies who want to cling to their profits funding fake science to confuse undereducated people (thanks to other capitalists who hate taxes) into making them think they need those fossil fuel jobs or else, or a capitalist culture that promotes the job cult. A lot of the continuing plummit into global temperature hell is directly tied to capitalism.

I don't think global warming would be anywhere near as much of a problem under socialism. Workers struggling to keep their jobs are much less dangerous than market forces encouraging energy companies to produce as cheaply as possible without regard for environmental sustainability.

Transitioning toward green energy in that kind of a system would also be way, way easier.
 

sphagnum

Banned
I don't think global warming would be anywhere near as much of a problem under socialism. Workers struggling to keep their jobs are much less dangerous than market forces encouraging energy companies to produce as cheaply as possible without regard for environmental sustainability.

Transitioning toward green energy in that kind of a system would also be way, way easier.

I think it's the industrialization hump that would cause the problem but once over that it would be far simpler.
 
I don't think global warming would be anywhere near as much of a problem under socialism. Workers struggling to keep their jobs are much less dangerous than market forces encouraging energy companies to produce as cheaply as possible without regard for environmental sustainability.

Transitioning toward green energy in that kind of a system would also be way, way easier.

I think it's harder to transition to socialism while also combating climate change. Forcing people to give up energy abundance exacerbates material differences between people. That makes people more keenly aware of scarcity. ...So it either makes transitioning to socialism easier or harder. :p
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
I don't think global warming would be anywhere near as much of a problem under socialism. Workers struggling to keep their jobs are much less dangerous than market forces encouraging energy companies to produce as cheaply as possible without regard for environmental sustainability.

Transitioning toward green energy in that kind of a system would also be way, way easier.

I mean it also depends on how you define socialism. I will admit that most of my clashes lately have been with anarcho socialists in particular
 

sphagnum

Banned
You all ruined my perfectly good attempt to bait spaghnum a few pages ago. Screw you guys.

I don't deign to respond to those barbaroi who refuse to admit that the Basileia ton Rhomaion is the legitimate continuing civilization of the Caesars, chosen by God to rule the world both spiritually and temporally, until Christ returns.
 
I don't deign to respond to those barbaroi who refuse to admit that the Basileia ton Rhomaion is the legitimate continuing civilization of the Caesars, chosen by God to rule the world both spiritually and temporally, until Christ returns.

The opulent, feminine dogs of the East know not the glory of standing in the Campus Martius, Gallic slaves enchained and bowing before the Princeps, and feeling the axis of the Mediterranean turn around them.
 

sphagnum

Banned
The opulent, feminine dogs of the East know not the glory of standing in the Campus Martius, Gallic slaves enchained and bowing before the Princeps, and feeling the axis of the Mediterranean turn around them.

How compares the glory of men to the glory of worshipping in the Hagia Sophia? You must cleanse yourself of these pagan desires and accept the truth borne on the cross, under which the emperors rule not merely as men but as representatives of God.
 
How compares the glory of men to the glory of worshipping in the Hagia Sophia? You must cleanse yourself of these pagan desires and accept the truth borne on the cross, under which the emperors rule not merely as men but as representatives of God.

Speak you of the glory of but one god to we, conquerors of the world, who have the blessings and grace of the gods of a thousand peoples?

Had the sacred chickens not disdained to eat this morning, war would be had between us this day, woman-men of the East.
 
It's kind of amazing looking at Bill Kirstol's Twitter feed. If you took the name off, aside from a few Tweets, it's indistinguishable from a centrist Democrat. He even put up a video of somebody putting up a conservative defense of the ACA.
 

pigeon

Banned
The opulent, feminine dogs of the East know not the glory of standing in the Campus Martius, Gallic slaves enchained and bowing before the Princeps, and feeling the axis of the Mediterranean turn around them.

How compares the glory of men to the glory of worshipping in the Hagia Sophia? You must cleanse yourself of these pagan desires and accept the truth borne on the cross, under which the emperors rule not merely as men but as representatives of God.

Fucking Homoousions.
 
Lol. White people externalising white people privilege and racism.

Sorry, people are just shit. And they're shit under all political and economic systems.

You want to win over more minorities and broader swathes of women to your cause, then stop pretending the random acts of bigotry, misogyny, and hatred they experience on a regular basis that you have never experienced will magically disappear due to fist for 15.
 
It's kind of amazing looking at Bill Kirstol's Twitter feed. If you took the name off, aside from a few Tweets, it's indistinguishable from a centrist Democrat. He even put up a video of somebody putting up a conservative defense of the ACA.

Bill Kristol‏Verified account @BillKristol 9h9 hours ago
Conservatives could "rebrand" as liberals. Seriously. We're for liberal democracy, liberal world order, liberal economy, liberal education.
 
Bill Kristol‏Verified account @BillKristol 9h9 hours ago
Conservatives could "rebrand" as liberals. Seriously. We're for liberal democracy, liberal world order, liberal economy, liberal education.

Poor naive child still thinks conservatives have a unifying philosophy behind "fuck you I got mine" and racism.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
Lol. White people externalising white people privilege and racism.

Sorry, people are just shit. And they're shit under all political and economic systems.

You want to win over more minorities and broader swathes of women to your cause, then stop pretending the random acts of bigotry, misogyny, and hatred they experience on a regular basis that you have never experienced will magically disappear due to fist for 15.

what a horrible fucking attitude

If you really think people will always be awful, why bother for fighting for any change at all?

No socialist would say that an economic transformation alone would end racism and misogyny (though it could potentially change their expression), but we recognize that these structures of oppression have a material basis.
 
Who's Rorhabacher, again? Lol

A dude so deep in Russian pockets that Republican leadership jokes about it:

In a private meeting with Republican colleagues last year, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy commented that then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and California congressional colleague Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach) were being paid by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

”There's two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump," McCarthy said in the recording of a June 15 exchange obtained and published by the Washington Post.

And I wonder how worried Paulie boy is getting:

At that point, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) cut off the conversation and swore those present to secrecy.

That little bit of obstruction on Ryan's part doesn't look so great these days.
 
It's a realistic attitude.

Talk to me about the inherent goodness of racists and bigots when you've actually been on the receiving end of it, kthx.

Why fight for change? Because you can use structures and systems to rein in or curtail the shitness of people so that they do less harm to others because of their shitness.

But the systems do not create the shitness. People do themselves. Because sorry, people are just shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom