grandjedi6
Master of the Google Search
oooo more people watched the 3rd debate than the 1st. So its 2>3>1
But the carrots of the economy trump the radishes of time!Brannon said:True, but stupidity is immune to the radishes of time.
tanod said:Just logged in to say:
Holy shit at Gallup. WOOO!!!!
Also, a little anecdotal evidence from IA:
My 50+ year old parents, life-long Republicans, are voting for Obama but I knew this already. They're really excited about it. They even had their "non-political" friends over for a debate watching party for the first Presidential debate and was prodding them to vote for Obama.
Awesome.
A couple days ago when I sent out my email about the vote for change website, my mom actually filled out the registration form for my older brother and my sister in law to get registered since they just moved to IA from WI and had them sign it.
Awesomer.
Then, she told me that my 75 year old grandparents, also life-long Republicans, shared who they were going to vote for, which is a surprise all of its own. But holy shit, they're voting for Obama too. :O :O :O !!?! They just said they feel more comfortable voting for him and that he seems to have a better handle of what's going on in the country.
Obama kicked so much ass in the debate last night. First with the BombBombBomb Iran and then with his healthcare defense.
I think I'm OD'ing on Hopium right now!!
AMERICA FUCK YEAH!!!
homersimpsondrooling.jpg
Joe said:maybe but after 2004 i have zero faith.
ghibli99 said:Cindy looked like she was an afterthought in John's shadow. Uncomfortable. Unapproachable. Unappealing. Nearly silent with a half-hearted grin on her face.
Stoney Mason said:Not that it matters per se but Intrade is very pessimistic at the moment.
Intrade Market Odds 73.5 26.4
Xisiqomelir said:Dude...that's not even a homophone of "ravages".
ghibli99 said:One other observation from last night's debate that I forgot to mention earlier is the stark difference between Michelle Obama and Cindy McCain. Michelle has a warmth and approachability about her that is just completely absent with Cindy. Michelle just looks like a first lady, and balances Barack near-perfectly, adding dimension to the couple. Notice how they walked around and spoke with all those seated around the debate floor. Michelle was out there, shaking hands, smiling, laughing, taking pictures. Cindy looked like she was an afterthought in John's shadow. Uncomfortable. Unapproachable. Unappealing. Nearly silent with a half-hearted grin on her face.
I was thinking about this, and say what you will about Dubya, but I've always found Laura Bush to be one of the most likeable first ladies. I can't help but smile when I see her, especially when she was campaigning with her husband, and I like a lot of the programs and initiatives she's been a part of and/or started.
Teresa Heinz (Kerry), on the other hand, I couldn't stand. Not that I thought Kerry was a strong candidate to begin with (I found him to be quite a dud), but his wife was someone I actively ignored, and she certainly didn't help his cause. I view Cindy in a similar fashion. She's incredibly unlikeable to me, and last night was another example of why.
Souldriver said:What the hell am I looking at right now.
I've clicked on the CNN Live stream linked to earlier, and it's just been shitty music for 15 minutes straight showing a room full of McCain supporters...
Is McCain going to speak soon?
quadriplegicjon said:what do those numbers mean?
Jonm1010 said:Someone is trying to argue me that Zogby is as reputable and accurate as Rassmussen and Gallup. I know some people had some things during the primaries and recently about how inaccurate zogby was. Any help??
Brannon said:.... the hell. I meant ravishes... but I'm still wrong? Let me just erase something here...
Jonm1010 said:Someone is trying to argue me that Zogby is as reputable and accurate as Rassmussen and Gallup. I know some people had some things during the primaries and recently about how inaccurate zogby was. Any help??
mj1108 said:
Stoney Mason said:Not that it matters per se but Intrade is very pessimistic at the moment.
Intrade Market Odds 73.5 26.4
quadriplegicjon said:what do those numbers mean?
Imm0rt4l said:
Jonm1010 said:Someone is trying to argue me that Zogby is as reputable and accurate as Rassmussen and Gallup. I know some people had some things during the primaries and recently about how inaccurate zogby was. Any help??
Brannon said:.... the hell. I meant ravishes... but I'm still wrong? Let me just erase something here...
People still use that phrase?BotoxAgent said:Looked like she was reluctant in shaking hands with the colored people.
Xisiqomelir said:That's not pessimistic at all. That's a historic high for him.
BobLoblaw said:People still use that phrase?
Joe said:wasn't it just last week when republicans were saying obama was going to spend $1 trillion dollars ($700b bailout + $300b spending) but now mccain is doing the same exact thing ($700b + $300b mortgage buyouts)???
mj1108 said:
harSon said:Holy Shit. My eyes are rolled back, my muscles are spasming, and my toes are curled!
BobLoblaw said:People still use that phrase?
Tamanon said:In the South they do!
blame space said::lol What's this all about? I like the music.
Are they former Democrats in a swing state? Otherwise, it's not nullification.RumpledForeskin said:I'm getting all my family to vote for mccain, just to nullify all your votes.
Joe said:wasn't it just last week when republicans were saying obama was going to spend $1 trillion dollars ($700b bailout + $300b spending) but now mccain is doing the same exact thing ($700b + $300b mortgage buyouts)???
Bumblebeetuna said:I'm in the South, never heard that phrase in 27 years of life.
Souldriver said:What the hell am I looking at right now.
I've clicked on the CNN Live stream linked to earlier, and it's just been shitty music for 15 minutes straight showing a room full of McCain supporters...
Is McCain going to speak soon?